
Frederick County will limit new data center development
Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater announced two executive orders to freeze data center development and foster transparency.

Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater announced two executive orders to freeze data center development and foster transparency.
Don't be fooled Frederick County voters, Jessica Fitzwater is not against data centers and she did not support the referendum to let voters decide the fate of data centers.
While this is a good stop gap, it also makes her appear better before the up coming election in regards to data centers, but don't be fooled, do not vote for her if you are against data centers in Frederick County.
Source article from Frederick News Post: https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/continuing_coverage/data_centers/fitzwater-announces-freeze-on-new-data-center-approvals/article_c35a58a6-07c2-56b8-93ee-5ec84c5899c5.html
Well, that video certainly does not make anyone from BGE or the City look good.
Do you think having the Libertarian Party on the ballot in Maryland is a positive or a negative?
Some would argue that having a viable third party on the ballot gives voters more choices. Others would argue that third parties can act as spoilers in close elections. What do you think?
Hi there!
I'm Destiny, one of the co-leaders of the Working Families Party Maryland Wolf Pack. We're hosting a World Cup Watch Party at R. House next Saturday, July 11, at 4:30pm. We'd love for folks to join, watch the game, learn more about WFP, and meet new people!
You can RSVP here.
Hope to see you there!
Primaries matter; the best way to let your party know you want change!
When you live under a regime that attempts to control your daily existence, you quickly learn to watch your tongue. You learn that asking questions is considered a form of betrayal, and the authorities do not feel the need to answer to the residents they represent - they expect residents to answer to them.
For the last few years, I have watched our elected leaders tighten their grip on the community where I live. It started subtly, but now the oppression is overt. Residents are no longer allowed to speak directly to elected representatives and any attempt to express concerns is blocked by a bureaucratic firewall. At public assembles, those in charge determine who is allowed to raise issues. Those who speak up without approval are silenced and those who have demanded transparency are labeled troublemakers.
We are being financially drained. In addition to rising utility costs and property taxes, mandatory monthly fees have increased at rates above baseline inflation annually without explanation. Contracts and procurement bids are treated like classified information, hidden from residents whose fees pay for them. Instead, an unelected administrator steers contracts directly to corporate entities connected to a private industry syndicate they are personally connected to. It is textbook conflict of interest, operating in broad daylight.
When concerned residents pointed out the illegal use of hazardous chemicals in public spaces, our elected leaders didn't apologize; they defended the use of the toxins, attempting to gaslight us into believing they are needed for our own good. Many major decisions have been deliberated behind closed doors, potentially violating written laws. We live in a place ruled not by accountability, but by fear, manipulation, and shadow decrees.
You might think I am writing this from a failing democracy or a totalitarian regime overseas. However, I’m just sitting in my modest townhouse in Maryland. This is daily life in a rogue Homeowners Association.
The authoritarian regime isn't a foreign dictatorship; it’s our own HOA Board of Directors and the unelected administrator is an unrestrained property manager who jointly serves on the Board of Directors of an HOA industry group. What is happening in communities like mine across Maryland is a crisis of absolute governance without adequate representation. Our board and property manager collude to control the microphone at meetings, decides who has the right to voice concerns, and have essentially built an iron curtain designed to filter out resident dissent.
Those who defend the current system love to offer two dismissive comments to frustrated residents: “If you don’t like it, vote them out,” or “If it’s that bad, just move.” In the real world, both options are just an illusion of choice. Voting out a rogue board is nearly impossible when the property manager and Board of Directors controls communications and holds meetings behind a wall of bureaucratic rules designed to suppress community organizing.
As for moving, it is a completely unreasonable demand. Many of my neighbors and I bought our homes here because it was affordable at the time. In a brutal real estate market where interest rates have locked people into their existing mortgages and home prices have skyrocketed, uprooting our lives is simply not a realistic option. Moving requires capital we no longer have - one reason being because our monthly HOA fees have increased 50% in just three years with little to no justification.
This isn't just a small scale neighborhood conflict; examples like ours are real housing affordability issues. Unchecked HOA fees are actively pricing families and retirees out of the homes they scraped together savings to buy.
When residents request to see vendor contracts or competitive bids to ensure our funds are spent well, we are denied the information. Meanwhile, the psychological manipulation used to keep us in line breeds a deep seated, quiet terror throughout the community. Speaking out feels like inviting a target onto your back, as residents stay silent out of fear that a minor, subjective architectural issue will suddenly become an expensive, retaliatory citation. It replaces a supportive neighborhood culture with suspicion and isolation.
We are trapped in a cruel paradox: if we take the necessary step of pursuing legal action to force compliance with the law, the lawsuits will drain our community’s funds. Every dollar spent on lawyers is a dollar taken from critical neighborhood infrastructure - meaning our sidewalks, roads, and shared spaces will crumble while we fight for basic fairness.
In many of Maryland’s counties, there is no local recourse for homeowners. While Montgomery County has a dedicated offices to handle common ownership community disputes, most offer no administrative protection, no oversight board, and nowhere to turn. A homeowner's only option is to escalate the fight to the state level, facing a daunting, expensive legal system alone.
Why is the system so heavily rigged against homeowners? Look no further than the Community Associations Institute (CAI) and its aggressive lobbying activity in Annapolis.
HOA residents in Maryland are not a niche minority. According to CAI's own data, there are approximately 1,062,000 Marylanders living in 406,100 homes across more than 7,100 community associations in the state. These million-plus residents collectively pour nearly $2.05 billion a year into these private associations. That $2.05 billion represents a massive pool of private, largely unregulated capital. To protect it, CAI is represented at the State House by a powerhouse lobbying firm with deep, entrenched connections throughout Maryland state government.
Year after year, this high powered corporate lobby has systematically dismantled or blocked common sense legislation meant to protect citizens. Bills aiming to establish a "Bill of Rights" for residential owners and mandatory state licensing for community association managers are routinely smothered by industry lobbyists who claim these basic accountability measures are "too expensive” despite many other much more expensive state initiatives moving forward without much question.
They have built a legal barrier around HOAs, ensuring property managers remain insulated from the consequences of their own malpractice while leaving everyday citizens entirely unprotected. While the General Assembly recently established a temporary Task Force on Common Ownership Communities to study these issues, a study group is not enough. We do not need more delay tactics while our bank accounts are drained, community affordability vanishes, and our rights are trampled.
HOAs were originally designed to protect property values and foster community. Instead, they have devolved into petty fiefdoms where transparency does not exist, accountability is treated as an insult, and state laws are treated as optional suggestions.
It's time for the residents of Maryland as a whole to wake up and take action. We don't live under a dictatorship, and it's time we stop letting corporate backed HOAs act like them. We need to cross neighborhood lines, unite our voices, and demand that our state delegates pass real structural reform: a permanent, statewide and local regulatory oversight units, strict statutory caps on fee increases, and mandatory transparency for all vendor contracts and solicitation processes.
Together, we need to tear down this suburban “iron curtain.” We need to demand open books, open meetings, and legislation with real teeth from Annapolis. Our homes, our wallets, and our basic democratic rights depend on it.
Today someone posted on another Reddit page and just making a fuss about her husband not able to vote due to being unaffiliated. Too bad and my 2
Cents is that less people will even want to vote at all if Maryland goes to a full blown open primary. People with signs saying ask me why I can’t vote have an agenda to actually turn off people from wanting to vote. I rather register my affiliation that is a party or no party instead of showing up declaring a party at the ballot box.
I trust that y’all are aware of the recent primaries. I worked for a Democratic candidate in the 5th Congressional district of Maryland. Her name was Quincy Bareebe. She is an Ugandan immigrant who built up a healthcare business in Odenton, MD. Her priorities during the campaign were affordable healthcare, holding corporations and bigger businesses accountable, protecting and supporting federal workers, and making higher education more affordable. She unfortunately lost and got 18.1% of the vote compared to Boafo’s 32%, but then again, there were 23 candidates (24 if you count Nicole Williams) in that race, so second isn’t atrocious.
I have this photo of me with my campaign shirt and reddit username as proof.
So 4 years ago. Dan Cox won his nomination for Governor on a bunch of innuendos and turned off voters who later elected Wes Moore. Will he win again as the nominee.