[I'm using her joyful face as the cover photo when she says she had an intimate relationship with Musk. What joy, what excitement, what happiness!. Love emanates from every part of her body.]

https://questioneverything.substack.com/p/watch-ashley-st-clair-called-me-slimy

Hello ! Although a bit late, I’ve watched Ashley’s latest interview with Brian Reed in its entirety and... wow, what a gem¡¡¡. I saw that she tried to stop the interview. I thought she was trying to stop it because of the amount of nonsense and lies she said during it, at least for the first three-quarters of the beginning, but no, to my surprise what bothered her the most was that the interviewer started "reminding" her of all the things she has said that go against what she now super-defends within the Democrats who fund her. And of course, ASC is worried about not making a career in the Democratic movement. Don't worry, my dear, as soon as they see how prone you are to fabulation, not to say the total absence of reality supporting what you say, they won't take you into account either, but don't worry, time will tell all.

On the other hand, I'm glad to know you read us, Ashley St. Clair. I've proven through this interview, once again, that you dedicate yourself to fabricating facts based on what is posted here, like the timeline we put together. Turns out that now you claim that when you "coincided with Musk in the same city" you were with him. You're saying this now based on the timeline we pulled on you, but let’s take it one step at a time.

Also, for someone who doesn't like Shivon Zilis at all, we don't either, but we'll get to that later, you copy her a little bit. ASC doesn't like being considered a baby mama, but girl, it's what you signed up for.

Before getting into the core of the matter, I have to say it is greatly appreciated that you were finally seen without the 85 filters you put on yourself on TikTok. At least now we know what her real face looks like without looking like a distorted virtual reality avatar. I would take something for the swelling. People out there have said that your face wasn't due to the baby being sick, because of course, we know you can't spend a single day of your life without the utilitarian use of that baby conceived via IVF and that you, of course, did not carry.

On the other hand, you went on the podcast, among other things, to talk about the lawsuit against xAI over Grok's photos of your person. Well, you went with a neckline down to your belly, nothing against it, but let's see, it's not the most coherent thing, but coherence isn't exactly part of your identity; quite the opposite.

The objective of this post is simple: We are going to compare, point by point, ASC’s assertions in the interview with the cold, relentless, and very public reality (flight logs, actual interactions on X, geolocated photos, and her curious timeline with Mike Benz). It’s going to take a long while because I have looked at absolutely everything.

This post serves to understand how a false narrative is constructed, especially now that she's running around with her lawsuit against xAI trying to win the Oscar for victim of the year. Here we go, gorgeous!

Ashley’s Central Premise: "I am the only chosen one". She and her narcissism.

According to her, there are a lot of people who know the truth but can't speak, so she has sacrificed herself to be the voice of the people. She claims she had an intimate relationship with Elon Musk starting in May 2023, that he is the father of her child (whom, by the way, she uses as a shield and an excuse whenever it suits her, which is incredibly sad), and that xAI generated millions of images of her.

As I already mentioned, she wanted this interview not to air, claiming that the interviewer "wasn't a real journalist." This coming from her, someone who never studied journalism but sold herself as such for years. What truly hurt her wasn't her supposed truths about Musk, but that at the end they brought up her history of toxic tweets, destroying her dreamed-of rise in the Democratic league. She thinks, or believes, that because she is currently being paraded as a puppet from podcast to podcast, they are going to catapult her to stardom as a Democratic influencer: but no, my dear, because more than helping them, she is sinking them because her contradictions are such that anyone who dives a little into what she says will realize she's lying. They don't need enemies because they already have her.

We know that for Reid Hoffman to have come forward to talk about Musk, given the dubious nature of his moral behavior as a close friend of Epstein and a puppet of Gates, the situation must be complicated. Even after sending her to every Democratic podcast they could. Well, let´s go.

The "Fairy Tale" and the Real Timeline

The instant crush (May 2023)

• What Ashley says: That in May 2023 Elon fell head over heels in her DMs ("He slid into my DMs"), asked her if she was in Austin or San Francisco, and it "immediately" turned into an intimate and daily relationship. And that they texted each other daily.
• What the facts say: There is only ONE photo of them together on May 19, 2023, at the X offices alongside the Babylon Bee team. If we look at the pattern on X, they had a strict average of 6 interactions a month (95% of which were just emojis). Coincidentally, on July 13, 2023, she herself bragged about a payment from X for $7,153 dollars thanks to the millions of impressions those replies from Elon generated for her. It wasn't love, friends, it was a monetization strategy for creators! There isn't a single credible screenshot of those supposed daily intimate chats. A fairytale romance where the language of love is priced in pennies per thousand impressions. How romantic!
• Furthermore, for a person who has gone to such lengths to forge messages, which we have already analyzed (whoever wants to know more can look at other posts we’ve done), and who shows everything, even what she doesn’t have but invents, she hasn't shown a single message from those daily texts.

The aerial "situationship" and the ghost trips

• What Ashley says: That the relationship lasted until February 2025. That they spent "good quality time" together in the same city and that they texted daily. She even made up a very movie-like anecdote on Elon's private jet: "Just the two of us on the plane, drinking wine, and him frustrated over a trick with silver silverware."
• What the facts say: Since she reads us (I know you love to use what we publish to feed your imagination), she has now adapted the script to a "situationship" because we already exposed that during those same dates she was very cozy with Mike Benz. She is a narrative scavenger: she copies a little bit from here and another bit from there. Now it's no longer a romantic relationship as she used to claim; she already knows she has a tough time proving that in court. We know that her goal in claiming a romantic relationship was, of course, to collect money before the judge in court regarding the child. Since she hasn't been able to establish that, and since we have been able to establish that the relationship she actually had was with Mike Benz, now she says she had a situationship, you know, something that doesn't mean any kind of commitment, but at the same time, aims to allow her to say she had something good with Musk, no strings attached, one of those things that happens. It's kind of what Zilis said in her deposition, that she hasn't had any relationship with Musk either, and the same thing happens to her as to you: she wants to be associated with Musk because, like you, she won't stop repeating that he is the most powerful man in the world, the richest, oh, how incredible, perfect for people who, in general, are like magpies, drawn to anything shiny without caring about anything else.

But let’s look at the Real Schedule (Total Divergence):

• June - August 2023: While Musk was in Europe or New York, Ashley was in Dallas or hitting bars in NYC with friends. Zero geographical coincidence.
• September - October 2023: She was celebrating her "team anniversary" with Mike Benz (with very affectionate photos and romantic dinners). Meanwhile, Musk was at Starbase.
• The St. Barts mystery (December 2023): She claims she conceived her child there between January 2 and 3, 2024. ADS-B flight logs completely destroy her: Elon arrived in St. Barts on December 31, but left early on January 2 because he had a court appointment in Austin against Grimes on January 3. Ashley doesn't appear in a single photo on the island, and Elon was photographed with other people.
• The movie-like private jet: Musk's planes always travel with a full crew (pilots, flight attendants). That "we were completely alone drinking wine" line sounds like it was taken straight out of a cheap novel. In fact, the photo of the silverware she refers to is one we already analyzed, and it was from a public broadcast of a Starlink test—a tactic she has used in the past, trying to pass off public videos as her own intimate photos. But here she goes again, copying what happened at the dinner where Musk was in Washington and Zilis crashed the dinner where Musk ignored her and Karoline Levitt kicked her out. Furthermore, just as she said in the interview, according to ASC, Musk knows a lot of these tricks and always uses silver silverware. It's so stupid how many times she repeated the bit about the silver silverware that it makes you laugh; they can't be brass, stainless steel, etc., they just have to be silver. (Clearly, a man with hundreds of billions of dollars is going to risk having his plane confiscated for not having his grandmother's china on board. Tycoon priorities, I guess.)

However, when Brian Reed asks her about Musk's psychology, her answers become abstract and generic: “what he wanted me to know at various times,” “very different versions depending on the circumstances,” “he was very different before and after I got pregnant.” [We repeat, this girl started fabricating photos of herself as pregnant. Proving she was pregnant is as easy as showing an ultrasound, and we know she couldn't even get the gestational age right in court].

In other words, when asked for concrete details about the person she supposedly spoke with every day for nearly two years, she only offers vagueness. Speaking of versions, I think she’s talking about herself, because depending on the podcast she goes to, she tells a different story: one day it's an online relationship, another a romantic relationship, another sexual, another a situationship... I don't know, dear, get your story straight, because honestly...

Furthermore, she claims there are things “that sound crazy” about how Musk grew up and his relationship with his parents that prove he is “very broken in many ways,” but that she would never share them publicly because they are too personal.

This is especially striking because:

• She has already publicly shared intimate details (texts about surrogates for a “legion of children before the apocalypse,” throwing tantrums like a toddler, silverware tricks on the plane, etc.). Which, as we have seen and analyzed, are messages that don't even carry the official Signal logo, or like the stuff about the elections. We are still waiting for ASC to show up in Congress with the evidence she has.
• The story about Musk being “broken by his family and his parents” is one of the central themes of Walter Isaacson's biography. She has repeated several times in interviews that she has never read it (“I never read it. Still haven’t read it”). Yet, she repeats the book's narrative framework almost verbatim. (It must be a fascinating case of literary telepathy, or perhaps the book reached him by mistake in the form of an audiobook while he was sleeping.)

Conclusion The intimate relationship and daily messages are a house of cards in the wind. The evidence shows a single real photo at a work event, a mutual agreement for interactions on X to pump the algorithm (and her bank account), and a fantasy fed by public posts while she spent her time with other people. When they have been in the same city, each was with different people and in different places, and anyway, maybe in all her madness, she should stop bringing out fake evidence because it is super obvious that it's going to hurt her in any trial. Perhaps it's just because she doesn't have the brainpower for even that.

Later, I'm going to continue with the XAI thing because that's very surreal.

With the OpenAI trial finally concluded, the media theater has collapsed. There is no longer a need to maintain the farce, neither for legal strategy nor for the confidentiality agreements (NDAs) forced with Musk. For those who have been investigating this case thoroughly, the pieces finally fit perfectly into a master plan of corporate betrayal and personal infiltration. Personally, I believe Zilis should have been sitting on the defendant's bench, but since Jared Birchall and she included her as a co-plaintiff without Musk knowing, it wasn't possible. Let's remember that Birchall has had powers to sign practically EVERYTHING on Musk's behalf. Shivon Zilis didn't just steal control of OpenAI; she executed one of the most calculated corporate blackmails of the last decade in Silicon Valley, using biological deception and financial extortion to try and seize Musk's empire. Well, we know Zilis has a stake in Orchid; she herself took care of leaking an article to the WSJ in 2025 about this company to let us know, and incidentally harm Musk. Zilis has access to IVF labs where eugenics tests are conducted, and all her children have been conceived through IVF and surrogacy. Labs that, incidentally, also hosted Ashley St Clair for the baby shower she had in November 2023 in Austin, Texas.

1. The myth of the "Relationship" and the true alliance in the shadows: Zilis and Jared Birchall The public narrative tried to force the idea of a romance between Zilis and Musk, but the upper echelon of OpenAI and the close circle knew it was statistically impossible. Zilis's true affective and operational dynamic was not with Musk, but with Jared Birchall, Elon's financial manager in Austin, Texas. That is, she was close to the one who controlled Musk's finances. She didn't need to be near Musk, but near Jared Birchall. While Zilis's written interactions with Musk were always serious, cold, and purely transactional, her emails and text messages with Birchall reveal a completely different reality: constant flirting, systematic adulation ("fawning"), and excessive confidence. Zilis didn't move to Texas for Elon Musk; she moved to Austin to be near Birchall (a man in his second marriage), with whom she shared day-to-day life while Musk split his time traveling the world. Birchall and Zilis are the ones who constantly live in Austin, Texas. Musk does not. It was a perfect alliance in muddy waters: Zilis provided the psychological manipulation, and Birchall placed authorized signature power at her disposal to divert funds, order children that were never Musk's, etc. "Oh, I love that," reads in their dynamics of complicity while they skimmed millions behind Elon's back. In fact, parentage data reveal that her son Strider is genetically Birchall's son, the reason why Zilis roundly refuses to perform public DNA tests on her four children: doing so would expose her game of having four different donor fathers (all executives in her environment). Actually, what is proposed so far is that Strider is Birchall's son, the girl is Ilya's, the third child, Seldon, is Greg Brockman's son, and for the fourth girl, Arcadia, the father would be Sam Altman. Altman is gay but fertile.

2. The farce of the pregnancies: Photographic evidence vs. Official Deposition It must be clarified that Shivon has the financial resources to raise the children in comfort with their nannies' support. She's on record as actively seeking donors. Zilis was never pregnant with any of her children. She used IVF labs in which she holds a stake (like Orchid) and surrogate mothers, a paid maternity scheme she learned after gaining the trust of Grimes (Claire). In her official deposition of the OpenAI case (September 7, 2025), Zilis declared under oath the birth dates of the minors. When crossing those data with her public photographic records, the physical truth is irrefutable:

• The Twins (Born in November 2021): Zilis published a photo on July 18, 2021, swinging a sword. The birth was barely four months away. Her abdomen was completely flat, something biologically impossible in a multiple gestation of five months, and a physically negligent activity to have truly been pregnant. The name change pact published in the Business Insider rag in 2022 is not proof of paternity; it was just the purchase of a last name. Something that has also happened to Ashley St Clair, who has always been completely flat during the time she says she was pregnant with the child and in her erotomanic delusion also says her son was conceived naturally. Well, Zilis at the beginning also said she had been pregnant by Musk through IVF, saying she had had the twins inside her womb, when we really know that was never so, because there are photographic records.
• Seldon (Born mid-2023 - June/July): On July 2, 2023, Zilis took a photo at her residence with Lex Fridman, Elon Musk, John Danaher, and Georges St. Pierre in a wrestling session. Weeks later, she published the image on X showing the same outfit, a smooth belly, and no postpartum sequelae or signs of full-term pregnancy. (The true biological donor is Greg Brockman).
• Arcadia (Born February 28, 2024): In the images of November 18 and 30, 2023 (Cybertruck event in Austin), Zilis showed a figure that did not imply any type of pregnancy and a flat abdomen while holding the twins. Three months from giving birth, the real gestation was being carried by a surrogate. (The true donor is Sam Altman).

With the last two children, Zilis didn't even bother trying to look like she had been pregnant by anyone, because there was no problem; in that sense, for once, she didn't fake, why bother? But with the twins she did, because always envious of Grimes, she didn't want to "be less."