Hey guys I need a favor from you. Does any one have Arjo Newest Mentorship? I ask this from you because, I had a talk with Derek who is Arjo's Personal Assistant and he said that the leaked mentorship is useless now, Can any one who in masterclass explain why he tell like that ?
I've been developing and refining a Supply & Demand strategy for about 2 years, and I finally have a version that's showing promising results in backtesting.
The core idea is simple:
Determine HTF bias using Supply & Demand.
Wait for price to tap a valid HTF zone.
Drop to the lower timeframe for confirmation (market structure shift + imbalance/FVG).
Enter only after confirmation, aiming for around 3R or better.
Also i use HTF liquidity sweep
My question is:
Can a Supply & Demand strategy with a proven edge become completely useless over time because of changing market conditions?
I'm not talking about normal drawdowns. I mean, can market structure change enough that a strategy which worked for years no longer has an edge?
If you've experienced this, how did you know it was the strategy that stopped working rather than just variance or a losing streak?
I'd appreciate hearing from traders with several years of experience.
Has anyone taken the course The Matrix Unlocked by Frank Warrink ( Zeussy )?How is that different from his other videos on the youtube?
I constantly get the DOL's correct and mark out the correct range. I know where price wants to go, I simply always get stopped out before TP hits.
I have simplified my strategy to a few things.
I use the 1H and 4H FVG's and Intermediate highs and lows as my Major swing points. so if we just hit a 4H intermediate low my bias is long and vice versa.
I use range EQ and I am a continuations based trader so after I have my bias I am looking for 5min/15min FVG retracements ad a 1min - 5min iFVG to enter off of to take price higher.
I use range Eq to find the best trade entries but end up getting confused as to where to actually enter so i don't get stopped out before price goes to my target.
I'm past the point where more ICT content helps. I don't mean that as arrogance — I mean it literally: order flow, liquidity engineering, HTF-to-LTF alignment, killzones, algorithmic delivery, the works. I can teach this material. I can look at any chart cold and reconstruct the narrative correctly after the fact. The theoretical ceiling isn't the issue anymore.
The gap is execution under live uncertainty — and specifically, the moment where I have a clean HTF bias and then let LTF noise talk me out of it in real time. Not because I don't understand why that's wrong. I understand it perfectly. But understanding and doing are clearly two different systems, and I've hit the limit of what self-correction and backtesting can fix. I move stops without partial exits, I re-enter setups I already invalidated, and even on winning weeks there's no sense of mastery — just relief that variance was on my side.
What I'm looking for isn't a strategy mentor. I don't need someone to explain concepts I already operate at an advanced level in. I need something closer to what elite athletes have — a coach who's operating a level above me, who can watch decision-making live and correct the layer that no amount of solo study touches. McGregor doesn't need a striking coach at this point in his career; he needs someone sharpening the 1% he can't see himself.
Has anyone here actually found a mentor like that — someone who works specifically with traders who already have the technical mastery, and whose value is purely in refining execution and decision-making at the edge? What did that relationship actually look like in practice? I'm not looking for course recommendations or "read this book" — I've exhausted that layer already.
I was wondering why my cisd failed, tapped in to a 4 hour unfilled fvg then had a 15 min CISD, targeted low resistance liquidity at the bottom. Is it better to wait for the 4 hour confirmation like a cisd or go to the lower timeframe and wait for a reaction like what i just did?
I just watched ict 3rd month of core content and he shows an order block on a monthly chart that is perfectly hit but isnt the real orderblock the green candle 2 candles to the right ?
Trade framing:
XAUUSD had relative equal highs (Buyside $$$) at 4186.8 ish. I was expecting the price to take out Sellside $$$ during NY and then reverse. The market close before reaching my TP due to holidays but I'm currently up 1.6%
Hi everyone
On thursday i bought 2500 quid of west texas intermediate. Price triggered my order and i used the opening range breakout start as a basis for continuation.
What followed is my best trade, probably ever. I followed my plan and i was one with price as i saw it hesitate and then explode up after exhausting sellers.
We all know oil is in a strong down trend, so this contrarian trade was purely short term to capture the momentum of the incoming support level. It will have to double bottom or triple to stop this on a macro level but on the daily it had already violated its daily range so was due for a sell side profit taking.
I would like some feedback on what i could have done better? Weather i should i have stayed on?
Like I have no idea about the basic terms to begin with. I feel so lost even watching the first couple videos of 2016 Mentorship. I feel like I have no prerequisite knowledge heading into the 2016/2022 series. So for a complete begin who has zero (like zero literally) knowledge about charts, trading etc. Where do I even start?
I have been studying the 22 mentorship about midway through it yet, i am testing on live markets but the position got stopped even though i was pretty confident with it. But as i am not as experienced i would love to ask if anything is wrong or is it just unlucky.
Most of us learn the partial close at 1.5R from ICT content but nobody actually runs the numbers on when it beats a simple 2R hold vs when it doesn't.
Three outcomes exist (not two):
The crossover point: partial close only outperforms simple 2R when your P2 (% of 1.5R-hitting trades that continue to 2R) is below ~87.5%. Above that, you're better off not closing early.
For a 40% win rate prop firm challenge, at P2=70% the partial close adds roughly 0.3R per trade to expectancy. At P2=90% you're leaving money on the table.
Worth running your own numbers before you start the challenge, not after.
Hi guys, for North America. US and Canada, whats the best prop firm with good leverage and immediate payments?
What are you guys using for forex?
Hi! So quick question. I recently watched ICT’s silver bullet modell video and if you are familiar with it, can you answer this please? Is it really that simple, just 3x1 hour time window and you enter off of the right fvgs? Is anyone trading this modell here?
Thank you for your help! 🫡😇
Here is NQ today.
So on any other day if i took this inversion with my SL at the REH i would've been stopped out before they went lower. I noticed if they leave REH/REL in area like where the entry was they would sweep and then go lower.
Why did the algo ignore it?
Consolidation
Expansion
Orderblock at equilibrium
I’m trying to trade with 2022 model waiting for a 15 min swing high or low to be swept than 2 min mss with fvg. Put a buy or sell order to that fvg. Sl at swing high or low of that mss. But I get stoped out almost 80%. Can I get some advice? What’s my mistake?
Hello and Happy upcoming Independence Day! I just wrapped up my morning and I had to share my trade from this session on MNQ. It was my single largest win in terms of points, and I don't really have anyone to share it with so I wanted to make a post.
The trade idea was stemmed from ES being so close to its previous day high, and NQ being quite a ways below its previous day high, as well as Semi's starting to look weaker the last couple days. My thinking was off the open, if I saw ES push higher and take that previous day high, while NQ looked weak and failed to sweep the 8:30 high, I would look for shorts.
Well off the open, ES ripped hard and swept that previous day high, and NQ tried pushing higher but was considerably below the 8:30 high while ES was sweeping, so I got short 2 MNQ on a bearish 5m FVG nested at the .705 fib level from the 8:30 high price leg. After NQ showed more weakness and started to break lower, I added one more short as it retested the bearish FVG.
Overall I was targeting the London Low as my full target, but also was considering the fact the markets are closed tomorrow for Independence Day, making today a pseudo friday, and was wondering if NQ would want to just sell off into the close.
So I took some partials around the 9:30 low, then tried to hold a runner for as long as I could, and ended up getting stopped out for 500pts, which is my single largest MNQ point win.
I've been trading futures for about 4 years, and this felt pretty awesome and I just wanted to share. Thank you for reading and have a great 4th of July weekend!
As with every trading guru you have to dig through the good reviews and the bad to figure out if it’s actually worth it to learn from them. I obviously know about caspersmc’s history with the law. But he does post a ton of free videos for people to learn from. My question is, has he provided any irrefutable proof of profitability. I see people calling him a fraud but then I also see people that took his mentorship and claim he’s genuine. Who do I believe before I figure out what i want to do myself. I haven’t seen any recent reviews within the past couple months to a year on his mentorship program.
