u/220878

A simple question: what will happen to human politics when the existence of a very white, very advanced non terrestrial human civilisation becomes widely known?

The answer, of course, would in no small part be determinedly by what they have to say for themselves. But if they remain silent and enigmatic what will (political) inferences will we draw?

What will we make of their seeming ethnic identity?

Their genetic homogeneity?

Their cultural uniformity?

Their disregard for the fate of this world?

Even the most casual student of Disclosure cannot help but notice a pattern of progressive revelation, not least by one of its most prominent exponents: Lue Elizondo. Mr Elizondo expands on his themes over time in an obvious way - more is shared, presumably once the previous revelation is properly 'digested'.

Presume too that this is strategic. This is planned, and given that the 'medium is the message', we must presume too that his public persona is carefully crafted (which seems likely: he is the inoffensive everyman: Christain, and Jewish; a Person of Colour, yet white presenting; a highest ranking civil servant who none the less can pass as a blue-collar hero) and his public messaging timed and shaped.

Perhaps this is too much cynicism, too much paranoia, but remember who and what we are dealing with. A counterintelligence officer who literally wears his regrets on his sleeves (read those tattoos, consider what they mean), someone in the service of the partial management of the declaration of potentially the most stupendous sources of power in human history (the recovery of alien craft, and the authority of alien power). Perhaps Lue Elizondo is indeed an 'amiable everyman'. But he is more likely the too ruthless servant of an agenda whose management is almost certainly severe and intensely purposed.

Lue Elizondo's public utterances then deserve very close scrutiny and should not be taken at face value. Equally, those of his counsel Danny Sheehan deserve an active hearing, as his views are likely extremely well informed.

Recently, Lue Elizondo mentioned his love of the film 'Last of the Mohicans'. Yes, it is a good film, and yes, it is worth recommending; however, his reference may be intentional, and his claim of repeated viewing may be deliberate.

The backdrop of the story is of warring native tribes in pre-Revolutionary upper New York. With a sense of history, you know the immense tragedy which these peoples will soon face. The Europeans they encounter in the story are but the rainfall that precedes the tsunami which will soon engulf them all.

Is Lou Elizondo trying to draw a parallel between the life and fate of these tribes with the life and fate of the peoples of the world now? Is he suggesting that the NHI and what they now do is but the faintest of shadows of what is to come?

There is reason to think this: in one interview, he did provocatively ask how we would feel if an 'NHI overlord' established itself, gelding the great powers in the process.

But a better reason to think this parallel was intended was Danny Sheehan's recommendation of Marshall Vian Summer's Allies of Humanity briefing, which can be reasonably taken as suggestion that this briefing represents something of an accurate overview of what is happening.

Which brings us to the point of this note: that briefing repeatedly draws parallel between the native America peoples right before outright conquest, and we now. In this view, we now see occasional NHI traders and explorers, few in number with a handful of outposts. The warning though, is explicit: far greater forces are coming if we fail to unite and declare sovereignty of our world. If we continue to war like the Mohicans and Magua, almost everything will we lost, and then presumably the most we can hope for is the glorified imprisonment of a NHI managed reservation which would follow a sorry history of crushing defeats and failed rebellions, in a context of relentless and unending social and culture decline.

Maddeningly, for all the Disclosure that has unfolded critical questions seems unanswered. Who they are and what they want seem often invite speculation, but rarely find definite reasoned conclusion.

Arguably, critical truths are much closer at hand than may seem at first glance. Grusch and Sheehan, for example, have both positively referenced the work of the Summers (Marshall and Reed, father and son), and in their work we find extensive accounts of the identity and motivation of those operating the UAP

According to them, the extraterrestrials present in our world, represent an intervention which competes with and compliments itself much like early European imperialism in the Americas. This intervention acts in ways that are larely undetected, covertly purposed to establishing control of the planet and its resources. To date, different governments have entered into agreements which have exchanged technologies for certain resources, including human beings. A goal here is the creation of hybrids who can serve as local proxies and loyal intermediaries.

Outright invasion is supposedly against the prevailing laws governing interspecies interaction in this part of the galaxy. Moreover, the forces here are fundamentally too small in number and too weak in reach to enforce their will. Hence, their reliance on covert means which also include extensive psychological warfare and mental manipulation.

Their ultimate goal is the weakening of human sovereignty, self sufficiency and self belief to the point we willingly trade our freedom and our right to the planet in exchange for technologies we come to believe we need, and for a leadership and guidance we no longer believe we can provide ourselves.

*

I have come to unhesitatingly recommed Allies of Humanity by Marshall Vian Summers because it is the most comprehensive account of the phenomenon, which answers many, many relevant questions in a way that is coherent and compelling.

One question he asked which is very striking - and relevant here - was why do people seek disclosure from the US and other human goverments and why do they seek the opening of the facilities of these governments when they never ask the same of the unwanted and unbidden visitors who so frequently enter our world and our skies, without permission or disclosure of their purpose or the purpose and contents of their ships.