Missouri Congressman Eric Burlison described a firsthand intelligence briefing on a UAP encounter. A helicopter crew responded after radar picked up multiple UAPs over the desert and encountered glowing orbs described as spheres of plasma.

The objects reportedly interfered with the helicopter and, when F-16s were scrambled, appeared to chase them.

“They got a call that the radar had picked up several UAPs.”

“What they interact with are basically glowing orbs.”

“It definitely was messing with the helicopter when it got there.”

“These things appeared to shoot up and chase or follow the F-16s.”

“This has brought this investigation from being priority number 500 and something to top 10 priorities for this government.”

“It’s a continuum from corporeal bipedal type life to what I would consider as sentient plasmoid life.”

Source:

https://x.com/americanalchmy/status/2072801550268068139?s=46

https://www.reddit.com/r/AliensRHere/s/bBQUE88ki6

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThroughTheVeil/s/OtENfGxO3W

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThroughTheVeil/s/Otsd9OJbIX

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThroughTheVeil/s/cvu3A7DHks

Thomas Campbell is an American physicist, consciousness researcher, and author best known for developing My Big TOE (Theory of Everything), a framework that argues that consciousness is fundamental and that physical reality is a kind of information-based virtual reality.

Source - Interstellar on X:

https://x.com/interstellaruap/status/2072474483751883172?s=46

Attorney Danny Sheehan claims that an extraterrestrial base exists beneath the ocean near Guadalupe Island, off the coast of Mexico’s Baja California peninsula.

During an interview with Julian Dorey, Sheehan said the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group had been deployed to monitor activity in the area.

He claimed that more than 100 UFO sightings were recorded involving objects entering the ocean and traveling toward the seafloor.

According to Sheehan, U.S. submarines also monitored the objects moving underwater.

He said:

“They monitored over 100 sightings of UFOs coming and going down into the ocean right there and going down to the bottom of the ocean.”

Sheehan then concluded:

“There is virtually certainly a base there.”

When the host asked whether the objects could instead represent highly advanced and undisclosed U.S. technology, possibly developed by DARPA or another military program, Sheehan rejected that explanation.

He said that although such a possibility could be described as conceivable, the behavior of the carrier group made an extraterrestrial explanation more probable in his view.

Sheehan argued that the U.S. military would not dedicate a carrier group, submarines and extensive surveillance resources to monitoring one of its own classified weapons systems.

He therefore described the alleged facility as an extraterrestrial base rather than a secret American installation.

The discussion appears to connect Sheehan’s claim with the 2004 USS Nimitz encounters, during which Navy personnel reported unusual aerial objects operating near the carrier group.

Retired Navy Commander David Fravor has publicly described encountering a white Tic Tac shaped object during that series of events.

The Department of Defense later officially released the corresponding 2004 Navy video and confirmed that the recorded aerial phenomenon remained unidentified.

However, the publicly available government record does not confirm that an underwater base was discovered near Guadalupe Island.

It also does not publicly confirm Sheehan’s claim that more than 100 UFOs were observed entering the ocean or that submarines tracked them traveling to the seafloor.

No publicly released U.S. Navy, Department of Defense or AARO document currently verifies the existence of an extraterrestrial base in that location.

Sheehan’s statement should therefore be understood as his own conclusion regarding the reported military activity rather than an officially confirmed finding.

The unresolved questions are what specific records or witnesses Sheehan is relying upon, whether submarine sensor data from the operation exists and whether any of that information could eventually be released.

Click below to access the sources and related material:

1. Watch the full Danny Sheehan interview:
2. Atlas of Mystery post on X:

Documentary filmmaker Dan Farah says multiple intelligence officials told him that not every alleged non human craft recovered by the United States was found after a crash.

According to Farah, some of the objects were discovered outside military bases in apparently perfect condition.

He described these cases as being almost like “gifts.”

Farah did not claim to know why the objects were allegedly left intact or whether they were deliberately placed there.

Instead, he said the accounts naturally raised questions about the possible intention behind them.

The distinction is significant.

A crashed object could be interpreted as the result of a malfunction, accident or hostile action.

An intact craft positioned near a military installation would suggest something very different.

It could imply deliberate placement, an attempt at communication, a technological test or an effort to influence military and scientific development.

Farah said more than one intelligence official had told him about events of this kind.

However, he did not identify the officials, the military bases, the dates of the alleged recoveries or the current locations of the objects in this segment.

He also did not present photographs, recovery documents, chain of custody records or physical material that could be independently examined.

The discussion then moved into possible interpretations.

Farah referred to a senior scientist featured in his documentary who questioned whether intact craft were being left only in the United States or whether similar objects might also be placed in rival nations.

That possibility raises a disturbing strategic question.

If advanced technology were distributed to multiple competing countries, would it function as a test of intelligence, cooperation or survival?

Would nations share what they learned, or would they immediately attempt to convert the technology into weapons?

The participants compared the idea to a kind of large scale intelligence test.

They also speculated about whether an advanced civilization might influence human development by introducing technology gradually, in the way a parent might give a child tools only when the child is considered ready.

The conversation later expanded into theories involving ancient civilizations, megalithic architecture and sudden periods of technological development.

Those ideas were presented as speculation rather than evidence connected directly to the alleged intact craft.

Nothing in this excerpt demonstrates that ancient technological advances were caused by non human intervention.

The strongest and most specific claim remains Farah’s statement that multiple intelligence officials described apparently intact craft found near military installations.

That account is substantially different from a conventional crash retrieval claim.

If accurate, the key question would not only be how the craft arrived there.

It would be why it was left there intact and who it was intended for.

The most important unresolved questions are:

Which military installations were involved?

Were the objects operational when discovered?

Was any message, symbol or accompanying material found with them?

Did the same type of event occur in other countries?

And is there any documentary or physical evidence available to Congress that supports the claim?

Click below to access the sources and related material:

1. Full interview with Dan Farah:
2. Atlas of Mystery post on X:

This 1988 Project Sun Streak document records a government remote viewing session in which the target was identified as the Ark of the Covenant.

The declassified file includes the evaluator’s comments, a session summary, handwritten notes and sketches created during the exercise. Whether you see it as intelligence history, Cold War experimentation or something stranger, it’s a fascinating read.

https://open.substack.com/pub/thedisclosurefiles/p/government-psychic-claimed-to-find?r=8idw3k&utm\_medium=ios

The 'Coptic Handbook of Ritual Power' is a 20-page parchment codex from 7th- or 8th-century Egypt. Unlike formal religious texts, this is a working manual for a ritual practitioner. It contains 27 spells ranging from love and business success to exorcising spirits and treating infections like 'black jaundice.'

The text captures a moment of religious transition, blending Orthodox Christian invocations with older Sethian Gnostic traditions. Most notably, it calls upon a mysterious figure named 'Baktiotha,' described as a master of forty-nine types of snakes—a figure completely absent from mainstream church teachings.

As the codex surfaced through the antiquities trade in the 1980s, the original owner is unknown. However, the contents suggest it was not written for clergy, but served as a functional guide for dealing with the 'supernatural' problems of daily life. It provides a rare look at the 'underground' magic that persisted while early Christianity was solidifying its hold on the region.

link : https://www.nbcnews.com/science/weird-science/how-nail-your-enemies-ancient-egyptian-spells-deciphered-n254231

Update: UAPGERB confirms he heard similar statements

See bottom of this post

Original post

In the latest Q&A Coulthart descibes some of the disclosure dynamics going on.

Timestamp 18:23:

Coulthart: Elizondo is the one the White House considers appointing

> Coulthart: "I'm not going to lie to you, that the gentleman that I've been talking about whom I suspect might be up for a big position is Luis Elizondo.

Coulthart: Elizondo needs to be more forthcoming about his past roles

> Coulthart: "[...] I think Luis needs to be more forthcoming about his past roles. And I like and respect Luis a lot. And I think he's in a difficult position because he's bound by his security oath about what he can reveal about his past roles. I know he can't talk about it"

Many people think Elizondo was part of a previous agenda

> Coulthart: "It's a ridiculous situation, but there are people who bitterly resent and don't think it's a good idea that Luis be appointed to a position of power in UAP transparency because they think that he was part of a previous agenda that was essentially to try to control the narrative to restrict what the public is entitled to know about the UAP disclosure"

James Clapper launched the controlled disclosure plan, with Elizondo as a frontman

> Coulthart: "And I think a lot of this was an intention by James Clapper, General James Clapper, to try and impose a narrative on the public domain using Luis as a frontman, a highly urbane, articulate, and likable frontman to try to restrict what the public was told about crash retrievals"

Grusch disturbed Clappers controlled disclosure plan

> Coulthart: "And it struck me over the years that I've been covering this issue that the story that we ran with David Grush really wrongfooted all of this. That all of a sudden David comes out and says, "Hang on a moment. We're not just arguing here about whether there are aliens or not. What we're talking about here is a crash retrieval and reverse engineering program and I'm saying it's real." he says"

> Coulthart: "And I think that did wrong foot that national security state attempt to try and provide a controlled disclosure. But I refuse to accept that the people like Luis Elizondo who were part of that attempt at a controlled disclosure were motivated by bad things. They're patriots. They love their country"

Grusch disappointed in Clapper: "he placed people in critical roles to manage this issue both publicly and non-publicly"

Here is a video where Grusch says Clapper managed the crash retrieval issue. He describes a "game of thrones" activity with multiple factions of the deep state, obama, clinton, trump involvement.

> Grusch: "And I'm a little bit disappointed as a fellow Air Force officer, and certainly General Clapper rate rose to the ranks as three-star general. That's all he said in the documentary, that that was a program he was aware of. In fact, without being inappropriate, I will say that General Clapper was well aware of the crash retrieval issue, managed the crash retrieval issue, and when he was the DNI, USDI, and DIA director, he placed people in critical roles to manage this issue both publicly and I'll just say not non-publicly as well"

Grusch: "General Clapper, Stephanie Wilson: be greater leaders on this"

> Grusch: "And I'll allow the audience to distill what I'm saying at the at the risk of being inappropriate or going too far with my discussion. So, General Clapper, Stephanie Wilson, other folks in the IC that are well aware of this issue that were in rooms discussing this issue, I ask you to be greater leaders on this. I should not be the only former military officer and intelligence official that is being completely candid with the information that they were exposed to"

Back to Coultharts Q&A video:

Coulthart: Elizondo worked in the Legacy Program

> Coulthart: "And I've spoken to people in the legacy program who knew Luis [Coulthart addresses elizondo directly] Luis: I know a lot of people, and they know you, and I know you can't speak about the role that you've held within the legacy program, but you did. And I think we've got to stop this nonsense because it's becoming destructive"

Elizondo is not in the "suppress reverse engineering" gatekeeper faction

> Coulthart: "[...] there is clearly a gatekeeper faction and Luis is not part of that gatekeeper faction that are trying to totally suppress the existence of crash retrievals and reverse engineering. And why do I believe that? Because he's talked candidly about the fact that Roswell was real and that there have been crash retrievals and that there has been reverse engineering. Now, he may not have done that if it wasn't for David Grush coming up, but [...]

If im understanding it right, Clappers plan initially was not to reveal reverse engineering (or not as fast as Grusch did it), but now that the toothpaste is out of the tube, it does. Still not full disclosure (abductions, agreements, etc), so it is definitely still controlled disclosure

Coulthart: I was very skeptical, but Trump and Miller are deadly serious about this topic

Timestamp 6:42:

> Coulthart: "I was very skeptical, very very cynical about the idea that President Trump, members of the actual executive administration of the US government are serious at all about UAP disclosure, that Trump was essentially just humoring this idea"

> Coulthart: "But it's been impressed upon me by quite a number of politicians both on and off the record. And you'll see some of those interviews shortly that Trump is serious. And the way that he's demonstrated how serious he is is by getting Steven Miller, his deputy chief of staff, to handle this brief. They are deadly serious. They are actually engaged with this topic"

What was Elizondo's role in Legacy Program?

For anyone wondering, see this image

UAPGERB: there are 2 allegations

Posted on X:

> Similar to @rosscoulthart I have heard similar statements from individuals within or on the periphery of the Legacy Programs regarding Mr. Elizondo. These allegations are two-fold:

> (1) From 2009-2017, Lue operated the AATIP, a cover program for several National Security Council-led activities at the behest of DNI James Clapper. This effort originated from within the Legacy Program onion (Clapper) and sought to push a partial disclosure/transparency initiative, culminating in attempts to establish Hillary Clinton as the "disclosure" president.

> (2) Separate from the AATIP, Elizondo has a very deep history within the Legacy architecture, specifically surrounding program protection.....

> I believe both of these allegations are not only true, but must be carefully considered, evaluated, and understood by both the public and White House.

> Lue said it best in a recent interview that history will remember him as a patriot or a villain. I do still think there is an opportunity for history to remember him as a patriot (I believe Lue believes he's operating as an American patriot), but time is running out, and there can only be so many lies, half-truths, and questionable actions before the house of cards crumbles...