r/ObjectivePersonality

I’ve heard Dave say something along these lines. That, since it is objective, AI can type you. I’ve tried to use AI to type me a few times just cause I posted a typing video and nobody agreed on anything about my type 😭

Depending on what questions I answered or how I prompted it, it would give me fairly different answers. The only consistent aspect was Ne savior and Consume savior (it would say either play or consume first depending). I don’t understand how the AI thing works then and why it would even have an accurate understanding of what the coins mean.

And how can a lead M Fi (possibly double activated) ease up a little?

I tend to journal alot as of recent and I'm making myself sleep more and slow down. I'm a blast play ej ( feminine se and Fi) but I think my sleep/recovery was so bad for years I dont really ever engage with others and when I do it's always giving up what I want to do although its nesscary tasks usually. but when I do Blast/play I go on forever I'm a pretty good teacher and can Blast/play forever when I do it it's just I rarely do.

There's alot of self suppression as well. I'm the quietest person even though there's alot going on internally people have literally asked others if im a mute lol.

Note: not officially typed

I kind of know how it works now, it’s just confusing trying to type myself. I’ve always seen myself as a decider but the ops definitions confuse me a little bit. I’m horrendously bad at names and it will take me multiple interactions to attach a name to a face. I don’t really know if that’s a people issue or sensory issue or something. I don’t really ignore input from others but I also don’t overlook myself either, so the decider types feel off. but so do the observer types because I don’t feel myself abandoning S for N or vice versa. I can see how disorganization plays a role in my life, so control is likely a demon. I can see Di>De and Oe>Oi but not the O/D coin for some reason? I thought that one was supposed to be easy

I’ve been thinking about this for a while: what are the actual differences between Si as a function and masculine Se? From my understanding, Si functions almost like a personal or subjective memory box. It seems heavily tied to past experiences and to an individual’s internal impressions of those experiences. Se, on the other hand, is generally described as being focused on the present moment and on concrete, factual details in the external world.

What confuses me is that masculine Se also seems to retain sensory details quite strongly, allowing the individual to recall those details later. If that’s the case, the distinction between Si and masculine Se can start to feel somewhat blurry, at least when it comes to memory. Dave and Shan also seem to have some difficulty clearly explaining Si, which might partly be because neither of them has Si in their function stack. So what exactly separates Si’s relationship with memory and past experience from the strong factual recall associated with masculine Se?

In the same vein, I’m also pretty confused about where exactly the line is drawn between Ne and feminine Ni. What is the meaningful difference between the two? In my experience, feminine Ni can sometimes look remarkably similar to Ne because it isn’t particularly pushy or rigid about its conclusions.

Is the distinction that Ni is still narrowing things down into singular conclusions, predictions, or projections, but feminine Ni simply doesn’t feel the need to stand firmly behind those conclusions? In other words, it might arrive at an Ni-style conclusion while remaining relatively flexible or “wishy-washy” about it. But if that’s the case, how would feminine Ni actually differ from something like masculine Ne? Masculine Ne could presumably be much more forceful and confident about its possibilities and interpretations despite still fundamentally operating through Ne.