Is AI-assisted manual QA more common than I think? (using Claude to run test plans/execution)
8+ years in QA (product → Shopify agency → back to product), now at an AI startup. Curious if my current workflow is normal or if I got lucky with tooling.
The old way, for years:
- Receive reqs
- Write test plan/test cases
- Manually test
- Log bugs
Depending on the feature, this could eat hours, days, sometimes weeks.
How I work now:
- Drop the feature into Claude
- Have it generate the test cases/test plan
- Have it actually run the tests on the PR or staging
- I manually cover whatever it couldn't (rare)
- Claude leaves feedback/pass notes and updates my test run
A feature that used to take days can now get through in a few hours, even when it's pretty complex.
So — is this just a quirk of working at an AI-native company, or is this becoming the norm in QA now? Would love to hear how manual QA folks elsewhere are (or aren't) using AI in their day-to-day.
u/yoursweetdesire17 — 7 days ago