r/inmatehopper

All this witch does is lie and lie. When will she ever just shut her mouth?

Ahmed was BOTHERED by his chat last night, he was so quiet, they were relentless... I was so proud of them!!!

!! Abuse trigger warning!!

Came across this live and when I went to check the views I saw her profile on there as one of the viewers. This TikTok shop claims to sell real authentic bags but does anyone knows if that’s true. Also is this where she gets her “designer” bags? lol! Thought this was funny and wanted to share

Via @at_thee_end_of_the_day on TikTok

It looks like the Assistant DA is requesting the names and addresses of anybody that Ashley’s defense team is planning to use to present evidence under rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Texas Rules of Evidence. What are those rules exactly?

According to this document released by the Texas Courts government website (https://txcourts.gov/media/1442383/texas-rules-of-evidence-updated-with-amendments-effective-112018.pdf):

Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses
A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may
testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if the expert’s scientific, technical, or other
specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact
in issue.

Rule 703. Bases of an Expert’s Opinion Testimony
An expert may base an opinion on facts or data in the case that the expert has been made aware of,
reviewed, or personally observed. If experts in the particular field would reasonably rely on those
kinds of facts or data in forming an opinion on the subject, they need not be admissible for the
opinion to be admitted.

Rule 705. Disclosing the Underlying Facts or Data and Examining an Expert About
Them
(a) Stating an Opinion Without Disclosing the Underlying Facts or Data. Unless the court
orders otherwise, an expert may state an opinion—and give the reasons for it—without
first testifying to the underlying facts or data. But the expert may be required to disclose
those facts or data on cross-examination.
(b) Voir Dire Examination of an Expert About the Underlying Facts or Data. Before an
expert states an opinion or discloses the underlying facts or data, an adverse party in a civil
case may—or in a criminal case must—be permitted to examine the expert about the
underlying facts or data. This examination must take place outside the jury’s hearing.
(c) Admissibility of Opinion. An expert’s opinion is inadmissible if the underlying facts or data
do not provide a sufficient basis for the opinion.
(d) When Otherwise Inadmissible Underlying Facts or Data May Be Disclosed;
Instructing the Jury. If the underlying facts or data would otherwise be inadmissible, the
proponent of the opinion may not disclose them to the jury if their probative value in
helping the jury evaluate the opinion is outweighed by their prejudicial effect. If the court
allows the proponent to disclose those facts or data the court must, upon timely request,
restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

Hmmm.. what are your guys’ thoughts about the DA’s strategy given this new development? And who do you think Ash’s defense team is going to introduce as a credible witness to defend her reputation? (Lol good luck) 🤔 😂

Does this dumb bitch ever stop lying?