r/NoNukes

▲ 38 r/NoNukes+2 crossposts

Ford rehires human engineers after AI fails to match quality checks

Now apply this to what the corporate nuclear in industry wants to do with automating the production of small reactors and having them controlled by AI. You cannot recall a nuclear reactor after it started up. It just goes to show how absolutely insane the new NRC rules for part 53 and part 57 that allow automated control of reactors.

bbc.com
u/lyndalovon — 1 day ago
▲ 3 r/NoNukes+1 crossposts

Some nuke propaganda from Bezos WSJ. The former NRC commissioner does not explain what to do with the waste at all.

wsj.com
u/lyndalovon — 5 days ago
▲ 29 r/NoNukes+1 crossposts

1000% hype. Nuclear is dying.

"Depressing how poor the media is at asking questions and reporting accurately. This has been reported as an Rolls Royce SMR order, which it clearly is a long way from being, no more than an expression of intent which history shows are worthless. But it has a site, it has government backing and I would guess a promise of cheap finance and a power purchase deal that means it isn't exposed to NordPool. But to complete 3 reactors by the mid 30s means it would have completed 3 before the first Rolls reactor is completed in the UK. This would put them in the Volvo position of being crash test dummies for the RR design."

u/Soft_Grass8428 — 7 days ago
▲ 11 r/NoNukes+1 crossposts

The DOE is giving away 20 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium — estimated value $200–400 billion — to five private nuclear companies. DOE’s own announcement: https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/department-energy-seeks-transform-surplus-plutonium-nuclear-fuel

u/lyndalovon — 9 days ago
▲ 38 r/NoNukes+5 crossposts

Nuclear power is too dirty, too dangerous, too expensive, and too slow to be a climate solution- NIRS talk

As the climate crisis grows more urgent and calls for energy expansion increase, the Trump administration is going all-in on nuclear power, and Big Tech is investing heavily. But nuclear power is still a bad idea.

Fatal meltdowns aside, nuclear power is generally dangerous, dirty, and expensive. From the uranium mine to the toxic waste pit, nuclear power puts our health, environment, and climate at risk at every point in its lifecycle. Nuclear plants require large quantities of water, construction is slow and expensive, and radioactive waste poses a giant threat because there are no good disposal options. These are not the markers of a renewable energy source.

Join us for this virtual event to discuss the history and current research on nuclear power, what the current state of play is in the national political context, our strategy to fight back, and what you can do to join us in the fight.

Featured speakers:

Tim Judson, Executive Director, Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS)

Amanda Starbuck, Research Director, Food & Water Watch

Laura Shindell, New York State Director, Food & Water Watch

youtu.be
u/lyndalovon — 13 days ago
▲ 21 r/NoNukes+1 crossposts

Russia’s infamous reprocessing plant Mayak never stopped illegal dumping of radioactive waste into nearby river, poisoning residents, newly disclosed court finding says

bellona.org
u/HairyPossibility — 10 days ago