r/RMS_Titanic

Is anyone going to this? its on all this week. I'm going Friday.

Edinburgh Rep / Erstwhile Media

It's 12:15AM, April 15th, 1912. Titanic has hit an iceberg. In approximately two hours, over 2,000 people will be in the freezing water of the Atlantic Ocean, with survival counted in minutes. Their lives depend on three men – Titanic radio operators Jack Phillips and Harold Bride, and Carpathia radio operator Harold Cottam – and the radio set that broke the day before. Fate has placed Phillips, Bride and Cottam, three working men doing a job, at the centre of one of the biggest peace-time tragedies of the twentieth century.

My husband goes through phases of rabbit holes, a recurring one is three titanic. He keeps wondering if the titanic had hit the iceberg head on, would it have stayed afloat? Or would it have at least stayed afloat longer or allowed more survivors? We don't know enough about the construction of it all or who to even ask, to know for sure. Curious is anyone has any thoughts on this? Thanks.

​

Why I think the Titanic's final moments are messy.

I've been chewing on the Titanic's final minutes for a while now, and there's something that's bugged me about the standard breakup story: it treats the whole thing as basically symmetric. The ship bends, the stress builds evenly, the hull snaps in half near the third funnel, and bow and stern go their separate ways. It's really clean and tidy. Also, I think, wrong...or at least incomplete.

Here's what doesn't add up if you take the symmetric story at face value. Survivors on the stern described it standing up at insanely steep angles..we're talking 25, maybe 30+ degrees... way past where a hull breaking evenly should be able to hold together. Multiple people also described the ship suddenly seeming to level out, to "right itself," just before the final plunge, even though it had been listing to port the whole voyage. And people in the water near the break, specifically Lightoller and Gracie, described genuinely violent, localized surges, not just "the ship sank," but something more like getting hit by a wave from below.

None of that fits neatly into "the ship broke in half symmetrically and sank." But it does fit a different story.

My theory is that the initial tear happened on the starboard side of the hull, low down near the keel and not evenly across the bottom. And there's actually decent wreck evidence for this: the starboard shell plating down in the break zone is far more torn away than the port side, and the "Big Piece," one of the largest chunks ever recovered from the debris field, is a starboard hull fragment. Something happened to that side first.

Once that starboard seam tears open, you've basically got a fire hose blasting seawater into the bow, low and to one side. And I think that single event explains two things at once. First, it's a ton of sudden weight added low on the starboard side, which would absolutely accelerate the bow's plunge. But second (and this is the part I find genuinely satisfying) , water rushing in low on the starboard side would counteract the ship's port list. Like adding ballast to the opposite side. That's my explanation for why survivors kept describing the ship "righting" itself right before the end. It's not that the ship was recovering. It's that it was flooding asymmetrically and that flooding happened to shove the list back the other way for a few seconds.

Meanwhile, (and this is the second half of the idea) the port side of the hull doesn't fail yet. It's still structurally connected while all this is happening on the starboard side. So as the bow keeps dropping and the ship keeps bending, the port side acts like a hinge, still holding stern and bow loosely together, and that hinge gets twisted harder and harder. That torque is what I think dragged the stern up to those crazy angles people reported and not a clean symmetric break, but one side ripping open while the other side gets wrenched and twisted until it finally can't take it anymore.

And when that port-side hinge does finally let go, I think you get a little recoil... a settling-back motion, like a rubber band snapping, right before the stern makes its final drop. Which lines up with Colonel Gracie's account of a sudden violent settling just before the end.

So the whole sequence starts to finish, in maybe 90 seconds to two minutes: 1. starboard tears open near the keel 2. water blasts in and rights the list 3. the port side holds on as a twisting hinge and hauls the stern to extreme angles 4. the hinge snaps 5. a brief recoil 6. final plunge.

It's not a clean, symmetric break. It's lopsided the whole way through, and I think that lopsidedness is exactly what explains the weird stuff survivors kept describing that never quite fit the standard story.

Curious what other people think, especially if anyone knows of wreck imagery that shows the port side in that same break-zone area, since most of what's public seems to be starboard-heavy and I'd love a real side-by-side comparison.