r/Nauma

▲ 12 r/Nauma+3 crossposts

Washington's new 2028 income tax seems to have a ~$27K cliff hidden in the capital gains rules. Am I reading this right?

I was working through ESSB 6346 (WA's 9.9% tax on income over $1M, starting 2028) and I think I found a strange edge case. Please check my reading.

Here is the problem I see. The bill says the add-back "applies only to taxpayers owing tax under chapter 82.87 RCW" (the capital gains tax). So:

  • Gain under ~$278k: you owe no capital gains tax, nothing gets added back, so the gain never touches the income tax.
  • Gain even $1 over: you owe capital gains tax, so the *whole* gain gets added back, including the first $278k that was previously free.

Example (single filer, $1.2M wages, 2025 deduction figure):

Scenario 1

  • Long-term gain: $277,000
  • Capital gains tax: $0
  • Income tax base: $1,200,000
  • Total WA tax: $19,800

Scenario 2

  • Long-term gain: $279,000
  • Capital gains tax: $70
  • Income tax base: $1,479,000
  • Total WA tax: $47,421

A $2,000 bigger gain costs about $27,600 more in tax, because 9.9% x $279,000 of extra income suddenly counts. It only affects people whose other income is already over $1M.

Caveats: I'm not a tax pro, this ignores the other credits in the bill, and the tax faces a repeal vote in Nov 2026. I found this while building the rules into a planning calculator, and I checked the wording against the session law text rather than a summary.

Does this match how you read Sec. 302(3)?

reddit.com
u/Maria_Nauma_Finance — 12 days ago
▲ 1 r/Nauma

Should major retirement expenses depend on market performance?

Imagine you planned to give your child $150,000 for a home down payment during your second year of retirement, but the stock market has just fallen 30%. Would you make the gift as promised, delay it, reduce it, or treat it as completely separate from your withdrawal strategy?

reddit.com
u/Expensive_Eagle01 — 13 days ago