Login

r/Dallasdevelopment

▲ 98 r/Dallasdevelopment+103 crossposts

I Tried ChatGPT to Fix My Resume. Here’s Why It Missed the Point.

Comparing https://resume.zoevera.com against https://chatgpt.com

And what a purpose-built ATS checker caught that GPT-4 didn’t.

Let me be upfront: I use ChatGPT for everything. Code reviews, draft emails, explaining stack traces at 2am. It’s genuinely useful. So when I needed to tailor my resume for a senior backend role, my first instinct was to open a chat window.

That was three weeks ago. Here’s what I learned.

What ChatGPT actually does well

Ask ChatGPT to “improve my resume” and it will:

  • Clean up passive voice (“responsible for” → “led”)
  • Suggest stronger action verbs
  • Add structure and formatting consistency
  • Rewrite vague bullets into something that sounds more impressive

For general writing quality, it’s genuinely good. If your resume reads like it was written by someone who hasn’t slept in 48 hours, ChatGPT will fix that.

What ChatGPT fundamentally cannot do

Here’s the problem: ChatGPT doesn’t know what job you’re applying for.

You can paste the job description into the prompt, sure. But there’s no mechanism for it to:

  1. Score your resume against that specific JD — it has no concept of a match percentage
  2. Identify which keywords are present vs. missing — it will suggest improvements but won’t systematically audit keyword coverage
  3. Know how Applicant Tracking Systems parse text — it will rewrite content without knowing whether an ATS will ever see it

ATS filters work on keyword frequency and placement. A resume that reads beautifully to a human can score 40% on an ATS if the right terms aren’t in the right sections. ChatGPT optimizes for human readers. ATS systems are not human readers.

I ran a test. Same resume, same job description (Backend Engineer, Node.js/AWS stack). I gave ChatGPT the full JD and asked it to optimize my resume for ATS.

The output was well-written. It added “microservices” and “REST APIs” in a few places. But it missed:

  • “AWS Lambda” — mentioned 4 times in the JD, absent from my resume after the rewrite
  • “CI/CD pipeline” — appeared in the required skills section, never added
  • The Projects section — ChatGPT rewrote my experience bullets but left the Projects section untouched, which is where most of my relevant backend work lived

When I ran the same resume through resume.zoevera.com, it flagged all three gaps explicitly, with section-level attribution. The ATS match score went from 54% to 81% after applying the suggested changes.

The core difference: diagnostic vs. generative

ChatGPT is a generative tool. It produces new text. It’s very good at that.

An ATS checker is a diagnostic tool first. It measures the gap between your resume and a specific job description, then tells you exactly what’s missing. The rewrite comes second — and it’s grounded in what was actually identified as absent, not what the model thinks sounds better.

This distinction matters because:

ChatGPT hallucinates improvements. It will add metrics you never achieved (“improved system performance by 35%”), use terminology that
sounds right but wasn’t in the JD, and rewrite bullets that didn’t need rewriting while leaving critical gaps untouched. Every line needsfact-checking.

A purpose-built tool works from the actual gap. The keywords it adds are the ones the JD asked for. The sections it flags are the ones the ATS will score. The output is closer to submission-ready.

A practical workflow

These tools aren’t mutually exclusive. The best result I got came from using both in sequence:

  1. ATS checker first: identify the keyword gaps and get a scored rewrite that closes them
  2. ChatGPT second: use it to polish tone, tighten sentences, and clean up anything that sounds mechanical

The ATS checker handles precision. ChatGPT handles prose quality. Neither does both well alone.

The cost argument

ChatGPT Plus is $20/month. If you’re actively job searching, that’s a fixed overhead whether you use it or not.

Most people search for jobs in windows — a few weeks of active applications, then nothing for months. A per-session model makes more
sense: pay when you need it, nothing when you don’t. ZoeVera’s pricing works that way — free analysis, one-time payment for the full
rewrite, no subscription.

For a developer audience specifically: if you’re applying to 10–15 roles over two weeks, you’re not optimizing resumes 365 days a year. The math on a monthly subscription doesn’t work.

What I’d actually recommend

  • If you just need better writing: ChatGPT is fine and you already have it
  • If you’re applying to roles where ATS filtering is real (any company using Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS): use a dedicated ATS checker first, then polish with ChatGPT
  • If you’re a developer and haven’t thought about this: your resume probably uses technical jargon that means something to you and nothing to an ATS keyword parser. “Built scalable backend” is not the same as “developed microservices architecture using Node.js and AWS ambda” — even if the underlying work is identical

The ATS doesn’t know what you meant. It only knows what you wrote.

Tested against a real Backend Engineer job description. Tools used: ChatGPT GPT-4o, https://resume.zoevera.com. June 2026.

u/Enough_Charge2845 — 1 day ago
▲ 251 r/Dallasdevelopment+1 crossposts

Mavericks and Stars plan to stay at AA Center until 2030-31 season

Dallas Mavericks and the Dallas Stars have resolved their legal dispute and plan to stay at American Airlines Center through the 2030-31 season.

The teams made the announcement in a joint statement on Monday afternoon.

"The Dallas Mavericks and Dallas Stars have reached an agreement that resolves the outstanding matters between the two organizations," the teams said in the joint statement.

keranews.org
u/dallaz95 — 3 days ago
▲ 9 r/Dallasdevelopment

DFW Office Footprints Likely To Shrink As AI Use Increases And Companies Battle For Talent

Source: https://www.bisnow.com/news/dallas-ft-worth/office/dfw-office-footprints-likely-to-shrink-as-ai-use-increases-and-companies-battle-for-talent-135578

While Dallas-Fort Worth’s growth as a financial hub has fueled the region’s flight-to-quality trend, companies are also upgrading their offices as the use of artificial intelligence grows and they compete for the best talent in the metro.

The adoption of AI could help level the playing field for smaller office users as big companies eliminate jobs and move to smaller footprints. But those reduced office footprints will also allow companies to invest in upgraded spaces with more amenities as they seek to attract and retain top talent. A highly amenitized office in a desirable metro area can be a differentiator for companies looking to stand out from the competition.

As office square footage shrinks and AI usage increases, companies like Bradford Commercial Real Estate are shifting their focus toward multitenant buildings rather than those with large floor plates. Bradford Senior Vice President and Managing Partner Richmond Collinsworth said he believes office footprints will continue to shrink due to new technology.

"It's going to eliminate a lot of the process-oriented back office operations, and that's why the front office operations are going to be where you want to focus," Collinsworth said at Bisnow's Future of DFW Office event July 23 at Hotel Dax in Addison.

The growth of AI doesn’t have to mean an elimination of jobs. Transwestern Managing Director Billy Gannon said he's seen companies increase productivity with the technology without losing any of their existing headcount.

Those companies have instead shifted away from hiring new people, which Gannon agreed will continue to impact office footprints going forward. He said he believes companies will increase their use of AI to become more efficient and provide more value to their customers.
That increase in productivity could prompt employers to pay more per square foot for smaller spaces that enhance innovation and connection, according to a CBRE report on AI’s impact on the office environment from February.

"We're just in the first or second inning from an AI standpoint,” Gannon said. “If you're not using AI right now, your competitor is."

The technology won’t eliminate the need for offices, as Gensler Studio Director and principal Lillian Giering said the biggest AI users still crave time with their colleagues. Those clients are seeking more collaboration spaces from the design company.

"Getting together with their colleagues and having those collaboration spaces to discuss their business's strategic plan is really vital," Giering said.

While she agreed that AI's reshaping of the office ecosystem is still in its early stages, things could still change in the years ahead as it hasn't had a huge impact on the way Gensler designs corporate spaces.

However, one thing that has changed in offices with the advent of AI is the requirement for server rooms. Collinswood said those former mainstays have largely disappeared as more tenants move to utilizing the cloud. It’s a change that can offer big cost savings for tenants.
Reducing square footage also allows companies to step up in quality, which can be a big differentiator for those businesses seeking the best people, as Gannon said DFW office users are in a war for talent.

CBRE reported in April that consolidation of operations was one of the top reasons for corporate relocations last year, with seven companies making intrastate moves to DFW to right-size their total square footage to smaller levels.

In addition to a desirable location like Uptown, Giering said cafes and lounge spaces have also become highly requested by clients.

Since the pandemic, companies have been competing with employees’ home offices, so offering a high-end coffee experience or food options can be another differentiator for business, according to Gannon.
He used Rosewood Court in Uptown Dallas as an example of this. The building at 2101 Cedar Springs Road has maintained a consistently low vacancy rate over the past 15 years, but its owner still invested in a high-end coffee experience to entice workers to leave their homes.

The competition for talent has led to companies trying to one-up one another with amenities, Collinsworth said. To be competitive, buildings need a conference facility large enough for tenants to hold larger meetings as well as fitness centers, delis and upgraded corridors.
"If you don't have an amenity that a competing property does, you're at a disadvantage,” Collinsworth said. “If you're not putting those dollars into your properties, other owners are.”

When Quadrant Investment Properties was putting together plans for its nearly $200M mixed-use project Addison Junction, founder Chad Cook said the company was very deliberate in creating experiential amenities that are actually walkable for North Texas.

With the heat consistently blowing past 100 degrees throughout the summer, Cook said Quadrant Investment Properties focused on ensuring there were affordable amenities workers could actually use.

"I don't care what's within a mile … What's within like 0.2 miles and does it have style and panache?" Cook said. "Those are the things that inspire people to pay a little more in rent."

u/dallaz95 — 2 days ago
▲ 18 r/Dallasdevelopment

Some question whether Valley View will really be final landing spot for Mavericks

The intersection of Preston Road and Lyndon B. Johnson Freeway in North Dallas bustled with sights and sounds of the morning rush during a recent visit. Cars weaved past, their horns often blaring, as drivers made their commutes.

But tucked along the highway nearby is a quiet 100-plus-acre site, largely vacant and fenced off, that was once home to Valley View Center. There’s not much left to look at of the former mall that closed around a decade ago.

Fast forward five years to 2031. Instead of a relic of retail past, the land could be home to a new Dallas Mavericks arena within a multibillion-dollar sports and entertainment district.

Or not. While the NBA team announced June 1 that it had selected Valley View as its preferred location for a new arena, the organization says it's still conducting due diligence. It has until early 2028 to close on a land purchase. Attorneys for the Mavericks' owners noted recently the Valley View deal is "purely exploratory" amid a legal dispute with minority owner Mark Cuban.

That has some downtown Dallas backers hopeful the team could come back to the city's urban core, perhaps with an arena at the current site of Dallas City Hall. The hub of municipal government is currently mired in a debate about whether to relocate, with many city insiders arguing the building at 1500 Marilla St. is outdated and repairs aren't worth the cost.

For preservationists, the idea of abandoning the I.M. Pei-designed building and moving City Hall elsewhere is a clear example of what's wrong with Dallas. Critics have raised questions about the transparency of the process and say the city is too eager to throw away a key piece of its history in order to court new development.

The Mavericks have tried to remain out of the City Hall fray in recent months. For an organization that has been under fire since the February 2025 trade of Luka Dončić, there is a lot riding on the arena decision. With the team planning to depart the American Airlines Center in Uptown Dallas when its lease there expires in 2031, the clock is ticking — and whatever the outcome, the decision will impact key swaths of the city for years to come.

The site of the old Valley View mall on June 2, 2026. The NBA's Dallas Mavericks have selected the site of the demolished mall in North Dallas as the site for their next arena.

'If you have options, you're not committed'

Valley View might not seem like a likely site for a new multibillion-dollar arena district.

It spent much of the past half-century as a lively retail hub for North Dallas after Sears opened there in the 1960s, which was followed by the mall's opening in 1973. It flourished as a popular shopping destination and hangout through the 1980s before increased competition from nearby centers like NorthPark and Galleria Dallas took a toll.

The mall mostly closed in 2015, and staged demolition began that year. Final demolition of the remaining structures was completed in May 2023. The vacant site has remained a thorn in the city's side.

Owner Beck Ventures, headed by Scott Beck, has over the years pitched various redevelopment proposals, including a grand mixed-use district called Dallas Midtown and what was called the International District. Beck declined to comment for this story.

Everything changed when the Mavericks announced earlier this summer their plans for a new arena at Valley View. The team said at the time the site met "most of the criteria" for its search and pointed to the opportunity to create "a vibrant mixed-use destination anchored by a state-of-the-art arena, along with restaurants, entertainment options, public green spaces and family-friendly experiences." The Mavericks have entered into options agreements for 104 acres at the site, meaning it has the right to buy the land at a future date.

The Mavericks have declined multiple Dallas Business Journal interview requests. In response to a recent DBJ story, Chief Communications Officer Gina Miller told the Dallas Morning News that the team was "still fully committed to Valley View" and "doing our due diligence." She emphasized to the publication that the team was "100% focused on doing the due diligence necessary to get this deal done."

But the Mavericks have until January 2028 to close on the land. Until then, the team's owners are on the hook for six-figure monthly payments, according to securities filings by Seritage Growth Partners, a publicly traded company that owns a portion of the Valley View site.

The options payments total $126,900 per month through January 1, 2027, then increase to $274,950 per month through January 1, 2028. The payments are non-refundable and do not count toward the final purchase price. The agreement calls for Arena Development Intermediate LLC, or ADI, a Mavericks subsidiary overseeing the land deal for the team's owners, to ultimately pay around $51 million for the site.

Another example of the vagueness around the stadium: When the Mavericks announced a partnership with Jerry Jones-backed Legends Global to work on the arena in July, the team only referred to a "future venue" without any mention of Valley View. The team has not released any renderings of a future arena district.

Robbie Baty, a partner at HPI who leads the firm's Dallas tenant advisory practice, said while Valley View offers a convenient location and the size needed for the Mavericks, the team appears to be "keeping their options open." He said he "would not be surprised" if the team ultimately passed on Valley View.

"If you have options," he said, "you're not committed."

Prominent real estate developer Ray Washburne, who owns land near City Hall where he has floated plans for a hotel tower, said Valley View "makes no sense" for the Mavericks. The arena and entertainment district should be in a denser, urban area that is supported by mass transit, he argued.

"Valley View doesn't accomplish that," he said.

Washburne believes replacing the City Hall site with an arena and entertainment district would spur broader development and job growth, in downtown Dallas and beyond. That could affect whether he wants to move forward with a hotel near the site.

Dupree Scovell, managing partner of real estate development firm Woodbine Development Corp., agrees. Scovell said he was "disappointed" when he heard about the arena at Valley View because redeveloping the City Hall site would have been "transformational" for downtown. It's not everyday that a multibillion-dollar entity wants to make that type of an investment in the urban core, he added.

Scovell also said it's still "very possible" the team could end up downtown rather than some 12 miles north at Valley View. He noted, however, that it's costly to reverse course once a site is publicly announced and money has been spent on design and consultants.

Another voice questioning the Valley View site is Cuban, who in 2023 sold his majority stake in the Mavericks to the current ownership group led by Miriam Adelson and Patrick Dumont, the family behind casino company Las Vegas Sands Corp. Cuban remains a 27% minority owner.

Cuban filed a pre-suit petition last month targeting Dumont, the Mavericks' governor and CEO of Sands, alleging he and the new ownership group froze him out of the arena development deal. Cuban's legal team called attention to ADI, the Mavericks' subsidiary.

Cuban withdrew his petition against ADI this week and it was dismissed by a Texas Business Court judge, meaning a hearing scheduled for Aug. 14 did not happen. In legal documents Cuban's lawyers claimed victory in forcing ADI to disclose details about its structure and ownership and alluded to plans to continue pressuring the majority owners.

Some Dallas City Council members have expressed concerns that a move farther north by the Mavericks would reduce access for residents of Southern Dallas. During an early June press conference, Council Member Zarin Gracey called an NBA arena a "perfect solution" for the City Hall site.

DBJ reached out to all council members to ask for their thoughts on the new arena and City Hall. Three responded including Council Member Paula Blackmon, who said her initial reaction to the Mavericks' selection of Valley View was that it was "interesting." The site fit the parameters the team's leaders had outlined of finding at least 50 acres for a district for an arena as well as a potential hotel, concert venue, team practice facility and headquarters and a slew of retail options.

But Blackmon, who opposes moving City Hall, said what the Mavericks aim to do would work better in a downtown setting. She called Valley View "mid-suburban" — with the old mall surrounded by a few older office towers as well as low-slung retail centers and traditional neighborhoods — and said rezoning would be necessary for an arena development.

Why Valley View could work

Despite those doubts, others see good reasons for the Mavericks to head north.

Jeff Kitner, president and CEO of the North Dallas Chamber of Commerce, called Valley View "one of if not the most prime site" for development in the entire city. He said the site, located across the highway from his chamber's office, lends itself to the growing trend of sports teams owning the land around their arenas and creating an ecosystem of retail and entertainment that extends beyond game days.

That desire became a point of contention in Victory Park, the development surrounding the AAC. While the area has boomed, the Mavericks and their arena-mates, the NHL's Dallas Stars, have no control over development and receive no revenue from the activity outside the arena's doors.

One of the biggest challenges with the Valley View site would be the lack of public transit, Kitner said. Visitors to the AAC have direct access to the arena from Dallas Area Rapid Transit's light rail system. DART's trains currently don't serve the Valley View site.

Kitner said upon hearing the Mavericks' June 1 announcement, he called DART Board Chair Randall Bryant and asked how they can begin discussions on expanding light-rail to the site. Kitner said Bryant is "all for" the idea, but DART lacks the funds and land to provide train service to the site anytime soon. Kitner said he plans to work with the Mavericks, DART, the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the North Texas Transit Authority on how to bring more transit to the site.

Council Member Gay Donnell Willis, a proponent of relocating City Hall, said she is happy the Mavericks chose to stay in Dallas. While leaders will need to consider factors like traffic and public safety as the Valley View plan progresses, she said the site is a solid one.

Council Member Laura Cadena praised the Mavericks' decision to develop Valley View because it addresses a "long-standing challenge" by bringing new investment to one of the "most valuable undeveloped properties in Dallas."

Another supporter of the Valley View site is Bryan Trubey, founding principal of Dallas-based architecture and urban design firm Overland International. Trubey previously worked at Dallas-based HKS, known for its work on AT&T Stadium and Globe Life Field in Arlington, in addition to the AAC itself, and many other arenas and stadiums.

Trubey said he was not surprised that the Mavericks chose the Valley View site, venturing an arena could be "quite successful" there. The Mavericks owners have the right idea to make the development a year-round destination and more than just a sports arena, he added.

Challenges facing the Valley View site are not unusual or insurmountable and it has the size needed to accommodate a large number of visitors, Trubey said.

Mike Rawlings, former Dallas mayor and a proponent of redeveloping the City Hall site, believes the Mavericks are serious about the Valley View site and are "planning for Valley View."

Rawlings said the city has wanted to see redevelopment at Valley View for years and an arena could give the site a "rebirth." The land offers its own unique challenges that the Mavericks, the city and surrounding neighborhoods will have to "power through," such as traffic, but the former mayor hopes those conversations can be done in a healthy and productive manner.

But he also noted "none of these things are done until they're done." He said the team did consider downtown, and may still be doing so, noting it offers many benefits that Valley View cannot.

Ties to City Hall debate

The City Hall debate still looms large. Numerous real estate and government sources have indicated the City Hall site remains viable, depending on what the city council decides.

After a quiet July during the normal summer recess, council's relocation debate is heating back up this month. Changes to how council makes real estate decisions, including lowering the threshold for the number of votes needed to leave City Hall, could be discussed August 19 and followed by an August 25 vote. The next day is expected to bring more info from City Manager Kim Tolbert on relocation options as well as a potential vote. Tolbert has said she does not want the City Hall decision to drag on past August.

Supporters of lowering the voting threshold to a simple majority instead of a supermajority call it a way to simplify oversight of the city's immense and aging real estate portfolio. But critics see it as an attempt to change the rules for a City Hall vote at the 11th hour. This feeds into a theory recently voiced online by prominent journalist Jim Schutze and others that the Mavericks remain interested in City Hall and will be ready to shift their focus back downtown if the site becomes available.

Big decisions about the central business district are being made as it's been battered by the announced departures of major tenants, including AT&T and Fifth Third Bank. Those exits could spike downtown office vacancy and exacerbate worries about downtown's future relevancy.

Downtown will also be losing the Stars, who are planning a multibillion-dollar sports and entertainment district of their own in Plano on the current site of The Shops at Willow Bend. Unlike with Valley View, the Stars' plans at Willow Bend have produced slick initial renderings and multiple public meetings with the real estate team. The Stars have secured an estimated $700 million incentives package from Plano.

If not Valley View or City Hall, Sands owns more than 200 acres in Irving, across State Highway 114 near the old Texas Stadium grounds. Irving City Council voted in 2025 to rezone the property to allow for a mixed-use development and resort, although they shot down an attempt to include casino gambling in case it is ever legalized at the state level.

The prospects for development in Irving are uncertain. Sands maintained that the long-term financial model for the resort relied on a casino. Andy Abboud, senior vice president of government relations for Sands, told DBJ earlier this year that getting zoning approval was important but that the company has "done everything in Irving that we need to do right now."

Wherever the Mavericks land, it will have major economic implications for generations to come.

Scovell said downtown Dallas would blossom with a new arena development at the City Hall site. While preservationists point to the iconic design of City Hall, Scovell said the current land use is "not exactly a win" and argued "it has not allowed for development around it."

Scovell called an arena and entertainment district a "once in a two-lifetime opportunity." But that may be all for naught, he noted, as indecision on behalf of city leaders may have cost that chance.

bizjournals.com
u/ActuatorSpecific3916 — 2 days ago
▲ 608 r/Dallasdevelopment+1 crossposts

Klyde Warren Park: The story of the urbanist project that radicalized me

I was born in the Bay Area but spent much of my childhood in various parts of both rural and urban America from California to Pennsylvania. Growing up, I saw great urban design, and terrible (and also literal Amish country mixed in there at one point).

It wasn't until I spent a couple years in uptown Dallas, Texas for work circa 2012 that I witnessed first-hand how a radical transformation from one to the other is possible (at least in one area) by a single well-executed urban project.

That was when Klyde Warren Park opened over the top of what was once the highway that divided downtown Dallas from the city's most densely populated neighborhoods in uptown.

It was an incredible success, but it wasn't until work brought me back to Dallas shortly before the pandemic in 2018 that I saw what it became.

It didn't happen easily. The late urban planner Kevin Sloan, who surfaced the idea in 1996, found few believers. Urbanism wasn't in the culture. With some help from the Dallas Institute of Humanities, he spent years trying to rally support before some key leaders in the commercial real estate community came onboard during the early 2000s.

It took years and millions of private dollars to build any meaningful progress toward making it a reality. A feasibility study in 2004 built momentum. So did the ARRA of 2009, signed by President Obama. It took 16 years, but in 2012 it opened for the first time. In 2024, it expanded.

It was completely transformational. The population of the square mile adjacent to the park's north side grew by 50% in 5 years, becoming the single densest square mile in the state of Texas at nearly 22k people.

Today, KWP is the epicenter of Dallas, the social town square, and the most popular outdoor gathering space in the city. 15 years ago, it was just a congested freeway connecting three other freeways near the city's center. Today, its 5.4 acres welcomes more than 1.5 million visitors per year.

Perhaps even more significantly, it sparked an urbanism movement unlike anything that existed when I was here the first time. Mixed-use high-rise buildings have sprung up on either side of the park (including the new BoA Parkside tower that will be completed later this year), and it's led to a resurgence of both the Arts District (on one side) and lower Uptown (on the other).

It's perhaps driven a bigger wedge between Dallas and its sprawling suburbs, but that's a conversation for another day.

A study by CNU surveyed park users and found 90.9% reported their quality of life was "significantly" improved by the addition of the park. It led to a 61% increase in streetcar ridership. The director of the DC-based Cultural Landscape Foundation called the park the "poster child" for the benefit of capping freeways and it's become a catalyst for other cities.

Four years after KWP's opening, the modified Dallas 360 plan was released. Its entire thesis centers around urban mobility, building public spaces, urban design, and housing growth, citing the success of KWP. Priorities fairly unimaginable in 20th century Dallas made front-and-center by a handful of persistent visionaries.

So far, since KWP opened, Dallas has nearly completed a 50-mile network of pedestrian roads called The Dallas Loop, spawned 4 additional downtown parks, 3 new pedestrian bridges over the river, a copycat park over the highway in nearby Oak Cliff, a plan to expand KWP further west, and plans to replicate it on both the East and South ends of downtown in the coming years.

Urban design takes decades and a city can't change overnight. But sometimes it just takes one well executed project to shift its trajectory. Sometimes dramatically.

Dallas has been home for me since 2018. And while my office these days is in Manhattan now, I've found living between both coasts with quick airport access to have professional perks and I've stayed.

The city still has a long way to go - I'll be reminded of that again when I'm in New York next week. But as long as the momentum continues (despite the hiccups that arise), it's made me a believer in what urbanism can do both here and elsewhere, with one little spark.

u/ActuatorSpecific3916 — 8 days ago