r/Marketingcurated

I keep finding technically competent designers but nobody who brings genuine creative thinking to the work. How do you find a designer who actually elevates your ideas rather than just executing them?

This is a frustration I have been sitting with for about a year. We have worked with several designers who are perfectly capable of producing clean, professional work when given detailed direction. What we have not found is a creative visual thinker who comes to a brief and pushes it further than what we asked for.

The difference matters more than I initially appreciated. A designer who executes instructions produces work that reflects your own creative ceiling. A designer who brings genuine creative problem-solving to the work produces output that surprises you and often outperforms what you would have briefed if left to your own thinking.

The challenge is that creative thinking is genuinely hard to evaluate from a portfolio. Most portfolios show finished work without any context for how much creative direction the designer was given. A stunning piece might have been produced from an incredibly detailed brief with very little creative latitude. You cannot tell from the output alone.

What I have started doing is giving a deliberately loose brief in early conversations and watching how candidates respond to the ambiguity. The ones who ask clarifying questions about the audience and the objective rather than jumping straight to visual references are usually the ones who think creatively rather than just aesthetically.

For founders and marketing leaders who have found designers who genuinely add creative value rather than just executing instructions, how did you identify that quality during the evaluation process? And where did you actually find them?

reddit.com
u/No-Mud1430 — 3 days ago

Looking for Anyone Who Has Used for GEO and AI Search Visibility  Finance Brand Specifically

quick background so you know why i am asking this specific question in this specific way. finance brand. three years old. solid product, good reviews, growing steadily. but paid acquisition is severely limited for our category which means organic and AI visibility is not just important it is existential. i discovered GEO about seven months ago when a lost deal debrief revealed that the customer had used an AI assistant to compare options and our brand did not come up. the competitor they chose did. three times across different queries on different platforms. that conversation changed how i think about marketing completely. spent the next few months going deep on generative engine optimisation. read everything i could find. ran experiments with our own content. built a citation tracking system. did journalist outreach. slowly and painfully got our AI citation share from zero to 8% through work i did almost entirely myself. 8% is real progress but it is not enough. competitors are at 25 to 30% and i can see exactly why. consistent editorial coverage in the publications AI models treat as authoritative. the FT tier, the Which tier, the sources that when they write about a brand that brand starts showing up in AI answers. i cannot build those relationships at speed alone. i have tried. the door is harder to open without existing credibility in the room. so i am looking seriously at Absolute Digital Media. they come up consistently in generative engine optimisation conversations that i trust and they seem to have genuine finance sector experience rather than just generic digital marketing dressed up in GEO language. has anyone here used Absolute Digital Media specifically for GEO or AI search visibility work? even better if you are in finance or a similarly regulated industry. want to know what the working relationship was actually like and whether the citation share movement was real.

u/Standard_Pain5419 — 3 days ago
▲ 5 r/Marketingcurated+1 crossposts

AP x Swatch Genius Marketing and how Pudgy Penguins could benefit from viral exposure

Audemars Piguet dropping a $400 Swatch collab today might actually be one of the smartest brand-defense moves I’ve seen in years

Because this was never really about selling a cheaper watch

It’s about protecting the Royal Oak silhouette itself

Here’s the part most people missed:

AP has quietly been losing trademark protection for the Royal Oak shape across multiple countries

- Milan rejected it years ago
- Japan rejected it in 2024
- The US followed in 2025

And the reason is kind of crazy

For 50 years, AP’s ads trained people to associate the name “Royal Oak” with the brand more than the actual octagon shape itself

So when courts checked what consumers recognized, the wording did the heavy lifting, not the silhouette

That’s a huge problem when your watch is one of the most copied luxury designs in the world

And suddenly the Swatch collab makes way more sense

- $400 pocket watch
- Swatch stores only
- One per person
- 100% of AP’s proceeds donated away

That last part donation is the tell

Brands don’t walk away from the money unless the real value sits somewhere else

And I think the real value here is much bigger:

Every single post, repost, meme and TikTok about this collab becomes live proof that people recognize the Royal Oak shape instantly

Which is exactly what the trademark courts said AP lacked

That’s the genius of the move

The pocket watch format is smart too because a $400 Swatch and a $40,000 Royal Oak don’t compete for the same buyer

So AP gets mass visibility without really hurting the luxury product

And this isn’t random either

AP’s new CEO came from Procter & Gamble, basically the masters of running multiple products in the same category without cannibalizing each other

Swatch already tested this playbook with Omega through the MoonSwatch and somehow made the original Speedmaster feel even more culturally relevant afterward

Honestly the biggest takeaway for me is this:

The strongest brands eventually stop relying on logos

You recognize them from the shape alone
- Pikachu
- Hello Kitty
- Labubu
- Coca-Cola bottle
- Pudgy Penguins

The silhouette becomes the shortcut in people’s brains

And once a brand reaches that point, it starts compounding culturally in a way normal advertising never really can 💙

u/FoxyPenguinApe — 5 days ago
▲ 10 r/Marketingcurated+2 crossposts

Curated Optics rigged marketing play drama

Did you see the new drama on Instagram about Curated Optics? A new account called The Eyewear Audit started posting industry news, and Curated Optics is apparently trying to wipe them off the map.
As soon as TEA launched, Curated hijacked their domain names and SEO to redirect all their traffic. Now, they’ve escalated to mass-reporting TEA’s Gmail to get them locked out and stop them from publishing.
The "Silicon Valley" branding they use is a total front. The person running it is actually based in Romania and is the CEO of The Other Glasses. She’s basically using Curated Optics as a fake neutral authority to trash other brands and rank her own stuff among the best ones.
It’s a massive conflict of interest and pure corporate sabotage. The whole thing is a rigged marketing play for her own brand.

reddit.com
u/Lopsided-Tap4932 — 7 days ago
▲ 5 r/Marketingcurated+1 crossposts

Need your help

We have a AEO/GEO Marketing Agency - we are working with good clients but now we are looking for scale but don’t know to to generate more leads and more meeting? Any Real Suggestion?

reddit.com
u/Acrobatic-Kitchen-37 — 9 days ago
▲ 1 r/Marketingcurated+2 crossposts

Urgency ‼️

How are AEO/GEO agencies finding reliable commission-based appointment setters or lead gen partners right now?

We run an AEO/GEO agency and are exploring partnerships with people/agencies who can help generate qualified meetings in our niche. We’re open to either:
• appointment setters booking calls for our team, or
• full sales partners who also handle closing.

We’re considering a commission/revenue-share model instead of fixed retainers.

For agencies already doing this successfully:
- What platforms or systems are working best for finding quality partners?
- What commission structures usually work well?
- Any red flags we should avoid while hiring or partnering?

Would love to learn from people who’ve already scaled through partnerships like this.

reddit.com
u/Acrobatic-Kitchen-37 — 8 days ago

Gartner on AI layoffs: ‘Workforce reductions may create budget room, but they do not create return.’ 80% of reductions do not appear to translate into return on investment (ROI).

gartner.com
u/AutoModerator — 9 days ago

Why is every brand suddenly posting “Gen Z vs Millennial social team” content on Instagram?

Is This Just a Trend or the Future of Marketing?

From u/findsalt to u/McDonalds, u/Homecentre, u/baskinrobbins, u/ikeasingapore, u/starbucksksa, u/joeandthejuiceksa and u/Pepsi, almost every brand is joining this viral social media marketing trend.

But is this just another Instagram trend, or is social media marketing actually changing?

Why Brands Are Using Gen Z Language?

Millennial marketing was all about polished aesthetics, curated feeds, and perfect captions. But Gen Z marketing focuses more on relatable memes, casual communication, trending audios, and authentic content.

So the real question is:

Are brands genuinely adapting Gen Z communication styles for the future of marketing?

Or are they simply trend-chasing to stay visible in an algorithm-driven attention?

Because if this shift is permanent, social media marketing in the next 5 years may look completely different from what we considered “good branding” a decade ago.

What do you think?  

reddit.com
u/Any_Muscle_5211 — 10 days ago

In the past nine days or so, 10,871 new podcast feeds have been created; approximately 4,243, or 39%, might have been AI-generated, according to the Podcast Index, an open-source platform that tracks the ecosystem.

bloomberg.com
u/AutoModerator — 12 days ago