r/ChatGPTPro

chatgpt o3 is still superior

I had a task, i asked chatgpt 5 instant, chatgpt 5 High, chatgpt o3, Grok Expert, and Gemini Pro.

chatgpt o3's answer was so superior, all other chatbots immediately agreed it was completely superior, and not to use their answer.

if chatgpt ever retires o3 it will be a tragedy.

there was a time when o3 was NOT available and i mourn those days. it's nice to have it back and YES. there are some things chatgpt can do that NO OTHER chatbot can do.

gemini's superior at minor coding tasks.

grok is superior at article searches.

chatgpt is superior where the other bots fail and claude is.... A JOKE.

reddit.com
u/Dramatic_Phrase1873 — 4 hours ago
▲ 4 r/ChatGPTPro+1 crossposts

Custom visuals in chat

I’m a subscriber both of ChatGPT Pro and Claude Max.

I’d love to consolidate and just use ChatGPT but a couple of things are holding me back.

The big one is the lack of visualisations in Chat beyond very basic charts. See this from Claude (https://claude.com/blog/claude-builds-visuals).

I just want to check I haven’t missed anything that would give me something similar. I’m happy to use Codex over the ChatGPT app but can’t reproduce it either.

u/Flaky-Major7799 — 14 hours ago

Is there any way to pay $200 instead of £200?

​

I’m in the UK and ChatGPT Pro appears to be priced at £200/month. In the US it is advertised as $200/month.

Has anyone in the UK successfully been billed in USD for ChatGPT Pro, or is GBP billing mandatory for UK accounts/payment methods?

Is there any way round this?

reddit.com
u/MrMrsPotts — 1 day ago

Upgrading to Business seems like an irreversible trap (Zero limit increases + lost Finance module)

Has anyone else been completely burned by the "upgrade" from Pro to Business? I was hitting usage limits on Pro, so I upgraded to Business. It has been an absolute disaster, I see no benefit to upgrading and I want to warn anyone else thinking of doing the same.

1. There is ZERO improvement to usage limits. (unless I'm mssing something) The terrible compute throttling that drove me to upgrade hasn't improved at all. My 5-hour window capacity is still getting drained in literally 2 minutes. The models still frequently stop halfway through outputs, which continues to take down my entire connected pipeline (Codex, CodexCLI). There was absolutely no capacity benefit to upgrading.

2. The migration is irreversible and you lose features. To add insult to injury, merging my workspace to keep my data meant I permanently lost the Finance module, which isn't available on the Business tier. There was no clear warning about this. Because the merge is permanent and deletes your personal workspace, there is no way back.

I'm now paying more for a service with the exact same unusable throttling, I'm locked out of features I used to have, and support's only "solution" is for me to buy a second personal subscription just to get the Finance module back.

Do not upgrade to Business expecting better limits. Has anyone found a way to undo the merge with support, or at least found a workaround for the instant CLI compute drain?

reddit.com
u/zgringo14 — 1 day ago

Is the ChatGPT model selector really doing anything

Way back when, if you selected thinking mode or extended thinking, high thinking, or whatever your version called it, it was slow and really thought things through, but you know you didn't need that most of the time.

Now, I feel like no matter what it's set on, as long as it's not Pro, most of the time it throttles down and gives me a near instant answer anyway.

I'm starting to wonder if they've got hard controllers in place to lower token usage and save money ahead of the IPO.

reddit.com
u/Hybrid-Intelligence — 1 day ago

Thinking of moving from my Claude Pro to ChatGPT Plus (currently have go), is it the right decision?

Over the last year, I have been using Claude Pro, mostly for long form writing and research but it seems my needs have evolved since then. I started using AI mainly for writing assistance but have since branched out to include blog post editing, research and scripting, Python, image generation, project planning, document analysis, website ideas for writing, ideation, and day-to-day productivity. With that in mind, I am considering whether an alternative that offers a more comprehensive suite of solutions in an interconnected platform might be a better choice for me as in ChatGPT Plus.

I acknowledge fully Claude’s strengths in writing, I am looking to see if ChatGPT Plus might be a better choice for my overall productivity due to its advanced features like Deep Research, coding, image generation, Projects, connectors to Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, GitHub, automation, and access to specialized models. I am not looking for just the best assistance with my writing – I want to be able to plan, organize, research, and execute my projects end-to-end within one cohesive platform while taking advantage of additional features like automation and third-party connectors. I want to see if it will make me more productive than the alternatives, even if Claude Pro excels at specific tasks.

The only thing Claude does better for me at moment is editing and its not even by that big of a margin, am i being an idiot swapping though, whats your verdict as ChatGPT users?

I am essentially looking for you to convince me to move as i am sick of running out of tokens :-)

reddit.com
u/TheMuldwych — 3 days ago

ChatGPT Pro and Extended Pro feature limit got extended again. Has anyone faced this?

I bought the ChatGPT Pro USD 100 plan thinking I would be able to use the Pro and Extended Pro features with much higher usage limits.
I mainly used the Extended Pro feature for answers for around 3 to 4 days, and I used it quite aggressively. After that, I suddenly got a message saying I would not be able to use the Pro and Extended Pro features for the next 7 days.
To be clear, this was only about the Pro and Extended Pro features, not the entire ChatGPT account.
At first, I thought maybe there are some hidden limits. Then I checked a few Reddit posts and realized other people have also faced limits, but the exact number of allowed responses is still not clearly explained anywhere.
The bigger issue is that while I was waiting for the limit to reset, another date appeared and the restriction got extended by another week without any proper explanation.
Has anyone else faced this issue with ChatGPT Pro or Extended Pro features? Is this normal, or does this feel misleading after paying USD 100?

reddit.com
u/Human_Distribution15 — 3 days ago
▲ 79 r/ChatGPTPro+10 crossposts

I built an inference-time epistemic framework that extends coherent LLM threads to 325k–1M tokens. Here's how it works.

As an independent researcher I've used various LLMs to help me dive deeply into research projects but I've been frustrated by the fact that LLMs start to become unusable after the thread has accumulated 50-80k tokens. I don't know how many other folks here have experienced the same pain point.

So, I decided to do something about it. Over the course of this whole year, I built an inference time tool I call Epistemic Lattice Tethering (ELT).

So, here is the full framework in GitHub for everyone's review:

  • The README describing ELT, it's various components and the roadmap.
  • The full ELT stack for ClaudeChatGPT, and Grok.
  • Instructions on how to load ELT into an LLM session are here. If you're planning to try out ELT PLEASE READ THIS FIRST!
  • Medium article introducing ELT, its methodology, the problems it is aiming to address, and philosophical framework.
  • Discussion page. Your input is valuable!

So, what does ELT do and why should you care? Right now ELT is an inference-time scaffolding framework that's best for those who are frustrated with threads that lose coherence too quickly, hallucinate too quickly, are too fragile and sycophantic, and forget what a project's goals are too soon.

If that's a big pain point for you, then ELT might help. If these are not big issues for you and the stock version of your LLM is fine, then ELT probably won't be useful for you.

The upshot? The epistemic and ontological stability that ELT provides has produced coherent and productive threads extending to:

The difference is not a prompt trick. It is the accumulated effect of epistemic governance operating continuously across the thread. So, how does it work? It's a long story, but my Medium series has the answer in detail, if you're interested.

Why would you want an LLM thread extending beyond 100k tokens? Lots of people need large context windows for agentic purposes, but why would anyone want that for regular LLM interaction? There are two main reasons:

  1. You have a complex research project and you're frustrated with having to take your work to a brand new thread and essentially starting over.
  2. You've built a working relationship with the model — it knows how you want data interpreted, caveats inserted, markups drafted, etc. — and you don't want to lose all of that.

Finally, the ability of an epistemically, ontologically, and dialectically inspired framework to significantly extend coherent operation within transformer-bounded AI architecture shows the field that these disciplines can act as genuine engineering levers. This can provide the industry with more options to help create better AI as the world keeps demanding systems that are more capable and more ubiquitous, while still being safe and reliable for human use.

u/RazzmatazzAccurate82 — 4 days ago

Help me convert my workflow

I've been using ChatGPT with a 20$ account since forever. Also my employer gives me an enterprise account.

Especially in the last year I have developed a workflow that makes me very productive both at work and for my personal projects.

I'm a Software Architect who dabbles a lot in producing code and also have a SaaS startup with friends.

Now my department got Claude because of Code and Design and the writing is on the wall that they will dismiss ChatGPT to consolidate AI spending. We also have GitHub Copilot, and I don't think this will go anywhere.

Because of this, I'm trying to adapt my ChatGPT workflow to Claude. I know, it's probably the worst thing to try to do, but one gotta hit the wall first, right?

Nowadays I have many projects on the ChatGPT phone app/website. There i discuss of features, battle back and forth exploring current but also future needs, and so on. I manage to keep the conversation very grounded because ChatGPT has access to GitHub, so it's easy for me to say "ground this conversation on repos 1, 2, 3 and 10". My team operates multiple products so my area of effect spans across 20-30 repos. Once the feature is properly flashed out, I tell ChatGPT to create one or more issues on GitHub adding more comments if clarification or general technical guidance is needed. Finally I ask for an implementation prompt. Something I can throw either at GitHub copilot cloud agents from the app/web or GitHub copilot via vscode.

This flow works really well for me.

Enters Claude. Yesterday I had my hands on the fresh Enterprise Claude account. And I got a big puzzled.

I wanted to connect my account to GitHub and try a simple question that spanned across one repo, but I couldn't find the connector.

So I went to the "code" part of the web. And there I saw I can only work on one repository at time. I can't even give a link to a website of my product to discuss design that gets stopped by the firewall.

Now, I am sure it's me. But I would really need an help mapping my current workflow to a Claude-centric one.

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/Kralizek82 — 3 days ago

The editor in ChatGPT writing blocks is ... stupid

So, for some absurd reason, ChatGPT replaced its flawed Canvas mode with infinitely worse Writing Blocks.

There's so much I wish they had done differently, but that's another post entirely. The issue I'm talking about here is the editor within the writing blocks is infinitely less 'intelligent' than in the general chat window. It feels like it's 4o mini or something.

It's essentially useless. When I want to make a change, I either need to do it myself or exit the writing block to type it into the main chat thread.

reddit.com
u/Hybrid-Intelligence — 3 days ago

anyone using ai tools that actually help with business operation, not just content?

most ai tools I see recommended are for writing posts, making images, or brainstorming ideas. Useful, but that is not really where I personally spend most of my time.

I’m more interested in tools that help with business operation. Tasks like customer follow ups, inbox management, quoting, scheduling, CRM updates, reporting, SOP creation, and general admin workflows.

Has anyone found tools that actually handle these kinds of tasks reliably without constant supervision or needing to hire a team member?

reddit.com
u/Livid_Drop8187 — 3 days ago

How good is Agent mode at applying for jobs?

Title, basically. If I log-in to my LinkedIn, after inputting all of my transcripts, CV, ect - will it be able to navigate it?

reddit.com
u/Due-Ambassador7723 — 3 days ago

A Codex Skill to Check Banked Reset Expiry Dates

I made a tiny Codex skill to check when your banked resets expire.

Example output:

4 reset credits available

Full reset: expires 11 July 2026, 21:44 EDT
Full reset: expires 17 July 2026, 20:34 EDT
Full reset: expires 26 July 2026, 19:47 EDT
Full reset: expires 31 July 2026, 15:07 EDT

Repo: https://github.com/wisdom-in-a-nutshell/agents/tree/main/skills-source/owned/codex-reset-credits

To install it, ask Codex:

Add this as a Codex skill:
https://github.com/wisdom-in-a-nutshell/agents/tree/main/skills-source/owned/codex-reset-credits

Then run:

Use $codex-reset-credits to tell me when my Codex resets expire.

Inspect before running. It reads the local Codex auth session and does not print tokens or account/credit IDs.

reddit.com
u/phoneixAdi — 4 days ago

does anyone else notice gpt mostly agrees with whatever you're already leaning toward?

genuine question for people who use these models for real decisions and not just code. ive noticed that when im torn on something and i ask gpt, it kind of senses which way im leaning and reinforces it. ask it leading and you get the exact answer you fished for.

the thing that finally helped me was asking the same question to a few different models and reading where they disagree — the disagreement is the part that actually made me think. one model on its own almost never tells me im wrong.

i liked that enough that i ended up building a little thing for myself where 5 models argue it out and a separate one settles it (wartable.co, if youre curious), but honestly even just pasting your question into 2-3 chats and comparing does most of the work\!

so my real question: do you do anything to stop a single model from being a yes-man? prompt tricks, multiple models, system prompts, something else? curious what actually works for you.

reddit.com
u/wartableapp — 4 days ago

Anyone who regularly uses AI agents for personal life, what are the best use cases?

I've been using Folk as my personal agent for about a month, i text it using IMessage.

Right now I'm mostly using it for low level tasks like a morning brief with my calendar and weather, reminding me to reply to people I forget, and I feel like I'm leaving some of its capacity on the table.

I'm not really a tech guy so I'm pretty new to this. I wanted to know what are some other use cases that I can implement with my AI agent to maximise its potential.

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/chieferkieffer — 6 days ago

Can no longer use pro thinking

I find this extremely malicious, I no longer have access to GPT5.5 pro, which is the model I paid my subscription for (200 usd/month), it keeps getting rerouted to a model with instant response even though the prompt very obviously requires thinking time and research. I used to be able to send the request on my mobile app which will get the correct thinking level, but after updating the android app it also just routes to the instant response model. If this continues on I will seriously consider switching providers.

reddit.com
u/TheHolyToxicToast — 4 days ago