He finally gave her attention!
what’s the verdict now? looks like she’s still in good graces with Elon..
what’s the verdict now? looks like she’s still in good graces with Elon..
Does anyone have any idea why Elon chooses partners that are not extremely attractive and why he cannot find a forever partner?
I had posted this at Ashley forum but the MOD there have issued with Elon for breaking her favorite heart, so I will repost this here!! Again I am surprise maya is doing the posting today not shiv
[I'm using her joyful face as the cover photo when she says she had an intimate relationship with Musk. What joy, what excitement, what happiness!. Love emanates from every part of her body.]
https://questioneverything.substack.com/p/watch-ashley-st-clair-called-me-slimy
Hello ! Although a bit late, I’ve watched Ashley’s latest interview with Brian Reed in its entirety and... wow, what a gem¡¡¡. I saw that she tried to stop the interview. I thought she was trying to stop it because of the amount of nonsense and lies she said during it, at least for the first three-quarters of the beginning, but no, to my surprise what bothered her the most was that the interviewer started "reminding" her of all the things she has said that go against what she now super-defends within the Democrats who fund her. And of course, ASC is worried about not making a career in the Democratic movement. Don't worry, my dear, as soon as they see how prone you are to fabulation, not to say the total absence of reality supporting what you say, they won't take you into account either, but don't worry, time will tell all.
On the other hand, I'm glad to know you read us, Ashley St. Clair. I've proven through this interview, once again, that you dedicate yourself to fabricating facts based on what is posted here, like the timeline we put together. Turns out that now you claim that when you "coincided with Musk in the same city" you were with him. You're saying this now based on the timeline we pulled on you, but let’s take it one step at a time.
Also, for someone who doesn't like Shivon Zilis at all, we don't either, but we'll get to that later, you copy her a little bit. ASC doesn't like being considered a baby mama, but girl, it's what you signed up for.
Before getting into the core of the matter, I have to say it is greatly appreciated that you were finally seen without the 85 filters you put on yourself on TikTok. At least now we know what her real face looks like without looking like a distorted virtual reality avatar. I would take something for the swelling. People out there have said that your face wasn't due to the baby being sick, because of course, we know you can't spend a single day of your life without the utilitarian use of that baby conceived via IVF and that you, of course, did not carry.
On the other hand, you went on the podcast, among other things, to talk about the lawsuit against xAI over Grok's photos of your person. Well, you went with a neckline down to your belly, nothing against it, but let's see, it's not the most coherent thing, but coherence isn't exactly part of your identity; quite the opposite.
The objective of this post is simple: We are going to compare, point by point, ASC’s assertions in the interview with the cold, relentless, and very public reality (flight logs, actual interactions on X, geolocated photos, and her curious timeline with Mike Benz). It’s going to take a long while because I have looked at absolutely everything.
This post serves to understand how a false narrative is constructed, especially now that she's running around with her lawsuit against xAI trying to win the Oscar for victim of the year. Here we go, gorgeous!
According to her, there are a lot of people who know the truth but can't speak, so she has sacrificed herself to be the voice of the people. She claims she had an intimate relationship with Elon Musk starting in May 2023, that he is the father of her child (whom, by the way, she uses as a shield and an excuse whenever it suits her, which is incredibly sad), and that xAI generated millions of images of her.
As I already mentioned, she wanted this interview not to air, claiming that the interviewer "wasn't a real journalist." This coming from her, someone who never studied journalism but sold herself as such for years. What truly hurt her wasn't her supposed truths about Musk, but that at the end they brought up her history of toxic tweets, destroying her dreamed-of rise in the Democratic league. She thinks, or believes, that because she is currently being paraded as a puppet from podcast to podcast, they are going to catapult her to stardom as a Democratic influencer: but no, my dear, because more than helping them, she is sinking them because her contradictions are such that anyone who dives a little into what she says will realize she's lying. They don't need enemies because they already have her.
We know that for Reid Hoffman to have come forward to talk about Musk, given the dubious nature of his moral behavior as a close friend of Epstein and a puppet of Gates, the situation must be complicated. Even after sending her to every Democratic podcast they could. Well, let´s go.
But let’s look at the Real Schedule (Total Divergence):
However, when Brian Reed asks her about Musk's psychology, her answers become abstract and generic: “what he wanted me to know at various times,” “very different versions depending on the circumstances,” “he was very different before and after I got pregnant.” [We repeat, this girl started fabricating photos of herself as pregnant. Proving she was pregnant is as easy as showing an ultrasound, and we know she couldn't even get the gestational age right in court].
In other words, when asked for concrete details about the person she supposedly spoke with every day for nearly two years, she only offers vagueness. Speaking of versions, I think she’s talking about herself, because depending on the podcast she goes to, she tells a different story: one day it's an online relationship, another a romantic relationship, another sexual, another a situationship... I don't know, dear, get your story straight, because honestly...
Furthermore, she claims there are things “that sound crazy” about how Musk grew up and his relationship with his parents that prove he is “very broken in many ways,” but that she would never share them publicly because they are too personal.
This is especially striking because:
Conclusion The intimate relationship and daily messages are a house of cards in the wind. The evidence shows a single real photo at a work event, a mutual agreement for interactions on X to pump the algorithm (and her bank account), and a fantasy fed by public posts while she spent her time with other people. When they have been in the same city, each was with different people and in different places, and anyway, maybe in all her madness, she should stop bringing out fake evidence because it is super obvious that it's going to hurt her in any trial. Perhaps it's just because she doesn't have the brainpower for even that.
Later, I'm going to continue with the XAI thing because that's very surreal.
Speak up.
Welcome to ElonChat_Commentary.
What would this sub be about without you? 😂🥂✨
She’s definitely reading Reddit. (& is very Bothered)
Mind you it’s not getting a lot of traction because people can read between the lies. Elon would publicly talk about someone he cares about he did for all the women he loved.