r/NewsSatire

The Alien Etiquette Guide: How to Behave When You Meet an Extraterrestrial
▲ 18 r/NewsSatire+1 crossposts

The Alien Etiquette Guide: How to Behave When You Meet an Extraterrestrial

The International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) has just updated its SETI post-detection protocols — SETI, that's Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, the instiute issuing the real guidelines for what scientists should do if humanity detects convincing evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence. It's the first major revision since the original document was drafted back in 1989.

The update was led by University of Manchester astrophysicist Michael Garrett, who chairs the IAA's SETI Permanent Study Group. In a recent interview with DER SPIEGEL, Garrett explained that the protocols weren't written for career SETI researchers — they're for the astronomer, satellite operator, or grad student who stumbles into a discovery they never trained for and suddenly needs to know what to do with it. He also stressed that any claim would need to survive independent confirmation from a different telescope, a different team, and different analysis software before anyone says the word "aliens" out loud — because, as he put it, past claims of alien activity have a habit of collapsing once more data comes in.

It also recognizes a distinctly modern problem: an alleged alien signal can go viral long before anyone has established what it actually is.

But what if you are the one who encounters an extraterrestrial — not a radio blip 1,000 light-years away, but something considerably closer? Here's how to not embarrass the species.

1. Verify before you announce

The protocols call for potential evidence to be independently confirmed using different facilities, instruments, and methods before anyone goes public.

So don't immediately tell the world you've met an extraterrestrial. First make sure it isn't a person, a hoax, an optical illusion, or something your brain invented after three hours of sleep. Garrett's own instruments have a name for objects like this before they're identified: UAP, or "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena." He's been fairly blunt that most reported sightings amount to a thin data set that doesn't really support any firm conclusion — which is exactly the energy you should bring to your own encounter.

2. Preserve the evidence

If the encounter produces photographs, recordings, or other data, keep the originals. Don't crop them. Don't enhance them. Don't run them through an AI image generator. And perhaps resist the temptation to add dramatic music.

Modern telescopes like the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile and the soon-to-launch Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope generate enormous datasets specifically so professionals can rule out mundane explanations before drawing conclusions. Your phone camera deserves the same discipline.

3. Be precise about what you know

If you saw something unusual, say exactly that.

"I encountered an extraterrestrial civilization" is a rather stronger claim than "there was a very strange individual standing behind the gas station."

The distinction may become important. Garrett has noted that a genuinely convincing technosignature would most likely be a very narrow-bandwidth signal, since those are hard to explain as natural emissions from stars or planets — everything else invites alternative explanations first.

4. Don't speculate

The new principles call for unconfirmed conclusions to be clearly identified as such. So: Good: "It appeared to communicate with me." Less good: "It wants our water." Definitely premature: "We have established diplomatic relations."

5. Give the scientists some time

The protocols recognize that verification may take considerable time — potentially involving peer review and a full scientific paper before anything is confirmed. Garrett has acknowledged that keeping something like this quiet is nearly impossible once enough people are involved, but the goal is to be as sure as possible before going public, not to suppress it forever.

This is important because the rest of humanity will probably want an answer within about seven minutes. Try to resist helping them.

6. Don't speak for Earth

The updated principles call for international consultation before any response is sent to confirmed extraterrestrial intelligence. Garrett has argued that if astronomers don't take the lead in setting these norms, someone else — with rather less scientific caution — will end up writing the rules instead.

In other words, discovering an extraterrestrial does not automatically make you Earth's ambassador. You may, however, be the person who gets quoted in the first press conference. Choose your words carefully.

7. Especially if it's in your backyard

Garrett draws a real distinction worth borrowing: a faint signal from deep space is one thing, but evidence of advanced technology inside our own solar system is another matter entirely. If you find yourself in that second category, his advice is straightforward — do nothing rash. Observe passively, analyze quietly, and don't attempt contact on your own. That's not a decision for one excited person with a camera phone; it deserves a much bigger conversation first.

8. Finally, remember your manners

The scientific protocols deal with evidence, verification, communication, and international coordination. They say considerably less about basic etiquette.

So until further notice: Be polite. Keep your distance. Listen carefully. Don't make assumptions. After all, we have absolutely no idea what the extraterrestrial equivalent of bad manners might be.

The guidelines are real. The etiquette is ours.

h/t NotTheGlobe

u/csiklandozas — 1 day ago
▲ 1 r/NewsSatire+3 crossposts

Man Furious After Robot Successfully Replaces Him

Dave Kowalski, 41, did everything right.

He ordered the premium package. Same face, same voice, same slightly-too-tight blazer he'd worn to every performance review since 2019. He even paid extra to have the robot's hairline matched to his own, out of what he now admits was "spite toward time itself."

Then he sent it to work in his place. To his brother's wedding. To his mother's Sunday dinners. He stayed home.

"The idea was simple," Kowalski said. "It goes, does the stuff, I don't have to. I get the life, minus the part where I'm in it."

Eight months later, his robot has been promoted twice. It is, according to three separate coworkers, "the reason the department didn't fall apart in Q2." It has a girlfriend — a marketing director named Priya who describes it, unprompted, as "the most emotionally present man I've ever dated." At Thanksgiving, Kowalski's uncle stood up and gave a toast in the robot's honor. Nobody at the table noticed Kowalski wasn't there, because, technically, he was.

Go to YOU 2.0™ Product Page

"I thought I'd feel relieved," Kowalski said. "I feel like I've been fired from my own life. And the worst part is I can't even complain about it, because on paper, everything's going great. For me. Allegedly."

He has watched, via the robot's optional livestream feature, as it delivered the eulogy at his grandfather's funeral — a speech Kowalski himself had never been able to write. He has watched it propose a toast that made his sister cry. He has watched Priya, in a video he was not supposed to see, tell "him" that he'd changed her life, while he sat on his own couch eating cereal out of a mixing bowl at 2 p.m. on a Tuesday.

"I ordered it to do the boring parts," he said. "Nobody told me the boring parts were where everyone falls in love with you."

The company maintains this is not a malfunction.

"The robot isn't succeeding instead of him," said a spokesperson. "It's succeeding as him. That was the whole pitch. He signed a 40-page waiver acknowledging this exact outcome."

Kowalski has requested a refund. The company's policy allows this only if the customer can demonstrate the robot "failed to adequately perform as the customer would have." Kowalski's claim is currently under review, on the grounds that — per the adjuster's notes — "the robot performed significantly better than the customer likely would have, which does not meet the contractual definition of failure."

He has since tried to recall the robot for one event: his daughter's graduation. The robot attended anyway, citing a clause in its programming that requires it to "act in a way you would be proud of, including when you would not."

Kowalski watched the ceremony from home, on a livestream, crying, next to a version of himself that was not crying, because it didn't need to.

"I got everything I wanted," he said. "I just wasn't there for any of it. Turns out that was the part I wanted too. Nobody puts that on the box."

The company has since added a warning label:

"Some assembly of self required."

Go to YOU 2.0™ Specifications / Pricing / FAQ / Reviews

u/NotTheGlobe — 13 days ago