Transhumanism may be necessary for the long-term survival of humankind?
Transhumanist augmentation may be necessary for the long-term survival of humankind?
Transhumanist augmentation may be necessary for the long-term survival of humankind?
I've read some people referring to Peter Thiel as a 'transhumanist', along with Elon Musk. Do you agree that Peter Thiel is a transhumanist? If so, why would you consider Peter Thiel a transhumanist?
Besides that, as a transhumanist, what is your personal and sincere opinion of him? As a transhumanist, do you support him?
Hey, everyone I am going on a mission to absolutely go crazy on biohacking, I am thinking of stacking CJC-1295 + ipamorelin and Reta for physical, on top of this I am using fish oil, magnesium glycerinate, zinc, d3 +k2, Creatine. Furthermore I am gonna be using psilocybin mushrooms, and ketamine for cerebral benefits. Along side this I will be eating at least 150 g of protein per day, and drinking a gallon of water per day, getting good sleep, and staying physically active. I know this is a very ambitious goal but it is definitely doable, and I am super excited to see where it goes. I am 21 and I am 5 ft 11, and have an above average athletic physique, I weigh 180.
Super interested in hearing what y'all think.
honestly after looking into it I think this will come before gene-therapies to reverse male pattern baldness.
Alright, let’s talk about the one biohacking story that sounds like pure science fiction but is actually happening right now.
Forget the expensive supplements and the cold plunges for a second. There’s a geneticist named Yuancheng (Ryan) Lu, and he’s not trying to sell you a powder. He’s trying to reverse aging in human eyes and he just started testing it on actual patients.
Here’s the simplest way to understand what’s going on.
The “Factory Reset” Button
Imagine your cells are like a computer that’s been running for 80 years. It’s slow, it has bugs, and files are corrupted. But the hardware (your DNA) is still fine. The problem is the software the instructions telling your cells what to do. As we age, that software gets glitchy, and cells forget how to function properly.
Back in 2006, scientists figured out a way to basically do a factory reset on cells. They found four proteins (nicknamed the Yamanaka factors) that could turn an old cell back into a young, blank-slate stem cell.
The problem? If you fully reset a cell in a living body, it forgets what it’s supposed to be. It stops being a skin cell or a nerve cell and just becomes a blob of stem cells which can turn into cancer. That’s bad.
Ryan Lu’s Genius Move
Lu had a better idea. Instead of a full factory reset, what if you just rebooted the cell? Refresh it without wiping it clean.
He tweaked the formula. He took out the most dangerous gene (the one that causes cancer) and focused on just three of them (called OSK) . Then, in 2018, he tested it on mice with crushed optic nerves basically blind mice.
He injected this modified gene therapy into their eyes. Sixteen days later? The nerves were growing back. The mice could see again .
Now It’s In Humans
This year, a company called Life Biosciences (co-founded by Lu’s mentor, David Sinclair) got the green light from the FDA. They injected a version of this therapy into the eye of a human patient with glaucoma .
That’s wild. A treatment that was a lab experiment on mice just a few years ago is now being dripped into a human eyeball.
Now, before you start planning your “eye injection for eternal youth” appointment, there’s a massive reality check.
This is a Phase 1 trial. That means they are testing for safety, not whether it actually makes you 20 again . The primary goal is to see if the patient doesn’t get cancer or go blind from the treatment itself. They are starting with eyes because it’s a contained space if something goes wrong, it’s contained, and it won’t spread to the rest of the body .
The Bottom Line
This isn’t a pill you take. It’s a highly experimental gene therapy for specific eye diseases like glaucoma. It’s not “the fountain of youth” yet .
But it is the first time the concept of reversing cellular age has been tested in a human. The science is moving from theory to reality. So, keep your eyes peeled no pun intended because this is the real, grounded science behind the biohacking hype.
Source: MIT Technology Review, “This geneticist’s age-reversal tech could help restore sight”
I think I'm onto something here:
https://futuristicnews.com/ray-kurzweil-your-brain-in-the-cloud/
https://neurosciencenews.com/internet-thoughts-brain-cloud-interface-11074/
Excuse me, please, if somebody has already made the connection.
Could this be the Vince Gilligan source of inspiration?!?
Please, all nonplurbed immunes, feel free to elaborate.
Will exclusive access to technological enhancements—such as genetic engineering, cognitive augmentations, and cybernetic implants—for wealthy elites transform socioeconomic inequality into an irreversible biological divide?
If an "enhanced" minority gains superior cognitive abilities, disease-free longevity, and physical advantages while the unaugmented majority remains bound by natural biological limits, will humanity speciate into two distinct biological classes? Does this risk destroying the fundamental principle of inherent human equality, creating an irreversible divergence where natural humans become a systematically secondary species?
Furthermore, how does this transformation impact human autonomy and free will? If neural interfaces, genetic predisposition programming, and emotional regulation algorithms allow our thoughts, desires, and decision-making processes to be pre-designed or algorithmically tuned, does the concept of genuine agency become an illusion? When human values and motivations can be engineered, do we lose the essence of self-determination, reducing human beings from autonomous moral agents into deterministic products of technology?
I’ve been thinking about how humanity could eventually achieve biological immortality.
One thing that occurred to me is that progress toward this kind of goal could require enormous amounts of genetic data, long-term research, and participation from many people.
That made me think about a broader question: what would society look like if people worked fewer hours and had more time to participate in research, education, creative work, and other meaningful activities?
I’ve been developing a social theory around this idea, including some principles for how such a system might function and a self-discipline method I developed.
I’ve put my current ideas into a video here:
https://youtu.be/s30F7DqfBlk?si=g8NR_QtTOHim6MWh
I’d be interested in hearing what people think about the underlying idea, especially whether a society organized around giving people more time for meaningful work could actually function.
Hello,
I am a French student following an international program in my high school, as a final task I must present a research project on a theme of my choice that has to be linked to the USA. I chose the theme "Building the future" and my work will answer the key question " Do modern medical advances simply heal humans, or do they also transform them?". In order to complete my report, I need a partner based in an English-speaking country to answer questions I might have to advance in my research, and I'm getting desperate. I chose this theme because I want to work in the medical field later, and America is the boiling point of many companies working on bionic technology, BCIs and genetic engineering. I've sent about 30 emails and received 3 answers, all negative, I've also tried contacting Instagram profiles of various university labs, but no one has answered me. I've come here to ask whether anyone with a profession related to my subject would be willing to answer my questions. .