r/creative_advertising

▲ 18 r/creative_advertising+3 crossposts

The GAP and Dance

Some campaigns never stop moving.

Breaking down the movement behind one of advertising’s most iconic uses of dance over the decades.

From swing and jazz to hip-hop, and now K-pop, @gap has continually used dance as more than choreography—it’s a reflection of the cultural moment. Each campaign captures the rhythm, style, and attitude of a new generation, turning movement into a language that audiences instantly recognize and connect with.

The result isn’t just memorable advertising. It’s the kind of creative work that helps shape culture, influencing the music we listen to, the fashion we wear, and the way a generation expresses itself.

As Oli Walsh of Invisible Dynamics, who created Gap’s latest campaign featuring KATSEYE, put it:

“By grounding a legacy brand in the voice of a new generation, we helped Gap not just participate in the conversation, but lead it.”

The best campaigns don’t chase culture. They move with it—and sometimes, they move it forward.

u/Fab_33 — 2 days ago
▲ 4 r/creative_advertising+3 crossposts

Kreative Splash

I will be posting about the company of ours ,

Who we serve, what we serve every thing

Thought I should give a sneak peak of it

u/Jams1999_ — 3 days ago
▲ 19 r/creative_advertising+6 crossposts

Open Submissions!

The Online.

We're a multidisciplinary collective and independent publication
documenting the strange,beautiful,and ordinary parts of being alive.

Through photography, film, writing, design, music, zines, and whatever
medium feels right, we create work that will linger.

Our work lives somewhere between documentation and imagination.

We're drawn to the overlooked, the nostalgic, the experimental, and the
deeply personal.

Our collective exists to give emerging artists a place to experiment,
collaborate, and tell stories that might otherwise go unheard...
________________________________

For our inaugural issue, we’re looking for work that captures late-night feelings, nostalgia, intimacy, solitude, city lights, empty streets, bedroom ceilings, fleeting memories, dreams, youth, friendship, love, heartbreak, identity, and the beauty found in ordinary moments. We welcome pieces that feel raw, reflective, cinematic, or deeply personal.

3:17 A.M. is a zine about the hours between yesterday and tomorrow. It’s about memories that keep us awake, the conversations we replay, the friendships we thought would last forever, and the strange comfort of knowing we’re not the only ones staring at the ceiling in the dark.

Through photographs, journal entries, illustrations, fragments of stories, and found objects, it explores nostalgia, loneliness, growing older, and the quiet beauty of existing while the world sleeps. This is a love letter to sleepless nights, forgotten places, and the versions of ourselves that only seem to exist at 3:17 A.M.

We accept photography, illustrations, paintings, mixed media, film stills, graphic design, poetry, short fiction, personal essays, journal excerpts, comics, experimental work, and anything that doesn’t fit neatly into a category.

Show us what 3:17 A.M. feels like to you.

Submit your work here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSey1pXYVAxuPo2g3YUvuA-MDgu2Z_nvZNZtMyC9kSN9icReVw/viewform

or email your work to us at http.theonline@gmail.com

Follow us on IG : http.theonline

u/Valuable-Egg-3828 — 6 days ago
▲ 10 r/creative_advertising+5 crossposts

the biggest mistake I see UGC creators make when pricing themselves

One thing I've learned from managing UGC programs is that most creators completely misunderstand what brands are actually buying.

A lot of creators pitch us like they're selling a piece of art, for example, one polished video for $400.

The reality is that, especially for apps and tech companies, we're usually looking for something else. We're looking for creators who can consistently produce native content at scale.

If someone can:

  • reliably deliver multiple videos every week,
  • follow a proven format, test new hooks,
  • hit deadlines without constant back-and-forth

They're infinitely more valuable to us than someone who creates one amazing video every few weeks.

The funny thing is, creators often assume this work pays less because the price per video is lower.

But when you're on a retainer producing content consistently, the numbers add up very quickly.

  • For example, we pay a creator $20 per video, and they produce 100 videos in a month, that's a $2,000 base payout. Then we layer on performance bonuses for videos that hit certain view milestones. The creator gets predictable income with upside, and we get 100 opportunities to find winning content instead of betting everything on a handful of expensive videos. That's a much easier investment to justify.

And I know a lot of people are probably thinking, "there's no way someone can make 100 videos in a month", but they absolutely can.

The reason is that these aren't highly produced ads that take days to create. They're short-form videos built around simple formats. Once creators understand what works, they're not starting from zero every time. They're testing different hooks, angles, and variations of proven concepts.

Because the content is short and native, filming and editing can be done quickly, which makes producing high volume possible.

reddit.com
u/Due_Donut7567 — 9 days ago
▲ 7 r/creative_advertising+1 crossposts

What books have genuinely changed the way you think as a creative? 📚

Looking to build a solid reading list around design, advertising, creative leadership, art direction, creative strategy, branding, and AI in the creative process.

What books have genuinely changed the way you think or work? Could be classics, hidden gems, or newer releases.

I’d love recommendations from creatives, art directors, designers, strategists, and copywriters.

P.S. I’ve been working in advertising and design for about 8 years (art direction/creative), so I’m not looking for beginner-level books.

reddit.com
u/UnitedChard2101 — 7 days ago
▲ 60 r/creative_advertising+6 crossposts

I fixed the tea in the bath problem

So every time I've wanted to drink tea in the bath, I've had a less than perfect experience.

A few times obviously the tea has spilled in the bath, which is often the worst possible situation. Then other times it's just annoying to have to place the mug carefully on the side of the bath or the floor or have a bath shelf (which I personally do not like at all).

A while ago I decided to see if I could solve the problem by making the mug itself float instead of relying on a tray. After a lot of prototyping, I finally got it working, and it's been surprisingly satisfying to use. It's insulated and spill resistant if you use a cap (which is a bit weird for hot tea, but to me is actually cozy feeling).

I thought some people here might appreciate the idea, so I wanted to share it. I made a video spoofing a classic infomercial.

u/Interesting_Beast16 — 11 days ago
▲ 13 r/creative_advertising+8 crossposts

Are Canvas UGC, Tech UGC, and High-Volume UGC actually different models?

If you're running a creator program for a tech company (apps, AI, SaaS, software, etc.), the best setup is Canvas UGC + Tech UGC + High-volume UGC.

  1. Canvas UGC is about where the content gets posted.
  2. Tech UGC is just because you're selling a tech product.
  3. High-volume UGC is about how you run the program: lots of creators, lots of videos, and constant testing of different hooks and ideas.

And companies outside of tech can still use Canvas UGC and High-Volume UGC. Those models aren't tied to software or apps; they're about how content is distributed and how creator programs are scaled.

So I don't really see these as three completely different models. It feels more like different pieces that fit together depending on the type of brand.

Does anyone else see it this way?

reddit.com
u/Due_Donut7567 — 10 days ago
▲ 12 r/creative_advertising+8 crossposts

One viral video doesn't mean your UGC campaign is working

I don't think views are enough to tell you if a UGC campaign is actually doing well. Of course, views are important, if no one watches the videos, nothing else matters.

But after running bigger creator programs, views aren't the metric that tells you whether the campaign is actually working.

What I care about more is whether the campaign is becoming more efficient.

Are we testing enough creators? Are we finding better hooks? Are new videos performing better than the ones from last month? Is our CPM going down as we learn what works?

To me, that's a much healthier way to look at a campaign than celebrating one video that gets a million views. A good creator program should keep improving over time, and every batch of videos should teach you something, so the next batch performs even better.

That's why I spend more time looking at campaign-level metrics than individual videos now. Curious if anyone else thinks about it this way, or if you still mainly judge campaigns by views.

reddit.com
u/Due_Donut7567 — 11 days ago
▲ 2 r/creative_advertising+1 crossposts

Seeking women working in Social Media, PR, Advertising & Marketing for a research interview

Hi everyone!
I’m currently researching and writing a Substack article about women in SPAM (Social Media, Public Relations, Advertising & Marketing) — focusing on the people behind the campaigns, trends, brands, and online conversations that shape modern culture.
I’m looking to interview women who currently work (or have worked) in fields such as:
Social media management/strategy
Public relations (PR)
Advertising
Brand marketing
Influencer marketing
Content strategy
Digital marketing
Creative direction
The goal of this research is to understand:
• What working in SPAM is really like behind the scenes
• What a typical day looks like in these careers
• The challenges and opportunities women experience in the industry
• How social media, pop culture, and internet trends influence marketing
• Advice for young women interested in entering this field
The interview will be a written Google forms interview with questions you can answer at your own convenience. It should take approximately 15–30 minutes.
Important: This is an independent research project, and participation is unpaid. I completely understand that your time is valuable, and I truly appreciate anyone willing to share their experiences and insights.
With your permission, selected responses may be quoted in my final Substack article. You can choose whether you would like to be credited by name or remain anonymous.
If you’re interested in participating, please comment below or send me a DM. I would love to hear your career story and perspective.
Thank you so much! ❤️

reddit.com
u/localsiren_ — 13 days ago