I finished the walking dead season 2 and in the end I stayed at wellington.If you left with Kenny,He would have died trying to save Clem and AJ but what happens to Kenny if Clem stays at Wellington? The game doesn't talk about Kenny after, So What do you think??
First, about Harvey Dent. It feels weird that we visit John in Arkham, but not Harvey. We should be able to visit Harvey.
Also why can't we try to save Harvey by giving him an antidote to the nerve agent? We should be able to redeem him.
The next thing I found weird is Arkham Asylum. We're told about a state-of-the-art replacement facility for Arkham Asylum named Thomas and Martha Wayne Memorial Hospital. So I thought since a new facility is being set up to replace Arkham, and since the Asylum had been in a bad shape for a long time which only got worse after the fight with Vicki, it would make much more sense to fund the police instead. If you pick the Asylum the speech is about how you're stopping work on the Memorial Hospital and focusting on restoring Arkham, which seemed pointless. Yet, in season 2, there's no replacement of Arkham, there's not even a mention of it. Not even in the codex. They removed the mention of the Hospital in Arkham's codex.
Similiarly, funding the police does absolutely nothing other than giving you a line of dialogue with Regina.
Trying to hide your identity from Gordon seems sloppy imo.
Finally, Alfred's argument about Batman creating evil doesn't make sense, Lady Arkham and Penguin were already criminals who were driven by revenge, and though they were inspired by Batman it is a secondary factor. Harvey Dent was put under immense pressure after the CoA attacks, 2 assassination attempts, Wayne scandal etc. Though seeing Bruce with Selina was his last straw. Riddler, Harley, Bane, Freeze were all criminals anyway. You only influence John. I'd like to think it's his paranoia and desperation speaking. He's tired of seeing Bruce getting hurt again and again.
basically the title. am i the only one that thinks this would’ve been amazing?
Watching The Clone Wars has made me realize that a game on the classic series would do great and shocked that they didn’t do one already, if a game based on Star Wars happened what story would you like to see?
After playing Telltales Batman, I was curious of how would a Telltale Harry Potter game would turn out?
they should tell a new story set in the different universe similar to Batman.
I chose to fight Vigilante Joker, and I was satisfied with my result, I chose to try to arrest Tiffany, and again, I was satisfied. Then I found Alfred, for all the game I wanted to tell him that doing what he was doing was unhealty for him, so when I got the chance, I told him to leave, because I agreed with that, but I still wanted him to explain why.: instead he simply left while frowning in the most anti-climactic ending I've probably ever played. He didn't explain himself, nothing, and we left almost on bad terms, simply because I thought I was doing good to him, and there was no way I could've known that he would have simply left. Same problem with other telltale games, being misleading choices. So angry right now
The Wolf Among Us 2
Fan-made poster inspired by Telltale's neo-noir world.
Wanted to lean into the comic-book aesthetic while letting the neon of Fabletown become part of the environment instead of just the backdrop.
Made in Photoshop.
High-quality print file available on: https://www.patreon.com/cw/ransomedesigns/shop
i mean the point and clicks so jptg is not allowed
A few days ago I finished playing the batman telltale series and the batman enemy within I really liked those games and I want to play more telltale games but I don't know what I should play what do you think I should play?
I have got the game running on my android tablet. The game works smooth and is very playable the audio doesn't stutter. The game is playable at high graphics around 25 FPS which is great for me because I don't have any pc.
I went into this thinking it was going to be an epic, "Game of Thrones-style" struggle where my choices would help House Forrester survive the political meat-grinder. Instead, I just finished the game and I’m sitting here, fuming.
It feels like the game forced the Forresters into the ultimate "Reverse Plot Armor." No matter how many tactical, smart, or loyal decisions I made, the game seemed dead-set on making sure everything fell apart in the most frustrating way possible. From the traitor plotline that felt forced, to the way Ludd Whitehill seems to have impenetrable plot armor despite everything I tried to do to stop him—it just feels like the game was rigged from the start.
I dropped it right after the scene where [Aher and lady forester got stabbed ] happened, and I just can't believe that's the "resolution."
Does anyone else feel like the "illusion of choice" in this game was particularly brutal? Why give us the chance to make these big decisions if the outcome is essentially "you lose, the bad guys win, and there’s nothing you can do about it"?
I’m genuinely angry at the ending. How did you guys handle this back when it finished in 2015? Did anyone else feel like they were just playing a rigged game?
If Skybound has truly moved on from continuing Telltale’s The Walking Dead in game form, then I think a TV adaptation is the most logical next step for the series.
Season 1 already has everything needed for a strong first season of television: a clear emotional core in Lee and Clementine, a contained story that works without needing multiple branching endings, and some of the best character writing in the entire Walking Dead franchise. Unlike later seasons, Season 1 is structured in a way that could be adapted faithfully while still allowing room to improve pacing, expand certain characters, and make the world feel more grounded in live action.
More importantly, I think an adaptation could solve one of the biggest limitations of the original game: the format itself. Telltale’s style was incredible for storytelling, but it also limited how much freedom characters like Lee and Clementine had to fully show their survival skills, physicality, and presence compared to characters from the main show or other survival games. A well-made adaptation could keep the emotional weight of the game while finally giving those characters the kind of screen presence they deserve.
I’m not saying it should be a shot-for-shot remake of every season. If anything, I think the smartest approach would be to adapt Season 1 closely, then let later seasons take a more refined route that keeps the core of Clementine’s story while fixing some of the inconsistencies and underused ideas from the games.
Telltale’s The Walking Dead is one of the strongest stories this franchise has ever produced. If the games are truly over, I think it deserves the chance to live on in another format.
You know how they see a tiny group of walkers and they act like it’s the biggest deal and they run away instead of fighting. Do you ever just think to yourself about how Rick from the show or pretty much any of the other main survivors could easily take on that group of walkers by themselves?
​
I absolutely love Bigby's character in The Wolf Among Us. But I only know his in-game version. Did the Big Bad Wolf character actually appear in any real fairy tale before this 2013 game? In the game there was a book where you could see all the princesses, dwarves, etc., and Bigby was in there too—attacking the Woodsman in full wolf form. Was a huge wolf like that ever depicted in old fairy tales? I mean, it doesn't need a name; did any princess story or similar tale ever mention a big wolf like that?
I ended up arriving at this conclusion: I think you can actually connect even the smallest wolf character to Bigby. In other words, all the wolf profiles depicted in fairy tales throughout history are essentially Bigby—just presented in different tellings. And I think this makes sense, because when you look at the Little Red Riding Hood story and go back to its earliest versions, that wolf was trying to rape the girl, or actually did rape her... something like that. The fact that the tales themselves aren't consistent is actually beautiful. It's more like a mythological character, passed down by word of mouth, understood and altered differently by everyone. That’s why Bigby's existence is entirely plausible when you look at it this way.
Bigby is what, 600 years old? Or maybe thousands of years old? Let’s say the Little Red Riding Hood story really happened—maybe the wolf truly did rape and eat the girl. But if we take Bigby's 1000-year-old self as a reference, maybe he was an incredibly young and inexperienced wolf back then. Maybe that’s why he did such horrible things to that innocent girl. And as centuries passed, he started appearing less and learning to control himself more. Maybe hundreds of years later, he became a detective, a wolf slowly being accepted by humans and Fables. Because even in the game, people didn't like Bigby and kept hinting at his savagery. And you can make many brutal and bloody choices in the game—snapping the Crooked Man's neck and throwing him down the Witching Well, or killing him before even reaching the well. So the game actually gives you a little taste of Bigby's youngest, most terrifying self.
And maybe a relative of the Woodsman from way, way back witnessed a much younger and more feral Bigby raping and eating Little Red Riding Hood, but Bigby escaped before he could be killed? And the story spread by word of mouth. Perhaps the reason the wolf isn't mentioned in other tales is because Bigby went far away, or because he grew older and more mature and never caused another incident. Then, thousands of years later, as those old stories became blurred, Bigby—still vigorous and possessing a mature mind—started living among humans and Fables. Even in the game, he always lives alone in the shabbiest apartment buildings. It's obvious that people still don’t trust him.
So in the end, these tales underwent small changes on everyone’s lips and reached us that way, and the work that put the final touch on it all was The Wolf Among Us. If Bigby is thousands of years old, it makes perfect sense that he committed those things and then went through some kind of atonement.
And maybe the name "Bigby" is one he gave himself centuries later. That's why he isn't known by name? Maybe the name Bigby was given very, very recently? You can catch it: BIGby—reminiscent of Big Bad Wolf. Maybe Snow White gave him the name Bigby when she made him a detective to reintegrate him into society. Because when you think about it, "Bigby" is a very soft-sounding name. It feels like it was chosen to make suspects, witnesses, children, etc. trust him more.