The other day while reading one of the Sasquatch Message To Humanity books, I came across The Seven Grandfather Teachings. It struck me as a topic that is important to share.

These teachings are a foundational set of guiding principles in Anishinaabe (Ojibwe) and various other Indigenous cultures. Each of the seven sacred teachings is paired with an animal whose natural behavior embodies that specific life lesson. I’m of the belief that if these lessons are taken as our own, they will work like medicine in our lives.

Wisdom (Beaver): Beavers use their natural gifts to build homes and shape their environments, symbolizing the importance of using your knowledge constructively to build community and survive. Wisdom through labor.

Love (Eagle): Because it flies the highest and sees the furthest, the eagle is closest to the Creator. Its teaching is mutual, unconditional love, which forms the core of all other teachings.

Respect (Buffalo): The buffalo gives every part of itself to sustain human life, showing profound consideration, appreciation, and respect for all of creation.

Courage / Bravery (Bear): Mother bears are famously fierce and protective. The bear teaches you to face your fears with integrity and to have the strength of heart to stand up for what is right.

Honesty (Sabe / Bigfoot/ Raven): Represented by the honest and straightforward sabe, this teaching means being true to yourself and others, speaking honestly, and admitting mistakes. (Also lying to a telepathic being is folly.)

Humility (Wolf): The wolf puts the needs of its pack above its own. Humility is understanding your sacred place in the natural world and living selflessly without arrogance.

Truth (Turtle): The turtle carries all human history and knowledge on its back. It reminds us to understand and live in harmony with the ultimate truth of the Creator and all things.

Crop circle formation at Etchilhampton Hill, Nr Devizes, Wiltshire.

Location details: Google Maps Link OS Grid Ref: SU 03839 60408.

What-three-words: scrapping.spelling.hitters

Note: Multiple images of the Etchilhampton Hill, Wiltshire, crop circle formation are presented here as a gallery. On mobile devices: just tap the image and scroll. On desktop: Use the arrows to scroll.

This crop circle was first reported on 24 June 2026.

The formation straddles two different crops: most of it lies within a field of wildflowers and poppies, while a smaller portion extends into a field of young wheat. It measures approximately 180 feet in diameter.

The design is a quintuplet formation, enclosed within a large outer ring. What makes this crop circle particularly special is that the majority of it appears within a wildflower meadow, including many red poppies. As the photos in the gallery show, this gives the formation a truly striking and unusual character.

Although rare, it is not unheard of for crop circles to cross field boundaries. In some cases, formations have appeared across adjacent fields, each containing a different crop. There are several variations on this theme, but the idea of boundaries, and the piercing or crossing of those boundaries - is something the crop circles have illustrated many times before.

The Etchilhampton formation seems to speak of a delicate threshold, opening into a beautiful, flower-strewn realm.

Etchilhampton Hill has been home to many dozens of crop circle formations over the years. It also offers a commanding view across the Pewsey Vale, adding further depth and atmosphere to this remarkable location.

Image credits: Stonehenge Dronescapes

Image credits: Dan Vidler

Image credits: Simon Young

Credit: Temporary Temples

"Zürcher Weinland, Switzerland, 23 June 2026"

Note: Multiple images of the Zürcher Weinland crop circle formation are presented here as a gallery. On mobile devices: just tap the image and scroll. On desktop: Use the arrows to scroll.

Crop circle formation discovered in the Zurich wine region.

This two-armed spiral formation was first reported on June 23rd 2026 and is in a field of wheat. It appears to be composed of circular arcs of varying sizes. In the three circles located at the centre and at the ends of the spiral arms, the wheat has been laid down in a clockwise spiral pattern.

At present, no information is available regarding whether the stalks are bent, broken, or twisted. A small tuft of leaves remains standing in the centre of the middle circle.

The formation measures approximately 51 m x 66 m, and the shapes appear to be cleanly crafted.

The farmer has requested that the exact location of the crop circle not be revealed.

Image credits: Ricardo Perret.

Credit: Temporary Temples

A few years ago maybe around 2023 I was coming home at night and when I got onto my street there was this huge craft above me. It was a very cloudy night and dark. The clouds seemed very low too almost as if near the top of houses. There was something moving really, really slowly and not making a sound at all. All I could see was this set of lights in a row in the clouds like white,blue, and I think red maybe 5-6 lights in a row. As it slowly moved above me I saw the underside and it was a diamond shape with those lights at each corner red and white. I watched it as it moved silently through the clouds and up the road until it disappeared.
I still don’t know what it was but it didn’t match helicopter, drone , plane etc.

Fast forward to the next year, one night I was dreaming of walking down a road with cornfields as far as I could see and taller than me. And in the distance something was coming toward me. I suddenly got a frightening feeling and instantly new what it was UFO and at that moment of realizing instantly woke up in bed( so I thought) and my curtains wide open and this big blue/ white light outside the window so bright it lit up outside and my entire room the brightest light I’ve ever seen. Then I woke up inside a craft.

No one believes me, but I feel this was real. I’ve had many sleep paralysis in my life constantly and nightmares etc. this was very different.

I was on a metal table. I felt it. It was very cold and I had no clothes but a small cloth. I was mostly paralyzed and couldn’t move much. I saw them standing around me like a few 3-5 and different sizes and types tall and short looking at me.

All my senses were there and I could see and feel every detail. Nothing foggy like a dream. And I had immense fear that I couldn’t control trying to pull the cloth over me and thinking this isn’t real and everytime I open my eyes nope they’re still there.

I remember telepathically being told something like to calm down but I couldn’t.

Then I seemed to black out and woke up in bed. BUT everything changed. My window curtains were wide open like when the light came in. I was laying on top of my blanket and it was perfectly under me like how a picnic blanket is laid out of how you make your bed not when someone’s tossing and turning.
My clothes were odd, my shirt was like half on. And my legs and body were bent and up exactly how I was laying on the metal table. Everything was just odd and different. That made me believe it was real and not a dream.

Last year, I’m sure I saw an orange orb floating in the distance during fireworks. I watched for an hour moving up, down, left, right. Going slowly and fast and doing zigzags and going back to same spot while fireworks were going on.

Since the abduction I’ve had these feelings every single night like erie feelings as if being watched or nearby. I haven’t seen anything but I feel it.

I’m always looking in the sky on my way home now but I never see anything.

Do you think I’ve had an experience? Do you think it’s just me over thinking and just dreams? Did anyone else have an experience like this?

New circle at Kingweston, Somerset (near Cedar Walk Plantation and Kingweston House).

Location details :https://maps.app.goo.gl/eg6W9SpNUYGQddWr6 

OS Grid Ref: ST 52135 31746. What-three-words: https://w3w.co/tech.unfilled.suitcase

Note: Multiple images of the Kingweston, Somerset, crop circle formation are presented here as a gallery. On mobile devices: just tap the image and scroll. On desktop: Use the arrows to scroll.

This crop circle was first reported on 21st June 2026, the Summer Solstice. It appeared in a field of young wheat and measures approximately 180 feet in diameter.

The formation features an eight-fold design, with distinctive lollipop-like motifs and four eye-shaped elements at its centre.

Visiting Notice:
Please do not enter the field. The farmer has specifically asked that visitors stay out of the crop, and we ask everyone to respect his wishes. With care and consideration, hopefully the formation can remain in place and the farmer will not feel the need to cut it out.

Image credits: Steve Alexander.

Credit: Temporary Temples

The Psychological Impact of UAP/NHI Disclosure | Disclosure Foundation

I came across a new white paper from The Disclosure Foundation titled “The Psychological Impact of UAP/NHI Disclosure”. There are two versions: an Executive Briefing and a much longer Full Report. The topic is not mainly “what are UAP?” but rather how could people, institutions, health systems, media, religion, science, and society psychologically respond if UAP/NHI disclosure continues or reaches a more advanced stage?

One important point is the report does not claim to know what UAP/NHI ultimately are. It says that the “nature, origin, capabilities, and intentions of any potential NHI remain unknown” and that preparedness frameworks must therefore function under “substantial uncertainty.”

The central idea is that disclosure is not just an information release. It is a psychological, cultural, institutional, and social process. The report states:

>“Disclosure is not happening in a void. It is occurring within a complex global environment shaped by culture, religion, politics, media, existing beliefs, institutional trust, and prior experiences.”

It also says:

>“Different stages may produce substantially different levels of public engagement, uncertainty, psychological impact, and societal response.”

This is important because the report does not treat disclosure as one single moment. It presents it as something that may unfold in stages.

The report outlines five possible stages:

1. Limited Disclosure Governments acknowledge that some UAP are real but remain unexplained. This is described as the current state.
2. Confirmatory Disclosure Official and scientific confirmation that at least some observed phenomena cannot be attributed to known human technology or accepted scientific models.
3. Attribution Disclosure Official acknowledgment that at least some phenomena are associated with known non-human intelligence.
4. Reconciliation Disclosure The public learns the broader reality of what has been known, what has occurred, what interactions may have taken place, what was withheld or mischaracterized, and what the implications are.
5. Full Integrated Disclosure Disclosure becomes part of ordinary social reality and affects science, education, technology, religion, economy, politics, culture, and long-term human self-understanding.

The authors also distinguish between ontological shock and ontological fracturing. They do not claim that, for most people, their entire worldview collapses completely. Instead, they describe a partial fracturing of the worldview:

>“For some individuals, this may produce ontological fracturing following an ontological shock; a disruption in core assumptions about reality without requiring a complete collapse of the worldview.”

This fits with another important finding: the report does not predict mass psychological collapse. It says responses would likely be heterogeneous, meaning very different from person to person. Some may react with curiosity, validation, fascination, or spiritual meaning. Others may experience anxiety, uncertainty, worldview disruption, distrust, or distress.

The authors argue that the main public health risk is not Hollywood-style chaos, but a surge in people seeking information, reassurance, therapy, religious interpretation, social support, or crisis help.

>“The primary public health risk is likely to be a surge demand for services in a concentrated period of time resulting in system strain, not mass panic.”

The Executive Summary expands on this:

>“Ambiguity surrounding disclosure, misinformation, and concentrated reassurance-seeking, could temporarily overwhelm behavioral health, communication, and educational systems.”

In other words, even if only a small percentage of the population struggles, that could still be a major issue if millions of people seek help or answers at the same time. Another major point is communication. The psychological impact would depend not only on what is disclosed, but how it is communicated, interpreted, and integrated. The report says:

>“Communication quality and strategies may be as important as the disclosed information itself for determining response.”

This includes transparency, consistency, trusted messengers, early communication, acknowledgment of uncertainty, predictable updates, and rapid correction of misinformation.

The Full Report also emphasizes institutional trust. If disclosure involves the realization that information was withheld, mischaracterized, or concealed for a long time, the trust issue itself could become a major psychological and social problem. The report refers to this as institutional betrayal and says:

>“For UAP/NHI disclosure, which may involve acknowledgment of prolonged concealment, institutional betrayal may become one of the defining psychological dimensions of the event itself.”

This means the shock may not only be “NHI exists.” It may also be “Who knew what, for how long, and why was it not communicated honestly?”

The report also discusses controlled and uncontrolled disclosure. Disclosure does not have to come only through official government channels. It could also unfold through former officials, unofficial statements, other governments, media, leaks, or third parties. The report says preparedness planning must account for “fragmented, partial, accelerated, disputed, uncontrolled or evolving disclosure conditions.”

This matters because uncontrolled disclosure could create more confusion, misinformation, fear, and institutional distrust than a clear and coordinated process.

The report also highlights stigma. For decades, UAP witnesses have often faced ridicule, dismissal, social invalidation, or professional risk. The report says distress among witnesses may be connected less to the experience itself and more to ridicule, isolation, dismissal, and lack of support. This is why the authors warn against prematurely pathologizing people who have UAP-related experiences or disclosure-related distress.

The report argues that people reacting strongly to disclosure-related information should not automatically be treated as mentally ill. They may need context, support, and informed care rather than stigma.

The authors assume that most people would be able to come to terms with such information in the long term. However, they warn that smaller vulnerable groups may be more severely affected, including people with existing mental health conditions, trauma, social instability, strong religious or ideological threat perception, intense personal UAP experiences, or low tolerance for uncertainty.

The Full Report also notes that children, adolescents, and different cultural communities may need specific forms of communication and support. Disclosure would not be interpreted the same way everywhere. Religion, culture, politics, media environments, institutional trust, and existing beliefs would all shape how people make sense of the same information. They argue that there is currently no adequate public health or psychological preparedness framework for this kind of event:

>“No existing national framework currently exists to coordinate the psychological, educational, public health, and societal dimensions of advanced UAP/NHI disclosure.”

The report recommends preparedness measures such as:

• Mental health workforce training
• Scalable behavioral health capacity
• Public psychoeducation
• Community support infrastructure
• Interagency communication planning
• Ethical guidelines for clinical engagement with UAP-related experiences
• Crisis communication frameworks
• Rapid correction of misinformation
• Age-appropriate and culturally adaptive communication resources
• Avoiding premature pathologization of people having UAP-related distress or experiences
• Media literacy and protection against manipulation by high-control groups, cults, or sectarian movements

The final message is that people can adapt, but institutions need to prepare.

>“The central conclusion is that people are capable of adapting to and integrating disclosure-related information in ways that prove manageable over time, and that this adaptation can be meaningfully facilitated, or impeded, by institutional choices around communication and preparedness.”

There are two documents available for download.

The Executive Briefing is the short version. It is 18 pages long and provides a concise summary of the key findings, authors, tiered models, core risks and recommendations. It is primarily intended for decision-makers, the media, public authorities or readers who wish to quickly grasp the main points.

The Full Report is the comprehensive version, comprising 71 pages. It covers the same basic thesis but in much greater detail: definitions, disclosure levels, historical comparisons, psychological mechanisms, research on UAP witnesses, communication, trust, resilience, the spectrum of reactions, children and adolescents, cultural differences, ethical issues, research gaps and references.

My personal opinion:
For once, this is not a document intended to cause panic again. It is a document about preparedness. It does not claim that disclosure would psychologically devastate society. Rather, it states that the public’s reaction would depend heavily on uncertainty, the perceived threat, the quality of communication, trust in institutions, stigmatisation, misinformation and the availability of support. It would also be about whether institutions are honest, prepared and psychologically mature enough to help society integrate it.

As the topic of plasma and its connection to paranormal phenomena comes up here from time to time, and there isn’t much information about the book on Reddit yet, I thought I’d write a brief summary of a few points after I stumbled across the book.

Andrija Puharich (born Henry Karel Puharić; 19 February 1918 – 3 January 1995) was an American physician, neurologist, inventor and parapsychologist. He was best known for his research into paranormal phenomena and mediums. In his book "Beyond Telepathy", published as early as 1962, he writes about telepathy, extrasensory perception, states of consciousness and the possible connection between mind, body and extraordinary perception. In it, Puharich attempts not only to describe psi phenomena as individual experiences, but to understand them as a coherent system.

Central to his work is the question of the biological, psychological and ritual conditions under which humans can receive or transmit information that does not pass through the usual sensory channels.

Read the book on archive.org and if you’d like more information about the author, I can recommend The Cosmic Clock’s Substack and YouTube channel.

Chapter Overview

1: The Telepathic Receiver and the State of Cholinergia
This chapter deals with the telepathic receiver and describes reception as a state of calm, openness and inner relaxation. The recipient is not tense, but is in a receptive state of consciousness.

2: The Telepathic Sender and the State of Adrenergia
This is about the broadcaster. The transmitter is more activated, emotionally charged or concentrated. Its inner tension creates the directed force through which information can be transmitted.

3: Telepathic Networks with Individuals Serving as Unconscious Relays
Puharich extends the model to telepathic networks. People can unconsciously serve as intermediate stations or relays without actively knowing that they are involved in the process.

4: General Extrasensory Perception Networks Containing an Object as a Relay
This chapter describes the role of objects. Objects can act as relays or triggers for extrasensory perception. This results in the connection to psychometrics.

5: The Memory Capacity of Objects, and the Impregnation of Such Objects by Mind Action
Puharich explores the idea that objects possess a kind of memory or can be shaped by mental influence. Objects appear here not only as dead matter, but as possible carriers of information.

6: The Dynamics of the Mobile Center of Consciousness when Separated from the Physical Body
This chapter introduces the mobile center of consciousness. It describes a state in which consciousness detaches from the physical body and can perceive independently.

7: The Mobile Center of Consciousness Completely Independent of a Living Physical Body
The idea is being continued here. The center of consciousness can exist completely independently of the living body and act as an independent focus of perception.

8: Shamanism: The Biology of the Ritual of the Irrational
He interprets shamanism as a biological technique for changing consciousness. Rituals, drumming, ecstasy, exhaustion or substances serve to create special states of perception.

9: Yoga: The Psychology of Autonomy for the Nuclear Mobile Center of Consciousness
Yoga appears as a disciplined path to the autonomy of consciousness. Through breath, concentration and inner control, the mobile center of consciousness is to be stabilized and directed.

10: The Biological Foundations of Psi Plasma
This chapter describes the biological basis of psi-plasma. It combines breath, metabolism, nervous system, body chemistry and states of consciousness.

11: The Physical Foundations of Psi Plasma
Here, an attempt is made to give the psi-plasma a physical basis. It is about the question of how spirit and matter could be connected to each other via a deeper field of action.

12: Summary of the Theory of Psi-Plasma Control
The final chapter summarizes the theory. Receiver state, transmitter state, object relay, out-of-body consciousness, shamanism, yoga and psi-plasma are combined to form an overall model.

Epilogue: A Test of the Theory
The epilogue serves as a final test of the theory. He tries to bring together his previously developed thoughts on a concrete example or test case.

Core concepts from the book

Telepathic Networks with Individuals Serving as Unconscious Relays
By this, Puharich means a telepathic network in which information does not go directly from a conscious sender to a conscious receiver. Instead, a third person can act as an unconscious relay. This person does not know that he or she is part of the process. So it doesn't have to send intentionally, it doesn't have to meditate, it doesn't have to participate, and it doesn't even have to know that a telepathic process is taking place.

This changes the whole idea of telepathy. Usually, one person thinks intensely about something, another receives it. But Puharich thinks more in terms of fields and nodes. A human being can be a kind of transit station in this field. The information then does not move linearly, but in several parts: from an event, a person or an emotionally charged context to another person to a recipient.

The crucial point is that the relay is not the origin of the information, but the mediator. It is like a radio network in which a signal does not travel directly from transmitter to receiver, but is amplified or forwarded via intermediate stations. Only in Puharich's work, this intermediate station is not a technical device, but a person with his own unconscious field.

It describes a non-linear chain of information. The recipient does not only access a single person, but a field of relationships. People who are emotionally, biographically or situationally connected to each other form a kind of invisible network. The conscious mind hardly perceives anything of this, but the subconscious mind can serve as a receiving and forwarding zone according to this model.

General Extrasensory Perception Networks Containing an Object as a Relay
In the next step, Puharich extends this model of people to things. Now it is no longer a person who is the relay, but an object. This can be a personal item, a photo, a piece of clothing, a letter, a piece of jewelry, or any other item associated with a person, place, or event.

In this model, the object is not merely a neutral object. It carries a relationship. It is connected to an event, a person or an emotional story. This is exactly what can make it a trigger for the recipient. Objects act there as primary inductors of information, i.e. not only as passive things, but as active relays in an extended information network. The object functions like an address. It does not necessarily tell the consciousness directly "here is the information", but it aligns the perception. It focuses the receiver on a specific track. Just as a smell suddenly opens a memory, an object may open an extrasensory information trail, according to Puharich.

The object does not have to consciously "do" anything. It is not a thinking being. But it can be a support structure according to this model. It holds, collects or mediates a connection.

Psychometry
Psychometry is precisely the field in which this ‘object-relay’ concept comes into practice. It is the ability to perceive information about an object’s owner, history or emotional charge through touch or proximity to it.

In psychometry, therefore, the sensitive person does not simply perceive something freely in the room, but uses an object as a key. The object is the point of access. One holds it in one’s hand, concentrates on it, becomes inwardly calm and observes what impressions arise: images, physical sensations, words, emotions, scenes, names, sensations of temperature, pressure, movements or symbolic images.

Peter Hurkos is a central example of psychometrics and object perception in Puharich's work. Hurkos was considered a sensitive person who could perceive information about people, events or contexts by touching or coming into contact with objects. In Puharich's model, the object is not just a memento, but an information trigger or relay.

Plasma

He describes and introduces the concept of so-called "psi-plasma". To explain how parapsychological phenomena (such as telepathy or mind-matter interactions) are physically and biologically possible in the first place, he deliberately divides the theoretical basis into two perspectives. For him, plasma does not simply play the role of physical plasma as found in stars, lightning or ionised gas. He uses the term ‘psi-plasma’ to denote a mediating principle between the body, the nervous system, consciousness and psi phenomena.

In his research, plasma is therefore a kind of psychophysical carrier medium. Puharich is searching for something that could explain how telepathy, psychometry, out-of-body experiences, shamanism and yoga function on a common basis. For him, psi-plasma represents an attempt not to treat all these phenomena in isolation, but to understand them as different manifestations of a deeper biological-energetic mechanism.

Biological plasma (biophysical level)
From a medical and neurological perspective, Puharich sought to establish a link between the human body and paranormal abilities. He describes biological plasma as a subtle, bio-electrical field generated by living organisms. He argues that the nervous system (in particular the interplay between adrenaline in the sender and the parasympathetic system in the receiver) is capable of controlling and focusing this biological plasma.

It serves as the ‘interface’ or link through which the human mind (what he calls the ‘Mobile Centre of Consciousness’) interacts with the physical world and biological cells.

According to Puharich, biological or personal psi-plasma is closely linked to the living organism. It is related to the nervous system, consciousness and a person’s physiological states. Changes in the autonomic nervous system, particularly in the parasympathetic state, are said to influence telepathic perception. The psi-plasma acts as a carrier of impressions, memories and telepathic information. It is, in a sense, the bridge between the brain, consciousness and paranormal perception.

• Linked to the nervous system
• Responds to states of consciousness and trance
• Can receive and transmit information
• Enables telepathy and clairvoyance
• Is bound to living organisms

Physical plasma (cosmic / quantum level)
To explain how thoughts can transmit information across vast distances, entirely without measurable radio waves or known physical radiation, he required a purely physical hypothesis. Here, he draws on the classical concept of plasma from physics (a state of ionised gas that reacts strongly to electromagnetic fields), but expands upon it metaphysically.

He understands this physical psi-plasma as a kind of universal, non-local field that permeates the entire universe (similar to the historical concept of the aether or modern hypothetical quantum fields). It functions as the actual medium of transmission. It is the ‘space’ in which space and time do not constitute barriers to information and in which telepathic networks operate.

According to Puharich, physical psi-plasma is a non-biological plasma state that can exist independently of the human organism. He describes it as a medium for the storage and transmission of psychic information. In his view, telepathic impressions, memories and contents of consciousness can be preserved in the plasma and transmitted over great distances.

Biological plasma explains how humans generate and receive this energy, whilst physical plasma explains how this energy travels through the universe without being bound by the limits of space and time. In this way, he attempts to bridge the gap between mind (biology) and the cosmos (physics) in theoretical terms.

• Universal information field
• Connection between matter and the universe
• Carrier of form and structure
• Stores past events and interactions
• Links matter and consciousness
• Enables non-local information transfer

So, let me start off by saying this. The weather; the storms at night, doesn't feel right, and a lot of people, even the non-sensitive people, have felt this too.

A few nights ago, something happened. Let me sketch the situation for you. I was sleeping at my bf's place, and he woke me up to go to the toilet before closing everything up (it's something I asked him to do). Right before he woke me up, I could see from above what was happening. It was weird though, everything was grey; like the tv static kind effect of grey. I could see that beings had a green outline. My boyfriend walking up to me had a green outline, but also these two entities.

I woke up all shocked, as if I were trying to wake myself up from a sleep paralysis nightmare (which happens to me often). I went to the bathroom and my boyfriend and I got back into bed. It started to thunder, rain heavily. I closed my eyes and I could see a blue 'person'. I was trying to shrug it off as if it was a thought, but that didn't work,. I felt uncomfortable so I opened my eyes, and closed them. Again, I could see a blue 'person' in my head, but it was a different person. So entity nr 2.

They had human features, human eyes, nose, lips, bald, but large heads. On the sides of their head they had white dots, like airbrushed type dots, not bold white, you know?

I get scared easily, I am a really sensitive person(not emotional stuff but paranormal stuff do make me uncomfortable. (trying to get stronger in that field).) I had to my boyfriend to keep him awake and prevent him from sleeping. I was terrified. Throughout my life I had a fear, lingering in the back of my mind, of being abducted by aliens.

Last night, I posted this story on another subreddit. Right after that, I became really unwell; I felt dizzy, my eyes couldn't stop rolling back, and I was about to faint. After I recovered, I couldn't sleep anymore because I felt like I was being watched. I had a terrible night. Today, I feel very shaky, which is not normal for me since I am a pretty tough person.

Thank you for reading! This was my first aware encounter with aliens I guess? If anyone could help me figure out what kind of aliens these were, I would appreciate it, because I've been Googling, but I'm not sure.