Today, in response to a tweet, Musk stated that his son Seldon is 3 years old. This confirms that the child was born between late 2022 and mid-2023, not more recently, as the public narrative suggested following Shivon Zilis’s tweets in February 2025.

Musk’s personal life is often painted as a Victorian romantic drama or a tangled web of secret relationships. The reality is quite different: analyzing the timeline of events, flight logistics, court records, and the pattern of births between 2021 and 2024 points directly to transactional assisted reproduction agreements (contractual IVF and gestational surrogacy). The only direct biological exception during this entire period was his first child with Grimes (X Æ A-12, May 2020); from that point onward, the dynamic shifted entirely toward biotechnological planning.

The Delayed Announcement of Seldon

On February 28, 2025, Shivon Zilis wished Arcadia a happy first birthday (born February 28, 2024). In that same thread, she introduced Seldon Lycurgus, framing it essentially as if the child had just been born.

If Seldon was actually born in 2023, keeping his existence completely hidden until 2025 only to introduce him alongside the birthday of a younger sibling (whose existence was already public) is highly anomalous for a traditional household. In corporate and estate contracts, public disclosure typically follows non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and PR schedules rather than family milestones.

The Timeline Collapse (2021–2024)

The "dating" or "cohabitation" or "romance" hypothesis falls apart under chronological overlaps. Embryos are implanted according to clinical schedules and legal contracts:

1. First Massive Overlap (Spring – Autumn 2021)

• Shivon Zilis (Strider & Azure): Active gestation from February/March 2021; born November 2021.
• Grimes (Exa Dark Sideræl / "Y"): Active gestation from March/April 2021; born December 2021.
• The Overlap: Both processes ran concurrently throughout 2021, culminating in births separated by just a few weeks.

2. Second Massive Overlap (Summer 2022 – Summer 2023)

• Grimes (Techno Mechanicus / "Tau"): Born June 2022.
• Shivon Zilis (Seldon Lycurgus): Estimated birth between May and August 2023 (implantation between August and November 2022).
• Shivon Zilis (Arcadia): Born February 28, 2024 (implantation between May and June 2023).
• The Overlap: The IVF/implantation for Seldon began right after Tau was born. Seldon’s gestation and Arcadia’s implantation crossed directly in the first half of 2023.

3. Third Massive Overlap (Autumn 2023 – September 2024)

• Shivon Zilis (Arcadia): Active gestation from May/June 2023 to February 2024.
• Ashley St. Clair (Romulus): Born September 2024 (implantation between 15-17January 2024).
• The Overlap: The initial gestation phase of Romulus overlapped directly with the final trimester of Arcadia. On top of this, communication on X between Zilis and ASC was notably active during this period.

Evidence of Contractual Co-Parenting

• Motherhood by Schedule, Not Cohabitation: Flight logs show Musk spends only hours or a few days in the same cities as these women. Court-documented custody visits last 1 to 2 hours under legal or corporate supervision.
• Corporate Management of Agreements: Jared Birchall (managing director of Musk's family office) handles real estate, legal notices, and financial settlements. ASC's attorney confirmed financial terms for Romulus were being negotiated via contract. Furthermore, both Grimes and Zilis receive financial compensation for raising these children, whom they theoretically had "for the benefit of humanity" to fight demographic collapse.
• Every single one of those pregnancies was planned and agreed upon through contracts. In fact, Ashley St. Clair's biggest problem arose when she refused to sign the final Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), which was a lifetime agreement outlining her compensation, just like everyone else. She wanted to negotiate and felt the money offered was too little. Well, it's not bad for someone you didn't even carry.
• Absence of Physical Pregnancy: Public appearances, livestreams, and media engagements show uninterrupted work schedules and no physical signs of pregnancy during gestational periods. The babies are carried to term by hired surrogates. In this sense, Grimes has been the most honest: she spoke publicly when she carried X herself and was fully transparent when she used surrogacy later.

Conclusion

The friction seen on platforms like Reddit or X doesn't stem from heartbreak; it arises from the clash when one party attempts to renegotiate an assisted reproduction agreement under a romantic narrative or traditional custody dispute. There is no relationship drama here: there are naming contracts, NDAs, IVF clinics, and co-parenting partners.

Ashley St Clair was chosen by Shivon Zilis to have IVF baby. Does Zilis have to pay child support for ASC's child?

We're going to borrow a post by Sonia Randhawa (@sonirw) on X regarding a topic that has already been discussed in these forums, but that she organized and explained quite well. It deals with Shivon Zilis's involvement and role in the deal with Ashley St. Clair, which makes us wonder whether she should be the one paying ASC child support and covering any other expenses she might incur. All of this was already shown by u/ApprehensiveTrick579; it’s just that Sonia has organized the information.

Furthermore, since both X accounts and people right here have had to deal with the self-promotion Shivon Zilis is pushing, we don't really get why she feels such a need for self-importance, leaving everyone baffled, or why she's trying to cover up her ongoing, multiple betrayals of Elon Musk.

First, I’ll post the summary I’ve made, and the rest will follow exactly as Sonia posted it.

Timeline of Events and Interactions (2018–2025)

1. Background (2018–2019)

• 2018–2019: Ashley St. Clair works as a brand ambassador (social media influencer) for the conservative political organization Turning Point USA alongside Charlie Kirk when she is 20–21 years old. She is fired in October 2019.
• Same Period (2018–2019): Shivon Zilis serves on the board of directors at OpenAI alongside Sam Altman.

2. February 2024: Initial Contacts and Coded Negotiations

• February 1, 2024:
  • Shivon and Ashley have their first interaction on X (later deleted), referencing The Lord of the Rings (Elon’s favorite books) regarding "eugenics and training."
  • Context: Shivon uses Orchid Health in San Francisco for embryo DNA screening.
• February 20, 2024:
  • Both share posts about Alexander the Great and names assigned through the court.
  • Romulus is only 7 weeks in vitro, but the theory suggests they are already discussing names for the child.
• February 21, 2024:
  • Another public interaction between the two is recorded on X.
• February 25, 2024:
  • The Jabs and Legal Ultimatum: In this interaction, Ashley responds by bringing up "moral responsibility," her background in politics, and intentionally using the word "philosophy" (Shivon's degree from Yale, often cited in criticisms regarding her lack of a technical background for executive roles at Tesla, Neuralink, or OpenAI).
  • This is interpreted as a warning: Ashley implies she will leverage her political connections and take matters to court if she doesn't get what she wants.
• February 28, 2024:
  • Arcadia is born.

3. March 2024: Pressure Point and Logistical Resolution

• March 12 & 13, 2024:
  • Public exchanges continue on X, demonstrating established rapport between Shivon and Ashley.
• March 15, 2024:
  • The Last Public Interaction: Ashley posts a collage of Elon’s companies (Tesla, Starlink, SpaceX) and uses phrases like "turning point" and "tax dollars" (subtly hinting at her political past and Elon’s future role in DOGE auditing government spending).
  • Shivon replies tersely: “good point,” proving she understood the coded message.
  • Following this exchange, public interaction between them ceases entirely, and their accounts go private.
• March 20, 2024 (Just 5 Days Later):
  • Ashley publicly debuts her new luxury Manhattan apartment in a photo holding an orange on her head.
  • The apartment is funded and managed through an LLC managed by Jared Birchall (head of Elon Musk’s family office). Notorious socialite Anna Delvey also resides in this building.

4. April 2024: Consolidation of the "Digital Truce"

• Once the financial assets are secured and the apartment keys delivered:
  • Elon Musk unsubscribes from Ashley’s paid subscription page.
  • Shivon Zilis purchases her second home in Austin (a few miles from Elon) to distance herself and stake out her territory.
  • The "digital truce" solidifies after the high-pressure operation achieves its goal.

5. March – October 2025: End of the Deal

• March 29, 2025:
  • The car provided to Ashley St. Clair is taken away (just over a year after acquiring the apartment).
• October 2025:
  • Ashley is forced to move out of the Jared Birchall-managed LLC apartment and moves in with her ex, Dr. Johnny.

So, here is Sonia's post.

Ashley St Clair was chosen by Shivon Zilis to have IVF baby

Shivon was involved in this pro-natal arrangement. Their online interactions, specifically starting in February 2024 reveal it.

Zilis had EVERYTHING to do with Ashley's BABY CONTRACT. Ashley's subsequent February 2025 "baby announcement" on X was also related to Zilis recommendation. Up until that point, they both controlled the narrative, and they continued to do so afterwards.

Shivon Zilis encouraged Ashley enough, directly or indirectly, to believe she was "brave." Grimes was also in contact with Ashley.

Jared managed to get Elon to sign on a loan of $1 million and then a payment of $1.5 million and also included a place for her to live and a Tesla vehicle to use for a year.

All the “baby-mamas” used IVF and surrogates for their children and have individual contracts that are managed by Jared Birchall. Even in the court documents, she had a “loan” of 1 million before receiving another 1.5 million in payments.

Elon did not “instigate” the contract with Ashley or chose her to be a baby mother.

Shivon posted about ‘spilled milk’ on 12.29.23 as symbolic communication.

Evidence: https://x.com/shivon/status/1740848683648946195

Then, Shivon was posted about “easter eggs” on a picture of a plane flying over the Tesla gigafactory on 1.01.24.

Evidence:
https://x.com/shivon/status/1741940084394328423

(Ashley miscalculated this as a signal indicating her IVF child has been planted - and used it to create her story about conceiving at St Barts on New Year, I have already proven she was in New York for NYE. She only met Elon once at the Twitter office )

Then, Shivon made a stand-alone post on 1.05.24 “chaos ex Machina” which is basically an unexpected event changes the course of the future.

Evidence:
https://x.com/shivon/status/1743423334413447573

Ashley's IVF baby was planted in mid January 2024
for Romulus to be born September 17, 2024

We previously analyzed Ashley St. Clair’s (ASC) latest interview on Brian’s Substack (Question Everything), but something was left pending:https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1ui2jrp/the_ashley_st_clair_timeline_debunked_flight_logs

https://questioneverything.substack.com/p/watch-ashley-st-clair-called-me-slimy

She is currently on a progressive media tour selling her "enlightened martyr" narrative, and well, she’s neither a martyr nor enlightened, as we’ve already seen:https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1tt8ys1/2024_as_plane_as_a_pancake/

https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1tqf0g6/deep_dive_analyzing_asc_metadata_and_locations_in/

In addition to what we've already covered, she dropped two things in that podcast that nobody even asked her about. But since she loves to talk and calls herself a "charlatan," let's analyze them:

1. The Tiffany Fong Case: From "Innocent Mother" to "Womb Broker"

In this new segment, Ashley adopts a soap-opera pose: she claims she was holding her baby in her arms when Tiffany Fong called her to say Elon was offering to have a child with her via DM, describing it as a "Gatlin gun of sperm." Then she says she innocently went to tell Elon about it after discussing it with a mutual friend (Isabel), and that Elon threw a "toddler-like tantrum," turned red in the face, slammed the door, and started furiously texting Tiffany.

The Real Story (The Money She Keeps Quiet About): Ashley spins this as a fit of jealousy or control, but the financial reality behind the scenes is completely different. As we’ve seen, Musk was never her partner at all. Not only did he never exercise any control over her, but he provided her with an income through X (like many other creators) and helped her with the child's expenses, first with $1 million and later through loans.

Yet ASC did whatever she damn well pleased during the time she was allegedly pregnant: she had an ongoing relationship with Mike Benz, traveled to Miami with her friends, and jetted off to Rome when she was supposedly 7 months pregnant. She was never actually pregnant, though she did post AI-generated photos claiming she was. She also sold us the narrative that she was "locked away", another massive lie we’ve already debunked.

Anyway, the point is that on April 16, 2025, Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) exposed the real motive behind this dispute on X after speaking with two people very close to Ashley’s inner circle:

>

Musk never had a jealous outburst with Ashley. In fact, she's so clueless that in this very interview she says, "I had a baby with him, so I call him my ex." Well, put it however you want, girl, you only had a contract, and we still don't know who the father is, we haven't even seen the DNA test.

Musk might have been angry, which I doubt because Jared Birchall was handling the whole ASC child contract issue, and we believe Shivon Zilis was involved as well, but Jared Birchall is absolutely confirmed by the court records. What could have angered him is...

Seeing that Ashley was breaching confidentiality and gossiping about genetic arrangements with third parties to press for more money, Elon lost it over the massive security breach. If Milo knew this, all of New York knew it, and the entire ASC influencer network knew it, and I'm not going to name names, but we all know the names.

The real story, and what seems closest to the truth, is that these baby mamas were brought in to combat global population decline caused by falling birth rates. There was absolutely nothing romantic or sentimental about any of this; it was all IVF, surrogacy, and financial contracts. The prevailing belief is that Shivon Zilis was the facilitator who brokered the contract for ASC. Then ASC, in her bid to secure more cash, likely encouraged by Zilis herself, tried to act as a facilitator for other potential baby mamas.

All of them were getting access to massive payouts in exchange for raising children to boost birth rates. But of course, admitting that was hard for them, especially for Zilis and ASC, who struggle to act with any shred of integrity. We've already seen that both of them are the absolute worst. That’s why they insisted on claiming they had a real relationship with Musk. In ASC’s case, it was to position herself to squeeze more money for the child in New York family court. In Zilis’s case, it was an attempt to look like something more than just a regular employee, when in reality she's been just that, and Musk’s treacherous lapdog, for the past 10 years. [We need to analyze who would be Sam Altman's Trojan horse at Apple, because we already know that Shivonn Zilis was Altman's Trojan horse at OpenAI].

I don't know if people remember, I assume they do, all those girls who were chasing after Musk back then. I won't name names, but many of us know exactly who they were, and ASC had a "friendship" or connection with all of them. They were all aggressively pronatalist because they all knew about the contracts, and they specifically knew about ASC's deal.

Milo wasn't wrong in that post:https://x.com/Nero/status/1912594718665691248

Just like he wasn't wrong when he predicted early on that ASC was going to get a baby. Milo knew exactly what she was up to as a facilitator. And that is exactly why Milo has never been sued for it.

[I'm using her joyful face as the cover photo when she says she had an intimate relationship with Musk. What joy, what excitement, what happiness!. Love emanates from every part of her body.]

https://questioneverything.substack.com/p/watch-ashley-st-clair-called-me-slimy

Hello ! Although a bit late, I’ve watched Ashley’s latest interview with Brian Reed in its entirety and... wow, what a gem¡¡¡. I saw that she tried to stop the interview. I thought she was trying to stop it because of the amount of nonsense and lies she said during it, at least for the first three-quarters of the beginning, but no, to my surprise what bothered her the most was that the interviewer started "reminding" her of all the things she has said that go against what she now super-defends within the Democrats who fund her. And of course, ASC is worried about not making a career in the Democratic movement. Don't worry, my dear, as soon as they see how prone you are to fabulation, not to say the total absence of reality supporting what you say, they won't take you into account either, but don't worry, time will tell all.

On the other hand, I'm glad to know you read us, Ashley St. Clair. I've proven through this interview, once again, that you dedicate yourself to fabricating facts based on what is posted here, like the timeline we put together. Turns out that now you claim that when you "coincided with Musk in the same city" you were with him. You're saying this now based on the timeline we pulled on you, but let’s take it one step at a time.

Also, for someone who doesn't like Shivon Zilis at all, we don't either, but we'll get to that later, you copy her a little bit. ASC doesn't like being considered a baby mama, but girl, it's what you signed up for.

Before getting into the core of the matter, I have to say it is greatly appreciated that you were finally seen without the 85 filters you put on yourself on TikTok. At least now we know what her real face looks like without looking like a distorted virtual reality avatar. I would take something for the swelling. People out there have said that your face wasn't due to the baby being sick, because of course, we know you can't spend a single day of your life without the utilitarian use of that baby conceived via IVF and that you, of course, did not carry.

On the other hand, you went on the podcast, among other things, to talk about the lawsuit against xAI over Grok's photos of your person. Well, you went with a neckline down to your belly, nothing against it, but let's see, it's not the most coherent thing, but coherence isn't exactly part of your identity; quite the opposite.

The objective of this post is simple: We are going to compare, point by point, ASC’s assertions in the interview with the cold, relentless, and very public reality (flight logs, actual interactions on X, geolocated photos, and her curious timeline with Mike Benz). It’s going to take a long while because I have looked at absolutely everything.

This post serves to understand how a false narrative is constructed, especially now that she's running around with her lawsuit against xAI trying to win the Oscar for victim of the year. Here we go, gorgeous!

Ashley’s Central Premise: "I am the only chosen one". She and her narcissism.

According to her, there are a lot of people who know the truth but can't speak, so she has sacrificed herself to be the voice of the people. She claims she had an intimate relationship with Elon Musk starting in May 2023, that he is the father of her child (whom, by the way, she uses as a shield and an excuse whenever it suits her, which is incredibly sad), and that xAI generated millions of images of her.

As I already mentioned, she wanted this interview not to air, claiming that the interviewer "wasn't a real journalist." This coming from her, someone who never studied journalism but sold herself as such for years. What truly hurt her wasn't her supposed truths about Musk, but that at the end they brought up her history of toxic tweets, destroying her dreamed-of rise in the Democratic league. She thinks, or believes, that because she is currently being paraded as a puppet from podcast to podcast, they are going to catapult her to stardom as a Democratic influencer: but no, my dear, because more than helping them, she is sinking them because her contradictions are such that anyone who dives a little into what she says will realize she's lying. They don't need enemies because they already have her.

We know that for Reid Hoffman to have come forward to talk about Musk, given the dubious nature of his moral behavior as a close friend of Epstein and a puppet of Gates, the situation must be complicated. Even after sending her to every Democratic podcast they could. Well, let´s go.

The "Fairy Tale" and the Real Timeline

The instant crush (May 2023)

• What Ashley says: That in May 2023 Elon fell head over heels in her DMs ("He slid into my DMs"), asked her if she was in Austin or San Francisco, and it "immediately" turned into an intimate and daily relationship. And that they texted each other daily.
• What the facts say: There is only ONE photo of them together on May 19, 2023, at the X offices alongside the Babylon Bee team. If we look at the pattern on X, they had a strict average of 6 interactions a month (95% of which were just emojis). Coincidentally, on July 13, 2023, she herself bragged about a payment from X for $7,153 dollars thanks to the millions of impressions those replies from Elon generated for her. It wasn't love, friends, it was a monetization strategy for creators! There isn't a single credible screenshot of those supposed daily intimate chats. A fairytale romance where the language of love is priced in pennies per thousand impressions. How romantic!
• Furthermore, for a person who has gone to such lengths to forge messages, which we have already analyzed (whoever wants to know more can look at other posts we’ve done), and who shows everything, even what she doesn’t have but invents, she hasn't shown a single message from those daily texts.

The aerial "situationship" and the ghost trips

• What Ashley says: That the relationship lasted until February 2025. That they spent "good quality time" together in the same city and that they texted daily. She even made up a very movie-like anecdote on Elon's private jet: "Just the two of us on the plane, drinking wine, and him frustrated over a trick with silver silverware."
• What the facts say: Since she reads us (I know you love to use what we publish to feed your imagination), she has now adapted the script to a "situationship" because we already exposed that during those same dates she was very cozy with Mike Benz. She is a narrative scavenger: she copies a little bit from here and another bit from there. Now it's no longer a romantic relationship as she used to claim; she already knows she has a tough time proving that in court. We know that her goal in claiming a romantic relationship was, of course, to collect money before the judge in court regarding the child. Since she hasn't been able to establish that, and since we have been able to establish that the relationship she actually had was with Mike Benz, now she says she had a situationship, you know, something that doesn't mean any kind of commitment, but at the same time, aims to allow her to say she had something good with Musk, no strings attached, one of those things that happens. It's kind of what Zilis said in her deposition, that she hasn't had any relationship with Musk either, and the same thing happens to her as to you: she wants to be associated with Musk because, like you, she won't stop repeating that he is the most powerful man in the world, the richest, oh, how incredible, perfect for people who, in general, are like magpies, drawn to anything shiny without caring about anything else.

But let’s look at the Real Schedule (Total Divergence):

• June - August 2023: While Musk was in Europe or New York, Ashley was in Dallas or hitting bars in NYC with friends. Zero geographical coincidence.
• September - October 2023: She was celebrating her "team anniversary" with Mike Benz (with very affectionate photos and romantic dinners). Meanwhile, Musk was at Starbase.
• The St. Barts mystery (December 2023): She claims she conceived her child there between January 2 and 3, 2024. ADS-B flight logs completely destroy her: Elon arrived in St. Barts on December 31, but left early on January 2 because he had a court appointment in Austin against Grimes on January 3. Ashley doesn't appear in a single photo on the island, and Elon was photographed with other people.
• The movie-like private jet: Musk's planes always travel with a full crew (pilots, flight attendants). That "we were completely alone drinking wine" line sounds like it was taken straight out of a cheap novel. In fact, the photo of the silverware she refers to is one we already analyzed, and it was from a public broadcast of a Starlink test—a tactic she has used in the past, trying to pass off public videos as her own intimate photos. But here she goes again, copying what happened at the dinner where Musk was in Washington and Zilis crashed the dinner where Musk ignored her and Karoline Levitt kicked her out. Furthermore, just as she said in the interview, according to ASC, Musk knows a lot of these tricks and always uses silver silverware. It's so stupid how many times she repeated the bit about the silver silverware that it makes you laugh; they can't be brass, stainless steel, etc., they just have to be silver. (Clearly, a man with hundreds of billions of dollars is going to risk having his plane confiscated for not having his grandmother's china on board. Tycoon priorities, I guess.)

However, when Brian Reed asks her about Musk's psychology, her answers become abstract and generic: “what he wanted me to know at various times,” “very different versions depending on the circumstances,” “he was very different before and after I got pregnant.” [We repeat, this girl started fabricating photos of herself as pregnant. Proving she was pregnant is as easy as showing an ultrasound, and we know she couldn't even get the gestational age right in court].

In other words, when asked for concrete details about the person she supposedly spoke with every day for nearly two years, she only offers vagueness. Speaking of versions, I think she’s talking about herself, because depending on the podcast she goes to, she tells a different story: one day it's an online relationship, another a romantic relationship, another sexual, another a situationship... I don't know, dear, get your story straight, because honestly...

Furthermore, she claims there are things “that sound crazy” about how Musk grew up and his relationship with his parents that prove he is “very broken in many ways,” but that she would never share them publicly because they are too personal.

This is especially striking because:

• She has already publicly shared intimate details (texts about surrogates for a “legion of children before the apocalypse,” throwing tantrums like a toddler, silverware tricks on the plane, etc.). Which, as we have seen and analyzed, are messages that don't even carry the official Signal logo, or like the stuff about the elections. We are still waiting for ASC to show up in Congress with the evidence she has.
• The story about Musk being “broken by his family and his parents” is one of the central themes of Walter Isaacson's biography. She has repeated several times in interviews that she has never read it (“I never read it. Still haven’t read it”). Yet, she repeats the book's narrative framework almost verbatim. (It must be a fascinating case of literary telepathy, or perhaps the book reached him by mistake in the form of an audiobook while he was sleeping.)

Conclusion The intimate relationship and daily messages are a house of cards in the wind. The evidence shows a single real photo at a work event, a mutual agreement for interactions on X to pump the algorithm (and her bank account), and a fantasy fed by public posts while she spent her time with other people. When they have been in the same city, each was with different people and in different places, and anyway, maybe in all her madness, she should stop bringing out fake evidence because it is super obvious that it's going to hurt her in any trial. Perhaps it's just because she doesn't have the brainpower for even that.

Later, I'm going to continue with the XAI thing because that's very surreal.

With the OpenAI trial finally concluded, the media theater has collapsed. There is no longer a need to maintain the farce, neither for legal strategy nor for the confidentiality agreements (NDAs) forced with Musk. For those who have been investigating this case thoroughly, the pieces finally fit perfectly into a master plan of corporate betrayal and personal infiltration. Personally, I believe Zilis should have been sitting on the defendant's bench, but since Jared Birchall and she included her as a co-plaintiff without Musk knowing, it wasn't possible. Let's remember that Birchall has had powers to sign practically EVERYTHING on Musk's behalf. Shivon Zilis didn't just steal control of OpenAI; she executed one of the most calculated corporate blackmails of the last decade in Silicon Valley, using biological deception and financial extortion to try and seize Musk's empire. Well, we know Zilis has a stake in Orchid; she herself took care of leaking an article to the WSJ in 2025 about this company to let us know, and incidentally harm Musk. Zilis has access to IVF labs where eugenics tests are conducted, and all her children have been conceived through IVF and surrogacy. Labs that, incidentally, also hosted Ashley St Clair for the baby shower she had in November 2023 in Austin, Texas.

1. The myth of the "Relationship" and the true alliance in the shadows: Zilis and Jared Birchall The public narrative tried to force the idea of a romance between Zilis and Musk, but the upper echelon of OpenAI and the close circle knew it was statistically impossible. Zilis's true affective and operational dynamic was not with Musk, but with Jared Birchall, Elon's financial manager in Austin, Texas. That is, she was close to the one who controlled Musk's finances. She didn't need to be near Musk, but near Jared Birchall. While Zilis's written interactions with Musk were always serious, cold, and purely transactional, her emails and text messages with Birchall reveal a completely different reality: constant flirting, systematic adulation ("fawning"), and excessive confidence. Zilis didn't move to Texas for Elon Musk; she moved to Austin to be near Birchall (a man in his second marriage), with whom she shared day-to-day life while Musk split his time traveling the world. Birchall and Zilis are the ones who constantly live in Austin, Texas. Musk does not. It was a perfect alliance in muddy waters: Zilis provided the psychological manipulation, and Birchall placed authorized signature power at her disposal to divert funds, order children that were never Musk's, etc. "Oh, I love that," reads in their dynamics of complicity while they skimmed millions behind Elon's back. In fact, parentage data reveal that her son Strider is genetically Birchall's son, the reason why Zilis roundly refuses to perform public DNA tests on her four children: doing so would expose her game of having four different donor fathers (all executives in her environment). Actually, what is proposed so far is that Strider is Birchall's son, the girl is Ilya's, the third child, Seldon, is Greg Brockman's son, and for the fourth girl, Arcadia, the father would be Sam Altman. Altman is gay but fertile.

2. The farce of the pregnancies: Photographic evidence vs. Official Deposition It must be clarified that Shivon has the financial resources to raise the children in comfort with their nannies' support. She's on record as actively seeking donors. Zilis was never pregnant with any of her children. She used IVF labs in which she holds a stake (like Orchid) and surrogate mothers, a paid maternity scheme she learned after gaining the trust of Grimes (Claire). In her official deposition of the OpenAI case (September 7, 2025), Zilis declared under oath the birth dates of the minors. When crossing those data with her public photographic records, the physical truth is irrefutable:

• The Twins (Born in November 2021): Zilis published a photo on July 18, 2021, swinging a sword. The birth was barely four months away. Her abdomen was completely flat, something biologically impossible in a multiple gestation of five months, and a physically negligent activity to have truly been pregnant. The name change pact published in the Business Insider rag in 2022 is not proof of paternity; it was just the purchase of a last name. Something that has also happened to Ashley St Clair, who has always been completely flat during the time she says she was pregnant with the child and in her erotomanic delusion also says her son was conceived naturally. Well, Zilis at the beginning also said she had been pregnant by Musk through IVF, saying she had had the twins inside her womb, when we really know that was never so, because there are photographic records.
• Seldon (Born mid-2023 - June/July): On July 2, 2023, Zilis took a photo at her residence with Lex Fridman, Elon Musk, John Danaher, and Georges St. Pierre in a wrestling session. Weeks later, she published the image on X showing the same outfit, a smooth belly, and no postpartum sequelae or signs of full-term pregnancy. (The true biological donor is Greg Brockman).
• Arcadia (Born February 28, 2024): In the images of November 18 and 30, 2023 (Cybertruck event in Austin), Zilis showed a figure that did not imply any type of pregnancy and a flat abdomen while holding the twins. Three months from giving birth, the real gestation was being carried by a surrogate. (The true donor is Sam Altman).

With the last two children, Zilis didn't even bother trying to look like she had been pregnant by anyone, because there was no problem; in that sense, for once, she didn't fake, why bother? But with the twins she did, because always envious of Grimes, she didn't want to "be less."

As the saying goes, the more you try to hide the sun, the more you see it.

I found it very striking that during this trial, none of the parties involved have made much use of Zilis’s emails from 2017, at least not the important ones. It is truly curious, as this is theoretically where the case should be decided, given it is such a "high-stakes" trial. I’m going to try to uncover the mysterious reasons why everyone is choosing to ignore Zilis’s role in all of this; it is undoubtedly the "dirtiest" role of all and obviously very difficult to ignore for anyone who has been paying close attention to this process.

Anyone who is even slightly observant will realize that both sides tiptoe around 2017, when everything was brewing, and try to move on to 2018 and 2019 in matters involving Zilis.

It certainly seems that both sides are attacking each other through Zilis, trying to gauge where her loyalties truly lied, without actually revealing her true allegiance. I will attempt to clear up the mystery behind why both sides are handling this so cautiously.

Based on the trial sheets, here are the specific emails and messages related to Shivon Zilis that have been presented by each side:

Evidence Presented by Musk’s Attorneys (Plaintiff)

Musk’s legal team used these documents during direct examination to establish a timeline of communications:

• Email from Shivon Zilis to Elon Musk (September 22, 2017): Identified as Exhibit PLF 159.
• Email from Elon Musk to Shivon Zilis (April 23, 2018): Identified as Exhibit PLF 233.

Evidence Presented by OpenAI’s Attorneys (Defense)

OpenAI’s defense used a broader selection of messages during cross-examination, seeking to demonstrate Zilis's close involvement in business decisions:

• Group Text Messages (September 13, 2017): A conversation between Elon Musk, Jared Birchall, Shivon Zilis, and Sam Altman (DEF 691).
• Text Messages between Musk and Zilis (February 16, 2018): A direct conversation identified as DEF 761.
• Email from Elon Musk to Shivon Zilis (April 23, 2018): OpenAI also submitted this email under its own numbering (DEF 806).
• Email from Shivon Zilis to Elon Musk (July 5, 2018): Identified as DEF 819.
• Email from Shivon Zilis to Elon Musk (March 8, 2019): Identified as DEF 862.

In summary: While Musk’s lawyers focused on 1 communication from 2017 and early 2018, OpenAI’s defense introduced additional messages extending through March 2019.