u/yoursweetdesire17

▲ 32 r/QualityAssurance+1 crossposts

Is AI-assisted manual QA more common than I think? (using Claude to run test plans/execution)

8+ years in QA (product → Shopify agency → back to product), now at an AI startup. Curious if my current workflow is normal or if I got lucky with tooling.

The old way, for years:

  1. Receive reqs
  2. Write test plan/test cases
  3. Manually test
  4. Log bugs

Depending on the feature, this could eat hours, days, sometimes weeks.

How I work now:

  1. Drop the feature into Claude
  2. Have it generate the test cases/test plan
  3. Have it actually run the tests on the PR or staging
  4. I manually cover whatever it couldn't (rare)
  5. Claude leaves feedback/pass notes and updates my test run

A feature that used to take days can now get through in a few hours, even when it's pretty complex.

So — is this just a quirk of working at an AI-native company, or is this becoming the norm in QA now? Would love to hear how manual QA folks elsewhere are (or aren't) using AI in their day-to-day.

reddit.com
u/yoursweetdesire17 — 7 days ago