Mobile control, agents, and the speed? Amazing. KUDOS to the devs. Please keep going. slow and steady wins the race. And getting it right is paramount. I hope everyone enjoys. I have been trying to post 12 hrs ago.
I’m using Claude for a project I’m working on, but I’ve run out of my Claude quota and have to wait three days before I can use it again.
I can’t stop working on the project, so I’m going to use another AI model for the next three days. I’m currently using Google Gemini 3.6 Flash/High, and I’ll probably use it a lot during this time.
When I can use Claude again, what prompt should I give it so it can understand everything I worked on during those three days?
I want Claude to understand:
I want Claude to be able to continue the project from exactly where I left off, without missing any important information.
I also want Claude to look through the answers Gemini gave me and point out anything that might be wrong, unclear, inconsistent, or needs to be checked again.
What would be the best prompt or process to give Claude so it can catch up on everything and then continue helping me with the project?
Gemini Flash 3.7 in Antigravity (Agy) is honestly insane. The speed, reasoning, and context handling are on another level, and it handled building complex tasks without breaking a sweat. Imho it's much better than Gemini 3.1 Pro.
What really baffles me, though, is why Google hasn't built a native Remote Control feature yet. Claude Code has had seamless remote orchestration nailed down for a while, making mobile workflow effortless.
Instead of waiting, I just used Flash 3.7 directly inside Agy to code a lightweight custom web interface and tunneled it out. Now I can prompt, trigger tasks, and manage Antigravity running on my main rig straight from my phone, even outside my home network.
It works great and shows how capable the model is, but it really feels like something Google should ship out of the box.
It's been quite some time that the notifications coming from antigravity are appearing to me as they're from "jetski"? is anyone else experiencing the same issue? is this a bug with AG or is it just me? am I missing something? wtf is jetski?
gratis 100 dollar credit nih : https://tabitoken.com/sign-up?aff=A37C login dengan Github. dapet CLAUDE FAMILY
How can I get Gemini Pro to use the same reasoning and problem‑solving abilities as Claude Opus? Is there a prompt I can use to make Gemini Pro as capable as Claude Opus? I have a antigravity project I’ve been using Claude opus for, but I’ve run out of use and only have access to Gemini AI.
Hi!
What do you think of the new Antigravity IDE Version: 2.5.4 update?
I noticed for me that the IDE AI model doesn't open files and ask me to approve changes anymore. It just makes the code changes without me seeing anything change in the code editor window, in the middle. I'm not sure I like that.
What do you like or dislike about the new IDE update?
We all vibe code apps and websites but how do i actually test it for vulnerabilities, security bugs, loopholes for hackers. How can i make sure my app or software is safe. I know there are tools like code rabbit. Are there any open source free tools for this. Please do share if you know.
If you're looking for a solution to running Antigravity remotely, give this a shot!
https://github.com/PodkopovP/paseo-antigravity-runner
I've seen a few Antigravity solutions for Paseo, but none of them worked exactly as I wanted (mainly, their solutions provide response times of 6s+ on the most basic of prompts).
This solves all of those issues - 100% remote, almost instant response times, and a few more; and importantly, it's really easy to run in most environments.
Massive credit to the projects this solution is built off of - I really just pointed AI to the solution I wanted here, and it's working pretty well for the most part; I'm actively working on it, as I need a solution in this space.
I switched over to codex on 5.6 luna high and had it redirect full specific edits to agy to save on tokens i don’t use anymore.
gemini 3.6 flash high?
it’s not thinking anymore it just does shit you have to reverse if you can.
please for the love of alan turing fix this shit google and actually let your models THINK
Gave Antigravity a task and checked the thinking after it finished...
“Celebrating Ultimate Departure”
Then bro proceeded to say Bye! 👋 Adios! approximately 47 times 💀
Meanwhile the NullDay app build finished successfully and was ready for Play Console.
Bro shipped the app and immediately retired. 💀
this is what im looking at currently
https://ibb.co/XfbnZCf0
So, something strange has happened…
I have three conversations/projects in AG. My Windows laptop needed to restart for some updates, so I restarted it. After opening AG again, the three projects were still there.
For two of the projects , I was able to find the conversation connected to them through the “Past Conversations” button (or History button..... whatever it’s called). These are the two projects I’ve recently made edits or updates to.
However, the third project is one I haven’t worked on for around two weeks. The strange thing is that when I open the History/Past Conversations button, the only three conversations that come up are the two correct ones and one completely wrong conversation that I abandoned a long time ago — it says it was from two months ago.
So my question is: where is the conversation I was working on 2–3 weeks ago, and how can I find it?
When I load the third project folder into AG, it doesn’t automatically load the previous conversation, and I can’t seem to find it anywhere.
Is there another way to search for or recover a conversation associated with a specific project folder?
Skills.google >>> dropped yesterday...
Hey guys my annual Google pro subscription is ending soon and want to see if it worths switching to Codex or not.
Has anyone switched to Codex from Antigravity?
Is Codex better? What do you suggest?
In terms of tokens you get on your pro plan are you able to actually do things or it runs out of weekly quota soon?
I tried claude few months ago but it was running out of tokens quite quickly that literally made it impossible to do anything.
-- i looking for a comparison from google pro (£20/month) to openai Plus plan (£20/month)
Can you elaborate on this please?
I am just controlling context window by telling the current conversation to go through the history of the current and other conversations in the current project.
Also, it always have to follow our global rules and safeguards etc.
If I want to do something in an other conversation, I paste the walkthrough.md to it and tell it to get informed.
Is this correct for getting the most out of context and token usage?
Please elaborate on your harnessing and other techniques.
I don't know why but even 3,1 pro (high) has difficulty in following normal design constraints
Claude sonnet 5 is much better in that regard, for some reason even after providing a design. md file it just cant seem to follow instructions there, messing up the colors the contrast and design.
What should I do to make it capable of making premium aesthetic design choices?
