r/ShitAIBrosSay

This is the propaganda accelerationists eat up. It’s these sequence of ideas connected by disjointed question marks, and all that matters is where they arrive: Utopia. Questioning whether anything anything makes sense leading up to its arrival is straight up not productive.

If you think Besos doesn’t make sense or is all over the place, it’s because you aren’t his target audience here. He is speaking to the gullible.

article: https://www.modelrepublic.org/articles/is-openai%E2%80%99s-super-pac-paying-for-an-army-of-twitter-bots-to-engage-with-their-content

And instead of asking people why they are against AI, I often see them ask other accelerationists why people dislike it — in a sub that expressly forbids "Luddites" from commenting.

Enter the echo chamber.

Note:

I am in no way encouraging tribalism. I am merely demonstrating how a portion of the AI community thinks.

The first screenshot also caught a really gross comment in response to running someone's art through AI.

So this person's art got run through AI and they did not give their consent to that. The second screenshot reflects perfectly why this is scummy.

The person prompting the image in the second screenshot prompted these image, because they were feeling "petty".

It is already wrong to put any art through AI, but to do it because one feels petty is just gross. This is exactly what happened with DDLC.

When Team Salvato released their statement an influx of DDLC slop came forth. The behavior that exists within these communities is really icky.

Of course I am not saying every single person does this, but also this behavior isn't exactly new and tends to happen a lot.

That being said, please judge every person individually, instead of lumping everyone together.

Finally, this individual did this twice. Once after OOP made their stance clear and second time to make a "response". The response did not need to have that prompt.