"The Odyssey" and "Troy"
Many on social media are comparing the two films, almost always favoring the second. I don't understand why. Or perhaps I do. "Troy" is an abomination against Homer and the rich Greek mythology, which it almost completely disregards. But it's not a valid historical film either. In that sense, it resembles the almost contemporary "King Arthur," starring Clive Owen, which replaces the legend with a pseudohistorical approach that greatly impoverishes the narrative and doesn't even serve as a recreation of a largely unknown true story. This approach is more false than the purely mythological one, because the mythological and legendary approach never pretends to be real history, while the pseudohistorical approach does so even knowing it isn't.
In other words, making Helen black is not an affront to Greek myths. Having Agamemnon killed by Briseis in Troy, rather than by his own wife upon returning home, is. Having the Laestrygonians wear medieval armor is not an affront to Greek myths, while having Hector kill Menelaus (who in "The Odyssey" returns safe and sound carrying Helen with him) is. It's not an affront to Greek myths for Agamemnon to wear armor like the one seen in the trailer for "The Odyssey." What is an affront is turning him into a pure villain without any redeeming qualities, as in "Troy" (in Homer's poem he's no saint, sure, but he's a more complex character).