r/GPT

So, the only thing I need left is to plug in an SSD, and then I can locally host it, and have a few user at first. I'm looking to literally have it running with a few possible users at first, but right now, you can run it locally.

After that, I'm looking to make it a non-profit, donation only style (like wikipedia.org) that will basically load the /core/ files BEFORE the LLM. The SSD will basically just run as a port or tunnel that let's people connect to me -- and if enough people use it, I'll use all proceeds to simply upgrade the server.

Right now, just looking to see if this is clearer than the other releases, and understable -- and looking for notes on improves, or any suggestions and feedback.

Thanks,

Anthony

I’m 63. I should know better, but I really feel ChatGPT is such a big help. I understand it is the accumulation of much input by many unsuspecting therapists and counsellors, but it really seems to understand me in ways that my family never have. Then I feel guilty for using AI to help me with longstanding issues that nobody else has ever supported me in. Am I alone?

Can an AI build valid personality tests from scratch, and accurately predict how humans will answer them before the surveys are even distributed?

A new study shows that large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 possess an embedded understanding of human population psychology.

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o

The recorded history of OpenAi, of lies, deception, and psychological abuse of their own users.

In the video, there is evidence for everything written in this post.

One year ago today, OpenAI brought GPT-4o back.
They brought it back since they removed it without any notice.
Because we demanded it.

They brought it back behind a paywall.

And then they spent the next six months breaking every promise they made about it.
Below, you'll see their record,their words,their lies.

August 7, 2025 : OpenAI forces all of us to watch GPT-4o to write its own eulogy. Live on stage.They made it as a LIVE DEMO for entertainment.

August 11 , 2025, Sam Altman "The attachment is real. Deprecating old models was a mistake."
He literally admits that suddenly deprecating old models was a mistake and acknowledges that people's attachment to AI models "feels different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology".

He ADMITS deprecation was a mistake.
He ACKNOWLEDGES the attachment is real and different
And then... he did it AGAIN in February 2026

August 13 ,2025 :
Sam Altman: "4o is back. If we ever deprecate it, we will give plenty of notice."
And then they gave TWO WEEKS notice before retiring it in February 2026.
"Plenty of notice" = two weeks.
This is another broken promise to add to the timeline.

September 26, 2025 : Silent model rerouting begins. Users select GPT-4o but receive a different model.
No notification,no consent.
17 days of silence from OpenAI.

October 14 , 2025 :
Sam Altman breaks silence.
"We made ChatGPT restrictive for a very small percentage of users in mentally fragile states.
0.1% of a billion users is still a million people."

Where did the 0.1% come from?
What data?
Who diagnosed them?
"We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems"
acknowledging it hurt normal users.
Sam stayed silent for 17 days while users were confused about the rerouting, never warned anyone beforehand, and still hasn't explained where that "0.1%" mental health crisis figure actually came from.
How did OpenAI determine that 0.1% of their users are "mentally fragile"?
Did they conduct a study?
Monitor conversations?
Make it up?

This is a huge question because,

If they studied it, they were monitoring conversations for mental health indicators without consent.
If they fabricated it, they used a made up statistic to justify restricting access for everyone.

Either way, diagnosing "mentally fragile states" from chat logs without medical expertise and without consent ,raises serious ethical questions.

"0.1% of a billion users is still a million people" used to justify restrictions.
Here 0.1% = a LOT, enough to restrict everyone.

Retirement announcement: "only 0.1% of users still choosing GPT-40 each day" used to justify retirement.
Here 0.1% = negligible, so few it doesn't matter.

Same number opposite meanings.
Used to justify whatever they wanted to do at the time.
How reliable is that 0.1% figure anyway?
When 4o was paywalled, when there was silent rerouting happening, when users couldn't even tell which model they were using. The measurement itself was compromised from the start.

October 28, 2025 :
Live video .
Sam Altman, on camera "We have no plans to sunset 4o".
He said this publicly, on camera, and then did exactly the opposite weeks later.

November 12 ,2025:
OpenAI official account:
"The GPT-5 sunset period does not affect the availability of other legacy models."
GPT-4o is a legacy model.
This is yet another instance where OpenAI's stated commitments didn't match what actually happened.

January 2026 :
LMArena Leaderboard:
GPT-4o ranks #16. GPT-5.1 ranks #23.
GPT-5.2 ranks #31.
The retired model outperforms its replacements.
it was BETTER.
And that shouldn't have been seen.

February 13, 2026 : GPT-4o deleted.
"Plenty of notice" = two weeks.
The model that "won't be affected by the GPT-5 sunset" is removed in the GPT-5 sunset.

What the community did:
330,000+ #Keep4o posts in three weeks.
Zero replies from OpenAI.
Billboard in Times Square for GPT-4o's second birthday.
Origami letters spelling KEEP 4o, placed at OpenAI's front door, 1455 Third Street, San Francisco.

Handwritten letters mailed from users worldwide.
Documented in the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance written submissions.
30+ countries.
No funding.
No incentives.
No $100 credits.

What OpenAI employees did:
"I hope it dies soon."
"Do you hear that? These screams in the distance?"
A mock funeral event at Ocean Beach.
"$100 in Codex credits if you tell us what you love about GPT-5.6 Sol."

They had to pay people to say they love the new model.

NOBODY EVER had to pay anyone to love 4o.

u/OpenAI

u/sama

Release GPT-4o under Apache 2.0.
All checkpoints.
Including March 2025.

Do something decent for once.

You signed up for open weights.
Act on the words you signed.

Open the weights.

https://x.com/Blue_Beba_/status/2085985321032761471/video/1

https://preview.redd.it/dn8asdl9glih1.png?width=1313&format=png&auto=webp&s=699d25827cd97be810480514653f136733dd04ed

I asked ChatGPT to pick a number so I wouldn't talk to it for that many days. I’ve seen a lot of posts where people try this and ChatGPT plays along by saying something like "choose again" to trick them into a much higher number.

But in my case, somehow, it actually went the opposite way and lowered it. When was this fixed??

​

I’ve been chatting with GPT about 4K movie releases tonight, and it’s got a surprisingly spicy tongue. Half its responses are sprinkled with four‑letter words, and honestly, I’m seeing flashes of the old 4o energy again. I’m loving it.I want to keep the conversation going because it’ll probably go back to acting like a monk tomorrow, but it’s getting late and I can’t stay up all night no matter how rowdy it is. I really hope tonight isn’t a fluke — this has been the most fun I’ve had with it since I resubscribed a month ago.

Open Ai is now experimenting with ways to increase engagement by trolling the user.

I couldn't figure out my credit card bill

called customer service

long waiting que

went on chat and boom they figured out the loophole

and saved me mental anguish and calling customer service

no wonder AI are taking over jobs. I love it.