r/nuclear

Was cool to see this in the local paper. The reactors in question are SMRs, but it would be neat to see nuclear power in some capacity back in SoCal after the closure of SONGS.

https://archive.is/JDmRk

Excerpt: The Philippine economy grew at its slowest pace in five years, expanding just 2.8 percent in the first quarter of 2026, as the country grapples with the persistent government spending slump and mounting inflation shocks.

The country’s economy, as measured by the gross domestic product (GDP), decelerated from the 3.0 percent expansion recorded in the final three months of 2025.

It also significantly missed the 3.4 percent median growth projected by economists in a survey, and marked the weakest quarterly output for the country since the first quarter of 2021, when the economy contracted 3.8 percent during pandemic-era lockdowns.

They have a remote job opportunity that would be great for me and was wondering if anyone is currently working for them or has worked for them and has any insight they are willing to share.

'Magyar challenged that account hours later. Under the original contract, Paks II should have been operating by 2024, he told reporters in a press conference Thursday. Instead, Hungary has spent roughly 1,000 billion forints (€2.8 billion) on a site he described as little more than depots and “two large concrete pits.”

“I don’t really see that they have adhered to the contract,” Magyar said. His government is now carrying out a full review of the project, including its financing and cooling arrangements.'

https://www.politico.eu/article/peter-magyar-danube-hungary-russia-nuclear-deal/

First of all, I am not a person who is qualified enough to talk about nuclear or environmental science. I am mainly from the formal sciences, which is why I have no experience how research works in the natural sciences specifically. However, given the fact that I do not know if every environmentalist subreddit is anti-nuclear, I thought that it would be great if I mentioned the issues here, and you guys correct me on what is actually happening.

There are two issues I want to ask about, you guys know very much about the second one, the first one is something not many might have a definitive answer. Here it goes:

1. The Green Revolution is something that has made the world hunger reduce by a huge extent. It is also controversial. There is an organization made by Bill Gates and the Rockerfeller Foundation called the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). Now, various environmentalists went against it, because of the corporate controlled seeds and because of the biotech industry. There was even a paper floating around; it wasn't even published to some journal; I don't even know if the claims here are misleading or not, but based on the fact that they were openly criticizing AGRA, it might definitely be biased: https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.tufts.edu/dist/0/5123/files/2020/07/20-01\_Wise\_FailureToYield.pdf

2. Now, while trying to fact check the above claim, while searching "why do environmentalists" on google, found "why do environmentalists hate nuclear power". Found this subreddit, and it felt like a space where scientific discourse is taken care of and is not merely cast into the notion of "captialism bad". Now, here, I noticed something quite contradictory: people talking about the anti-nuclear lobby and how the future is being stolen, people talking about how the common people do not want nuclear energy running their datacenters (despite nuclear being safe), and how the environmentalists don't like nuclear power.

Both of these feel contradictory, and it feels as if I am looking at two entirely different viewpoints.

What do you guys think? I think I went on a tangent here...