r/Infomaniak

After moving my mailboxes off Infomaniak couple of years back (into Zoho), I'm now looking at coming back since I'm looking at a bit of a more complete suite (with storage, docs and meetings).

I think I'm really familiar with Infomaniak's pros and cons (in addition to my experience, I read this sub frequently), but can't really make up my mind on Infomaniak vs Proton. The latter is way more polished, and although I'm an advanced user spending half of my life on command line or IDEs, I don't mind an idiot-proof, good looking UI for this type of tasks - and Infomaniak is light years behind from that point of view.

Proton's biggest downsides (lack of sync with standard apps, E2E pitfalls, higher costs) are all sort of moot to me because I only use web UI, still use Google for Contacts/Calendar, and don't need a ton of storage (~80GB files, ~5GB mail).

Figured who moved to or from Proton to Infomaniak has the answers I need - so if that is you, do you mind sharing your experience? Would you do that again? Any key feature gap (either way) I should be aware of?

Thank you!

First, thanks to the Infomaniak team for publishing official MCP servers for mail, calendar, contacts, kChat and kDrive. They work great in Claude Desktop.

I wanted them in claude.ai and on my phone, which needs a remote server with OAuth. While trying, I found that OAuth apps created in the Manager can only request `openid profile email phone`; every API scope (`user_info`, `workspace:mail`, `workspace:calendar`, ...) is refused with `invalid_scope`. So a third-party app can't get API access through OAuth at all, only through a static API token.

My workaround is a small open-source bridge you host yourself: it runs the official packages unmodified, uses Infomaniak login for identity, asks the user for a scoped API token once, and exposes everything as one remote MCP endpoint with the OAuth flow claude.ai needs.

The token are stored on the bridge encrypted via AES-256

GIthub repo : https://github.com/xdubois/infomaniak-mcp-bridge

Quick questions for the community and, if anyone from Infomaniak reads this, for them.

Is there a plan to let OAuth apps request product scopes, or to offer a hosted remote MCP endpoint? Either would make this bridge unnecessary, which would be a good outcome !