r/GamersNexus

Image 1 — Not all is lost, I won in court.
Image 2 — Not all is lost, I won in court.

Not all is lost, I won in court.

I know GN and the industry as a whole has been doom and gloom lately but I have some good news. I won my warranty dispute in court.

TLDR: I'm aussie in queensland. I had a 7800xt with vram/cache/io die issues and attempted warranty, It was denied citing damage from customer misuse. The damage was environmental corrosion on the finstack. After the retailer admitted it was environmental the judge concluded that if it's damaged by the environment it's unsuitable for the aussie market and ordered the retailer to pay the value of the card + fees.

Long version:

I got a sapphire 7800xt Nitro+ back in 2024 and was pretty happy for a while. After maybe 4 to 6 months I started getting ryzen MCEs. I tried the usual steps like stability tests, turning off PBO, memtest, etc. nothing came up.

I RMAed the CPU through AMD (Another story, They were champs) but still nothing, After looking through the MCE logs properly I realise there are 3 errors. MC22, MC5 and data fabric flood event. Garbage data was making it's way into the northbridge causing the CPU to zero out the fabric which in turn would cause which ever core that most recently access it to crash. Over the months I try to replace what I can afford as a form of AB testing. I live in a rural area so there are no shops I can test at. Side note, Apparently the kingston KC3000 has stability issues with ryzen, If you haven't updated the firmware, you should.

I eventually got around to the GPU after a while of denial, Swapped it for my old 2070s and no more MCEs.

I bought the card through Umart, An aussie retailer. I started the RMA process through Umart after attempted it through sapphire directly but apparently they don't support direct warranty in aus. This is where the fun begins.

After the refusal I request they hold onto it as I'm am disputing it along side a detailed reason as to why it was denied and how it wasn't what I thought. I get back 2 images of the heatsink and IO plate with minor corrosion stating damage from customer misuse. One thing to clarify for non aussies, 90% of us live on the coast and salt air is a real thing here. My older 2070s which is 5-ish years old is so corroded the screws no longer work. But it sill OCs to 2100 and sitting at a frosty 65c while missing a fan. Not once did they reference the actual issue I documented or show any evidence as to how and/or why it wasn't what I claimed. It was a classic 'Look there is corrosion, our hands are tied'.

So after ignoring my request, I receive an email stating they have sent it back and to the wrong address. I managed to get it redirected but that was a fun few days.

I continue to escalate the issue, Threatening legal action, Office of Fair Trade and the ACCC. I even threaten to contact the council of steves as this was right around the whole Umart memory warranty fiasco earlier this year. After continued deflection I follow through, Filed with the OFT and ACCC, Emails both GN and HBU and after a month of nothing filed for QCAT.

Another fun little side note and goes to show how mussed up their CS is, The final message I recieved before filing and after the threats was, "1f you would like, we can return the graphics card to you. Please confirm how you would like to proceed.".

After the Umart representative was over an hour late for the hearing, They admitted they never actually tested the GPU for the issues reported citing 'safety issues'. After which the judge concluded that if the device was 'damaged' after environmental exposure to the tropical australian climate, It's not fit for purpose and ordered Umart to pay me the value of the card plus fees.

So not all is lost, Yes I am out a GPU and with prices the way they are I'm gonna be out for a while even with cash in hand. But I still managed to legally tell a retailer to shove it.

u/Quontex — 6 days ago

Ram RMA: one month in, asked for a €1,163 deposit on a €248 kit, then offered two downgrades as “replacements”

Bought a Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB (2x32GB) DDR5-6400 CL32 kit (CMH64GX5M2B6400C32) from a Portuguese retailer for €247.90. One stick failed. Before opening a ticket I did the full troubleshooting routine: BIOS reset and reflash, JEDEC speeds, each stick in every slot, different CPU and PSU, minimal setup outside the case. The problem follows the module.

Here’s how the ticket has gone so far (opened 9 September):

  • Advanced RMA: the deposit was ~€1,163 (charged in USD) for a kit I paid under €250 for. RAM prices have gone up a lot, so I get why the deposit is high, but that’s effectively impossible for a lot of people. I offered a deposit equal to what I paid. Refused.
  • Single-stick RMA: I asked to send just the faulty stick so I could keep working. Fine, but the “closest” replacement offered was a 1x32GB 5200 CL40 module.
  • Escalated: a Tier 3 supervisor offered a full 5600 CL36 kit instead. Better, but still a downgrade.

Corsair’s own warranty says a product is replaced by the same product if available, and only substituted with something similar if it’s unavailable. My kit isn’t discontinued, and Corsair was ready to ship the identical kit on day one through Advanced RMA. In the EU, the legal guarantee also requires the replacement to bring the product into conformity with what you bought.

I’ve said I’d happily take the identical kit or the 6600 CL32 version. The supervisor is “seeing what he can find”, but it’s now been a month.

Has anyone else had Corsair offer downgrades on DDR5 RMAs lately? Did you get a like-for-like replacement in the end, or did you have to go through the retailer?

PS. I understand the current situation with AI, but this is quite literally ilegal to to/offer to a client

https://preview.redd.it/zbp1k3s6rauh1.png?width=558&format=png&auto=webp&s=c1fb938beda256753faf58617b8fb6b541961d49

https://preview.redd.it/5bsjqmm9rauh1.png?width=622&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa65f983a18af2ee9d8f66be27e78da0ec99b6f2

https://preview.redd.it/ot7gmmu9rauh1.png?width=519&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d9a17311a98d6d0fdf140ed44fe59a96eb34d54

reddit.com
u/jozkah — 6 days ago

Razer refused my RMA after I bought the laptop second-hand. Now they’re accusing me of falsifying information.

I’m new to Reddit and English isn’t my first language, so I’m writing this with the help of AI. I’ll keep it short.

I bought a Razer Blade 16 second-hand. The original proof of purchase was provided to me by the seller, and I also have the previous owner’s RMA/service report showing that this exact laptop had already been repaired by Razer.

The laptop developed the same trackpad issues again, so I contacted Razer support.

At first, everything went perfectly. Support approved the RMA, created the shipping label, told me to send the laptop to their repair center in Germany (At the time of starting the rma I was in the US for an internship; my actual residence is in France, and that's where the pc was bought initially), and even told me the repair would take around 3-5 business days after receiving it. I shipped it using the instructions they gave me.

Then things went downhill.

The package apparently got stuck with FedEx. Razer told me they were investigating it and kept telling me to wait all whilst they kept spamming FedEx tickets under my name and email without ever responding to them or picking back up the previous ticket (to the point where FedEx directly emailed me to stop doing so, even if it wasn't me). This went on for weeks.

And today, after weeks of waiting, Razer suddenly CLOSED my case and accused me of providing falsified or doctored information.

Their reason? Something apparently didn't match their records regarding the product registration, proof of purchase, or address information.

I explicitly told them from the beginning that I bought the laptop SECOND-HAND. I provided the original proof of purchase and the previous owner's RMA report.

I genuinely don't understand how buying a second-hand product suddenly makes me a fraudster.

What makes this even worse is that they already approved the RMA, gave me a shipping label, accepted the laptop into their process, and had me send the damn thing away.

Now I'm left without my laptop, and apparently I'm the one being treated like I did something wrong.

I have all the support conversations, documents, photos, and RMA information saved.

Has anyone else experienced something similar with Razer? What can I do from here?

reddit.com
u/TuffT0mmy — 6 days ago
▲ 4 r/GamersNexus+1 crossposts

I was lucky

reddit.com
u/Such-Ad3039 — 7 days ago

ASUS: Two official documents concerning the same RMA contradict each other. What would you do in this situation?

I would like to hear from other ASUS users and people with experience with laptops, computer hardware, and warranty/RMA cases.

I have an ASUS ExpertBook P1503CVA that was submitted to an authorized ASUS service center through the store where it was purchased.

I was not a customer of the service center. The store that submitted the laptop was the service center's customer.

The problem is that I received two official ASUS records concerning the same RMA that contain mutually contradictory information.

The official ASUS RMA system states: “Repair completed.”

However, the official “Repair Report” for the same RMA states that:

  • no repair was carried out,
  • no parts were replaced,
  • the reason given was: “Customer resigned from repair (external screen / monitor works),”
  • the case was classified as CID (Customer Induced Damage) without any technical assessment being carried out.

At the same time, the documentation confirms that the manufacturer's warranty for my ASUS P1503CVA remains valid.

As a result, I have been left with a defective ASUS ExpertBook, a business laptop designed to comply with the MIL-STD-810H standard.

For about a month, I have been trying to obtain a substantive explanation from ASUS/ASUSTeK regarding this discrepancy. I have contacted ASUSTeK Headquarters and official corporate channels. So far, I have not received a clear explanation of why two official ASUS records concerning the same RMA describe completely different outcomes.

This is no longer simply a question of repairing the laptop. My main concern is the discrepancy between the official information contained in ASUS's own service documentation, including the classification of the case as CID without a technical assessment.

Has anyone here experienced a similar situation — particularly one where the ASUS RMA status indicated “Repair completed”, while the official repair report stated that no repair had been carried out and the case was classified as CID without any technical assessment?

What would you do next in a situation like this?

I have the complete documentation of this case available for review, including the official ASUS records and correspondence.

The full background of the case is also described on my Reddit profile.

reddit.com
u/ZB_Online — 8 days ago