So I've been hearing this ridiculous thing about governments throughout the world wanting to classify so called "incels" as a terrorist threat, which is completely ridiculous.

First of all, how do you even know someone is an incel? Because they went online and said something mean about women? People get called incel for all sorts of reasons. Even married men do. The definition can be abused to suit whatever agenda people want.

There's also the fact that the vast majority of incels are peaceful, and aren't a danger to anyone except themselves. The idea that every single deselected man is secretly an Elliot Rodger type is nothing but anti male propaganda used to demonize struggling men.

The word incel needs to be rejected as it is a slur used to demonize men. And men must fight against any propaganda aimed at them.

As a gamer and someone who does not want feminist propaganda shoved in my face against my will, the idea that a developer would consult a feminist organization like Sweet Baby Inc is insulting. It is a punch in the face to gamers, the majority of whom are male.

The fact is, women simply are not interested in video games. Maybe a minority are, but the vast majority are not. Men and women's interests are inherently different. The idea that a male dominated hobby must change to suit the whims of feminists is a slap to the face of gaming's core audience. Men do not demand that franchises like Twilight or 50 Shades of Grey change to suit a male audience, so what right do they have to demand franchises we enjoy change to suit them?

As someone who is a writer myself, I would find it insulting if this organization tried to shove feminist themes into my work. I want my work to be misandry free. Not to be tainted by their poisonous ideology.

Men must defend their spaces against women and gatekeeping is necessary for that reason, otherwise feminists will run amok and destroy them.

I believe the most condensed form of misandry is conscription (and possinly MGM). So conscription is bascially slavery. Sure, you might come up with a made-up distinction but for all intents and purposes it's unfree labour and it's disgusting. I am REALLY annoyed when people even take issue with men expressing their disapproval of the fact that they are drafted solely because of their gender. Go to a thread about the war in Ukraine on an European subreddit. Someone is bound to bring up the fact that only men are drafted as an injustice and then the replies are "well what are they supposed to do?' IDK, if Ukraine is so desperate for people they might try drafting women too. Or "well sure human rights can be curtailed during war". Well why is it that only men's rights are curtailed. Or "but you enjoy the stuff the state gives you and need to give back". Sure but women also get services from the state and apparently they are freed from that obligation. When we talk about peacetime military service in countries like Finland and Austria the gaslighting gets out of control. I'm not kidding, all of these countries that have a male-only draft specificly exclude that fact from their constitutional equality clauses by using the excuse that "the male draft clause takes precedence because its a more specific clause". This is a totally made-up and nonsensical concept meant to shup men up about that issue. And again I'm calling Europe out because in all the countries with male conscription that men have sued for discrimination they have used this justification for upholding the law. So just saying "it's not discrimination because it says so in the constitution even though we have equality laws" is not a real argument and is not tackling the issue. There are studies on how conscripts' lives are lagging compared to non-draftees and it's not trivial stuff. Less income overall, throughout all of their lives, which for some reason is not considered worth talking about, more prone to alcoholism, etc etc. But none of those issues can be brought up for discovery in a lawsuit because "well the constitution says its not discrimination and therefore you don't have a case". Disgusting. Also I want to talk about how it's really the women who benefit from men being drafted. Yes, it's not some abstract "state" that benefits from the male-only draft. It's women because they get to live in a country that's being protected only by men. Also there is civil service as an option and the men have to work for basically no pay in hospitals or fire departments. And women can't be made to do any of that because this form of forced labour is only permitted as an alternative to doing military service and of course women are not made to do military service. That's why women had the audacity to in majority to keep the draft for men in Switzerland AND Austria in 2013 just to gaslight them and say "BuT iT's MeN DrAftinG oThEr MeN". So yeah, the male draft issue is the most important one and it fully exposes the nature of male oppression. The gaslighting needs to stop.

In my language we have a saying that roughly translates to "to weave a whip that you'll get beaten with". English equivalent would be "dig holes under yourself" I guess.

Men regularly partake in supporting agendas that end up being used to harm them both systematically and on everyday social level (and are actually used almost exclusively to bash on men), and in fact other than trying to gain status these are the only things a lot of them put any time and energy into.

In this post I'll outline some of them.

1. Homophobia:

Why is it anti-male: one thing is that it only goes one way. Same retards that rave about gays salivate over lesbians and have no problem with them, at best they'll do some 'durr durr these are mentally ill pink haired cat ladies, they were brainwashed' lip service, instead of harassing and slandering them the same way they do to male homosexuals.

Another thing is that even if you're a straight man you will most likely still get bashed as homosexual at some point in your life, as funny as that sounds.

There is myriad of things that can get a man accused of being homosexual, clothing, interests, haircut, way he talks, moves or looks like etc.

When confronted with that men like to pull out the usual 'it's not me, it's all the other guys' cope, 'no no, me? I'm so masculine, nobody would ever say I'm gay to demean me!' meanwhile for example you have even the most masculine presenting redpill copers/conservatives regularly getting accused of being closeted.

This has a morbidly funny consequence - due to sheer amount of constant homosexuality accusations men face, and because of actual number of straight men vs gay men, if you just went with sheer flat number then there are more instances of straight men experiencing homophobia then honest to god gays.

On the other hand a woman can dress and act however she wants, nobody will say that she's a lesbian based just off of that (and even if, like I already wrote, that doesn't really do anything to women) - if anything, a lot of guys are happy about women taking up male interests or clothing/presentation.

Simply put, homophobia is an issue that's almost exclusively faced by men, if you're homophobic man you're screwing yourself over.

2. Racism:

Why is it anti-male: gender bias/preferences triumph racial preferences by miles, it's not even comparable.

Almost all racist rhetoric is aimed exclusively at men of any given race, and even on rare occasions when not - just like with lesbians, it's just a lip service. Men support all manner of bizarre claims and demonization of their gender when it's about men of another race, most recent example would be supposed UK grooming gangs.

Over the years I've observed people from circles that are most ardent about race theory...shack up with ethnic women and even have multiple children with them.

I'm sorry, how can you rave about racial differences, superiority/inferiority and talk like we're different species for years, and then go shack up and reproduce with a woman who is member of supposedly inferior race? What does this say about your actual beliefs and motivations?

Most right wingers are bitchmade and just wave it away as some "haha, hehe, I'm such silly billy, shacking up with ethnic women when I'm so racist" joke, so I'll tell you what it says - all their beliefs are smokes and mirrors, everything they do is trying to get status by bashing other men so that women will shack up with them.

Much more could be said but that's for another thread.

Point is - if you're racist man, you're supporting male bashing and screwing yourself over.

3. Transphobia

Why is it anti-male: I'm not a big fan myself of trans circles due to rampant misandrist behavior I've seen from them over the years, but that's besides the point - trans issue has got to be the biggest smokes and mirrors that men have got duped into being invested in.

Men have myriad of issues, yet right wing/conservative men obsess over what is probably far, far less than a percentile (percentile, not a percent!) of population. Not to mention that the whole thing has somewhat got men who claim to be against feminists side with some of the most radical offshoots of feminism (and that's saying something considering how hateful and radical feminism is in the first place).

Over the years time and time again I've seen the trans discourse prompt even self-proclaimed misogynists into quasi-religious women worshiping behavior - "bla bla bla femininity is divine and you can't fake it" etc.

Needless to say, this has been perhaps one of greatest maneuvers of duping men into sucking off their own enemies, ignoring their own actual issues and propping up female oppression myths that I've witnessed in my life. I'm almost in awe.

4. Pedo smearing

Little clarification before some redditor screenshots this and does that thing where they pretend to be socially stunted in order to misinterpret your point on purpose - by "pedo smearing" I mean accusing men of pedophilia without any evidence.

Why is it anti-male: people only throw pedophilia accusations around like candy when it comes to men. Nobody accused women of being pedophiles as a gag reflex, even though they're capable of it and partake in it as well.

It's also a go-to way to smear low status men - if you're ugly looking male and you're low status, 100% you've been called a pedo or suggested to be a pedo, either to your face or behind your back. Sometimes I joke that it's almost rite of passage.

Why is it this way? Cause people hate men in the first place, and they're looking for any way to justify that hate. They actually WISH you were a pedo so that they could feel justified in their sadism.

It's particularly insidious too - it's obvious that people hate pedophiles with passion, so by smearing you like this people basically are hoping that they'll indirectly get someone to harm/kill you. 

Another thing - morbid but needs to be talked about - why pedo hunters only hunt male pedos? Can you name a single pedo hunting group that had male decoys/hunted female preds? 

Do you think that if you made fake account of a handsome underage boy, there wouldn't be women interested? There would be, dozens upon dozens, avalanche of cases where female teacher slept with male students shows that.

So why is nobody interesting in catching female predators? Cause it's another thing that got co-opted into punishing and demonizing men, FFS it's so bad that a lot of people out there think that only men can be pedophiles.

My point is, there is something profoundly ironic about group that's most likely to be accused of pedophilia without any evidence (men) virtue signaling about how much they hate pedophiles. Again, tying noose around your own neck.

5. Being against "sexual degeneracy"

Why is it anti-male: people only rave about male masturbation habits, because only male sexuality is seen as inherently harmful. 

Almost nobody talks about rape smut women consume, or the fact that a lot of sex toys for women are shaped like animal genitalia. Recently I've discovered that there are communities of women that are into gore hentai/light smut.

Point is, no matter what you think about any of that - only men are shamed and demonized for their sexual habits in any real capacity.

A lot of men who rave about 'sexual degeneracy' don't see any issue when those acts are performed with a woman, in fact over the years I've seen the exact same types of men proudly boast about sexual acts that by all means would be considered degenerate by their own definition.

Which brings me to another point, partially tied to homophobia I guess - when you look at porn site stats, some of the most popular straight porn categories are blowjobs and anal. 

Can someone explain to me difference in putting your dick in male or female anus? Better yet, how are blowjobs any different from anal sex? You're putting your penis in hole where it doesn't belong purely for the sake of sexual pleasure. Yet almost nobody who raves about 'sexual degeneracy' sees any problem with blowjobs - I could tell you what all that implies but I don't like repeating same things ad nauseam so just look at the end of section on racism again.

My point is, rhetoric about sexual degeneracy is so one sided against one gender that it gets to the point where a woman just partaking in an act magically makes it un-degenerate.

Final thoughts:

These are just obvious few things that came to my mind, when you think about it, in his extreme self hatred almost everything a man puts energy into is against his actual self interest.

Men also suffer from extreme "it's not me, it's all these other guys!" syndrome, that's a topic for another thread in on itself.

They all think that by supporting aforementioned things they'll put other men down and gain status, they have trouble wrapping their heads around the fact that a) almost every single other man thinks the same, sometimes including the very same ones that he's bashing b) they can end up on the chopping block that they've been setting up themselves (it would never be me, I'm a special boy! -again, they don't understand that most other men think the same way).

Thanks for reading!

1) anti-abortion women

semi-based at best. still soft as baby shit. “no jail for the baby-chopper cuz she’s a victim of the patriarchy” they want the moral high ground without the consequences. classic female brain: “killing is bad… unless it’s me doing the killing then it’s trauma 🥺”

2) anti-abortion males (us)

pure. no exceptions. no cope. no “what about the mother’s mental health”. baby gets to live, end of story. Women's feelings ranked somewhere between “irrelevant” and “actively harmful”. based and humanity pilled.

3) pro-abortion boys

mostly NPCs. algorithm-fed, college-brainwashed, or just low-T simps who think “my body my choice” is deep philosophy. some are pure midwits who should be shipped to the nearest gulag for re-education via hard labor and zero wifi. a few are actual psychopaths but most are just ret*rded.

4) pro-abortion women

the final boss of evil. murder apologists who will argue over “consciousness” and “pain capacity” like they’re writing a philosophy thesis while the limbs are still twitching. a) willingly uninformed = willful stupidity b) informed and still chooses it = pure malice + misandry + who*e programming and the sexism s always the same: “men should get vasectomies!!!” never once “women should get their tubes tied if they don’t want kids”. double standard maxxing.