r/AntiDetectGuides

I see beginners learn that sharing the exact same User-Agent across multiple accounts causes instant bans. So they go into their antidetect browser, hit the randomize button, and don't even look at what the software actually assigned them.

Half the time, a cheap randomizer will hand you a User-Agent string for Chrome version 98 on Windows 8.5, or some obscure Linux build.

Anti-fraud systems look at that and immediately flag the session. Normal internet users aren't browsing modern sites on a five-year-old browser version. The general public updates their browsers automatically. If your UA string says you are on an ancient setup, you stick out from 99% of normal traffic.

Yes, you need a unique User-Agent for every single profile to avoid getting linked. But those UAs need to actually make sense in the real world. You want to look like a brand new device, but a modern one. Always verify that your software is giving you the most current, mainstream browser versions before you log in.

Do you guys manually check and restrict your User-Agents to only match the current monthly Chrome release, or do you just trust your antidetect browser's default randomizer to keep the versions updated?

Please help a nubie 🙏

Edit:

Which of the three options is riskier?

1. Go through with sms and passport verification on this bad proxy setup
2. Switch to Mobile proxy on a mobile device for the verification step
3. Delete existing unverified account, create a new one on mobile proxy but if they store the information about the user with bad proxy, I have a problem. My First name is plastered all over the existing account (username, profile name and it's even in the email adress). I will have to use it during verification with passport picture on the new account. This might link the account with bad proxy with account that I want to create

Old post:

What do you think would be less suspicious: to finish account creation on the same setup that I started or switch to mobile proxy? They are still gonna ask for sms verification (my friend in the country of IP will help me with that). Maybe somewhere around that sms verification they will also be checking my proxy more vigorously…

The account is for Fiverr and it likes to ban its users’ account for the smallest things sometimes.The IP is Poland, right now I have ISP proxy from Brightdata that draws many suspiciouns, bans and Captchas on many websites.Suspitiously, the Internet Service Provider is Ukranian even though the IP is in Poland. Decodo and Oxylab don’t even have Polish IPs

Please help 🙏. I'm new to this but I read Reddit for couple of days 😅.

I need antidetect browsers and proxy to create Fiver account for Poland (I'm in. And I don't want it to get banned later on.

Is it normal that different antidetect browsers with ISP proxy (from Bright Data) cannot access Google search, Facebook, Scamalytics among other websites? And I'm often getting checkbox captcha and sometimes I cannot go through it.

I tried Dolphin{anti}, Gologin and Multilogin. Only Gologin doesn't not get detected on Iphey. But on all of them Iphey detects the use of proxy.

Is it a problem with proxy, antidetect browsers, fingerprint? Should I create cookies before going on Fiver or don't bother?

About fingerprint:

-Only thing that seems weird about fingerprint is the screen size that gologin profile creates (1536*842). When I try to increase it they put a warning sign, like it's not recommended to do so.

-The language doesn't seem to matter for proxy getting detected

About proxy:

-I chose dedicated ISP proxy on Bright Data. I don't wanna risk getting residential and have IP change in the middle of the session. I read that you cannot always trust sticky sessions. Also they are too short on Bright Data (up to 30 min). Don't wanna use less trustworthy proxy provider.

-For some reason the proxy belongs to Ukrainian Internet Service Provider even though the Proxy is for Warsaw (Poland). Kinda suspicious 🤔. But people are saying that Bright Data proxies are the best...

-Other things about this proxy might be suspicious according to IP2Location:

Usage Type (DCH) Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit

Address Type (U) Unicast

Category (IAB19-11) Data Centers

Fraud Score 99

Is Proxy Yes

Proxy Type (VPN) VPN Server

Domain ukrtelecom ua

I want to know if there is any tool can help with the safe multi-account management for social media.
Constant logins/logouts, app-hopping, platform tracking, and the cost of extra phones… I experience this absolutely and know how chaotic it can get.
I've heard tools like cloud phone, anti-detect browsers and some social media schedule tools—but there are too many service providers in the market and I want real experiences, no ads thx. So which tool actually works for juggling multiple accounts? Pros, cons, horror stories… spill it all.
Would really appreciate your insights or any suggestion, thanks in advance~

I see a lot of people trying to scale up their operations by moving their antidetect browsers onto a cheap Windows VPS. You set up your residential proxy, the IP score is perfect, but you still get instantly banned the second you hit the registration page.

The problem is usually hardware acceleration. Most basic virtual private servers do not have a physical graphics card. Because of this, when the browser tries to render visual elements, it is forced to use a software-based fallback instead of real hardware.

If you run a fingerprint test on your VPS, scroll down and look at the WebGL Unmasked Renderer field. If it says something like Google SwiftShader or Microsoft Basic Render Driver, you are dead on arrival.

Every major anti-fraud system knows that real consumers browse social media or e-commerce sites on laptops or phones with actual Intel, AMD, or Apple silicon chips. The only traffic coming from a SwiftShader renderer is automated bots running on data center servers. Even if your antidetect software attempts to spoof a high-end Nvidia card, the underlying software rendering engine often bleeds through the canvas drawing tests.

Are you paying the premium for bare-metal servers with actual dedicated GPUs, or did you just give up on the cloud and start building physical PC rigs in your house to run your profiles?

I’ve been trying different setups because the usual browser profiles start to feel unreliable once you scale. It works at first, but eventually things start overlapping or acting weird between accounts. Right now I’m just looking for a cleaner setup where each account can run independently without affecting the others, something more stable long-term.

I see “unique fingerprint” used a lot in anti-detect browser discussions, but I’m curious how people here actually think about it.

Is the goal to look completely unique, or just to look normal enough not to stand out?

Feels like a lot of people mix up fingerprint randomization, fingerprint consistency, and just looking suspicious in a different way.

What’s your take?