r/EnergyAndPower

▲ 17 r/EnergyAndPower+1 crossposts

Energy / Electricity Shortages?

This idea came to mind in regard to first world quality of life, and planetary care, which to me don't seem to align and would like to share.

I am personally all for AI and it's use to assist humanity grow to our fullest potential, yet this came with the cost of pushing the electrical grids to their maximum. No doubt, this will cause increased demand, and rising costs for the average citizen (ie, share holder profits), but also potentially raise revenue for individual retirement portfolios... but what about the planet? What about the average citizen day to day, check to check, and the well being of Earth?

With all the billions being thrown around so loosely, why is nobody invested in fixing ALL of the aforementioned and seemingly focusing solely on profit of trade insiders and government lobbies / groups?

The reason I say this is because WE HAVE the technology to improve the efficiency of the electrical power grid, reduce heat, reduce use, reduce waste heat, INCREASE availability to data centers and individuals, and also increase revenue generation for companies by increasing capitol flow through efficiency improvements through efficiency improvements.

This came to mind when talking to the owner of MISSION IGNITION SYSTEMS LTD., where the owner has a method of improving electrical transmission efficiency of the existing grid by 20-35%, with minimal replacing of existing infrastructure, and what is being done? Nothing.

Is it me, or is this the same, beaten to the ground, status quo thinking and mindset? Are insiders and shoulder rubbers focused purely on greed, unsustainable models contributing to the very issues they bring up daily such as greenhouse gases, carbon footprints, heat generation, and have offered no solutions other than continually asking the average individual to reduce our "carbon footprint", while we reduce consumption, and pay more, while trying to assist the planet, and data centers hog the available remainder electricity.

How is it the average individual are tasked with giving and shouldering the responsibility to correct and reduce consumption, pay more for electricity, yet, when small innovators, creators, and companies, who offer viable solutions and are ignored?

The idea of "increase market revenue", is accomplished through efficiency improvements by selling more with reduced loss, reducing waste heat, and improving sustainability. Shouldn't we be asking questions as to motives, insider shoulder rubbing, and the direction leadership is taking in these initiatives?

My random thoughts, would enjoy hearing yours, take them for what it's worth.

reddit.com
u/markdrk — 1 day ago
▲ 1.2k r/EnergyAndPower+5 crossposts

Yesterday: Trump official mocks renewables and brags fossil fuels are "keeping our air conditioners blasting." Today: Feds issue emergency alert to cut power to avoid massive blackouts.

Yesterday, the Department of Energy took a massive victory lap on social media. They proudly posted a chart showing the PJM grid running on over 91 percent fossil fuels and explicitly mocked renewables. The exact brag from the administration was that legacy energy sources were "keeping our air conditioners blasting." It was framed as an absolute validation of their energy strategy and grid reliability.

Less than 24 hours later, reality hit hard. The PJM grid, which is the largest in the US and covers 67 million people across 13 states, was pushed to the brink of collapse. The federal government had to issue an emergency alert begging residents to drastically cut their electricity usage to avoid rolling blackouts. The very same AC units they bragged about powering are now actively crashing the system.

Instead of a seamless energy powerhouse, the grid was crippled by three distinct physical failures:

  • Generator outages: Traditional legacy power plants experienced unexpected downtime right when peak load hit.
  • Overloaded transmission lines: The aging physical wires and substations simply could not handle the surging electricity demand.
  • Prolonged heat: Sustained high temperatures pushed baseline consumption far past what the current infrastructure was built to support.

You cannot fix overloaded transmission lines with a tweet. Upgrading this aging infrastructure requires an enormous amount of physical raw materials, specifically copper for new wiring, transformers, and grid expansions. Domestic resource development plays a direct role in fixing these exact grid bottlenecks. As an example of the upstream supply chain required for these physical improvements, Gunnison Copper (OTC: GCUMF) is currently advancing its permitted US-based operations in Arizona to supply the domestic copper cathode market.

Politicians will always argue over which fuel source is best, but the reality is that our physical grid is rotting from the inside out. Bragging about coal and gas does not matter if the transmission lines cannot handle the load. We are watching administrators prioritize social media engagement while the physical infrastructure tying the country together is hanging by a thread.

u/mynameisjoenotjeff — 2 days ago

How to lie about radiation -

Drinking one beer a night for a year is a lot less harmful than drinking 365 beers in one go. The same applies to radiation exposure, but regulation doesn’t agree.

worksinprogress.co
u/DavidThi303 — 2 days ago
▲ 379 r/EnergyAndPower+4 crossposts

U.S. electric-bill fight grows as utilities point to data centers

The data-center buildout is starting to show up in ordinary power bills.

WUSA9's video metadata says electric bills are soaring as utility companies point to growing demand and data centers. Without a transcript, that should be treated as title-level evidence, but the infrastructure issue is still clear enough to discuss. Large loads require generation, wires, substations, transformers, switchgear, cooling systems, and regulator-approved cost recovery. Somebody pays when the grid has to expand.

The screen I would use:

  • Is the utility proving which costs are data-center related?
  • Are new substations, lines, and transformers being paid for by everyone or by large users?
  • Is power demand matched with real generation and grid capacity?
  • Are regulators separating normal rate pressure from AI-load costs?

Gunnison Copper (OTC: GCUMF) ties directly to the power-bill issue through copper's role in electrical infrastructure: company materials describe Arizona copper projects, and data-center-driven grid expansion needs copper for transformers, cabling, substations, switchgear, backup systems, and the distribution equipment that turns power demand into physical buildout. The sponsor connection is the copper intensity of the grid layer behind those bills.

Data centers do not just consume electricity. They can change who pays for the next layer of the grid.

u/mynameisjoenotjeff — 3 days ago

Largest US Power Grid Issues Emergency Energy Alerts

U.S. power grid operator PJM, the nation's largest covering much of the East Coast and Midwest, on Friday ordered customers in emergency alert to curb their use, as it battled generator outages, overloaded transmission lines and surging air-conditioning demand during a prolonged heat wave.

PJM Interconnection, which manages the electricity system serving 67 million people in 13 states and the District of Columbia, has issued emergency energy alerts amid expectations that hot summer weather will drive up power demand.

The 13 states are Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

PJM issued two alerts: a maximum generation alert and a load management alert.

reddit.com
u/chota-kaka — 2 days ago
▲ 3 r/EnergyAndPower+4 crossposts

Can anyone debunk it or Bust this Myth

The Right handside arm(RHS) is getting more than 180 degree with momentum after i drop the ball and counter weight is working against gravitational pull back by balancing the mass of lower tube then why it shouldn't work?

(1) I cannot drop the ball once the arm rotate towards left side.IF BALL DROPS FROM THE LEFT HAND SIDE ARM (LHS) THEN THE ARM WILL GET BACK MORE HEIGHT TOWARDS RHS THAN ITS INITIAL POSITION AND VICE-VERSA

BOTH TUBES HAVING EQUAL MASS (230 GRAM)

(2) anyone can try it as it will work even with dead material.

(3) INTERESTING point is arm is getting more height once I increased the counterweight.

(4)Hand power or force is nothing in this design.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gO0PwRZBELQ&pp=ygUfZXhwZXJpbWVudCBwaHlzaWNzIHZpa3JhbSBndXB0YQ%3D%3D180

u/Suspicious-Row2985 — 4 days ago
▲ 90 r/EnergyAndPower+1 crossposts

NV Energy

​

I cannot understand why I see advertisements for NV Energy. They are granted a monopoly in Nevada. They should be prohibited from spending money on advertising.

The water company advertises, but that is to make the public conscious of water conservation.

Nv Energy has no message for the public welfare. Is their advertising some type of crony payoff scheme? This needs to be investigated and prohibited. They are charging excessive fees and need to be monitored. There is no way that they need that much profit. This company needs to be removed from the possession of Warren Buffet. I am a proponent for capitalism, but utilities are not subject to the invisible hand of the market; they are granted monopolies and need very close monitoring.

reddit.com
u/DescriptionOk4046 — 4 days ago

What do you think of Mandami's suggestion to conserve energy?

Please tell me what went through your heads when he told everyone to set their thermostat at a certain temperature and turn off the lights when necessary?

Is this something you are already doing? Are you angry about it? What do you think he'll ask you to do next? And will you comply?

I honestly want to know--if this is what NYC wanted or if NYC is against it?

reddit.com
u/Lolihey — 3 days ago

German nuclear discourse remains popcorn-worthy.

In January, Merz called the nuclear phaseout "a serious strategic mistake" and said Germany simply doesn't have enough generation capacity. Two months later, in March, he called the same phaseout "irreversible." His reasoning: SPD wouldn't agree to nuclear in the coalition deal. Not physics. Not economics. Political theatre.

That's essentially where the German nuclear debate has been stuck for years. Acknowledge the problem, then declare it unsolvable because of politics.

Last week, former nuclear plant managers published a letter in Bild addressed directly to Merz and his coalition, urging them to seriously examine restarting reactors. Their message boils down to: the technical knowledge, the sites, the infrastructure, parts of the plants and portions of the workforce are still there. But you don't have much time. Every month of continued decommissioning makes restarts harder and more expensive.

Right alongside this, Radiant Energy Group just released their updated feasibility and cost report for restarting Germany's 14 remaining reactor units. It's quite the read and the link is in the header for those who want to deep-dive.

They sort the fleet into three priority groups by condition and restart complexity:

Group A (5 PWRs, 6.83 GW): Brokdorf, Emsland, Grohnde, Neckarwestheim 2, Isar 2. Most recently shut down, least decommissioning progress, shared design lineage enabling fleet efficiencies.
Total restart cost: €8.5 billion, online before 2032.

Group B (3 BWRs, 3.92 GW): Krümmel, Gundremmingen B and C. Similar cost profile to Group A but without the fleet-build efficiencies, smaller BWR workforce.
Total: €5.0 billion, online by 2033.

Group C (6 reactors, 7.96 GW): Biblis A and B, Philippsburg 2, Unterweser, Grafenrheinfeld, Neckarwestheim 1. These need extensive rebuilding, including new nuclear steam supply systems and in some cases new reactor pressure vessels.
Total: €25.8 billion, online 2033-2034.

The whole shebang: 14 reactors, 18.7 GW restored, ~147 TWh/year of firm dispatchable generation at €39 billion.

And every single reactor in the programme produces electricity below Germany's current wholesale price of ~€90/MWh. Groups A and B actually come in below the inflation-adjusted 2010s average of €51/MWh.

Meanwhile, German May futures traded at ~€87/MWh while French May futures sat at ~€22/MWh. Roughly 4x.

The 147 TWh/year from the full restart programme beats what either wind (~130 TWh) or solar (~90 TWh) added to the German grid over two decades of buildout. Delivered within ten years of a political decision, and unlike wind and solar, it's firm and available around the clock.

It also replaces Germany's ~90 TWh of remaining coal generation, making the Kohleausstieg achievable by the mid-2030s without relying on gas plants that haven't been built yet, which of course would run on LNG shipped in from outside the EU.

The report also kills the "too far gone" dismissal. German PWRs were designed from the outset for large-component replacement. Steam generators, pressurisers, pumps, turbines and I&C systems have all been routinely replaced at operating plants worldwide. Even the reactor pressure vessel was originally installed through equipment airlocks that still exist, so removal and replacement is physically possible.

Germany's deindustrialisation numbers keep getting worse. Output in energy-intensive industries has fallen 15.2% since February 2022, costing 53,300 jobs and a DIHK survey of nearly 3,600 companies found 59% of large industrial firms are considering cutting production or relocating abroad, up from 37% in 2022. The Bundesrechnungshof projects another €460 billion in grid expansion costs alone by 2045.

But sure, Germany can't fix this..because it just can't, apparently. If this is Germany in the 21st century, then we are all of us here in Europe in deep trouble.

radiantenergygroup.com
u/Dyn-O-mite_Rocketeer — 5 days ago

Ever wanted to see the inside of a wrecked combustion turbine?

1970s, GE Frame 7, 3rd stage I think. I could be wrong

u/crappinhammers — 4 days ago
▲ 27 r/EnergyAndPower+4 crossposts

Global electricity demand growth is set to outstrip GDP growth for the first time

Good article, lays out the business case for owning the "toll booth" to "the future".

HREEs aren't just for magnets, although Phase 1 ALOY's roll-out will be for Primes ----> ALOY is poised to capture many other verticals (and more importantly, approved budgeted massive critical infrastructure projects).

------------------------------------------------

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/article/electricity-demand-is-set-to-grow-faster-than-the-global-economy-amid-the-ai-boom-chart-of-the-day-100000388.html

After a decade of stagnant power demand, the economy is undergoing a massive wave of electrification, Bank of America metals strategists led by Michael Widmer wrote in a recent note to clients.

Electricity demand is now expected to grow significantly faster than GDP for the next two and a half years.

Global power usage by data centers is expected to grow from a current level of around 55 gigawatts to 84 gigawatts — equivalent to the power usage of roughly 70 million homes — in only the next two years, according to research from Goldman Sachs.

The electricity needs of the infrastructure will force further build-outs of global power grids, all of which require substantial amounts of metals for wiring, transformers, and other components.

-----------------------------------------------------

REalloy's core focus for Phase 1 are the HREEs Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb), which play an indispensable, hidden role in the physical infrastructure layer of AI compute factories and systems; the massive power densities and thermal profiles of AI clusters require physical hardware that depends fundamentally on HREEs.

- Advanced Data Center Cooling Infrastructure

- Mass Data Storage Systems

- Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment

- Power Infrastructure and Clean Energy Grid Tie-Ins

----------------------------------------------------

Phase 1 is the closed loop for GM Defense and their Prime partners. Keep in mind, ALOY's furnace is modular, scalable and can be deployed globally, all weather too.

Dept of War's MOU with REalloys specifies Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb) two of the most critical and highest-value HREEs.

https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/energy/articles/realloys-nasdaq-aloy-receives-department-112200537.html

u/bourbonwarrior — 4 days ago
▲ 654 r/EnergyAndPower+2 crossposts

Comparing 1 acre of growing corn for ethanol, to 1 acre of solar panels to charge EVs

Assumptions (reasonable numbers for US Midwest farmers):

  • Corn: 200 bu/acre
  • Ethanol yield: 2.8 gal/bu
  • Ethanol efficiency: 20 mi/gal (typical sedan mileage)
  • Solar: 250 MWh/acre-year
  • EV efficiency: 0.30 kWh/mile

A visual chart really puts it into perspective. You need far less land for solar to power EVs, than burning corn ethanol in a combustion engine. That's why switching to solar can reduce land use, and free it for more productive purposes. Solar would also drastically reduce fertilizer and pesticide use, and create buffers zones to reduce agricultural pollution reaching our waterways.

-----

Before someone jumps in to talk about other byproducts of corn ethanol (Distiller's grain for animal feed, and corn oil), we can just boil it down to the bottom line economics. This gives a good idea of the value of the land use.

Land use Typical landowner income per acre
Farmer growing corn for ethanol ~$50–$400 profit/acre/year
Cash-renting the land to other farmers ~$200–$350 rent/acre/year
Utility-scale solar lease ~$800–$1200 /acre/year

Over 30 years, ignoring inflation:

  • Corn land profit: $270 × 30 ≈ $8,100 per acre
  • Solar lease: $1,000 × 30 ≈ $30,000 per acre
u/Narcan9 — 7 days ago

Former managers call for restart of German nuclear power plants

Apparently, "reactivating German nuclear power is a technically feasible and sensible option," a group of former managers of nuclear power plants in Germany and nuclear technology experts have said in a letter to the German government.

Let's imagine how much less burning of coal and gas could be avoided with such initiative.

world-nuclear-news.org
u/GrosBof — 7 days ago
▲ 510 r/EnergyAndPower+2 crossposts

In late 2022 the world passed 1 TW of installed solar capacity. Just 3.5 years later we've already reached 3 TW.

➡️ The first terawatt took 68 years.
➡️ The second took 2 years.
➡️ The third took just 18 months.
➡️ The 4th in 9 months? and so on...

And what makes this even more amazing is that this is also more actual generation than fossil fuels, even with their low capacity factors. Solar & Wind Each Produced More Electricity Than Coal In USA In April https://cleantechnica.com/2026/06/26/solar-wind-each-produced-more-electricity-than-coal-in-usa-in-april/

Solar and wind are now each out-producing coal on actual generation — not just in installed capacity. That’s what makes this shift real: the “capacity factor” jab misses the bigger picture, because renewables are growing faster in both capacity and output than anything in history.

The big takeaway is simple: the grid is already being reshaped by this pace of growth, and the “they don’t generate enough” critique is already behind the curve.

u/ceph2apod — 7 days ago
▲ 3 r/EnergyAndPower+1 crossposts

Before putting your money on hydropower company what do you see in that company

Before putting your money on hydropower company what do you see in that company

reddit.com
u/No-Specific-3125 — 5 days ago
▲ 16 r/EnergyAndPower+3 crossposts

A US firm is now dropping massive floating data centers into the open ocean because domestic power grids can no longer handle the energy demand

The surging demand for artificial intelligence data centers, combined with a broader national push for grid modernization and domestic manufacturing, is placing unprecedented strain on the U.S. power grid and critical material supply chains. Tech firms are already looking at radical alternatives, such as deploying autonomous, wave-powered data center pods into the open ocean, simply because local land-based utilities can no longer keep up with the sheer volume of power requests. This massive spike in energy consumption highlights a fundamental structural bottleneck: the U.S. electrical grid cannot expand fast enough to support the next generation of industrial and technological demand without a drastic increase in raw infrastructure materials.

At the core of this infrastructure challenge is the critical need for a secure domestic copper cathode production pipeline. Copper is the literal backbone of electrification, required in massive quantities for transformers, high-voltage transmission lines, data center power distribution, and defense applications. However, the U.S. currently relies heavily on complex and vulnerable international supply chains for refined copper, leaving domestic infrastructure projects exposed to geopolitical disruptions, shipping bottlenecks, and shifting global export policies. Building out a reliable, localized supply chain is no longer just a matter of economic convenience; it has evolved into a pressing national security and defense issue.

To bridge this gap, the domestic industrial sector is increasingly focused on accelerating Arizona-based SX-EW copper production and advancing domestic copper projects on private and state land. Securing these vital resources within U.S. borders is essential for long-term supply-chain resilience, but the industry faces a delicate balancing act between rapid development and stringent regulatory oversight. For the U.S. to successfully maintain its technological edge, support national security infrastructure, and prevent localized power grids from buckling under the weight of the digital boom, stabilizing the broader U.S. copper cathode supply must become a coordinated national priority.

u/mynameisjoenotjeff — 6 days ago