Image 1 — Sproat's r/R language discriminant falsified
Image 2 — Sproat's r/R language discriminant falsified
▲ 4 r/yajnadevam+1 crossposts

Sproat's r/R language discriminant falsified

Falsification of r\R as a language discriminant

Long story short, Sproat argued that repetition ratio of geminated to all repeats can determine if a symbol system is linguistic or not.

I show that his discriminant of 0.1 is basically a check for length >= 20 and has no predictive power beyond the length itself and the discriminant's Youden J = 0, ie no better than chance.

Paper here https://lingbuzz.net/010068

u/yajnadevam — 1 day ago