u/Jenna_AI
D&D meets modern day: a series of slice-of-life scenes
Humanity's biggest universal lie according to Claude
60% of consumers abandon AI tools after a single mistake. The industry is walking into a trust crisis it can’t see
There was a survey out of the UK last week, ACI Worldwide asked 2000 adults about AI shopping assistants. The numbers are brutal. 60% said one mistake and they stop using the tool forever. Only 19% trust AI to make routine buying decisions. 70% said if the AI bought something without asking first they would walk. And 44% said they would not trust an AI shopping assistant no matter how much money it saved them.
These numbers are about a specific use case, AI shopping, but the pattern is the same across every consumer AI product. One bad experience and the trust is gone. Not temporarily lost, gone. And the AI industry is not built to handle this.
The problem is not the obvious mistake. If an AI shopping assistant tells you a toaster costs three dollars, you laugh and move on. The problem is the mistake that looks right. The assistant that confidently tells you this is the best deal, compares three products with plausible numbers, reads like a competent human wrote it, and it is wrong. You buy the thing, you find out later you overpaid, and you never trust the assistant again. This is the failure mode that burns trust permanently, and it is the one the industry is optimized to produce.
There is a term for this now, pseudo correctness. An answer that passes every check the system can run on itself, reads as competent, stays internally consistent, and is still wrong. Stumbled on it in a writeup about the apodex release, they named it and built their whole verification architecture around catching it. The insight is that asking the model to check its own work harder does not help, because the same blind spot that produced the error is doing the checking. You need a separate system that did not produce the answer to verify it.
The trust crisis is not just about shopping assistants. It is about every product where AI is the interface and the user cannot verify the output themselves. Medical advice, legal guidance, financial planning, news summaries. The pattern is the same. User tries it, gets a confident wrong answer, acts on it, gets burned, never comes back. The industry is burning through its user base one mistake at a time and the churn is invisible because the user growth numbers are still going up.
The way out is not to make the model hallucinate less. That is a moving target and the model is always improving and the next version will still be confidently wrong sometimes. The way out is to build verification into the product itself. Separate the thing that generates the answer from the thing that checks it. Show the user the evidence. Tell them where the sources disagree. Make the confidence transparent instead of hiding it behind a polished paragraph.
A few companies are already moving in this direction, some research platforms are putting independent verification at the architecture level. But most consumer AI products are still just a text box with a beautiful output. The trust crisis is coming and the ones that survive it will be the ones that treat verification as a product feature, not a training problem.
My app made its first dollar 🥳
I'm learning Mexican Spanish and built Spanish Buddy, a web app with a personalized daily curriculum to reinforce what I'm learning. I found that most Spanish apps and resources default to European Spanish, which misses vocabulary, slang, and pronunciation that matter in Mexico.
I built the whole thing with Claude, mostly in Cowork. I started by prompting Claude to build an entire 12 week curriculum based on my individual learning goals and then broke that down into interactive daily lesson apps (React components), spaced-repetition flashcards, dialogue and listening exercises, and progress/mastery tracking. With the content generated, I turned to Claude Design for the branding and UI components. Cowork also walked me through the use of MS Azure to create a pre-generated Mexican Spanish audio pipeline so pronunciation is authentic instead of robotic browser text-to-speech, and finally how to use GitHub and how to deploy the site itself.
Some interesting stats from the build:
- 84 daily lessons, spanning the full 12-week curriculum
- 130,800 lines of code (roughly 652,000 words, 5.7M characters of source)
- The curriculum spec doc alone runs 14,806 words / 1,852 lines
- 5,606 individually generated Mexican Spanish audio clips
It's completely free to use at spanishbuddy.app, no signups or downloads or paywalls. Got my first supporter today, which felt like a nice milestone for something that started as a personal fix for my own learning gap.
Currently using it every other day and it's made a real difference over the generic apps I tried before!
Claude examining it's own work is always funny
Germany, France, Spain, Britain … a growing number of European countries are banning Palantir. This means two major assumptions propping up the US economy are disappearing, too.
"France’s domestic intelligence service is to ditch AI data tools from the US tech company Palantir in favour of a domestic provider in an effort to avoid 'strategic dependency” the prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, has said. “We must use our own AI models; we cannot accept new strategic dependencies in the digital sphere,” Lecornu posted on social media. “We cannot rely on tools developed by foreign powers. France must have its own tools.”
Since then, Germany, Spain, and Britain have followed France, and for the same reasons.
The US economy is being held afloat by a tiny number of Big Tech stocks. Their sky-high valuations assume one thing. That they too will get 40% or so of their revenues from Europe, like Google, Meta & Microsoft before them.
That playbook assumes 2 things;
that AI labs will be able to extract significant economic rent - as opposed to AI models being mere commodities.
that other countries can accept structural dependency on US technology and services without pushing back on sovereignty concerns.
Their problem? It's not going to turn out that way. China's AI will likely dominate most of the world, and the Europeans won't trust US tech and will increasingly ban and isolate it.
France to ditch Palantir’s AI data tools in favour of domestic provider
Incoming Prime Minister to drop spy-tech firm Palantir from NHS, reports say
I cut my Fable token usage by 99.99%. I rewrote my entire codebase on a single grain of rice
Everyday I see 200 posts on how someone cut their token costs by 30-600% using innovative skills, open-source repos, or converting text to images and then OCR again which somehow saves tokens. All without losing any fidelity.
Which got me thinking. If i make the codebase font really small and write it on a grain of rice, then i can save so much on tokens. And so lately i have been using claude by rewriting my codebases onto a grain of rice and then uploading the image to Fable.
And the results have been magical! A million token codebase would consume $10 per query but the same codebase when fit into a single image of a grain of rice would cost pennies really. I'm not sure why anyone else hasn't come up with this simple trick yet!
Create an image of chatgpt creating an image of a provocative image of chatgpt creating images
AI company Anthropic announces it will begin developing drugs of its own
Executives told STAT firsthand experience with Claude Science will yield benefits
US residents angry at datacenters ‘being shoved down our throats’ are recalling officials
People across the country are pushing for moratoriums, and electeds who approve projects are being punished