Hey guys, if you missed it, TD Asset Management settled CAD $70.25M  with investors over claims it charged improper trailing commissions. And, I just found out that they’re accepting claims even though the deadline has passed.

Quick recap: In 2023, TD Asset Management was accused of charging investors fees for advisory services that were not actually provided. In short, certain mutual fund investors paid trailing commissions through discount brokers despite receiving no advice.

After this news came out, the stock dropped, and investors filed a lawsuit for their losses.

Now, the good news is that the company agreed to settle CAD $70.25M  with them, and even though the deadline has passed recently, they’re accepting late claims.

So, if you invested in $TD when all of this happened, you can still check the details and file your claim here.

Anyway, has anyone here invested in $TD at that time? How much were your losses, if so?

Hey guys, if you missed it, CytoDyn just settled $500K with investors over claims it misled the market about its drug leronlimab some time ago. And they have already sent the agreement to the court for final approval.

In a nutshell, in 2021, CytoDyn was accused of overstating the effectiveness and regulatory progress of leronlimab. In short, the FDA later said the company’s claims were not supported by data, revealing no clear benefit. 

After this news came out, the stock dropped 25%, and investors filed a lawsuit for their losses.

The good news is that the company recently agreed to settle $500K with them, and already sent this agreement to the court for final approval. So, if you invested in $CYDY when all of this happened, you can check the details and file your claim here.

Anyway, has anyone here invested in $CYDY at that time? How much were your losses, if so?

Most people who followed $CYDY remember March 30, 2021. The FDA publicly stated that CytoDyn's claims about leronlimab were "misleading and not supported by the data", no benefit was shown in COVID-19 treatment trials. The stock dropped 25%+ that day.

What happened afterward was a class action lawsuit covering investors who held $CYDY between March 27, 2020 and March 30, 2022.

A $500,000 settlement has been reached and terms are now submitted to the court for approval.

Who qualifies?

Anyone who held $CYDY during the class period and suffered losses from the alleged misrepresentations about leronlimab's effectiveness for HIV and COVID-19.

Can I still apply?

Yes, you can submit your application now and it will be processed once claims filing officially opens after court approval.

If you were damaged by this don't forget to check your eligibility. GL!

You already know slippage eats your entry on Solana.

And don't even get me started on most liquidity pools they're all just held together with glue and promises.

Let's be real, most yield numbers are probably fake and not actually earned.

So, when you've got two protocols doing the same thing on the same chain, it's not about which one looks better. It's about which one actually holds up when you dig deeper.

If you’ve been in the Solana ecosystem you’ve probably heard of $ORE. Grid-based mining. Automated buybacks. Deflationary mechanics. It built a real following and for good reason the model is genuinely interesting, I’ll will give it that. Burns 90% of repurchased tokens, supply shrinks consistently, and the numbers back it up. Strong thesis.

But most people stopped there.

$GODL runs on the same grid as $ORE, same probability-based competition. You deploy SOL, compete for block rewards, and if you lose a round, the winner gets the SOL. It sounds similar, but that's where it changes.

ORE relies on scarcity to drive value over time. You hold onto it, and the supply shrinking does all the work.

GODL, on the other hand, pays you while you wait. It's got an APR of 239% and an APY of 27.6%, all generated from real mining activity. Miners fund the yield every round they play, so you don't have to rely on fake emissions or inflation.

And here's the icing on the cake - the OTC mechanic means you can buy directly from the protocol's vault at a 0% slippage rate. If you would've lost, you get credited back as unrefined GODL that earns yield from the moment you hold it.

A loss converted into an earning position before you even close the trade.

Liquidity sits at 21% of market cap way higher than most Solana projects which average around 2-10%. And it grows automatically from mining revenue every round, without any team intervention needed.

Supply capped at 2.1M. Everything earned. Nothing given.

Two protocols. Same foundation. One bets on scarcity. One bets on you.

Source: godl.supply/about

https://linktr.ee/godlsupply

So, which model makes more sense to you long term ? Do you bet on scarcity or do you bet on earning ?

(Disclaimer: not financial advice, just what happens when you keep looking)

The real treasure in crypto right now isn't a specific token, it's being able to tell what's built to last and what's just a flash in the pan. Knowing the difference between what earns real returns and what'll suck you dry.

Imagine a world where the same principles that made Bitcoin legendary - scarcity, fairness, decentralization - get updated for a new generation of crypto. That's what's happening with $GODL.

$GODL's a Solana protocol based on a simple rule value should be earned, not made up. There are only 2.1 million tokens, all made through honest means like mining, staking, or giving them away. It's not printed or inflated like some other systems. The rules are set by a smart contract, with no questions asked.

The coolest part is the mining mechanic.

Bitcoin is a probability game it costs energy to mine and miners compete based on probability to win blocks. $GODL takes that same philosophy and rebuilds it for Solana. Miners put SOL on a grid and compete for rewards. The more SOL you put in, the better your chances of winning. When one block is picked, the losing blocks get transferred to the winner - it's pretty competitive, transparent, and always incentivizes participation amongst users/miners.

And, with each round, $GODL feeds the Dual Motherlode, a progressive jackpot that also gets a little bit of all the SOL used. That's some serious potential for a big return on investment.

This isn't like some passive system - it's an active system that's always working for everyone involved.

If you take some raw $GODL and refine it, you can get an amazing 239% APR from real activity, not fake rewards. Stake it for two years and you could earn 90 to 140%. Send someone an invite and you'll get a cut of every claim your network makes. Buy OTC and if there's any slippage, you get back a bit of unrefined $GODL, which starts earning yield right away.

The Rush game lives within the ecosystem, where each action you take creates additional fees that flow right back into liquidity and buybacks. Walking through each part of the system creates yield, which makes the next cycle stronger.

10% of all SOL mining revenue goes directly towards buying back $GODL from the market, continually shrinking the supply. The liquidity is a strong 21% of the market cap, while Solana's is around 2 to 5%. It's grown 14% in just three days without any hype - and the team behind it is always pushing out new updates.

V3 just launched with a live marketplace and OTC options, and the $GODL card is on the way. They've also got Rush V2, open source development, a Seeker phone app, and even an AI mining agent in the works. While other teams are still talking about roadmaps, this one is actually building its vision.

$GODL builds its own products like Rush, which generates fees that flow right back into the system. It's self-sustaining, and it doesn't rely on outside money to survive - it funds itself.

Every lesson and opportunity you've learned and missed has prepared you for this moment, where you can spot what this is. $GODL doesn't need to convince you - just take a clear look at what's already happening and decide if you belong in it.

The next generation of digital value is happening right now - don't miss your chance to be a part of it.

Don’t sleep on this opportunity the same way people slept on Bitcoin in its early days.

Position yourself before the masses catch on

Start mining, refining, staking, and holding now’s your chance to print generational wealth

Anyone here already mining on Solana? Curious what your experience has been with protocols like this.

https://linktr.ee/godlsupply

$310 billion just flowed into the U.S. stock market.
The S&P 500 climbed +0.46%, adding around $287B in market cap. Nasdaq gained +0.64%, bringing in another roughly $224B.
The rally kicked off as Trump arrived in Beijing for a two day summit with Xi Jinping. He was joined by 17 of the biggest U.S. CEOs, representing companies worth over $12 trillion combined.
But judging by the price action, Bitcoin doesn’t seem too excited about the news. BTC already slipped back below $79K.

Jensen is claiming 1000x compute demand in this interview. Agentic inference chains reasoning tokens across many steps, calls external tools repeatedly, and runs orders of magnitude longer than single-pass generation. Even a fraction of 1000x is an enormous demand multiplier. Jensen compounds this with user growth as AI becomes genuinely useful, arriving at a framing where legacy GPUs from four or five years ago are now appreciating in value rather than depreciating.

His claim is rooted into profitable customers racing for more of NVDA.

Both OpenAI and Anthropic, plus most AI native companies, have turned to strongly positive gross margins in the 3-6 months prior to this conversation. When token economics are profitable, the rational move is to maximize token output, which means buying more compute. He names Claude Code specifically as the first agentic system to demonstrate genuinely productive work at scale, and uses this to anchor his entire narrative about when AI "became useful."

Infrastructure is another big moat that is incoming and can give NVIDIA a chance to capture larger piece of the pie. A single Vera Rubin rack runs $4-5 million, weighs three tons, contains 1.5 million parts, and spans seven distinct chip types including silicon photonics, advanced 3D memory packaging, and specialized cooling electronics. A full data center fills a football field with these racks. At $4-5M per rack, a football field of them implies data center costs well into the hundreds of millions per site, with NVIDIA capturing value at multiple points in each rack. 

These details makes me believe that $10 Trillion target can be achieved sooner than later.