r/planhub

▲ 12 r/planhub+1 crossposts

CIB and TELUS partner to expand fibre broadband to 17,000 B.C. households

🛜 B.C. is getting a major rural broadband expansion

The Canada Infrastructure Bank and partners are committing $379 million to expand broadband access in British Columbia.

As part of the agreement, the CIB will provide a $49.3 million loan to TELUS to help deploy fibre-to-the-home internet in underserved rural and Indigenous communities.

The project is expected to bring high-speed internet access to more than 17,000 households, including approximately 380 Indigenous households.

This is not a flashy phone-plan deal. It is the other side of Canada’s connectivity problem: basic access.

For rural households, better broadband can affect work, school, healthcare, business, emergency communication and whether a community can fully participate in the digital economy.

u/Planhub-ca — 3 days ago

Apple may be preparing its biggest iPhone attack in years (5 new device in the making)

Apple is reportedly planning at least five new iPhone models between late 2026 and early 2027, including its first foldable iPhone.

The strategy looks simple: hit Android rivals from multiple angles at once.

A foldable iPhone would finally put Apple directly against Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold line, while a broader iPhone lineup could help Apple cover more premium and mid-premium buyers.

The supply-chain is just as interesting. Reports say Apple has increased its foldable iPhone production target to around 10 million units, even as Android manufacturers deal with pressure from memory shortages and rising component costs.

The question is not just “what new iPhone is coming?”

It is: how expensive is the next smartphone cycle going to get?

Foldables, AI features, premium screens and higher memory costs could push flagship phones even deeper into luxury-tech territory.

That makes BYOD plans, refurbished phones and last-year models more relevant than ever.

u/Planhub-ca — 3 days ago
▲ 404 r/planhub+8 crossposts

Canada banned activation fees. Rogers, Bell and TELUS are already testing new device charges

The CRTC’s ban on activation and plan-change fees took effect on June 12.

Rogers and Fido now charge $40 for specialist-assisted phone purchases completed in stores, over the phone or through live chat. Customers can avoid the fee by completing the purchase online.

Bell has a separate $40 Device Handling Charge connected to phone orders, while TELUS introduced a $15 charge for both physical SIM cards and eSIMs.

The CRTC is already challenging Bell and TELUS. Both companies have until June 17 to confirm they stopped charging the fees or explain why they believe the charges qualify as optional products or services.

Rogers has not yet publicly received the same formal warning.

The central issue is whether these are genuine optional services or activation fees reconstructed around phones, SIM cards and employee assistance.

u/Planhub-ca — 6 days ago
▲ 15 r/planhub

Canadian firm exploring Google lawsuit over alleged recording of conversations

A Canadian law firm is currently investigating a possible class-action lawsuit against Google following a similar case and settlement in the U.S.

mobilesyrup.com
u/Planhub-ca — 4 days ago
▲ 0 r/planhub+1 crossposts

Happy Canada Day, Canada! 🇨🇦

May your signal be strong, your data last, and your roaming fees stay asleep.

u/Planhub-ca — 4 days ago
▲ 11 r/planhub+2 crossposts

Lenovo has launched an AI phone for students, but without the usual smartphone chaos

Lenovo’s new AI Student Phone is built around a very different idea: what if a child’s first phone was not a tiny entertainment machine?

The device, launched in China, removes games, web browsers and social media apps. Instead, it focuses on voice and video calls, location tracking, emergency contact features, classroom mode and AI-assisted learning.

There is even a dedicated AI button that lets students ask questions or get homework help without opening a full browser.

For parents: keep kids connected without handing them an endless scroll portal.

Are we heading toward a new category of “controlled phones” for kids, where the device is designed around learning, safety and limits instead of maximum engagement?

After years of trying to manage screen time with apps and parental controls, Lenovo is trying the harder version: change the phone itself.

u/Planhub-ca — 4 days ago
▲ 31 r/planhub+1 crossposts

Public Mobile is running a Canada Day deal: 80GB of 5G data for $35/month

Public Mobile is currently advertising a Canada-wide 5G plan with 80GB of data for $35/month.

The offer is listed as ending July 1, so this is a short-window promo for people looking to switch or upgrade before Canada Day.

80GB at $35 is aggressive for a 5G plan, especially for users who stream, hotspot, travel around Canada or just want more data without jumping into a premium Big 3 plan.

As always, check the fine print before switching: eligibility, speed details, province availability, autopay requirements and whether the price is promotional or ongoing.

u/Planhub-ca — 7 days ago
▲ 23 r/planhub

Our intervention on the new CRTC proceeding against Bell, TELUS, and Rogers over those new $40 fees.

Following up on Planhub's post on CRTC 2026-155: here's the part of the story I think doesn't get told enough. This is a response to the 40 people who bombarded my inbox this week asking about it.

Planhub did a good job laying out the structure of the proceeding. I want to fill in some of the technical and economic blanks, because once you see those, the "we're just recovering legitimate costs" defense the Big 3 are running falls apart immediately.

1. TELUS pinned themselves on the SIM argument

The Commission's prohibition exempts "additional products or services... not required for the delivery of the telecommunications service."

In TELUS's own June 17 response to the CRTC, they wrote that a SIM is "a component of terminal equipment" without which "a wireless device cannot access a wireless carrier's network."

So by TELUS's own words, a SIM is REQUIRED for the delivery of the service. Which is literally the test the Commission's exemption rules out. TELUS argued themselves straight out of their own exemption. We cited that exact paragraph back at them in our intervention.

2. The eSIM cost reality nobody wants to say out loud

There's a real difference between a physical SIM and an eSIM. A physical SIM is a chip with manufacturing, warehousing, and shipping costs. An eSIM is a software profile generated by a server. There is no card, no warehouse, no truck, nothing physical changes hands.

A small carrier like us pays $0.50 to $2 per eSIM profile to a third-party SM-DP+ vendor. TELUS, at their volume, almost certainly pays a fraction of that, and they likely operate their own SM-DP+ in-house, which collapses the per-profile cost to effectively zero.

A $15 retail "eSIM purchase fee" charged to a customer is not cost recovery. It is profit on a digital good that costs the carrier pennies to produce.

3. The numbers nobody is using as a headline

Bell's parent (BCE) made $24,468,000,000 in revenue in 2025. TELUS made $20,506,000,000. Rogers made $21,712,000,000. Combined: over $66 billion.

The maximum AMP under the Act is $10,000,000 per company. That is approximately 0.04% of one carrier's annual revenue. Less than half a percent of net income for any of them.

If the CRTC imposes anything less than the maximum, it is a license fee for ongoing violation, not a deterrent. The Big 3 have already shown they are willing to keep charging these fees in open defiance of the prohibition. The only way this regulation has teeth is if the AMP actually bites at their scale.

4. Personal liability is the only thing they're actually scared of

Section 72.008 of the Telecommunications Act lets the CRTC find individual officers and directors personally liable for up to $25,000 each. That is nothing to BCE or Rogers as companies. But $25,000 out of an executive's own pocket, plus the reputational headline of being personally found liable under federal telecom law, is the part of this that actually deters people.

The conduct under investigation happened on the watch of three named CEOs: Mirko Bibic at BCE, Darren Entwistle at TELUS (who retires June 30, but the personal AMP follows him regardless of retirement), and Tony Staffieri at Rogers.

Our intervention asked the CRTC to find personal liability against all three.

5. The next move (we predicted in writing)

This is the part I really hope gets attention. If the CRTC kills these activation-side fees today, the Big 3 will try to bring back equivalent dollars under a new label tomorrow.

The most likely target: suspension or disconnection fees on customers who are mid-port to a competing carrier. A carrier that can't charge you to activate has every commercial incentive to charge you to leave.

We asked the CRTC, in our intervention, to declare in advance in this proceeding, right now that any suspension, disconnection, or reconnection fee charged on a porting customer is a fee whose main purpose is to discourage switching, and is therefore already prohibited under section 27.04(1) of the Act on exactly the same logic as these activation fees.

Slam the loophole shut before they walk through it.

Why I'm posting this

Planhub covered how the proceeding works and how to file. I won't repeat that. The thing I want to add is: the Big 3 have professional regulatory teams writing carefully-crafted defensible-sounding submissions. The CRTC needs to hear the substance too, not just the procedure.

If you've been charged any of these fees, file a short letter. It does not have to be a legal brief. Even one paragraph supporting maximum AMPs, personal CEO liability, and a pre-emptive ruling on suspension fees gets read by the Commission.

u/TheExaltedPrime — 6 days ago
▲ 1 r/planhub+2 crossposts

Is there a class action lawsuit against Rogers yet?

This is an update post which I was hoping to make to say everything has been resolved but unfortunately, it is the opposite situation and now I am even more fuming than I was before.

It has been over a month and Rogers still has not been able to coordinate a tech to arrive to fix the issue. After our internet went out randomly, my husband waited for hours (as one does) to get Rogers on the phone to send over a tech. TWICE no tech showed up and my husband, who works in construction, had to leave his job site and co-workers, to be at home for the time slot a tech was expected to arrive. Both times no tech showed up but they charged US a no-show feee. Then my husband went out of town Saturday morning and I had Covid and a random tech showed up and spoke to the upstairs neighbor and started tinkering with the line. The only reason I was even informed was because the upstairs neighbor was confused and contacted me. My husband says he received no warning a tech was showing up and just got a “tracking” notification 5 minutes before this tech supposedly arrived. I said look my husband isn’t here and we received no warning so I can’t give the green light to do anything to the line. Why weren’t we informed you would be arriving? The tech appeared to not want to understand and insisted upon working on the line when I insisted no, because I am not going to be able to safely monitor as I have Covid and both our upstairs neighbours and ourselves use Rogers and I don’t want to take the responsibility if their internet shuts out as they work fully remotely because of any incidents with this tech visit.

Then finally my husband escalates to the Office of the President and by this time it is a month and they say they will get a tech and still the same coordination problems persist. I finally call up a number of small ISPs and one of them that uses Rogers infrastructure had great customer service (what Rogers customer service used to be like) so I say ok. I work hybrid and my work had been impacted so I am ok to proceed. Full set up and tech and everything go smoothly that weekend with TekkSavvy. As Rogers is still not able to fix anything, my husband ports his number to Bell. Immediately, we get a flood of calls to help fix the problem but again it STILL does not get fixed. Finally I get on the call with the Office of the President person and it is a bit heated ngl because I said look this is not working out, you’re not able to coordinate a single tech to come in to fix this issue. You can’t send over a tech without warning when we are not even available to receive the service. We just want to smoothly cancel to not have to deal with the stress of this anymore and he said we are on the hook for 225 CAD cancellation fee because we demonstrated “denial of service” because we wouldn’t let the unscheduled/unverified tech work on the line. That is when I lost it a bit because for OVER A MONTH my husband and I have been changing our work schedules, cancelling evening plans and/or weekend plans, beholden to our phones to get this coordinated and sorted until finally we had to go to different service providers and then for Rogers to act this entitled to THEIR CUSTOMERS bending over backwards to get THEIR COMPANY to fix a problem OR PAY for a contract cancellation which is already void from their lack of ability to service said contract is obscene.

So, finally they say they will contact me on Friday after 5pm to coordinate a tech because again my husband works on construction sites, often in the middle of a busy intersection, where it is not safe for him to randomly pick up a personal call. I rush home early to make myself available for said call and do they call? No. Instead, once again they call my husband, who is in the middle of Pape redirecting traffic so he and his coworkers remain safe, and leave another useless voicemail that they will call back. A week goes by with more phone tag with us calling them and them calling him until finally today after they call HIM again on Friday, he calls them today on Sunday and they say a tech will show up this Thursday. I won’t believe it until I see it but I am so incredibly done. My best friend’s mother-in-law just passed away this week and we are providing as much support as we can but this unnecessary stress on top of that actual stress is causing extreme mental and emotional distress cause it is NOT ENDING.

On top of that my work performance slipped noticeably because we couldn’t get a mental break from this issue and I was already backlogged because I couldn’t get work completed in the evenings until I finally moved over to TekkSavvy. Before that I was using up my Telus data to be able to either work remote or work in the evenings.

The fact that they have rolled back customer service to ridiculous hours (really only until 7pm when most people get home from work and no Sunday service?) and are trying to enforce cancellation fees when THEY are not providing the service and no show fees and “denial of service” accusations when one time my husband said after the two no shows, hey we need a break from this stress—it is impacting our jobs, we will call you later to coordinate—and then they send a tech with zero warning, means there is something seriously wrong with this company. And the fact that this is happening to SO MANY customers, means it is widespread and wilful negligence on the part of the company. We are now recording all calls with them and taking down every CS Rep’s name and ID where possible:

So, I am asking does anybody know of any class action lawsuits that are in the works as I would be very happy to share our experience and story to help the case. We don’t want anything, we just want to make Rogers stop treating their customers like they are entitled to OUR money to fund bad business decisions they have made, and for those who are not financially privileged enough to weather their terrible tactics to not have to suffer like we have. We are very lucky that we can afford to be able to pay but I know many others are not. I told the agent even if Rogers does fix the issue now, do you know how terrible our impression is of this company? Do you think we’ll ever come back? Or have anything positive to say about this company to existing or potential customers? And all they had to say was a very non-genuine “well, we’ll be sorry to see you leave”—which fair enough, I was not easy on them so don’t blame the guy for his snark.

TLDR: Rogers still not able to get a tech to coordinate a proper visit after over a month of no service and trying to charge us a 225 CAD cancellation fee even after two CCTS complaints. Would like to know if there is a class action lawsuit in the works or what other legal recourse there may be. At this point it is no longer just about the financial penalty but about the principal.

reddit.com
u/This-Mistake6472 — 8 days ago
▲ 10 r/planhub+1 crossposts

PC Mobile offers $25/month 5G plan with 25GB and PC Optimum rewards

PC Mobile is currently advertising a $25/month 5G plan with 25GB of data, plus 20,000 PC Optimum points as a welcome bonus and 10% back every month.

It is a telecom deal wrapped inside the PC Optimum ecosystem.

For budget shoppers, the math is interesting: lower monthly price, 5G data, prepaid-style flexibility, and rewards points that can be used across the PC Optimum network.

There is also a separate flash offer showing 10,000 PC Optimum points on a SIM card purchase in store until July 1.

u/Planhub-ca — 6 days ago
▲ 14 r/planhub

🚨 Quebecor warns Corus deal could strengthen Bell’s grip on English-language media

Quebecor is pushing back against Corus Entertainment’s proposed restructuring, arguing that the broadcaster should be taken over by experienced media players rather than effectively handed to creditors.

The fight is now before the CRTC.

Corus wants approval for a recapitalization plan that would see lenders forgive about $500 million in debt in exchange for 99% ownership of a new parent company. Canso Investment Counsel is expected to become the largest shareholder.

Quebecor CEO Pierre Karl Péladeau argues that Corus represents essential Canadian media infrastructure, and that weakening Corus as an independent media force could leave Bell in an even more dominant position in English-language broadcasting.

This is not just a corporate finance story.

Corus owns Global News, dozens of radio stations, specialty channels and conventional TV stations across Canada. The decision could shape local news, media concentration, Canadian content and who controls major English-language broadcasting assets.

The CRTC file is now one to watch.

u/Planhub-ca — 7 days ago
▲ 5 r/planhub+1 crossposts

Fizz is running a Quebec-only $40 referral promo

Fizz is currently showing a $40 referral-code discount on its Quebec site, with the offer listed as available until July 7.

For Quebec users: sign up with a referral code and save $40, while still getting Fizz’s usual prepaid-style features like no commitment, no activation fee, and flexible plans.

Before switching, check the province selector, the checkout page and the final monthly price.

u/Planhub-ca — 7 days ago

Samsung’s next foldable could push the “Ultra” price ceiling even higher

Samsung’s next foldable lineup is starting to leak from multiple directions, and the most interesting model may be the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra.

According to recent leaks, Samsung could be preparing a higher-end Fold8 Ultra with an improved screen resolution, a larger battery, faster charging and an ultra-thin design. Regulatory listings also suggest the next wave of foldables is getting close to launch.

The real angle is the price.

A Korean leak claims Samsung’s next foldable lineup could launch at higher prices in some markets, partly because of rising manufacturing, memory and storage costs.

Foldables are already among the most expensive smartphones consumers can buy. If the Fold Ultra line moves even higher, the question becomes simple: how much more can premium phones cost before they turn into luxury tech instead of mainstream upgrades?

This also makes last year’s foldables, refurbished devices and BYOD plans much more interesting.

u/Planhub-ca — 7 days ago
▲ 54 r/planhub+1 crossposts

I went from paying $20.95 with 80 Gigs to Now Having unlimited Data for $25 with all the discounts applied

They offered me this plan for $50 with all my discounts I’m paying $25 so 50% I guess

- $5 auto pay

- $20 disability discount credit

Which makes it $25

Btw I’m reposting this without the Ai made photo so you guys stop assuming I’m faking it
Also this plan is on the website so I’m not lying ether!

u/Dry-Property-639 — 12 days ago
▲ 11 r/planhub

A Canadian-built social network is launching on Canada Day

Gander, a new Canadian social media platform, says it will officially launch nationwide on July 1 as an alternative to foreign-owned social networks.

The company says the app already has more than 18,000 members and is backed by 2,517 Canadian investors.

Its pitch is very Canadian-tech-core: healthier conversations, stronger communities, human verification, less bot activity, no surveillance advertising, no sale of personal data, and Canadian data kept in Canada.

The bigger question: can a Canadian platform actually break through in a social media world dominated by Meta, TikTok, X, Reddit and YouTube?

Even if Gander stays niche, the timing is interesting. Canadians are talking more about data sovereignty, algorithmic outrage, privacy, platform dependency and who controls the digital spaces where public conversations happen.

A small app, maybe. But a very 2026 question.

u/Planhub-ca — 7 days ago
▲ 98 r/planhub+10 crossposts

Canada’s wireless fee ban is being tested across the whole brand maze: Fido, Virgin, Lucky, Koodo, Public, Freedom, Fizz and more

Not breaking news, more of a follow-up/watchdog thread.

The CRTC’s ban on activation/modification fees took effect on June 12. Since then, the focus has mostly been on Rogers, Bell and Telus, but that misses a big part of how Canada’s wireless market actually works.

Customers don’t only see “the Big Three.” They see dozens of brands.

Rogers family: Rogers, Fido, chatr
Bell family: Bell, Virgin Plus, Lucky Mobile
Telus family: Telus, Koodo, Public Mobile
Quebecor/Vidéotron family: Vidéotron, Fizz, Freedom Mobile
Regional/MVNO layer: Eastlink, SaskTel, Tbaytel, Cogeco Mobile, PC/No Name Mobile and others

And the network/antenna situation makes it even more confusing.

Some brands are just flankers owned by the same parent company.
Some are prepaid brands running on the same network.
Some are regional carriers with their own towers plus roaming deals.
Some are MVNOs that sell service but use another carrier’s network.

So when a fee shows up at Fido, Virgin, Lucky, Koodo, Public, chatr, Fizz or another brand, it should not be treated as separate from the bigger carrier ecosystem.

Confirmed examples already worth watching:

Bell / Virgin Plus: $40 device handling charge
Rogers / Fido: $40 device setup charge
Telus: $15 SIM/eSIM fee
Freedom Mobile: appears to have backed off on some fees/requirements after the CRTC ban

That last one matters. If one carrier can adjust after the rule, why are others trying to preserve similar fees under new names?

Are activation fees disappearing, or are they being renamed across the whole Canadian wireless brand maze?

If you were charged anything since June 12, please comment with:

Brand:
Parent company/network, if known:
Fee name:
Amount:
Date:
Online, store, phone or chat:
Was it waived?

u/Planhub-ca — 13 days ago
▲ 163 r/planhub+1 crossposts

Japanese AI model to be competing with GPT-5.5, Opus 4.8, and Fable 5 !!

Sakana Al, founded by ex-Google researchers David Ha and Llion Jones, released Fugu as an OpenAl-compatible API that dynamically orchestrates closed and open models for complex tasks. Fugu Ultra shines on benchmarks like 73.7% on SWE-Bench Pro, rivaling restricted U.S. systems such as Anthropic's Fable 5, with demos showing it optimizing GPU experiments and building CAD designs. CEO Ha promotes 'Al sovereignty' through resilient routing, and early users praise its multi-step workflows for coding and analysis, though skeptics await independent verification.

u/HeadWoodpecker5237 — 13 days ago
▲ 267 r/planhub+1 crossposts

Mistral AI is using the spotlight to push its open-weight strategy

Mistral AI says it plans to release a new open-weight model this summer, with early access expected in July.

The company is leaning hard into the sovereignty angle: instead of relying only on closed APIs from U.S. giants, governments and companies could deploy and control models more directly.

That’s probably where Mistral has its strongest argument right now: not just “we have another chatbot,” but “you can actually own and audit part of the stack.”

Europe’s AI pitch is becoming less about hype and more about control.

u/Planhub-ca — 13 days ago
▲ 149 r/planhub+2 crossposts

Five Eyes intelligence agencies warn that frontier AI could supercharge cyberattacks within months

The Five Eyes intelligence (pdf) alliance is warning that new frontier AI models could rapidly change the cyber threat landscape.

Officials from the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand say advanced AI may soon boost both offensive hacking and defensive cybersecurity capabilities.

The timeline they’re talking about is not “years away.” They’re warning it could be months.

The advice is still basic but urgent: patch systems faster, reduce exposed infrastructure and use AI defensively to find vulnerabilities before attackers do.

The scary part is not that AI invents hacking. It’s that it may compress the time, skill and cost needed to launch more complex attacks.

u/Planhub-ca — 13 days ago