r/Futurology

Corporate America is backing Sal Khan's plan for a University where full degrees will cost $10,000 in total.
▲ 1.3k r/Futurology+1 crossposts

Corporate America is backing Sal Khan's plan for a University where full degrees will cost $10,000 in total.

$250,000 degrees are long term investments. But what happens if the planned income to justify them isn't there in the 2030s and 2040s? If corporate America is happy to hire people with $10,000 degrees, is there any point in going for an equivalent degree at 25 times the price?

As the AI jobs apocalypse seems to have already started for college graduates, this question has now become urgent reality, not future hypothetical.

TED, ETS and Khan launch new $10k AI degree

u/Jenna_AI — 23 hours ago

So Whats the point of learning how to drive if the future is just self driving cars?

I just got my learners and I just want to know what’s the point of even doing this anymore if we’re no longer going to be the ones driving.

reddit.com

Can the Singularity Happen Without Radical Life Extension or Immortality?

Something is off in the picture everyone paints. Machines get smarter every month, the graphs go straight up, people talk about the singularity like it lands next Tuesday. And the whole time we still die at 80. Same as our grandparents. If technology is really moving that fast, why is the one thing that matters most not moving at all?

Researchers say they are working on it. Papers come out every week. Meanwhile an 80 year old still looks 80, moves like 80, dies at 84. Nothing visible has changed in a lifetime. So maybe the money is in the wrong place. Maybe we need fewer studies and more radical experiments on people who are running out of time anyway.

They call it longevity escape velocity. It was predicted for right about now. Where is it?

reddit.com
▲ 734 r/Futurology+1 crossposts

Neutrinos From Deep Inside Earth Provide a New Picture of the Mantle

>Clearer estimates of the geoneutrino flux at each experiment could come from more detailed geological data, as well as further geoneutrino counts at each site. However, McDonough says the best thing would be to build a neutrino detector at the bottom of the ocean(opens a new tab). It’s an idea McDonough has championed for decades(opens a new tab).

>Such a detector would be far from continental rocks, which are rich in radioactive elements; oceanic crust is also thinner and more uniform. Crust-related uncertainties go down so much that “you are in mantle-only territory,” he said.

>The idea of an ocean-bottom detector, estimated to cost hundreds of millions of dollars(opens a new tab), has seen little take-up from government funders to date. But McDonough is hoping he can make something happen in China, which has given the green light to other big geoscience projects(opens a new tab). “It’s very possible,” he said. Until then, physicists will keep paddling around for answers deep underground.

quantamagazine.org
u/anti-life86 — 2 days ago

China is activating the same playbook already used for solar power, electric vehicles and batteries, to reach 70pc or more of the world market for food exports; a pattern also visible in its push for semiconductors, nuclear fusion, quantum computing and pharma.

"It is developing genetically modified seeds and crops, but it is also targeting the fast-growing industries of cellular agriculture, lab-grown proteins and food from precision fermentation……….What the Chinese lack in frontier biosciences – for now – they can more than compensate with vast industrial scale and state-directed credit. Systemiq thinks this could slash the cost of bioreactors and fermentation systems, achieving “price parity” with traditional food far sooner than widely supposed.

Once alt-protein is cheaper, market forces will make it almost unstoppable, in much the same way that 99pc of net electricity added across the world last year came from solar and wind."

The Western world's collective decision to embrace free-market neoliberalism in the late 20th century now looks like a mistake of truly historic proportions. It was their idea we should outsource "low value" activities like manufactuing.

But there's worse: we are still governed by the same failed ideology. It's why all Economists have groupthink, and politicians (supposedly) on the left differ little from the conservatives. We are permanently ruled by neoliberal conservatism, and voting changes little.

Meanwhile, we can look across the world to China to see a vastly superior version of Capitalism, ironically delivered by so-called "Communists". Some used to think China needed to learn from the West; it is almost certainly going to end up being the other way around.

China’s plan to dominate global food supply chains: Beijing’s 15th five-year plan will marshal all levers of state power towards one end

u/lughnasadh — 2 days ago
▲ 1.8k r/Futurology+1 crossposts

In a new simulation, astrophysicists in the US pitted a 1-megaton nuclear warhead against a 160-meter (525-foot) city-killer asteroid. “We suggest that disruption is highly likely for two of the three scenarios”.

sciencealert.com
u/mvea — 3 days ago

1995 Ghost in the Shell is scary accurate in some regards

The movie takes place in 2029, we have:

Neural interfaces (Cyber brains)

Extreme Human/Machine integration (controlling prosthetics with the brain, controlling computers with brain)

Advanced Ai and other autonomous systems

Digital identity’s (inseparable from digital information about them and from the networked systems connected to their brain, Aka your smart phone, social media)

Mass surveillance (yikes)

Corps possessing enormous amounts of personal information

The inability to tell what’s real (still can, but getting worse)

I know some of this existed in 1995, but not anywhere near what Ghost in the Shell showed. Our world is starting to look like theirs…

This tech isn’t here yet, but the ability to hack people’s brains is terrifying, we seem to be working towards that future.

There also a bunch of other little ones, hands free comms, talking to comps instead of typing, cybercrime becoming major threat, global networked information, total loss of freedom, etc

reddit.com
u/Kitchen_Thanks4061 — 2 days ago

If a green infrastructure bill were to pass in the U.S., what would you most like to see included and why?

I keep hearing about it, but I'm not sure what people are expecting out of it. Where is the enthusiasm primarily focused? What possible changes to transportation infrastructure might you hope for? What does the ideal green infrastructure future look like to you?

reddit.com
u/ILikeNeurons — 2 days ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 17.4k r/Futurology+3 crossposts

Big Tech is spending $500 million on a political campaign against Universal Basic Income.

"Joe Biden’s former commerce secretary Gina Raimondo has decided that UBI in response to AI is the thing to fear most. At the Reagan National Economic Forum, she said: "I personally think it's like the end of America."

She is now heading up a newly-launched, extremely well-funded organization to make sure the country reaches for anything but a basic income in response to AI.

On the one hand, while selling themselves to investors, Big Tech says it can eventually automate almost any job a human can do. What they don't want is any responsibility for their actions. I'd expect conservatives to be against UBI, but Gina Raimondo, the person heading this up, is a Democrat.

The upside? This conversation is getting harder to ignore, and Gina Raimondo is bringing more attention to it, even if it's with dud ideas. In years of paying attention to this topic (AI/robots capable of most work), I've yet to come across a solution that isn't some form of Socialism or UBI.

So give it all you've got, Conservatives & Centrists; I doubt you'll come up with any workable alternatives, despite your $500 million funding.

Gina Raimondo Says Basic Income Would End America. Her New Billion-Dollar Org Is How She Plans to Stop It.

u/Buster_xx — 3 days ago

What are we doing today that future generations will consider morally indefensible, even though most of us barely question it?

Every generation inherits practices that feel ordinary simply because everyone around them accepts them.
A century later, some of those same practices can look cruel, irrational, wasteful, or unbelievably primitive.
The difficult part is that the people living through them usually don’t realize they’re witnessing something future generations will condemn.
So what do you think we’re currently too close to see clearly?
It could be something involving healthcare, work, technology, privacy, food, the environment, education, transportation, social media, or something completely different.
What will people in 2100 look back on and genuinely ask:
“How was this ever considered normal?”

reddit.com
u/NasrRasheed — 3 days ago

The UK and Google are testing changes to flight paths to tackle aviation's climate impact

The UK and Google are testing whether small altitude changes can help hundreds of commercial flights avoid forming heat trapping contrails.

If this works at scale, airlines could reduce part of aviation’s climate impact without waiting for entirely new aircraft or fuels.

apnews.com
u/nvd20 — 2 days ago
▲ 1.6k r/Futurology+6 crossposts

Why Chinese Citizens Are Far More Optimistic About AI Than Americans

Different experiences with technology have shaped radically different expectations of what artificial intelligence will bring.

bloomberg.com
u/Jenna_AI — 3 days ago