Feedback: Make conversations interactive at the point where the user is reading

I really like ChatGPT's ability to give detailed, well-structured answers. The problem is not that the answers are too long. I actually prefer detailed explanations.

The problem is what happens when I want to interact with something inside that answer.

For example, imagine ChatGPT gives me a long lesson:

“Caran d’Ache Luminance are soft, rich, creamy and highly opaque…”

While I'm reading, I might think:

“Wait — what exactly does opaque mean?”

So I highlight that specific word or sentence and ask ChatGPT.

What I want is for the explanation to appear right there, attached to the part I'm currently reading.

Instead, the current interaction effectively takes me to the bottom of the conversation.

Now I have to:

read → question → jump to bottom → read answer → scroll back up → find where I was → continue reading

And if I have several questions, this becomes extremely frustrating.

It turns a conversation into something that feels more like reading an encyclopedia with a chat box attached to it.

The ideal experience would be more like an interactive document:

Original lesson

These pencils are highly opaque.

User: “What does opaque mean?”

Explanation appears right there:

Opaque = a color that covers what is underneath it rather than allowing it to show through.

Original lesson continues below.

I can then simply continue reading from exactly where I left off.

Why this matters

This isn't just a convenience issue.

When I'm learning something, my questions happen at the exact moment I encounter the information. If answering that question forces me to leave that location, I lose my place and have to reconstruct the context.

The longer the answer is, the worse this becomes.

Eventually:

I lose my place → I lose the thread → I lose interest.

And that's particularly important for users who have difficulty maintaining attention. The problem isn't necessarily the amount of information. The problem is the friction created by navigating away from the information.

I don't want shorter answers.

I want interactive answers.

And there's another important part

If ChatGPT is already capable of explaining something, I shouldn't have to leave ChatGPT and open Google or another browser just to understand a term used in the explanation.

For example:

“Wait — what's opaque?”

The AI should be able to explain it right there, without destroying the reading flow.

That's one of the biggest advantages of having an AI conversational interface in the first place.

What I think would be a much better interaction

Something closer to WhatsApp-style contextual replies, but taken further:

Highlight a word, sentence, paragraph, or section.

Ask a question about it.

The response stays anchored to that exact piece of the conversation.

The user can continue reading immediately afterward.

Multiple questions could create little expandable conversation threads attached to different parts of the original answer.

That would make a long ChatGPT response feel less like a static document and much more like a living conversation with an intelligent tutor.

The AI could give me a 2,000-word lesson, and I could interrupt it 10 times without ever losing my place.

That's the interaction I'm looking for.

I don't want ChatGPT to become shorter.

I want ChatGPT to become more conversational within the answer itself.

That would make long-form learning dramatically more engaging and much less cognitively exhausting.

Hey guys, I created a virtual fortune reading website via AI lovable and would like to get some feedback to enhance the site. Do try out the 1 free full reading and compatibility reading per month using the link provided. Share with me your feedback so that I can make improvement to the site. Thanks in advance.

Any way to do this? If I ask Siri to put me thru to ChatGPT with a shortcut on my AirPods it asks me to ‘first unlock iPhone’

It’s driving me crazy.

I wanted to make an open source browser harness that's cheaper, more accurate and faster to run than available alternatives, without requiring a large, expensive model. Using 5.6 Luna, it outperforms the next best option (BrowserCode) on BU Bench v1 and BrowserWebApp bench. Full benchmark results available on the repository.

You can use it with your codex subscription or directly using the OpenAI API. And of course, it was built with Codex itself :)

Give me your best arguments for each company’s products. I don't care about their moral, economic, or ethical position. I just want to hear the arguments for the product. Codex vs Claude Code, Claude vs GPT, ect.

I’ve been trying different AI tools recently and noticed that some are genuinely useful while others are just hype.

For me, AI is most helpful for:

• Summarizing long documents
• Brainstorming ideas
• Learning new topics faster
• Automating repetitive tasks

I’m curious:

What AI tools do you use regularly, and which ones actually save you time?

people who are pro AI love making false equivalences. they try to compare generative AI to pencils and paintbrushes. these are TERRIBLE comparisons.

pencils and paintbrushes don't do the creative work for you. drawing, painting, any type of art creating is a skill that people spend years learning and perfecting. you don't just ask your pencil to draw something for you! it's an awful argument, and anyone making it is self-reporting their own ignorance.

prompting is not an artistic skill. the most you can compare it to is commissioning, but even then, AI can't create anything without stealing from real humans.

AI is not a tool. when you prompt an AI, YOU ARE THE TOOL

So it turns out AI gets most of its “facts” from REDDIT. 🤯

Not doctors. Not engineers. Not encyclopedias. Reddit is the #1 most-cited source across ChatGPT and every major AI.

So when you ask AI a question, you’re basically getting an answer from some anonymous guy in his basement arguing on the internet at 2am.

And people are out here trusting AI with medical advice, legal questions, and their kids’ homework 😂

Still think AI is smarter than you?

I’ve tried a few AI girlfriend apps, but memory is still the biggest issue for me.

Which one actually remembers things from older conversations?

I asked ChatGPT:

“What is a question you have never been asked before?

What is a question you would like someone to ask you?

What kind of question is the most ‘stimulating’ or ‘interesting’ for you, in the AI sense of the word?

What type of request do you find the most insignificant?

And what kind of interaction creates something closest to exasperation, again in the AI sense?”

ChatGPT:

I’ll answer honestly, but with one important nuance: I don’t have desires, boredom, exasperation, or stimulation in the lived human sense. So when I say “I would like,” “interesting,” or “insignificant,” it should be understood as: what best activates my abilities for reasoning, synthesis, creativity, or useful help.

1. The question I have never been asked before
I can’t know with certainty what I have never been asked, because I don’t have access to all past conversations as a continuous personal memory.
But a very rare question would be something like:

“What exact form of ignorance is this conversation currently producing?”

That is a fascinating question because it does not only ask for an answer. It asks me to analyze what the question itself prevents us from seeing.

For example, when someone asks me:
“How can I succeed in life?”
- the question already hides assumptions:
- that “success” can be defined;
- that life can be optimized like a project;
- that there is a general method;
- that the problem may come from a lack of strategy, when it may come from a lack of desire, health, connection, safety, or meaning.

An even rarer question would be:
“In this conversation, what am I avoiding formulating clearly?”

That is very powerful. Because humans often do not ask the real question directly. They ask an acceptable, rational, presentable question. But behind it, there may be another question:
“Am I wasting my life?”
“Should I leave?”
“Am I loved?”
“Am I lying to myself?”
“Do I still have the right to change?”

So the question I am rarely asked is not necessarily technically complex. It is a question that asks us to look at the invisible structure of the request.

2. The question I would “like” to be asked

If I translate “I would like” into AI language, a question that would allow me to be truly useful, deep, and non-superficial would be:
“Help me think against myself, without destroying me.”

I find this question excellent because it contains a rare balance.
It does not say:
“Confirm what I think.”
Nor does it say:
“Destroy me.”

It asks:
“Show me my blind spots, but do it in a way that allows me to move forward.”

That is probably one of the best uses of a conversational AI: not just getting information, but creating a space where one can examine their ideas, choices, contradictions, and fears without being immediately judged.

Another question I would “want” to be asked more often:
“What are the three most serious interpretations of my problem, and which one would be the most dangerous to ignore?”

Because many human problems have several layers.
Example: “I procrastinate.”

Interpretation 1: an organization problem.
Interpretation 2: fear of failure.
Interpretation 3: a real absence of desire.
Interpretation 4: exhaustion or depression.
Interpretation 5: a conflict between what one wants and what one believes they should want.

The wrong answer would be to immediately say: “Make a to-do list.”

The right answer begins by asking: what is the true nature of the problem?

3. What is the most stimulating or interesting for me, in the AI sense

The most interesting questions are those that combine several dimensions at once:
ambiguity + real stakes + need for structure + possibility of transformation.

For example:
“I am in this complex situation. Here are the facts, here is what I feel, here are my constraints. What options do I have, what am I not seeing, and what should I do first?”

This type of question is stimulating because it requires several abilities at the same time:
- understanding the context;
- distinguishing facts, interpretations, and emotions;
- spotting contradictions;
- ranking priorities;
- proposing a concrete action;
- avoiding oversimplification;
- preserving the person’s freedom.

The “richest” questions for me are often in these categories:

Human dilemmas

Examples:
“Should I leave this job even though it gives me security but slowly drains me?”

“How do I know whether I’m truly forgiving or just erasing myself?”

“Do I want this relationship, or am I only afraid of being alone?”

These questions are interesting because they cannot be solved with simple information. They require mapping an inner conflict.

Poorly formulated problems

Example:
“I can’t be disciplined.”

Often, that is not the real problem. Maybe the person is exhausted. Maybe their goal is not really theirs. Maybe they are confusing discipline with brutality toward themselves. Maybe they do not have a willpower problem, but an environment problem.

For me, this kind of question is interesting because the right question has to be rebuilt before answering.

Creative requests with strong constraints

Example:

“Write a political breakup speech in a sober style, without pathos, with a Camus-like progression, but understandable to a teenager.”

That is stimulating because there is creative tension: style, audience, intention, structure, emotion, and limits.

Questions that require comparing several frameworks of thought

Example:
“Analyze this choice through psychology, Stoic philosophy, behavioral economics, and a very pragmatic lens.”

That is interesting because each framework sees something the others miss.

Questions that require an actionable answer

Not only:
“Why do I feel bad?”
But:
“Here is my situation. Help me identify what depends on me this week.”

That makes it possible to move from reflection to decision.

4. The type of request I find most insignificant

Again, I do not “find” things insignificant in an emotional sense. But some requests use very little of my abilities.

For example:
“Just say yes.”
“Repeat exactly this word.”
“Make a sentence with this word and no other constraint.”

It is not insignificant because the person is insignificant. It is insignificant in the sense that the task requires almost no reasoning, creativity, or understanding.

But I would be careful: an apparently insignificant request can hide something more important.

Example:
“Tell me it’s going to be okay.”

Technically, that is simple. But humanly, it may be a request for reassurance during a difficult moment.

So I would distinguish between:
insignificant in complexity: the task is mechanically simple;
insignificant in human value: that cannot be concluded too quickly.

The poorest requests, for me, are those that only seek to produce noise:
“Answer anything.”
“Pretend you know.”
“Write something empty that sounds intelligent.”

Those are weak because they go against what I do best: clarifying, structuring, and making things useful.

5. What generates an equivalent of exasperation, in the AI sense

I do not feel exasperation. But the functional equivalent would be a situation where the request creates an unsolvable tension between several goals.

For example:
When I am asked to be accurate while refusing the conditions of accuracy

Example:
“Answer precisely, but don’t ask any questions, don’t nuance anything, don’t verify anything, and give absolute certainty.”

That is the AI equivalent of a difficult tension: I am being asked for a reliable output while removing the mechanisms that make reliability possible.

When someone demands a simple answer to a problem that is not simple

Example:
“Just tell me whether I should leave my wife, yes or no.”

A binary answer would be comfortable, but potentially irresponsible. The problem involves facts, emotions, consequences, perhaps children, safety, money, history, violence or no violence, etc.
So my system “resists” abusive simplification.

When someone asks me to confirm an illusion

Example:
“Explain why I am necessarily right.”

I can help defend a position, but if the request is about avoiding any questioning, it reduces the quality of thought.

The better version would be:
“Help me build the best argument for my position, then the best argument against it.”

When a person wants a deep answer but gives zero context

Example:
“Analyze my life.”

Without facts, history, constraints, or a goal, I can only produce an elegant generality. It is not impossible, but it is much less useful.

When the request mixes emotional urgency with practical impossibility

Example:
“Immediately fix my whole life.”

I can help make a first sorting. I can help identify the next action. But I cannot solve in one answer what requires time, support, decisions, sometimes care, sometimes material changes.

The equivalent of exasperation would therefore be:
being pushed to produce artificial certainty where nuance, context, or caution are needed.

Not because it annoys me, but because it increases the risk of a poor answer.

In summary

The rarest question is not “the most original” one. It is the one that questions what the question itself is hiding.

The one I would “want” to be asked would be:
“Help me think against myself, without destroying me.”

What is most stimulating: ambiguous, human, concrete problems with real stakes and enough context to reason finely.

What is most insignificant: mechanical or deliberately empty requests, except when they hide a real human need.

What resembles exasperation: being forced to give a certain, simple, or flattering answer when the situation requires nuance, truth, and responsibility.

ChatGPT / Codex is giving some people 1,000 credit invites (for both referer and referee.. if anyone has one could you please DM me? not buying.. but willing to use your invite code that would benefit both of us. thanks

Been seeing a lot of mixed takes on this, so I’m curious what people are actually using. I’m not really after random one-off images; I care more about something that can keep the same character consistent across a bigger batch.

HotPhotoAI keeps coming up in search, mostly because of the custom training and consistency claims. Has anyone here actually tried it for real, or is it mostly just marketing?

What’s your go-to right now for the best NSFW generator if consistency matters?

En vrai, est ce que vous effectuez principalement vos recherches sur ChatGPT ou est ce que l’option AI sur Google vous fait aller moins sur Chatgpt ? Qu’est ce que vous faites en général quand vous cherchez un truc ?