
r/LinguisticMaps

Current prevalence map of Franco-Provençal (Arpitan) speakers
Estimated speaker prevalence:
• Aosta Valley (Italy): 15–25% (the last relatively vital area)
• Rural parts of Savoie, Haute-Savoie and Ain (France), Alpine valleys of Piedmont (Italy), other historical Arpitania areas in France and Switzerland, major cities (Lyon, Geneva, Chambéry, etc.): 0–1% (virtually extinct)
Franco-Provençal (also known as Arpitan) is a severely endangered Gallo-Romance language. In France and Switzerland, it has been almost completely wiped out from daily use due to long-standing aggressive assimilation policies. Total active fluent speakers across all countries are estimated between 100,000 and 200,000, with the large majority living in the Aosta Valley (Italy) and mostly elderly speakers elsewhere.
Sources:
• Ethnologue: Arpitan (frp) — https://www.ethnologue.com/language/frp/
• UNESCO Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger — https://en.wal.unesco.org/
• Centre d’Études Francoprovençales (CEFP) — https://www.centre-etudes-francoprovencales.eu/
• Wikipedia: Franco-Provençal language — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Proven%C3%A7al
• Kasstan, Jonathan (2015). Variation and Change in Francoprovençal. PhD Thesis, University of London.
• Bert, Michel & Costa, James. Sociolinguistic research on Arpitan in France and Switzerland.
• Fondation Émilie Gamelin & Arpitan cultural associations (Aosta Valley).
Notes:
• The language is primarily preserved in the Aosta Valley (Italy), where it still has some institutional support and community use.
• In France and Switzerland, the language is almost extinct.
• Four flags are shown on the map: the national flags of France, Italy and Switzerland, plus the Arpitan flag, proposed by the Arpitan Cultural Association representing the cultural heartland of the Arpitan language.
The most fool proof map of homelands of language families in NE Asia
Current prevalence map of Sorbian speakers in Germany
Estimated speaker prevalence by district:
• Eastern and central rural areas of Upper Lusatia: 25-35%
• Rural Catholic Upper Lusatia villages and smaller municipalities (especially Bautzen/Budyšin, Kamenz/Kamjenc, Hoyerswerda/Wojerecy, and Schleife/Slepo): 15-25%
• Northern Lower Lusatia rural areas (around Cottbus/Chóśebuz and Spreewald/Błota): 5-15%
• Major urban centers (Cottbus/Chóśebuz, Dresden, Berlin) and surrounding suburbs: 0-5%
The Sorbian languages are severely endangered, with fluent speakers concentrated mostly among elderly populations and in a limited number of traditional rural communities. Total active speakers of both Sorbian varieties are generally estimated between 40,000 and 60,000.
Sources:
• Foundation for the Sorbian People (Stiftung für das sorbische Volk). Official reports and statistics. https://stiftung.sorben.com/en/
• Domowina – Bund Lausitzer Sorben. https://www.domowina.de/
• Ethnologue: Upper Sorbian (hsb). https://www.ethnologue.com/language/hsb/
• Ethnologue: Lower Sorbian (dsb). https://www.ethnologue.com/language/dsb/
• UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger. Sorbian entries.
• Wikipedia: Sorbian languages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorbian_languages
• Sorbian Institute (Sorbisches Institut Bautzen). Linguistic research and censuses. https://www.serbski-institut.de/
• Stone, Gerald. 2015. *Upper Sorbian – English Dictionary*.
• Dołowy-Rybińska, Nicole. Various publications on Sorbian language vitality (2010–2023).
• Lewaszkiewicz, Tadeusz. 2014. Studies on the current situation of Sorbian languages.
Notes:
• The Sorbs (Serbja) are a West Slavic minority indigenous to the Lusatia region of eastern Germany. They possess a strong regional and ethnic identity centered around language, folklore, and historical continuity.
• The Sorbian linguistic continuum consists of two standardized literary languages: Upper Sorbian (Hornjoserbšćina), spoken mainly in Saxony, and Lower Sorbian (Dolnoserbšćina), spoken mainly in Brandenburg. The two are related but not fully mutually intelligible in everyday speech.
• Upper Sorbian remains significantly stronger due to Catholic rural communities and institutional support, while Lower Sorbian is critically endangered and has suffered heavier assimilation.
• Intergenerational transmission has declined sharply since the mid-20th century. Most fluent speakers today are over 50 years old, and daily conversational use is increasingly confined to family, ceremonial, educational, and cultural contexts.
• Due to river elevation rather than cardinal directions, Upper Sorbian is located in the south, while Lower Sorbian sits further north.
• Percentages reflect estimated current speaker prevalence adjusted from older census and fieldwork data (1990s–2010s), accounting for ongoing language shift and demographic decline.
The South Slavic dialect continuum
Map of the confirmed Arctic-Altaic language family
Migration of Koreanic and Japonic Languages 3000BC~100BC
Information and linguistic map of Kurdish languages
Map of the most spoken Language per Subdistrict in Northeast India. (c. 2011)
An alternate theory/ query on the invention of Sanskrit ?
*Could Sanskrit as a language been intentionally designed to shape and to interact with human biology?**
I’ve been thinking about the possibility that Sanskrit verses and mantras were not only meant for meaning, but also for **sound, vibration, breath, and nervous-system effects**. For example, sounds like *Om* or humming-like recitations seem to resonate physically in the throat and body, and chanting in groups can create a powerful psychological effect.
This makes me wonder whether Sanskrit, or at least mantra recitation traditions, were designed in a way that deliberately works with human biology , influencing the nervous system, the organs, the hormones, the brain systems — influencing attention, emotion, and inner state through sound rather than meaning alone.
I’d be interested in hearing:
- Whether there is any historical or linguistic evidence for this idea.
- OR Has anyone even asked the question?
- Whether this can become a scientific investigation?
- Whether the biological effects of chanting could explain why sound was emphasized so strongly in these