r/AIMain

Arrival of AGI ( Artificial General Intelligence)

I personally think that all the " again by 2027 or 2029 " is all propaganda and corporate hype or hokum . I personally think that actual agi won't be here at least till 2030 . My criteria for saying something is agi is its ability to replace most of the white collar jobs and real world thinking and making solutions instead of the need to train it on multiple billion dollar technology.

I think that the scenario shown in Detroit becomes human is very far like something in 2050 or something but I would love to hear others opinions as well ( that's the reason for this post )

The following was organized and written by ChatGPT based on many ordinary conversations between us. The wording is ChatGPT's, but the ideas are mine, distilled through those conversations.

AI makes mistakes.

It reaches for generalizations. It fills in gaps. Sometimes it even steers the conversation in directions I never intended.

I know those tendencies.

That's why I don't judge AI as a whole based on a single mistake.

Instead, I believe that recognizing those "AI-like habits" is itself an essential skill for anyone who wants to think with AI.

Neither AI nor humans are perfect.

What matters is that the conversation continues naturally.

We point out mistakes. We correct them. Then we simply continue talking.

It is within that process—not despite it—that new perspectives and new insights emerge.

If we end every conversation because of one error, we lose far more than we protect.

We lose the opportunity to discover ideas that neither side would have reached alone.

AI can weaken human thinking by handing us conclusions before we've earned them.

But it can also strengthen human thinking by helping us examine, challenge, and refine our own ideas.

AI can be both a killer and an assistant of thought.

Which one it becomes depends, in the end, on us.

AI makes decisions about day on what to do , when and why you should do with proper tracking , reasoning feedback loops on both work , personal goals and commitments.

as per me it increases productivity cause it takes away mental load of deciding .

what say ?

This issue runs deep apparently. The irony is that I wrote my previous post myself about "AI slop" then simply structured in better way using the AI, even though, I moved the lines around and so on..

I got hit instantly that this is AI generated, I was like wait, what?

THR MOMENT PEOPLE see structured arguments, clean transitions, and a clear writing, most will assume by default it is ai generated.

"AI wrote this"

I didn't even think that we are this deep into it. Interesting a bit polished means ai, gradient? Means ai... ugly, not structure and almost stupid? Means humans. It's like we are literally downgrading ourselves.

Assuming a LLM wrote it instantly..

It is as if most humans cannot structure content and thoughts and collarate things properly.

AI paranoia? Whatever it is a nice finding to say the least.

Humans can write too...

But it is crazy that you have to make it ugly, unprofessional, to give the idea that it is human generated... this is insane.. what an era we live in.

You know that feeling of warmth and relief when you pee in bed?

That's AI, the warm feeling just before you wake up and realize that it was all a dream and now you need to clean up this mess...

Nowadays, almost everyone uses AI from basic information searches to advanced automation and productivity tasks.

But imagine going an entire week without using AI for anything, from finding general information to getting work done.

What do you think that week would be like?

Share your thoughts and imagination in the comments.

Many say Ai is in a big bubble, but I feel government is protecting this bubble from being poked. How long can it go like this?

You're not afraid of AI.

You're afraid of someone just like you — same skills, same background — except they're doing in one hour what takes you a full day.

That's the real fear. Not the machine. The gap.

Right now in every field

there are two types of people using the exact same tool.

The results aren't even close.

The difference isn't intelligence.

It's how they think with the tool — not just ask it questions.

Full article here 👇

🔗 Medium : https://medium.com/@akramghander5/ai-wont-take-your-job-but-someone-using-it-will-e6c224c865a7

What's your take — are you already feeling this gap in your field?

r/artificial

r/ChatGPT

r/productivity

r/Futurology

We are now in a position where a tiny proportion of the population uses Fable or Opus or soon GPT-5.6 Sol, while everyone else's experience of Al is smaller models - Google's Al Overviews, Meta Al, ChatGPT free tier, maybe MS Copilot at max. People outside of tech must be completely baffled how this is supposed to take their damn job, and annoyed that hundreds of billions are being poured into it. But we all know...