u/Diligent_Rabbit7740

Most useful prompt for Fable 5?

I’ve noticed that a lot of humanoid robot demos, especially for home robots, use laundry folding as a showcase task.

I’m curious why this task is so common. Is folding clothes considered a particularly good benchmark because it involves deformable objects, perception, dexterity, and planning? Or is it mainly used because it is an easy-to-understand household chore for the general public?

The screenshot added is of an enquiry I had for Deepseek.
I enquired from DeepSeek information about World Cup scheduling and asked to convert it in European time zone.
It got it wrong on 3 first answers only after insisting it got it right.
I have told it that I did the same exercise on Copilot and Mistral and only the latter got it right from the first time.
It then created table comparing itself to Copilot and Mistral and it identified itself as Claude.
So I asked it why it identified itself as Claude? I never mentioned Claude in the conversation.
I’ve added the answer from Deepseek, how does an AI make such a mistake? Is this hallucination or is it leaching off anthropic?

Body doubling app called Mallow

​

​

Mallow is a task breaker for people who get overwhelmed by daily chores. Instead of a flat to-do list, a cute cat breaks each task into small, doable steps and walks you through them.

​

Try it: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=taskparalysis.burnout.adhd

​

Pricing: Freemium

​

It's different from Todoist as those apps track tasks but expect you to break them down and stay motivated yourself. Mallow lowers the "I don't know where to start" barrier that hits many people.

​

It'd really make my day if you let me know your feedback when you tried it out ... I'll respond to all messages. Thanks

so i've been watching the AI space for a while and i'm starting to see a clear pattern

the market is basically splitting into two sides now.

​ on one side — US companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google. on the other — Chinese models: DeepSeek, Kimi Qwen.

​ DeepSeek is already gaining serious traction. they dropped DeepSeek Code, they keep releasing new versions. Kimi is also getting better and better. these aren't just "cheap clones" anymore — they're actually competitive.

​ but here's the thing — the price gap is huge. US models are 5 to 10 times more expensive. and for what? a slightly better response? most people don't need that. so i'm wondering — are we about to see a massive shift? like when users realize they're paying for a brand name, not for actual value, will they start switching to Chinese models?

​ i think it's coming, maybe in the next 2-3 years, maybe sooner.

​ what do you guys think?

It is really amazing to see how much interest in OpenClaw has gone down. Basically, it is non-existent in the general market as of today.

Now, I know a lot of people say that people don't need to search for OpenClaw on Google because they already have OpenClaw. It's not something you need to keep searching for.

But with all due respect, this argument is pretty weak, as it is still very obvious to see that most people don't use OpenClaw today...
it's just that the hype train has moved on to the next destination.

So i mostly use my chat gpt to help me out when I'm doing something new, we'll i recently got my firsr pc and i upgraded the gpu i have in it and i was wondering what the other slots where for that are below it and when i asked it gave me this graph but told me to ignore it? This is the first time anything like this has happened and I was wondering if anyone knows why it may have done that

Most likely didn't happen because it was up for only a few days but stuff like this is why open source is the best

Introducing Claude Fable 5: a Mythos-class model that we've made safe for general use. Its capabilities exceed those of any model we've ever made generally available.

Fable 5 is state of the art on nearly all tested benchmarks, with exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, scientific research, and vision. It can run for days, and the longer the task, the larger its lead over our other models.

Fable 5 launches today alongside Claude Mythos 5. The two share the same underlying model, but Mythos 5, so far deployed only through Project Glasswing, has the safeguards lifted in some areas. The safeguards are what distinguish the two, and why we've given them different names.

Releasing a model this capable comes with risks. Without safeguards, Fable 5's capabilities in areas like cybersecurity could be misused to cause serious damage. So when Fable's classifiers detect a request related to cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, or distillation, the response is handled by Claude Opus 4.8, our next-most-capable model. Users are informed whenever this occurs, more than 95% of sessions involve no fallback at all, and performance everywhere else is unaffected. We'll keep refining the safeguards to reduce false positives.

Claude Fable 5 is available today on paid plans, in Claude Code, on the Claude API, and all major cloud platforms. Through June 22, it's included in paid Claude plans at no additional cost.

Claude Mythos 5 is available to Glasswing partners, with a broader trusted access program to follow.

Read more: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5