My gut instinct says tracing A.I. and not necessary straight up generating. But that don’t, the facial expressions, and the way they stare directly at the camera are major red flags to me. The problem is she’s clearly extremely talented, it’s weird she only posts once or twice per week, she could easily do this without an a.i. reference or tracing.
The most damning one was ‘god mode’ over there. But the thing that’s throwing me off is in the first image with ‘Dream Social’ on the hat, if you stare at that blanket there’s a few artifacts, so now I’m thinking, is the whole image a.i.?
Would love to get some insight, I am not a big pro at a.i. detection.
Their commissions are open, and I saw some genshin art that I actually really liked, but they've posted so many pictures in such a short time, it makes me raise an eyebrow. Plus some of the pictures are weird looking but in a way that could easily be artist error, imo (the first one is the worst to me, looks too grainy and 'lofty')
Also their VGen account was suspended for "for violating VGen's Terms and Policies" which obviously sounds sus as hell.
it sucks that i have to do this now but unfortunately other artists ppl 100 percent trusted in the past ended up starting to use ai at some point.
Image by Alohaii for anyone curious.
On one hand nearly/all the shadows are correct with is normally a major give away for me. But on the other the photo is just too perfect, ya know?
So I decided to go low contact with my mother over her obsession with AI recently. I used to use CHATGPT when it first came out but not anymore and I am very much anti-AI. She had noticed I hadn't been messaging her and asked me why so I was honest and told her AI use makes me uncomfortable and I would prefer not to be involved nor would I like to communicate unless necessary until we are both in therapy (we've had other issues as well). However, when she sent her reply, I could not help but feel whiplash by the response. Not only did her response seem extremely polished with perfect grammar, it also heavily reminded me of another "apology" I received a few months prior from another person who is also AI obsessed because the format and language are almost 1 to 1. What strikes me as this being AI is how this is structured. AI will usually try to validate whatever you wrote then enter into de-escalation mode.
"I hear what you are saying."
"Thanks for letting me know." Or "Thank you for being honest."
"I don't want to dismiss your feelings" etc
These are all quotes I usually read or hear about and now I cannot help but raise an eyebrow at this. Because if she actually did send me an AI written response after I expressed to her my feelings about it, I would feel extremely disrespected.
As mentioned in the title, it just doesn't look right. For one things, I feel like the fins are way too pointy. Also, the way it "walks" just doesn't look quite right. There's no obvious signs of this being AI that I can see, but it just doesn't look quite right.
Book my daughter picked out to borrow from the library. The carton on the cover feels like AI to me and I couldn’t find anything on the internet about Nina Neme. Says it was published in 2024.
So this is from a Discord Server im in and someone posted this in the #Art channel on there.
Me and a couple other people found it suspicious especially because he posted the second image that looks a little dull first and later the seemingly AI generated one only saying "better" i am aware that there are people with this kind of style but the jump from the first and second drawing is insane and the way he drew the neck and the neck print on the torso not together seems a little off.
He then got asked by a person to send a picture of his hand besides the drawing as proof and that is what he did, but the fact that the first picture and the one he’s send with his hands are around two hours apart it is a little suspicious that the painting is still in the same spot without having moved, in fact not even the camera moved! It is as if just the hand got cropped in.
So my guess is AI but i really wanna hear others that are better at spotting if it is so he can get a warning on the server and be banned from posting his Art.
Edit: the person got Banned from the #Art channel, Thanks
Hello!
I am sponsoring some art events on a server and want to make sure everything is fair for everyone
However, I am not very good at identifying whether sketches like these are AI
I just wanted to double check before warning the member that they should not participate in future events if they continue using AI
They claim they drew and signed the sketches themselves, so I wanted to get a second opinion before making any decisions 🙇
Thank you so much!
Edit: Thank you so much for all the replies / Information and for helping me double check!
I love stalking the cats sub and saw this today; the clip is attached to nothing, and you wouldn't do a countdown with marker on pen.. I could be completely wrong but I'm just hoping to get better at identifying it! https://www.reddit.com/r/cats/comments/1wzerlr/the_allegations_are_true/
So is this ai generated? I believe something is wrong in this image, but I'm not sure what it is.
From the looks of it, the people look off and the trains look weird. So did a human make this or not.
Trying again as my first post wasn't lengthy enough. I had posted a review about this product a few weeks ago after seeing it in an ad. It is overly detailed and has that uncanny valley feel to it. The proportions and details also seem off. I still believe it is, and it's funny I would have forgotten about this if they hadn't emailed me back.
ETA: They're charging $24 for these btw
The tool works for detecting SynthID watermarks in images, video, and audio generated by Google, OpenAI, NVIDIA, Kakao, and soon, Apple.
The tool: https://synthid.com/
The post is from someone saying his boss bought this dinosaur cat scratcher for their office, and the office cats love it. The lighting in the pics feels off, and OP is responding to a ton of comments in a way that feels very bot-y. I zoomed in on the text in the 2nd pic and it says ‘all for your furry friends want’ which doesn’t really make sense? But there’s like 1k comments and nobody else seems to think it’s fake
the image looked very digital to me at first, the character is pretty clean visibly but the marker on it is blurry at the bottom and cuts off oddly on the page. I also recognize this format being popular with AI right now where the artists leaves the tools on the page to try and make it seem more realistic. I also cant read the bottom of the marker at all but the handle but the characters head is clearly legible.