

🚨 PROJECTION: Legislative Assembly of Queensland
Based on poll by DemosAU 27 May – 3 June 2026


Based on poll by DemosAU 27 May – 3 June 2026
The state’s gaming minister has supported adopting a strict anti-poker machine crackdown in the strongest indication yet that the state government will act on the concerns of rank and file Labor members.
Senior Labor Party figures gave blistering assessments of NSW politics “looking the other way” and bowing to pressure from powerful lobby groups to maintain the status quo on poker machines at the NSW Labor conference on Sunday.
The proposal brought by Inner West Mayor Darcy Byrne and Unions NSW’s Mark Morey puts a moratorium on new machine licences, creates a new tax on clubs that raise more than $20 million in gaming revenue and commits to halving machine numbers in 10 years.
“(For) too long, the suffering caused by gaming machines has been allowed to fester and spread,” Byrne said.
“Too long, the private interests of the poker machine lobby have trumped the public interest of preventing addiction and harm, but on this day at this conference for our party, this was a calamity that can no longer be ignored because the scale of the crisis has become obscene.”
Gaming minister David Harris told the conference the motion was a road-map that reflected the best of the Labor movement, his strongest yet support for the tough measures and the clearest indication yet the government will implement the policy.
The state government isn’t bound to legislate the policies passed at state conferences but would face a major union and member backlash if the measures went ignored.
“[The motion] is about lasting structural reform,” Harris said. “It puts harm minimisation at the heart of our gaming system, expands support for those experiencing gambling harm, strengthens prevention and ensures accountability is built into the system, not borne by those it has failed.”
The policy would also eliminate perks such as free food for punters and make facial recognition technology mandatory in all gaming rooms.
The motion was passed unanimously.
The government will work on engaging stakeholders between now and the March state election. The government is also yet to respond to the findings of an independent report on gambling reform.
While Labor members presented a united front on pokie reforms, members of Left and Right factions clashed on the government’s controversial protest reforms.
Angus McFarland of the Australian Services Union NSW and ACT moved to bring a debate forward about protest laws, telling Labor’s rank and file that scenes at a pro-Palestine protest at Town Hall in February was evidence the government’s crackdown was not working.
“Whatever your views are on the issues being protested, I don’t think anyone could look at those scenes and honestly conclude that that reflects the kind of social cohesion that we should aspire to,” he said.
Road Minister Jenny Aitchison, of the Right faction, rebuffed the attempt at moving the debate as a “disgrace” and accused members of the Left of attempting to silence the bush by prioritising protest issues over the Country Labor items.
The motion ultimately failed.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese received a hero’s welcome from all but a handful of pro-Palestine members, who unfurled flags in protest during his speech. One woman marched through the conference floor draped in a Palestine flag but remained silent and Albanese’s speech was not interrupted.
He used his address to fire back at “barely coherent” backlash to his government’s tax reforms and labelled the Coalition and One Nation the “axis of grievance”.
Their history is loaded with pro one nation posts and pretending to be a Labor supporter when they clearly are not. They have spammed multiple Aussie subs with this shit for like 21 hours per days activity.
They are trying to manipulate Australians into believing there is grass roots support for Pauline and that one nation are a viable opposition whilst taking subtle jabs at Labor.
They hide their support for one nation by posting one nation stories and then commenting “wouldn’t it be scary if one nation got in, they are doing really well, us Labor supporters should watch out for how successful they are” type bullshit.
It’s likely they are part of the fake one nation engagement teams from Indonesia.
Other than the absolutely fantastic take - I love listening to Russell Crowes voice.
Every day there’s either a new allegation or new poll that’s negative for Jacinta Allan. It just keeps compounding every day.
So many Labor supporters fear that Labor will become a crossbench party in Victoria with Libs in government and One Nation as opposition.
Ben Carroll would also lose his seat if Allan is leader at the election.
One Nation becoming opposition or government would hyper legitimise them and it would have a devastating impact on centre-left politics in Australia for many, many years as this will reverberate in other states and territories and federally. All because of Jacinta Allan.
It’s time for Jacinta Allan to go.
It's no secret that Jacinta Allan doesn't has long as leader. She faces many possibilities, such as the possibility of her losing her seat in Bendigo East, being challenged by another in her party, or party pressure to resign after the election.
The front runners would most likely be Ben Carrol from the labor right faction, and Gabrielle Williams or Lily D'Ambrosio from the socialist left faction.
One issue Ben Carrol faces is possible difficulties in his own seat, but I believe he will win as I've heard he is quite well liked by his constituents.
One issue Gabrielle and Lily face is a possible lack of trust in the socialist left faction due to both Allan and Andrews coming from that faction
I am not from the Labor Party so it would be interesting to get a deeper understanding so please feel free to suggest more possible candidates or even convey reasons why you think Jacinta Allan will stay
Thanks!
Imagine if the CFMEU were a big bank or a big consultancy, or if the systemic corruption and criminality that the construction union is accused of had occurred under the watch of a Liberal government. The Labor Party and its fellow travellers would be leading the calls for a full-blooded public inquiry to get to the bottom of the scandal.
Instead, two years after the joint The Australian Financial Review, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and 60 Minutes Building Bad series exposed the scale of the CFMEU’s alleged misconduct and infiltration by organised crime and bikie gangs, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan continues to deflect or deny and refuse to take meaningful action to eradicate corrupt and criminal behaviour in the construction sector.
The CFMEU scandal hasn’t diminished the union’s clout. David Rowe
Allan’s latest brazen strategy for rejecting calls for a royal commission into union corruption in her state is to keep claiming that any evidence of alleged union wrongdoing should be referred to the Victorian police, who have the power to investigate.
Allan has previously described as “unfounded” the estimate by anti-corruption expert Geoffrey Watson that infrastructure project cost blowouts due to CFMEU corruption cost Victorian taxpayers $15 billion. She is now risibly resorting to the argument that it is inflation, “not corruption”, that has caused building costs to blow out over the past 12 years while Labor has been in power in Victoria.
Handballing the problem to the cops and blaming the CPI are convenient alibis for a compromised premier who, as infrastructure minister under Daniel Andrews, oversaw the $100 billion “Big Build” program which has now been shown to be rife with CFMEU rorts. Allan’s insistence that the government’s response has been appropriate is belied by the latest revelations of continuing union-related graft on major construction projects during her term as premier.
Fresh investigations by The Age and 60 Minutes on the weekend revealed that in May 2024, construction firms building Melbourne’s new Metro Tunnel rail project warned the government that being forced to use CFMEU-affiliated labour hire firms would cost taxpayers $200 million more than it should. It was also revealed that, until this year, subcontractors continued to make payments to firms and associates linked to underworld figure Mick Gatto to secure work on Big Build projects.
Shutting the gate long after it should have been bolted, Transport Infrastructure Minister Gabrielle Williams has ordered builders to disclose what industrial relations fixers they hire and announced that a mandatory register of approved consultants will be established. This belated move to kick organised crime off the Big Build underlines how unserious the Allan government has been about cleaning up the construction union.
That inaction is part of wider institutional malaise in Victoria, which includes the failure of the state’s toothless anti-corruption body to hold the CFMEU to account. Meanwhile, the inaugural federal administrator appointed to oversee the union’s yet-to-be-completed restructure resigned in April, following a gruelling 20-month tenure that included receiving death threats. His replacement, Michael Crosby, a former union executive and NSW union official, must now complete the onerous reform process to finally root out corrupt elements.
It’s astonishing, therefore, that the Albanese government has nevertheless seen fit to get into bed with both the Allan government and the CFMEU by committing $6 billion of federal taxpayers’ money to the first stage of the mega $34.5 billion Melbourne Suburban Rail Loop project.
That failure to treat union corruption seriously is further underscored by the new procurement laws rushed through the national parliament on Tuesday, which will prevent contractors and subcontractors without union-negotiated agreements from working on federally funded projects.
The Albanese government is essentially doubling down on the pro-union regulatory chokehold that already enables corruption in the construction sector.
Under the registered unions provision of the Fair Work Act, the CFMEU is granted an effective monopoly over the labour supply on building sites. That stranglehold is what enables crooks and thugs to extort contractors and subcontractors, at the barrel end of threats of industrial action or being barred from projects, under the union’s banner.
Federal and Victorian Labor’s lack of vigilance about ensuring basic standards of probity and integrity in the construction sector adds to the case for a royal commission. Victorian Opposition Leader Jess Wilson promises to call one if the Liberal Party wins November’s state election, with polling suggesting that the failure to tackle CFMEU corruption is a major factor (along with the dire state of Victoria’s economy) that has turned voters off Allan and against granting Labor another term in office.
A royal commission will likely be needed to get to the bottom of the CFMEU rot. Only an inquiry with the power to compel witnesses can break the culture of silence and omerta enforced by the construction unions’ long rap sheet of thuggery and intimidation.
But a royal commission is also the right forum to examine the structural enablers of union corruption in the industrial relations system, which now includes the Albanese government’s union-friendly procurement policy.
I reply by saying I will give $100 when the Government completely bans gambling advertising.
This is not 2023 anymore, Australia as a whole has very high anti-immigration sentiment right now and One Nation‘s rise is a symptom of that.
Modi is coming to Australia next week. Albanese associating with that person is likely to be highly politically toxic given the nature of political discourse at the present moment.
Modi is probably even more unpopular than Donald Trump in Australia.
For Labor supporters, is it right to be worried about this?