best restaurants here?
im visiting right now, what are yalls favorite restaurants here? Preferably mexican food!
im visiting right now, what are yalls favorite restaurants here? Preferably mexican food!
#2ndlifemedia #newmexicoconservativenews #AlamogordoTownNews #Kalhradio #transparency #LocalNewsMatters #communityfirst #pnm
Alamogordo N.M. -Â In what could be the most significant consumer protection crisis facing Alamogordo families in recent memory, Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) continues to impose unexplained billing increases of $100 to $300 per month on residents already struggling with the rising cost of living.
What makes the situation worse: some residents report bills showing usage three times higher than normalâa discrepancy PNM blames on short-staffed meter readers and estimated billing rather than actual usage readings.
Only one local political leader has publicly challenged these practices: Mayor Sharon McDonald, who directly contacted PNM leadership to express municipal concerns about the billing abuse.
Estimated Billing: The Hidden Problem
Dozens of Alamogordo residents report the same troubling pattern: their PNM electricity bills have skyrocketed due to estimated billing rather than actual meter readings.
"I'm an elderly woman on a fixed income," one affected resident shared. "My PNM bill jumped $280 one month. I didn't add any new appliances. I didn't change my usage. When I called PNM to ask why, they couldn't give me a straight answer other than that they're short-staffed in meter readers and may have estimated my usage."
This is the core of the problem: PNM is charging residents based on estimated usage rather than actual meter readings, and when residents call to verify the charges, they receive vague explanations about staffing shortages instead of concrete explanations or corrections.
Families are forced to choose between paying utility bills and purchasing groceries. Elderly residents on fixed incomes face the choice between staying cool in Alamogordo's summer heat and maintaining other basic necessities.
Mayor McDonald Takes Action
Alamogordo Mayor Sharon McDonald has contacted PNM leadership directly to express the city's concerns regarding the systematic billing problems affecting residents. She made clear that these are not isolated customer service complaintsâthey represent a widespread pattern demanding corporate accountability.
"This is exactly what we should expect from elected leadership," consumer advocate and District 51 candidate Grace Nagamine said. "Mayor McDonald recognized that Alamogordo's families needed someone with a voice loud enough to reach corporate headquarters. She answered that call.
The question now is: where are the others?"
Nagamine Provides Action Plan for Residents
District 51  NM State Representative candidate Grace Nagamine has issued a comprehensive action plan providing Alamogordo residents with direct pathways to hold PNM accountable through official regulatory channels.
"This isn't about social media posts," Nagamine emphasized. "This is about making noise where it actually countsâwith regulators and corporate leadership who have legal obligations to respond."
Residents can take action immediately:
FILE A COMPLAINT with the Public Regulation Commission at:
https://www.prc.nm.gov/consumer-relations/file-a-complaint/
Phone: (505) 827-4500Â
SUBMIT A COMPLAINT to the New Mexico Attorney General at:
https://nmdoj.gov/get-help/submit-a-complaint/
Phone: (505) 827-6000 | Email: consumer@nmag.gov
SEND A CERTIFIED LETTER to PNM Corporate Headquarters:
One First Financial Center, Albuquerque, NM 87158
CALL PNM PUBLIC RELATIONS to formally document your complaint:
(505) 241-2700 (Business Hours, Monday-Friday)
The Silence from Other Political Leaders
As families face $100-$300 monthly billing increases from estimated usage, most of Alamogordo's political establishment has remained silent. City commissioners, county commissioners, and state representatives have offered no public statements, contacted no PNM leadership, and requested no regulatory investigations to date via any public statements.Â
This is not a complex issue requiring expert analysis. Alamogordo families are being overcharged based on estimated usage. They cannot get explanations. They are suffering financial hardship.
Why Official Complaints Matter
The power to demand accountability rests with citizens, not political figures. Formal complaints to the Public Regulation Commission carry legal weight. Complaints to the Attorney General create an official record. Certified letters to corporate headquarters require documented response.
Social media posts change nothing. Official complaints to regulatory agencies change everything.
If enough residents file formal complaints, the Public Regulation Commission will be forced to investigate. If systematic overbilling is confirmed, PNM will face enforcement actions, penalties, and demands for customer remediation.
ACT NOW
Document your bills and usage patterns
File a complaint with the PRC online or by phone
Submit a complaint to the Attorney General's office
Send a certified letter to PNM Corporate demanding explanation
Call PNM Public Relations to formally document your complaint
Do not accept vague explanations. Do not allow PNM to hide behind customer service scripts. Make noise where it counts.
More News from Alamogordo
Sidney Paul Gordon Shooting Range Reports Strong July Performance; Second 100-Yard Bay OperationalFacility Serves 816 Visitors; Major Championships Draw Competitors from Across Nation
Lady Alamogordo Tigers Soccer Split Games at Silver City TournamentAlamogordo girls soccer team wins opener, falls to Miyamura in weather-shortened finale
The Rock It Rocket has completed the round of renovations they were doing and is getting some events going again. Mere Mortals is bringing sone local flavor to this show, Taj is down from ABQ, and Alium is also down from ABQ.
Got a $600 water, sewer, and trash bill from alamogordo utilities. $368 for water, $186 for sewer, and $19 for trash before tax.
Is it not bad enough I got charged $900 by PNM for electricity? I hope theyâll be rolling over the difference on that one at least.
When an AI-generated image appears on social media, outrage is swift. Users demand regulations, share alarming claims about â10 gallons per imageâ water consumption, and express moral outrage.
Yet these same critics have already used AI hundreds of times that day without noticing.
Before finishing morning coffee, the average American interacts with AI dozens of times: credit card fraud detection, email spam filtering, social media content curation, GPS navigation, appointment scheduling, loan approvals, investment management, streaming recommendations, and voice authentication. By conservative estimates, Americans use AI-powered systems hundreds of times dailyâalmost all invisibly embedded in routine commerce and convenience.
The disconnect is stark. AI fraud detection systems analyze your credit card transaction in milliseconds. AI algorithms screen and rank every social media post you see. Machine learning models refine weather forecasts and optimize delivery routes. Yet only the visible image triggers moral outrage.
This selective environmental consciousness reveals how Americans understand AI: not as the invisible infrastructure powering modern commerce, but as a visible technology choiceâone we simultaneously depend on and denounce.
What Companies Are Actually Doing
The corporate adoption of AI tells the real story of the technologyâs integration into everyday life. Nearly 80% of businesses globally are using AI in some capacity in 2024. In North America, the numbers are even higher: Organizations in North America are witnessing the highest AI adoption percentage, which increased to 82% in 2024.
More dramatically, 92% of Fortune 500 companies now use ChatGPT, and more than 7 million enterprise workplace seats are activeâa 9x increase year-over-year.
By industry, the adoption patterns are striking:
About 63% of companies use GenAI to write text content, 36% to generate images, and 27% to assist with coding. But these numbers only capture intentional generative AI use. The real adoption is much higher when including machine learning for transactions, analytics, and customer service.
In specific sectors:
âą Retail & E-commerce: Customer service has seen an explosive growth in AI adoption, increasing by over 2000% since January of 2025. AI now screens every chat inquiry, powers recommendation engines, manages inventory, and optimizes pricing in real-time. Walmart and Amazon are the largest retail users of AI from self checkout analytics to credit card processing and even messaging targeted to consumers online.Â
âą Finance: Every major bank uses AI for fraud detection, credit scoring, and algorithmic trading. When you approve a loan online or check your credit score, AI has already evaluated you through multiple models.
âą Healthcare: In 2025, 31% of individual legal professionals reported using generative AI at work. While legal-specific, this illustrates professional adoption. Healthcare adds diagnostic AI, appointment scheduling, and insurance processing and screening.
âą Manufacturing: In 2025, 51% of manufacturers reported using AI in some form, with AI most often applied in marketing and sales (27.11%) and production processes (26.23%).>
âą Logistics & Delivery: Amazon, UPS, FedEx, and every major shipping company use AI for route optimization, package sorting, demand forecasting, and warehouse robotics and AI for customer service tracking updates. Click on that tracking number and AI engine helped provide the status result.Â
The reality: Americans interact with AI-powered business systems far more than they interact with visible generative AI tools. Yet the social media image generates the outrage, the hypocrisy is astounding.Â
The Water Reality: What Actually Uses Massive Amounts
Hereâs where the hypocrisy becomes quantifiable. Americans express alarm over AIâs water consumption while remaining silent about industries consuming orders of magnitude more water.
The real water-intensive industries:
Agriculture dwarfs everything else. In 2015, agriculture pulled 118 billion gallons of water per day for irrigation.
Growing corn, raising cattle and irrigating soybeans sit at the top of the chart, and most of that water exits through the crops and livestock themselves rather than flowing back to a river.
To put this in perspective: US corn farming uses more water in a single day than every American data center consumes directly in a year.
Thermoelectric power generation is the second largest consumer. Power plants pulled 133 billion gallons per day. Note that power plants withdraw enormous volumes of water to cool steam turbines.
Industrial manufacturing follows:
âą Forest product manufacturing in the US uses around 4 billion gallons of water a day.>
âą Steelmaking uses around 1.8 billion gallons per day.
âą Crude oil refining uses around 270 million gallons a day.
âą Semiconductor manufacturing uses around 80 million gallons a day.
Recreational use is often overlooked:
âą U.S. golf courses use 2 billion gallons daily.
âą Residential lawns consume 9 billion gallons.
Data centers, by contrast: All U.S. data centers combined use approximately 50 million gallons per day for on-site cooling. AI represents roughly 15-20% of data center energy, suggesting ~10 million gallons daily for AI specifically.
The disparity is stunning. Americans anxiously debate AIâs water footprint while maintaining manicured lawns that consume 900 times more water than all AI data centers combined.
Why the Selective Outrage?
Nobody protests outside a corn processing plant or demands regulations on golf course irrigation.
The water footprint of livestock productionâvastly larger than AIâsâbarely registers in public discourse.
The issue is visibility combined with novelty. The â10 gallons per imageâ figure appears to be viral misinformation without academic backing.
Once this false claim entered public consciousness, it shaped perception regardless of fact.
Established technologies receive moral acceptance through familiarity. Weâve normalized agriculture and power generation. AI, being new, triggers fear and scrutiny that older, larger polluters never faced.
The Uncomfortable Reality
To be clear, AIâs water consumption isnât irrelevant. Unlike carbon, water impacts are local and depend on basin-level scarcity. Many data centers are in water-stressed regions, competing with agricultural and residential use. Data centers in Arizona or Nevada present genuine challenges to local water supplies.
But the contradiction deserves examination. Americans donât actually oppose AIâwe depend on it constantly, have organized financial and commercial systems around it, and use it hundreds of times daily.
What we oppose is visibility. Weâre comfortable with invisible algorithms powering credit card swipes, social media feeds, and financial decisions. Yet an AI-generated image triggers environmental outrageâdespite consuming far less water than maintaining residential lawns.
This selective concern reveals more about psychology than environmental science.
Meaningful policy and meaningful debate requires proportional concern matched to actual impact, not panic over novelty. Know the facts!Â
Data Sources
More News from Alamogordo
PRC Acknowledges Timberon Water System as Regulated Utility; Regulator Focus Shifts to Troubled Small SystemsPRC and NMED discuss Timberon water issues among agenda itemsâŠ
Tularosa Activates Emergency Water Distribution; No Contamination Detected Boil Water Advisory Precautionary Not Contamination Detected Village clarifies precautionary advisory, begins hauling potable water from Holloman Air Force Base
I've noticed hardly anyone speaks up on here, maybe it's the small town, smaller population, easier to see through the anonymity that Reddit affords mostly. Maybe I'll ask this question, and no one will answer it which is fine. So here goes nothing.
Has anyone else noticed the amount of Flock ALPR cameras that have gone up in the last year? It went from "just the exits" as the former police chief said during a city council meeting, with the Las Cruces police chief playing spokesman, when they were introduced to them (city council) and rapidly approved in 2024. Presently almost every main thoroughfare's intersection, all the intersections with traffic lights it seems from here to Mescalero, and South all the way to the state line. Has anyone entered an FOIA on the subscription fees?on the ways they've been implemented, used, queried for searches, and/or abused? Results? I'm guessing not? Just curious. I know how folks in Alamogordo value their privacy, I do, I don't live in Alamogordo either technically but I drive. I see the same cameras at the big box stores too and learned private subscription holders can query for searches through Flock Safety. Subscription holding Private citizens can invade the privacy of other private citizens. That's kind of concerning.
At least LEOs are held to a higher standard even though oversight is non existent. Not that I don't think this technology shouldn't be afforded to our public servants to help them do their job, but paying for the data that they say they are not collecting, yet the moment you offer to purchase it, then it's in the possession of the purchaser. How strange is that?
If Alamogordo DPS officers do this same act in order to get PC to pull you over anyway,(run your tags) you know who you are, why waste the money on Flock and just hire more officers or give the deserving one's pay raises. And seeing these cameras going up county wide makes one wonder the same for the other county and state agencies.
Which brings the inevitable question of who is benefitting from kickbacks er I mean sales commissions that work for our local implementing agency or governing bodies. Again I reiterate that I believe these cameras are a great tool to have for our local police, but I remember hearing on the scanner about LEOs interactions with ongoing traffic investigations with Flock and their database, up until they encrypted the transmission signals. Digitized.
There can be, no trust, without transparency. Said the anonymous redditor sheesh đ