u/Apart_Distribution72

Wild parsnip and garden parsnip are the same plant.

It's that time of year again, when the fear mongering posts about wild parsnip start going around. It's the exact same plant as the garden parsnip that has been cultivated for thousands of years and doesn't need any extra caution compared to a garden grown parsnip.

This pertains only to Pastinaca Sativa, not Heracleum species that are sometimes called cow parsnips.

Some of the main concerns I hear every year are:

"It looks like hemlock!!" No it doesn't. The leaves are significantly different and look nothing like either carrot or hemlock. The flowers are yellow, not white. The only resemblance to hemlock is that they're tall and green and share a similar form when viewed from a distance. Up close the differences are obvious, and once they flower it's unmistakable.

"They cause photosensitivity and blisters!!" That's true. So do garden variety parsnips, because they're the same thing. Parsnips have been cultivated for thousands of years without people burning all their skin off. How? You harvest them in early spring before the new growth comes up, late fall after the first few frosts, and in the early morning or late evening to avoid the sun. People have been doing this since the Roman empire. Gloves, sleeves and some soap to wash up with have been perfectly fine for millions of people over thousands of years. There is no reason to harvest them when they're in their peak growth season, and at their most dangerous, because they'll be starchy and woody anyway. Your granny was probably doing it this way, are you gonna be more scared of a parsnip than her?

"It can cause blindness!!" Don't get it in your eyes then. If you're not ripping them up like a maniac you're not going to get the sap all over. Don't rub your eyes with your gloves on and you'll be fine.

So where does the fear and misconception come from? It's a crossover from the landscaping/lawncare world. Wild parsnips are a common weed all over the world and often need to be removed when spaces are being cleared. Using lawnmowers, string trimmers, etc on parsnips will aerosolize their sap and completely coat your body in it. this kind of work is also usually done when it's sunny out. This combination makes wild parsnip a serious concern for people clearing brush and weeds where it grows. This isn't a concern you need to have unless you're planning on clearing out patches using machinery. When pulled by hand wearing gloves and long sleeves, the risk of harvesting wild and cultivated parsnips is exactly the same. Use a garden fork to loosen the soil so the root pulls easily and you won't even risk breaking a stem.

I hope this can dispel some of the fear around wild parsnips, because there really isn't any such thing. A parsnip is a parsnip, and any "wild" variety is really a combination of escaped garden varieties and the original native variety. Parsnips have been cultivated for so long that "wild parsnip" is really a misnomer. They've all been affected by human influence.

reddit.com
u/Apart_Distribution72 — 12 days ago
▲ 72 r/trans

I'm 25, mtf, and white. I've been working with several local activist groups and keep running into the same problem, being lumped in with the white men. the other day a BIPOC woman in a group said "I'm not trying to gender anyone but white people born male tend to talk over others more." I'm definitely outspoken, and have a lot to say on certain issues, but I don't talk over anyone.

These group meetings are curated and people talk in the order their hand was raised, all.im guilty of is raising my hand more often than others and it feels like they resent me for that because they don't have the confidence to do the same.

if it were anyone else I'd call it out but it feels like I just have step back and be white here, I can't defend my identity because in the end I'm white and they're not, my issues are basically fantasy compared to theirs.

I was recently removed from a pro-disability site for "upholding white supremacy" because I argued it isn't white supremacy for a white disabled person to receive care or have a caseworker who would potentially treat BIPOC people worse, because the disabled white person has no say or control in that situation and refusing care would only hurt them while not helping anyone.

They responded that it's still white supremacy and then brought up that while I'm oppressed as a white trans person, the vast majority of oppression is faced by BIPOC trans people. i felt like that was uncalled for but I can't stop thinking about it.

As a white trans person I feel like I can't do anything without being some kind of white savior or talking over BIPOC trans people. If I lash out against the system, that's adventurism, if I use my privilege to my advantage I'm upholding white supremacy, if I talk to much I'm talking over cis women and basically just a man to them. It feels like the most progressive thing I can do as a white trans person is to go die.

reddit.com
u/Apart_Distribution72 — 15 days ago
▲ 150 r/TrueAnon

Red button people love to explain it as if their button means nobody dies and that anyone who presses blue is just stupid. In this hypothetical, everyone, whether they're 6 months old, don't understand English, are mentally disabled, or just misunderstand the situation are still required to press a button. It's not a "nobody jump in the wood chipper vs some people do" situation, it's "our most vulnerable are already in the chipper and we can stop it from being turned on if we're willing to risk ourselves."

The question fundamentally comes down to "do you believe the most vulnerable people in society deserve to be helped?"

I didn't expect so many people answer to be no.

u/Apart_Distribution72 — 22 days ago
▲ 400 r/leftist+2 crossposts

I've seen this sentiment spreading and want to explain why it's so dangerous.

This argument doesn't hold up when you look at the split as pro vs anti trans instead of along political lines. The argument "this could happen to you, an innocent regular person" doesn't hold any weight to people who are already anti trans because this is an issue of what is and isn't obscenity. Their next logical step is "only the people who really look like they deserve the wood chipper will get it, it's like porn, you know it when you see it."

The people who are already anti trans aren't that way because they're gender binary purists, it's because they oppose anything that doesn't follow cis heteronormativity, and on a larger scale anything that doesn't "feel normal." They don't care if a few cis women get tossed in the chipper because for that to happen those women must've been abnormal enough to end up there, and so are of similar value to the intended target anyway.

When you make the split between trans women and "real" women, even in an attempt to gain political traction amongst the "undecided", you just end up moving the bar for "real women" further towards white, cis, heteronormativity and push more women (both trans and cis) into the "not fit for existence" category.

u/Apart_Distribution72 — 25 days ago
▲ 1.0k r/grandrapids+1 crossposts

Mexican toppings "secured" under a White sauce. It speaks for itself. This place is run by awful, evil people.

u/Apart_Distribution72 — 1 month ago