u/Adventurous_Motor129

U.K. has this National Emergency Briefing that they claim leads 87% of viewers to want more action in 9 different areas.

Right away, this climate professor shows a chart showing no drastic change in CO2 level over many millennials. Lots of ups and downs.

But a minute later he shows a Mann-like chart showing sudden increases in temperature. Typical exaggeration that we know omits the Medieval Warm Period & Little Ice Age among others.

A follow-up article illustrating why the West, or at least the U.S., doesn't need to worry about China...or other BRICS nations for that matter.

Climate has nothing to do with it unless we continue throwing trillions toward Chinese EVs & solar, helping them while hurting us.

Contrast life in China vs. the U.S.

- they live in 645 ft2 apartments making typically $6000-$19000 annually

- their household spending accounts for 43% of their economy while the U.S. is 70% & the Global average is at the 60+% level

- they continue to practice intellectual property theft & spying within our universities indicating poor moral character

- pollution within their 145 million person cities remains heavy perhaps because they open two new coal plants each week

- their high speed trains are not used extensively

- their green products are heavily subsidized by their government & are not very profitable

- their military air defenses, etc. were not that effective in Venezuela & Iran, & they continue to threaten neighbors & claim Taiwan, plus the South & East China Seas

Another one bites the dust.

This guy must have been a great instructor when younger given his constant hand/arm movements.

He got his PhD in 1965!! Lots of contrast/comparison between his, IPCC, CO2 Coalition, and Cohler/Soon work.

Another court victory in the persistent lawfare assault.

Like everyone else's exaggerated or downright inaccurate predictions about climate alarm.

Anybody know about the CO2 Coalition paper & why it disagrees with J. Cohler leading to them telling him to quit his membership?

He seems to prove mathematically, as a former Harvard Physics teacher, that man-generated CO2 is responsible for between just 26% to 1.3% of Global CO2 reflected in the Keeling Curve.

For some reason, both the CO2 Coalition & IPCC scientists claim man is responsible for nearly 100% of CO2 increases.

This also illustrates the vulnerability of going to an all electric economy.

Great news. Possible precedent that individual states can't tax energy companies.

This 35-yo UC Santa Barbara professor, who was born/raised in Canada, gets emotional advocating collective climate alarm.

She fails to recognize heavy tar sands oil, manufacturing, & IT within 100 miles of the U.S. border are the reason for Canada's success.

Much of California's population (nearly equaling Canada's 41.5 million) also grew with fossil fuels, early manufacturing & agriculture made possible by hydrocarbon fertilizer...not taxing billionaires.

The fires she speaks of were created by poor forest management that could have been enhanced instead of attempting a high-speed rail to nowhere & higher state worker pensions.

Thankfully, half the U.S. & Alberta, recognize that CO2 is not the enemy, her high school teacher was smarter, & technology will be the saviour...not Canadian solar panels covered by snow during short days, & EVs losing range in the cold weather.

Sounds an awful lot like the communism that Finland abandoned & China embraced.

After living again in Silicon Valley for 2.5 months, you can be assured that it is not a viable model for the rest of the North, Central, & South Americas where public transportation, bikes, vegans, & $4000 apartments would never work.

When will sufficiency "experts" ever learn that making the haves, have less, is not the climate solution.

Another Cool Down article predicted $863 monthly PG&E prices soon in California

Four problems other than the fact 66% of California opposes the ban:

- he's going to run for President of all U.S. states, where more like 90% oppose, yet we in flyover country would be force fed Newsom's beliefs

- he leads a cabal of 10+ other Blue states that do whatever California espouses for vehicles

- car companies often build only a California-spec car that gets excessive gas mileage at the expense of performance if gas-powered, & EVs if mandated

- California still allows a $3500 state EV new rebate that no doubt would become $7500 again if elected President. Your tax dollars would support the rich.

Clowns at the Guardian. They suggest imposing sanctions on the U.S. with no mention of China being an issue.

They claim that nations with just 1% of CO2 emissions are the plurality problem when China, alone, exceeds their totals when international shipping is included.

Similar articles appeared in May 2025.

Mali is mentioned along with possible U.S. sources that could constitute twice the natural gas reserves.

Why do alarmists never mention this alternative to solar & wind?