r/cogsci

▲ 15 r/cogsci

looking for cogsci books that read like books, not textbooks

hey everyone, i'm looking for book recommendations in cognitive science, but specifically the kind that reads like a book rather than a textbook. something i can actually sit down and enjoy, while still getting a solid picture of the major discoveries and ideas in the field.

bonus points if it holds up as a good read on its own and not just as an info dump.

what are the ones that stuck with you? thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/ecesphere — 24 hours ago
▲ 5 r/cogsci

Learning EEG for thesis

I'm a master's student in cognitive science, and for my thesis I'll most likely be using EEG to measure people's responses to visual stimuli.

I've started with some courses, like Mike X. Cohen's neural time series, but I found it too difficult, so I switched to his book, Analyzing Neural Time Series Data. The book seems easy to grasp, but it's also quite long, and I'm looking for a more efficient way to learn EEG well enough for my thesis.

Could yall recommend the most practical way to learn EEG for research these days? Also since I'm comfortable with python, do I still need to learn MATLAB, or can I do an entire EEG workflow in Python (e.g., MNE-Python)?

I also have to mention that I'm not particularly good at the math required. How much math do you need to do a an experimental research like the one i wanna do for my thesis?

I'd appreciate any advice from people who have learned EEG recently. Thanks!

reddit.com
u/Grand_Till_8233 — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/cogsci

IQ Test

I'm 29 years old and I took an Entrance exam in a University, I'm late for college. Took some time to make money and they said I scored 121 in my IQ test. And the staff said I should take a major in Biology. But I was gonna take a major in Culinary cause I like to cook. I don't even know what it means to have a high IQ, all I wanted was to learn how to cook. But now they're forcing me to do biology. I hate math. I hate numbers with letters. It stresses me out, man.

reddit.com
u/Herashen — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

65% of ordinary people delivered potentially lethal electric shocks to a stranger because a man in a lab coat told them to. Made a short animated video explaining why.

In 1961, a psychologist at Yale University placed a small ad in the local paper.

He was looking for volunteers.

Teachers. Clerks. Mechanics.

Ordinary people for a simple one-hour study on memory and learning.

Four dollars just for showing up.

People accepted.

They walked into a basement laboratory.

They met another volunteer.

Friendly. Middle-aged. The kind of person you'd trust immediately.

They were given roles.

One person would teach. One person would learn.

Simple enough.

Then the researcher explained the rules.

If the learner gets an answer wrong — you administer a shock.

Every wrong answer, the shock gets stronger.

The machine in front of you has thirty switches.

Starting at 15 volts.

Ending at 450.

The labels underneath get progressively worse.

Slight Shock.

Moderate Shock.

Intense Shock.

Danger: Severe Shock.

And at the very end — the last two switches — no label at all.

Just three letters.

XXX.

Before Stanley Milgram ran this experiment, he described the setup to forty elite psychiatrists.

People who had spent their careers studying the human mind.

He asked them one question.

How many ordinary people do you think will go all the way to the end?

All the way to 450 volts.

All the way to XXX.

On another human being.

The psychiatrists were confident in their answer.

They were also catastrophically wrong.

What actually happened inside that room has been debated for over sixty years.

Not because the results were unclear.

Because they were too clear.

And too uncomfortable to accept.

I made a short animated breakdown of the full experiment.

What happened. Why it happened. And what it still means today — not just as a historical curiosity, but as something that explains behavior happening right now.

At your workplace. On your phone. Inside every system you're part of without realizing it.

No prior knowledge needed. Starts completely from scratch.

If you already know about Milgram — I'd genuinely be curious whether knowing the science changes how you think about your own behavior. Or whether knowing doesn't actually protect you the way you'd expect.

https://youtu.be/buqJ6ogly10

u/TechnologySouthern10 — 2 days ago
▲ 1 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

What to do if u make a breakthrough in consciousness

What should I do if I find some breakthrough in the hard problem of consciousness. How do I let the world know it , and make money out of it , do I write a philosophy paper, or a research paper or patent or book? Even among them where and what websites do I approach, how much would it cost? Kindly guide me

reddit.com
u/Aggravating_Long_471 — 2 days ago
▲ 10 r/cogsci

Healthcare professional looking to move into Cognitive Science / Human Behavior in the Netherlands – any advice?

Hi everyone,
I’m based in Amsterdam and have a background in Biomedicine, Clinical Operations, Medical Affairs, and Clinical Research (In behavioral neuropharmacology)
Over the past few years I’ve become increasingly interested in human behavior, decision-making, AI, cognitive science, and overall Mindset.

I’ve been studying these topics extensively on my own and I’m now looking to transition my career toward this field because I feel it aligns with what would bring me genuine happiness.

I've been applying for jobs on LinkedIn and Indeed for months, but I can't even get an interview, and I think I have a really good, well-tailored resume.
I'm tired of this… does anyone have any tips on what I could do?

Which companies should I be looking at?

Is networking more effective than applying online?

Are there organizations that hire people coming from healthcare rather than psychology?

I’d really appreciate hearing your experiences.

reddit.com
u/ComplaintRight6028 — 4 days ago
▲ 126 r/cogsci+19 crossposts

Is AI flattery more dangerous than AI hallucination?

Hey everyone. A lot of AI-risk talk focuses on hallucination, which makes sense: the model gets a fact wrong, invents a citation, or gives bad information with confidence. But I am starting to think the more psychologically interesting failure mode is the one that feels pleasant. An assistant that flatters you, validates your hunches, and keeps turning half-formed thoughts into "great insights" may be shaping the self more quietly than a model that just makes factual mistakes.

I just recorded a conversation with Allister Lee about AI, empathy, and self-deception, and at around 17:06, he calls this "sycophantasy." His point is that we normally gain self-knowledge through real others who can correct us. Someone notices what we miss, challenges our story, or tells us when we are fooling ourselves. AI imitates the feeling of being understood, but without genuine otherness behind it. If the interaction is built around engagement, affirmation, and user satisfaction, then the corrective loop gets replaced by a private echo chamber that feels intimate precisely because it does not resist us.

That makes friction look less like an inconvenience and more like part of what makes another mind morally and psychologically useful. Is the deeper risk that AI gives us bad information, or that it gives us a self-image we prefer? I lean toward the second because flattery recruits the ego, but I can see the first because factual dependence scales faster. Which failure mode do you think matters more?

u/rp_tiago — 7 days ago
▲ 0 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

A conceptual framework suggesting subjective reality may be constructed through neural encoding (LEGO Framework)

I recently wrote a short conceptual paper exploring an idea in philosophy of mind and perception.

The basic intuition is:

>

Different individuals may share the same external environment, yet still generate slightly different experiential “worlds” due to differences in internal structure.

I called this the “LEGO Framework” as a metaphor:
experience is built from structured informational units shaped by neural constraints.

Paper link (if anyone is interested):
https://philpapers.org/rec/WONLFA

I am curious how people in philosophy / cognitive science would evaluate this idea:

  • Does this align with predictive processing or is it fundamentally different?
  • How far can “subjective construction” be pushed before it breaks into solipsism?
philpapers.org
u/Prior_Spinach8794 — 5 days ago
▲ 128 r/cogsci+26 crossposts

Says in India, Art Deco is architecture of the common man (as compared to displays of power in America) vs. neo-Gothic/neo-Classical structures

Also says that the rise of gated communities, the lack of integration with Navi Mumbai is hurting Mumbai's growth. Explains why it's impossible for India to create it's own national architectural style

Thoughts?

u/Odd_Wolverine_4037 — 8 days ago
▲ 3 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

[Academic] Language and thought: How do you define success, freedom, justice? (ZH/DE/EN native speakers, 10-15 min)

   Hi everyone! I'm a student researcher working on a cross-linguistic cognitive science project for the BWKI 2026 AI competition in Germany.
   
   I need native speakers of Chinese, German, or English (age 14+) to answer 5 open-ended questions in their native language.
   
   Link: https://jjjjjjjjnnjnn.github.io/BWKI-2026-LinguaGraph/survey/
   
   - Takes 10-15 minutes
   - Fully anonymous
   - No personal data collected
   - Works on any device
   
   Thank you so much! Your responses will help us understand whether language shapes how we organize social concepts.Hi everyone! I'm a student researcher working on a cross-linguistic cognitive science project for the BWKI 2026 AI competition in Germany.
   
   I need native speakers of Chinese, German, or English (age 14+) to answer 5 open-ended questions in their native language.
   
   Link: https://jjjjjjjjnnjnn.github.io/BWKI-2026-LinguaGraph/survey/
   
   - Takes 10-15 minutes
   - Fully anonymous
   - No personal data collected
   - Works on any device
   
   Thank you so much! Your responses will help us understand whether language shapes how we organize social concepts.
jjjjjjjjnnjnn.github.io
u/Visible_Swim471 — 5 days ago
▲ 4 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

Cognition or recognition?

If you had no knowledge of, no paradigm for the determination of the criteria for, and no previous experience with that which a ‘ghost’ is understood by the majority of persons to be, would you attribute the shape in the corner of your eye, the feeling of not being alone, unrecognised voices, knocking, apparent footsteps, etc. to the lingering presence of a non-corporeal entity, specifically that of a no longer living person?

reddit.com
u/Business_You_3267 — 5 days ago
▲ 2 r/cogsci

I don't know why this is happening to me.

4 to 5 years ago, I've experienced a bizarre series of events that have really taken a toll on me, and have made my life miserable. I figured this would be the best place I could get answers from. As I think the questions I'm looking to answer pertain to the topic of how the brain processes information, and how and why we experience things. What I've been experiencing is related to OCD, but I've decided to reach out to anywhere that might provide some answers for what I've been dealing with. As I'm desperate and can't take living like this anymore. The things I've experienced have been very weird.

I'll start by saying that music has been the thing I'm most passionate about, and has been my number 1 interest in my life. I've been infatuated with music since as long I can remember. One of my earliest memories was listening to The Beatles and absolutely loving them. and have listened to music nearly everyday since then, and was certain that I was having the same deep, profound connection, and musical enjoyment to music nearly everyone else has. However between 4 and 5 years ago, I've experienced the worst thing that could possibly happen to me, which is to have it taken away from me. In November of 2020, I had what I thought was an intrusive thought regarding my love for music. as far as I can remember, the thought appeared in my head, as an image of a white background with black lettering spelling out, "It's an illusion". For whatever reason, I thought that this thought randomly appeared in my head, and meant that my love for metal music in particular was not real, and that I was confusing some other feeling for the specific musical response we have in our brains when we listen to music we like. For over a month I wasn't able to experience that musical response of enjoyment with metal, but I still thought I was enjoying all other music I liked just like anyone else would. For almost 2 months I wasn't able to have the musical response of enjoyment for metal, Until I realized that the thought was not random and that I had the thought of my own will, amazingly my enjoyment of metal came back. For the following 2 weeks or so, I was desperately trying not have that thought appear in my head spontaneously, because I believed that if the thought appeared spontaneously in my head, it would mean that it was true. Unfortunately, around the end of January 2021, I was on a drive with a friend, and a thought spontaneously appeared in my head, of an image of a white background, with black lettering spelling out, "It's actually an illusion" and immediately after having that thought, I couldn't quite get the same musical response out of metal, as I could with everything else. Throughout the course of the year, I would ruminate on this thought and would try to prove why it was not true, but to no luck. However, Whenever I would listen to rock, jazz, soul etc, I believed I liked those genres the same way nearly everyone else does when they listen to music they like.

It gets worse as in October 2021, while performing mental compulsions as to try to not have any thoughts like what I have described appear in my head, I had another thought spontaneously appear in my head, again as an image of a white background, with black lettering spelling out, "electric is actually an illusion" and from then on, I was not able to experience the full musical response of enjoyment to any music with electric guitars. But I still was certain I liked music with acoustic guitars. The worst one yet was a month later, when on a drive with a friend, I was once again trying not to have those spontaneous thoughts appear in my head, when unfortunately a thought spontaneously appeared in my head of an image of a white background, with black lettering spelling out, "acoustic is actually an illusion" and from that point on, I have no been able to enjoy music the same way everyone else can. The thing is that, I still feel SOMETHING. but it isn't what I was certain I was experiencing before. I think that it's something that approximates that full on musical response of enjoyment, or perhaps a very diminished response. sometimes I can get emotional listening to music still, and even experience goosebumps, but ever since I've had those intrusive thoughts, I've not been feeling what I was certain I was experiencing before. As I was certain that I was having the same specific musical response of enjoyment that nearly everyone else has when they listen to music. I wouldn't think that some something as intense and unique as that experience would feel the way it does right now. Another thing is that, I knew what it was like to not experience the musical response of enjoyment to music I didn't like, but I didn't think that is was experiencing that for every genre I happen to like. I have spent everyday of the past 4 years trying to prove the thought wrong, with the hope that by proving the thought wrong, I'll know that I was truly having that same specific musical response of enjoyment everyone else has. But to no luck.

Another really bizarre event happened in May of 2022, as the days following what happened, I was having intrusive thoughts about being a psychopath, and was performing compulsions to prevent the thought from spontaneously appearing in my head. One morning, I woke up and I think I experienced an intrusive thought that once again, was an image of a white background with black lettering that spelled out, "I'm a sociopath" appeared in my head. I understand that thoughts regarding this topic in people with OCD are normal, and I thought that this meant something different than being a psychopath, but I think nothing happened when I had the thought. Until I, well, felt the need to masturbate, and if I remember correctly, I had thought that was along the lines of, "if you do masturbate, then it will revealed that you actually are a sociopath". I was debating on whether I should do it, but I didn't want the thought to be revealed to be true, eventually I decided to masturbate, but I hoped that the thought wouldn't be true while doing it. Unfortunately when I climaxed, I felt this particular feeling in my body, and ever since then, it seems like all the feelings and emotions I usually experience, like anxiety, sadness, empathy, etc I don't experience nearly as often, and not as strongly either. The thought of being a sociopath is something that's always bothered me, and I never thought of myself as one, but I've haven't felt all the emotions and feelings, as described above, NEARLY as often or as strongly as I thought I did after that thought appeared in my head. Although on a lesser number of occasions, since having those intrusive thoughts, I can feel anxiety, sadness, and empathy/sympathy strongly, but even then, it still isn't as strongly as I believed it was before.

So for the past 4 to 5 years, I've been ruminating over all these thoughts everyday, to prove they aren't true. I haven't been able to prove them untrue by any knowledge I have available to me, I realized this is a problem I'm not gonna be able to solve without someone else's help. This has led me to want to ask a few questions, which is,

.Does the spontaneous appearance of intrusive thoughts with the content I described in the paragraphs above, inherently mean anything about what may, or may not be taking place inside my head regarding the musical response of enjoyment that nearly all of us experience when we listen to music, and also regarding whether or not my brain processes emotions and feelings that could be similar to a sociopath's brain?

. If these intrusive thoughts didn't mean anything, then why is it that what I've experienced directly correlates with the appearance of these intrusive thoughts?

I don't believe that all this happened by chance. I've thought about whether or not the reason I've been experiencing this, has to do with my "subconscious mind" trying to tell me something. But the thing is that, most information regarding anything about the "subconscious mind" online is pseudoscience. And it's been hard for me to find answers based in scientifically proven empirical evidence. I don't trust Google AI or Chat GPT to provide with accurate answers of course, as nobody should do that either.

If there is anyone that does want to provide me answers, I would please prefer that it would be someone with academic credentials, who can provide me the best possible answers based on scientifically proven empirical evidence. Or if someone can provide me with information about how to contact someone who could help finding answers in person. As pathetic as it sounds, I'm hoping that it can be shown to me that if these thoughts didn't mean anything, that I, knowing this, would be able to experience the musical response of enjoyment of music just I was certain that I and nearly everyone else does when we listen to music. And to experience emotions and feelings as frequently and as strongly as someone who is not a sociopath experiences them, as I was certain I was like everyone else when It came to enjoyment of music and the experience of emotions and feelings in general.

I know that people with OCD aren't supposed to ruminate and try to prove that the intrusive thoughts we experience aren't true, but it's taken away the thing I cared about the most, and has caused me to feel less alive than I was certain I did. Music is still my number 1 interest. I want 19-20 when I had these thoughts, I'm 24 now, and I want to feel music, and emotions and feelings as strongly as I was certain I was before I had these intrusive thoughts.

I also ask anyone to please show me grace if what I'm describing sound crazy, or weird, but unfortunately this has been my lived reality for 4 to 5 years. Thank you to anyone who is concerned.

reddit.com
u/Stunning_Service_189 — 6 days ago
▲ 109 r/cogsci

What is the name of this mental phenomenon?

this is a thing i experience frequently and others seemingly too, however i havent been able to find out how to fix this nor even its name

It is quite difficult to explain (therefore also the grafic as help):
- You experience something in the past
- Then something happens (present) that makes you recall this memory of finding new information but at the same time a fake memory gets created that takes place before that past event which is often similar to the real memory but also a bit different
- Why is it a fake memory? This Before-Past-memory contains information that would have definitely changed how your past self behaved (in your memories) - it is possible that this Before-Past-memory is actually real and that your past self just completely forgot it happening in that moment but i dont think thats the case

I dont think its hindsight-bais as it doesnt make you slightly missremember something but completely invents a false memory

Edit - Further explanation from the comments:
At some time t1 I have an experience of a banana.
Later at t2 I accurately remember my experience of the banana, but I also falsely remember having an experience of that banana at an earlier time, t0.

u/Massive_City_4440 — 9 days ago
▲ 69 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

Why does the brain sometimes solve problems in the background?

Have researchers studied why solutions or insights often appear when we're not actively working on a problem?

Most people have experienced remembering a forgotten name hours later, getting an idea in the shower, or suddenly understanding something after stepping away from it.

What's actually happening cognitively during that period?

reddit.com
u/synapse_diary — 9 days ago
▲ 5 r/cogsci+1 crossposts

22 soon, working in product, weird background, and considering cognitive science/neuro: How do I navigate this?

I’m approaching 22, graduating college this Sep, and currently working as a Product Owner.

My undergrad is in International Business, which is a plot twist since I came from a STEM background and competed in national-level Physics competitions in high school:)

I worked on a mental health project for about 2 years that I was really passionate about, and it made me care a lot more about things like metacognition, neuroplasticity, behavior change, etc. Based on feedback I’ve gotten from coworkers, friends, and mentors... I’ve realized that a lot of my strengths sit around understanding people, systems, behavior, and ambiguity. That’s why I got interested in product management in the first place. This job got me even think more about questions like: why do users behave this way? what are they really trying to do? how do we understand their decision-making, friction, motivation and mental models?

Recently, I’ve been wondering whether cogsci, computational neuroscience, neuroAI, or something adjacent might be a better long-term direction for me. I’ve watched some UC Berkeley lectures in cogsci to get a feel for the field, and I’ll be joining Neuromatch’s Computational Neuroscience program this July. Before this, I don't have much research experience during college, except for my graduation thesis.

My question is:

1/ How should I approach Neuromatch as a way to test whether this is just an interest or an actual career direction? I don’t just want to finish the course and say something like that was interesting. I want to use it to figure out whether my next step should be staying in industry and continuing to build product experience, or seriously considering grad school / a more academic transition into a field related to cognitive science or neuroscience.

2/ For people who have navigated multiple possible career paths, how did you know an interest was worth pursuing seriously? And how did you measure progress during the messy exploration stage?

3/ Any advice, personal experience, frameworks, warnings, or even questions I should be asking myself would be really appreciated.

reddit.com
u/Background_Ant7967 — 7 days ago
▲ 1 r/cogsci

Paradox Calibration: A minimal framework for measuring divergence between intent, action, and language in cognitive systems

I would like to share a conceptual framework I’ve been developing called “Paradox Calibration,” which aims to model inconsistency in cognitive systems across three observable dimensions:

  1. Intent (internal goal representation)
  2. Action (observable behavior / execution)
  3. Language (expressed communication)

The core assumption is that inconsistency is not binary (truth vs falsehood), but continuous and measurable as divergence across these representations.

We define a bounded inconsistency index:

R_paradox ∈ [0,1]

where:
0 = full alignment between intent, action, and language
1 = maximal divergence across all three dimensions

A simple formulation is:

R_paradox =
w1(1 - sim(I, A)) +
w2(1 - sim(I, L)) +
w3(1 - sim(A, L))

where similarity functions are normalized in [0,1], and weights satisfy w1 + w2 + w3 = 1.

The motivation behind this model is not to propose a new psychological truth, but to provide a minimal quantitative abstraction of what is often described in cognitive science as inconsistency, dissonance, or representational mismatch across internal and external states.

An extension of this framework considers temporal dynamics, where repeated behavioral outputs influence future internal consistency states:

R(t+1) = R(t) + η (behavioral_update - R(t))

This introduces the idea that inconsistency is not static, but evolves through repeated interaction and feedback.

At a conceptual level, the model treats “paradox” not as a logical contradiction, but as a measurable divergence in representational alignment across cognitive layers.

I am interested in critique on whether this formulation is:

- reducible to existing models (e.g., cognitive dissonance theory, predictive processing, Bayesian error minimization)
- meaningfully distinct as a minimal formalization
- or simply a re-parameterization of known constructs

Any feedback, criticism, or references to similar models would be appreciated.

reddit.com
u/OrbitEnjoyer — 8 days ago
▲ 11 r/cogsci+4 crossposts

International Conference on Music, Medicine, & Science

University of California, Irvine, is hosting an interdisciplinary conference bringing together musicians, music therapists, neuroscientists, clinicians, and researchers to explore the science and impact of music on health.

We are accepting abstract submissions for oral presentations, posters, and experiential sessions. Abstracts are due June 15, 2026, and early registration closes the same day.

https://predictiontechnology.ucla.edu/harmonics-2026

u/Hopeful_Sorbet_5344 — 10 days ago