Login

u/Accomplished-Day1614

r/BryanKohbergerMoscow r/Idaho4Coverup r/Bryan_Kohberger_Case r/idaho4uncensored
Image 1 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 2 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 3 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 4 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 5 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 6 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 7 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 8 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 9 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
Image 10 — HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case
▲ 14 r/idaho4uncensored

HUGE FOIA NEWS / ISSUE in the Idaho 4 Case

If you didn’t tune into the live over on YouTube earlier tonight with @TypicallyUnique‬ @BronxTailsTrueCrime‬ @connor..h8‬ @TruCrimeCafewithDago‬ and myself you need to go listen! You will hear us talking about the issue that was found related to FOIAs! 🚨

When MPD receives a FOIA request they are only searching their Spillman System, never the separate Synology server. Tim Smalldridge’s own sworn declaration confirms it: the Synology holds 2.3M+ files (58 TB) of digital evidence, and it’s a separate system from what gets searched on a FOIA request.

That’s why 40 of our 133 tracked requests (~30%) have come back “No Records. Does Not Exist.” including documented interviews like Reid Uptmor, DJ Myers, and Nick Matowich.

This is a huge problem. Public records are being held from the public and taxpayers because MPD wasn’t able to successfully label the files stored on the Synology server, which stores over 59.18 TERABYTES OF DATA.

So we sent a new request: the directory tree of the Synology itself. No name search, no room to hide behind a mislabeled folder. We need to know all of the data that is stored in this server!

Here’s the link to the live: https://www.youtube.com/live/S83tLI4SmTE?is=E107ftibes4csCNk

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 21 hours ago
▲ 20 r/idaho4uncensored

📁 More documents just released in the Kohberger case (CR01-24-31665)

More documents just released in the Kohberger case (CR01-24-31665)

  1. State’s Motion in Limine RE Text Messages and Testimony
    https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+States+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Text+Messages+and+Testimiony.pdf
  2. Exhibits 1–3 in Support of Motions in Limine RE Vague and Undisclosed Expert Testimony
    https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+Exhibits+1+2+3+in+Support+of+Motions+in+Limine+RE+Vague+and+Undisclosed+Expert+Testimony.pdf
  3. Exhibits 1–5 in Support of Motion in Limine RE Excluding IGG Evidence
    https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+Exhibits+1+2+3+4+5+in+Support+of+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Excluding+IGG+Evidence.pdf
  4. Exhibits 1–2 in Support of Motion to Strike Death Penalty RE Autism Spectrum Disorder
    https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+Exhibits+1++2+in+Support+of+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdf
  5. Exhibit 1 in Support of Motion in Limine RE Conditions as Aggravator
    https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+Exhibit+1+in+Support+of+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Conditions+as+Aggravator.pdf

📁All of the documents have been saved here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Qhi6KgYtoqr4q8bLdCYGyrdbj1SacZxV

reddit.com
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 11 days ago
▲ 25 r/idaho4uncensored

Cherry-Picked Phone Records? Compare the Court Exhibits Yourself

Before anyone jumps to conclusions, look closely at what you’re actually seeing.

The entries highlighted in pink came from the defense exhibit that was filed on March 26, 2025. This filing is the FIRST filing that was released to the public that contained Dylan’s phone activity ONLY, including text messages, calls, and certain application activity. Below is the link to the court document.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LySVss3rgsGzHCvaaEwCayEMoLZLEA7C/view?usp=drivesdk

The second photo behind each photo that contains a pink highlighted entry came from the SECOND court document that was released to the public that included Dylan and Bethany’s phone records. That document was originally filed on March 17, 2025 titled Exhibit 1a, which reformatted many of the same records into the colored “bubble” format.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T\_CmJ8IbjDo9nZtJ2u7Fj34H5LleqCcj/view?usp=drivesdk

It also doesn’t matter whether these exhibits were filed by the defense or the State. My point isn’t about who submitted them. My point is that none of the publicly released filings contain the complete forensic phone extractions. The State’s filings don’t match these exhibits either, and they also do not contain the full set of Dylan’s phone records. More importantly, none of the State’s publicly released filings include Bethany’s complete phone records at all.

That being said both filings that have been released DO NOT MATCH EACH OTHER and show that the released court documents that contain the phone records ARE CHERRY-PICKED and are NOT a full set of records. AND that’s exactly my point.

The publicly released exhibits are not one continuous forensic extraction of DM’s or BF’s phone. They are selected excerpts presented in different formats across different filings. When you compare the March 17 and March 26 exhibits side by side, you can see that different records appear in different places and some entries are added that were not visible in the other filing.

Because of that, no one outside of law enforcement and the parties that have Dylan’s complete phone extraction can 100% state what Dylan or Bethany did on the
Phones from 4:00 AM to 12:00 PM. The public has never been given the full forensic extraction for either device.

Now let’s talk about the VSCO post that has been going around in this thread.

If the FBI received information that Dylan was posting on VSCO around 3:30 AM, and a screenshot exists showing what appears to be a 3:33 AM timestamp, that’s a pretty remarkable coincidence. On top of that, the publicly released phone records also prove that Dylan added a new contact at 3:51:03 AM. Further proving she was awake before that 4:00 AM timeframe.

But the people arguing with absolute certainty that “Dylan never posted to VSCO at 3:30 and are citing the court documents released with her phone records,” cannot know that based solely on the publicly released phone records, because those records are not complete. And they probably don’t even realize that the released phone records were cherry-picked!!

Until the complete forensic phone extractions are made public, no one can honestly claim to know every action that did or did not occur on Dylan’s or Bethany’s phones that morning.

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 19 days ago
▲ 62 r/idaho4uncensored+1 crossposts

Dylan Was Awake at 3:33 AM — Bianca Perez Interview Exposes the Timeline

Connor on YouTube recently received Bianca Perez interview from December 6, 2022. In it, Bianca tells detectives she heard Dylan posted a photo to VSCO around 3:30 AM.

MamaBearof3 who is in ​⁠Typically Uniques discord had a screenshot of the Dylan’s VSCO post which is timestamped at 3:33 AM.

At 3:51 AM, Dylan also created a new contact in her phone even she told police she was asleep until around 4:00 AM. The records say otherwise.

Also raised: the blood at the Whites and whether it was ever tested… and the rumor that Dylan may have recognized the masked man from a party earlier that day.

Dylan’s story needs to be heavily scrutinized because it doesn’t add up.

Credit to MamaBearof3 for the 3:33 AM screenshot.

youtu.be
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 20 days ago
▲ 47 r/idaho4uncensored

To the New Users Joining or Coming Out of the Woodwork Since the Post-Conviction Appeal

As long as I’ve been in this group I’ve seen it have plenty of disagreements, but for the most part people debated the evidence and moved on. Since Bryan Kohberger announced his post-conviction relief appeal, we’ve seen a huge influx of new users, and the tone has changed dramatically.

Posts are being mass downvoted, comment sections are turning into arguments, and there’s been a noticeable increase in personal attacks and unnecessary drama. As a moderator, I’ve also had people telling me, “You banned someone yesterday for the same thing, so you should ban this person too.” It’s becoming exhausting.

So I have a genuine question for those who have recently joined this community primarily to argue:

If you’re absolutely convinced Bryan Kohberger is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, why come into a subreddit where people are discussing the evidence from different perspectives just to argue with them?

If the evidence is truly as overwhelming as you believe, then it should withstand scrutiny and, if there were ever another trial, speak for itself. Debate is one thing. Constant hostility, personal attacks, and trying to turn every thread into a fight is something else entirely.

This community should be a place to discuss the case, challenge ideas with facts, and disagree respectfully, not a battlefield where every conversation turns into insults.

reddit.com
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 24 days ago
▲ 17 r/idaho4uncensored

CV01-26-15094 | Bryan Kohberger Petitioner, vs. State of Idaho Respondent⚖️

New documents have been officially filed in Bryan Kohberger’s post-conviction case as he seeks post-conviction relief to withdraw his guilty plea.

07/27/2026 Petition for Post-Conviction Relief
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kDzD9-jPytrHQ-EzRovudvSsijG\_y0GS/view?usp=drivesdk

07/27/2026 Motion & Affidavit in Support for Appointment of Counsel
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m\_BK\_P-pTUUWl7xfdcYuw9qrzGuZ29dV/view?usp=drivesdk

07/27/2026 Motion & Affidavit in Support for Appointment of Counsel
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OO06\_QmGCwYXT4212w6bAYfZUp\_mb6f7/view?usp=drivesdk

reddit.com
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 25 days ago
▲ 49 r/idaho4uncensored

🚨 Kohberger’s Handwritten Affidavit Released

Bryan Kohberger’s handwritten affidavit supporting his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief has now been filed. In it, he alleges he was coerced into accepting the plea agreement and claims his attorneys withheld exculpatory evidence and misrepresented aspects of the case.

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 25 days ago
▲ 40 r/idaho4uncensored

🚨 New Court Case Filed

Bryan Kohberger has filed a new Post-Conviction Relief case in Ada County District Court (Case No. CV01-26-15094). The petition was filed pro se and includes a request for appointed counsel and permission to proceed with reduced court fees.

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 25 days ago
▲ 84 r/idaho4uncensored

Bryan Kohberger says he wants to withdraw his guilty plea.

The New York Times published an interview today with Bryan Kohberger in which he says he has filed a petition to withdraw his guilty plea.

According to the article and the statement attributed to him, he claims:

His guilty plea was based on “false promises” and “wrong information.”

He intends to enter a not guilty plea if allowed.

He says he wants the State to prove its case at trial, even if that means prosecutors seek the death penalty again.

He maintains that he is innocent and says the plea should be withdrawn because it was based on “false promises and blatant disinformation.”

Per KathysIndieZone - A NEW CASE # HAS BEEN ASSIGNED ‼️CASE NO: CV01-26-15094 / POST CONVICTION RELIEF FILED

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/07/27/us/bryan-kohberger-statement.html

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 25 days ago
▲ 15 r/idaho4uncensored

Sy Ray’s Interview + Turvey’s Post: Is Something Bigger Coming?

I haven’t been able to stop thinking about Sy Ray’s interview. I’ve listened to it several times now. He heavily criticized the IGG process as improper and spent a lot of time talking about DNA evidence handling even though that’s not his area of expertise. His retained role was only cell phone data and geolocation.

Then I saw that Dr. Brent Turvey recently posted on LinkedIn about a DNA analyst who pleaded guilty to manipulating evidence for years. The article states:

“According to an arrest affidavit, investigators said Woods intentionally left DNA samples out of tests or reports and sometimes would test samples until the results showed what she wanted.”

“Investigators alleged that Woods deleted some findings of what are called ‘specific values’ in more than 30 sexual assault cases. She was accused of submitting reports that said no male DNA was found, when there was, in fact, male DNA or possible contamination that should have been retested.”

Sound familiar? All the untested DNA and items in the King Road house that were never fully processed or explained?

Makes you wonder what’s really going on here and what might be in the works. If you read between the lines, there’s a much bigger picture and Sy Ray’s interview feels like it could be the foundation of what’s to come. In my opinion, it won’t be in favor of the prosecution. 🤔

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/former-colorado-dna-analyst-yvonne-missy-woods-pleads-guilty-manipulating-data/

u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 1 month ago
▲ 50 r/idaho4uncensored+1 crossposts

Sy Ray Contradicted His Own Sworn Report - Why?

Sy Ray was retained as a defense expert in the Bryan Kohberger case. In his January 2025 sworn expert disclosure, he attacked the State’s evidence and supported the defense’s position.

But in his July 2026 live interview, he made multiple statements that directly contradicted his own sworn report including claiming there was “overwhelming evidence” that Kohberger committed the crime.

This video breaks down the key contradictions between what Sy Ray swore to in court and what he said publicly after the plea deal.

Key points covered:

• Phone location near the crime scene
• Crime scene cleanup and Dr. Brent Turvey
• Accusations of intentional misconduct by investigators
• Pattern of life evidence
• Why Sy Ray changed his story

He went from limited technical expert to publicly stating there was “overwhelming evidence” of guilt after the plea was already done.

Why did he change his story? Makes you wonder.

youtu.be
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 1 month ago
▲ 28 r/idaho4uncensored

🚨 In regard to Bryan Kohberger’s case, the new declaration submitted by Moscow Police Chief Anthony Dahlinger in the EWU Media public records lawsuit is one of the most eye-opening documents I’ve read. 🚨

This is absolutely insane….

This is a sworn declaration from MPD’s Police Chief Anthony Dahlinger where he clearly states that during the Kohberger case, the evidence related to the Kohberger Case sometimes arrived on thumb drives with no description of what they contained and that, years later, not all digital evidence has been relabeled in enough detail to quickly locate specific named items. The declaration also states the investigation involved over 2 million digital files, 58.19 TB of data, and that the City does not possess all records generated by the FBI.

That raises some serious questions.

If MPD doesn’t have these evidence items clearly labeled now, how did they know exactly what had to be turned over to the defense? How did they verify that every interview, video, photo, and surveillance recording was identified and disclosed?

No wonder the defense argued they needed more time to review millions of files across multiple agencies. Seeing these statements in a sworn declaration is remarkable.

I saved all the new EWU Documents that were released today here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bOxr1l8NMM9jLM21\_QcPH9nslX86-9eG

youtube.com
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 1 month ago
▲ 36 r/idaho4uncensored

Warning.. This is disturbing but this question that Pete asked during his 12/5/2022 is concerning!

During his December 5, 2022 interview, Peter Elgorriaga told detectives he had heard a disturbing rumor that Kaylee Goncalves’ tongue had been cut out. He said he heard it from someone but never identified who. At that time, details of Kaylee’s injuries had not been publicly released, and her autopsy had not yet been signed. While Peter’s statement was not accurate, the autopsy later documented significant injuries to Kaylee’s tongue and teeth. This raises a question: if Peter said he heard this from someone, why didn’t detectives press him to identify the source of that information? Why wasn’t he asked who told him, where he heard it, or when he heard it?

youtu.be
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 1 month ago
▲ 71 r/idaho4uncensored

🚨 15 NEW DOCUMENTS RELEASED 🚨

Judge Hippler has released 15 new documents in the Bryan Kohberger case. You can view them on the Idaho Supreme Court’s Cases of Interest website:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/Cases/CR01-24-31665.html

Some of these filings are documents we’ve seen before, while others include previously released filings with additional information or newly unsealed content.

To make them easier to access, I’ve downloaded all of the newly released documents and organized them into one Google Drive folder. This can also help if any of the court website links aren’t working.

📁 Google Drive (All New Documents):

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15TyxgJw9NUOq_UQYR8lymZ0bGGX7fZ6G

3/03/2026 - REDACTED Exhibits S-1 through S-13 to State’s Amended Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert Testimony

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2026/030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

3/31/2025 - REDACTED Exhibits to Defendant’s Third Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert Witnesses (Penalty Phase)

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/033125+REDACTED+Exhibits+to+Defs+3rd+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Discovery+RE+Expert+Witnesses+Penalty+Phase.pdf

3/27/2025 - REDACTED Exhibits 1-4 to State’s Response to Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 7 Regarding Bushy Eyebrows

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032725+REDACTED+Exhibits+1-4+to+States+Response+to+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+7+RE+Bushy+Eyebrows.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-22b – Seat

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+States+Exhibit+S-22b+-+Seat.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-19b – Miller

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+States+Exhibit+S-19b+-+Miller.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-17b – Maichek

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+States+Exhibit+S-17b+-+Maichek.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-16b – Dace White

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+States+Exhibit+S-16b+-+Dace+White.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-25b – Youngling

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+-+States+Exhibit+S-25b+-+Youngling.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-18b – Martinez (Part 2)

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+-+States+Exhibit+S-18b+-+Martinez+Part+2.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Exhibit S-18b – Martinez (Part 1)

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+-+States+Exhibit+S-18b+-+Martinez+Part+1.pdf

3/24/2025 - REDACTED / SEALED State’s Exhibit S-10 – Mowery

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/032425+REDACTED+-+SEALED+-+States+Exhibit+S-10+Mowery.pdf

3/17/2025 - REDACTED Exhibits 1 and 2 to Defendant’s Objection to State’s Motion in Limine Regarding Text Messages and Testimony

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/031725+REDACTED+Exhibits+1++2+to+Defendants+Objection+to+States+MIL+RE+Text+Messages+and+Testimony.pdf

3/14/2025 - REDACTED Exhibits S1-S4 to State’s Amended Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert Testimony

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/031425+REDACTED+Exhibits+S1+-+S4+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Req+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

2/24/2025 - REDACTED State’s Motion in Limine Regarding Text Messages and Testimony

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022425+REDACTED+States+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Text+Messages+and+Testimiony.pdf

2/20/2025 - REDACTED Proposed Redactions to January 23, 2025 Closed Hearing Transcript

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/022025+REDACTED+-+Proposed+Redactions+to+January+23+2025+Closed+Hearing+Transcript.pdf

01/23/2025 - Exhibits to Defendant’s Supplemental Response to Request for Discovery Regarding Expert
Witnesses

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/CR01-24-31665/2025/012325+REDACTED+Exhibits+to+Defendants+Supplemental+Response+to+Request+for+Discovery+Re+Expert+W.pdf

reddit.com
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 1 month ago
▲ 30 r/idaho4uncensored

DM did not see the Masked Man Until after she Texted Kaylee at 4:22:47 AM, SV1 leaving at 04:20:47 AM is not the Masked Man Dylan saw

After reviewing Dylan Mortensen’s phone records, the FBI surveillance report, and the 1112 King Road surveillance footage, it’s very clear that SV1 could not have been the masked man Dylan saw.

According to the FBI, SV1 left the area at 4:20:47 AM. The 1112 King Road surveillance footage is consistent with that timeline.

Now let’s compare that timeline to Dylan Mortensen’s interview with Detective Gooch and her phone records.

Keep one timestamp in mind: 4:20:47 AM

Also keep in mind Dylan tells detective Gooch that she immediately texted Kaylee after she heard her run downstairs and say “someone is here,” which was at 4:22:42. She then tells her after that she opened her door for the 2nd time heard crying in the 2nd floor bathroom and a man say “I am here to help you.“ She then closes her door. Then Dylan opens her door for a third time and that’s when she sees a man with a mask dressed in all black leave out the sliding door.

Dylans own text message show she never mentioned the man in the black to Bethany until AFTER she texted Kaylee at 4:22:42 AM. The first text to Bethany about the man in black wasn’t until 4:23:42 when she tells Bethany, “No it’s like a ski mask almost.”

According to Dylan’s own timeline and phone records SV1 could not be the masked man that Dylan saw in 1122 King Road because that car had left the area by 4:20:47 AM.

youtu.be
u/Accomplished-Day1614 — 2 months ago