u/Apostate_Basil3643

Majma al-Zawa'id, Volume 1, p. 335, Hadith No. 1249:

وعن أبي سعيد الخدري، أن النبي ﷺ قال: «إن الشيطان يأتي أحدكم وهو في صلاته فيمد شعرة من دبره، فيرى أنه قد أحدث، فلا ينصرف حتى يسمع صوتًا أو يجد ريحًا».

On the authority of Abu Sa’id al-Khudri, the Prophet ﷺ said: "Indeed, Satan comes to one of you while he is in his prayer and pulls a hair from his buttocks, such that he thinks he has passed wind. So let him not leave [the prayer] until he hears a sound or perceives an odor."

I want to know what compulsion Muslims have in the 21st century that makes them believe in such disgusting things 🤢 I’m happy that I am no longer a Muslim, because these devils only play with Muslim's asses during prayer and even pull their buttock hair to the point that they feel like farting 🤢 I request those Muslims who are not aware of such hadiths to leave this filthy religion, because such things cannot exist in a religion of the Creator of the universe. This is nothing but a product of a disgusting, mentally disturbed person. And those Muslims who know about these hadiths and still defend Islam should feel ashamed of their belief system and sit aside and cry for believing in such things. Shame on you, Muslims.

The word Allah derives from the Semitic root ʾL, expressing general divinity. It later became ʾIl / ʾIlu in Akkadian as a common title for a god. It shifted into ʾEl in Northwest Semitic languages, where it also functioned as a supreme deity’s name. It expanded into ʾIlah (alongside ʾEloah/ʾElah) as a common noun meaning “a god.” It then formed al-ʾilah, with the definite article al- meaning “the God,” which, through contraction, became Allah before Islam. Although its structure remains al + ilah, Islamic scholars insist it is a unique proper name and treat al- as inseparable to prevent breaking it down and exposing “Lah” as the real proper name of the God of Islam. In pre-Islamic Arabia, ilah was a generic term used by tribes for any deity, while al-ilah (Allah) functioned as a specific title referring exclusively to the supreme high god above all lesser deities. Astral worship began in Mesopotamia and later spread into Arabia, influencing pre-Islamic religion, including Mecca. In this system, pre-Islamic Arabs worshipped seven celestial bodies—the sun, the moon, and the five visible planets—as gods, with the moon regarded as the supreme male deity due to environmental, cultural, and linguistic reasons, showing a broader astral belief system that influenced Arabian religion before Muhammad. In Mecca, this astral belief system included the worship of Hubal, a red-stone idol identified as a moon god, brought from Syria, placed inside the Kaaba, treated as the chief deity of the Quraysh, and regarded as the central divine authority of the shrine, where rituals, divination, and pilgrimage practices were performed. The Quraysh, as custodians of the Kaaba, were the primary worshippers of Hubal as their supreme deity within a henotheistic system, and early Islamic historical reports state that Muhammad’s grandfather, ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib, took the newborn Muhammad into the Kaaba to the idol Hubal. The word Allah, originally a descriptive title meaning “the God,” was used by the Quraysh as a title for their supreme deity Hubal, and the account of ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib’s vow, prayers, and divination at the Kaaba proves that Allah and Hubal were the same god, with Allah functioning only as a title for Hubal, and both words were used interchangeably. Muhammad knowingly took the title “Allah,” which was used for Hubal, rebranded it as his own God, fabricated revelations without any evidence, failed to convince people through preaching, and ultimately used force—destroying idols, especially Hubal—to erase all references and impose Allah as the only god under his authority.

This is just a brief summary from my book. For a detailed contextual explanation of each part, read my book:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1od6GpB3qnat6lR1bvjY2DXY4I2Um3Suq/view?usp=drivesdk

In Sunan al-Kubra of Imam Bayhaqi:

عنِ ابنِ عمرَ أنه كان إذا اشترى جاريةً كشفَ عن ساقِها ووضع يدَه بين ثدْيَيها وعلى عجُزِها وكأنه كان يضعُها عليها من وراءِ الثِّيابِ

From Ibn Umar: whenever he bought a slave girl, he would uncover her leg and place his hand between her breasts and on her buttocks, as though he was placing it on them from behind the clothes.

Are there any Muslims who are not morally corrupt like Ibn Umar and are sincere enough to condemn this filthy act committed by the filthy son of their Caliph Umar? Also, this hadith is considered sahih, so no Muslim can question its authenticity.

https://dorar.net/h/wofi6N07

Every Muslim on earth believes that Muhammad was a descendant of Ismail. This claim is based just on belief, with no historical or genealogical evidence. It relies on a logical fallacy—specifically an appeal to authority.

Just because Muhammad said, "I am the descendant of Ismail," Muslims take this extraordinary claim with no evidence at all. Muhammad simply wanted every Muslim to believe this claim blindly, and Muslims today are fulfilling this.

​ This is entirely based on a logical fallacy of appealing to authority. Based on this principle, any religion in the entire world could be true because their authoritative figure told their followers to just believe in them blindly without evidence. So, if a Muslim says other religions are false, he is wrong based on his own principle—because those religions also believe in an appeal to authority, just like any Muslim.

​The Challenge:

If any Muslim can provide historical evidence for this claim without committing any logical fallacy, I will right away accept Islam.

​Every Muslim on earth believes that Muhammad was a descendant of Ismail. This claim is based just on belief, with no historical or genealogical evidence. It relies on a logical fallacy—specifically an appeal to authority.

Just because Muhammad said, "I am the descendant of Ismail," Muslims take this extraordinary claim with no evidence at all. Muhammad simply wanted every Muslim to believe this claim blindly, and Muslims today are fulfilling this.

​This is entirely based on a logical fallacy of appealing to authority. Based on this principle, any religion in the entire world could be true because their authoritative figure told their followers to just believe in them blindly without evidence. So, if a Muslim says other religions are false, he is wrong based on his own principle—because those religions also believe in an appeal to authority, just like any Muslim.

​The Challenge:

If any Muslim can provide historical evidence for this claim without committing any logical fallacy, I will right away accept Islam.

The Qur’an says:

وَمَا خَلَقْتُ ٱلْجِنَّ وَٱلْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ

And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me. (51:56)

This verse is very clear. The word “لَّإاِ”(except) means the only purpose for creating humans and jinns is worship. So according to this verse, Allah clearly claims that he does not create humans and jinn for anything except worship.

The Qur’an also says:

يُحْىِۦ وَيُمِيتُ

He gives life and causes death. (7:158)

So according to the Qur’an, both life and death are controlled by Allah.

Now, according to global health data, around 240,000 newborn babies die every year within 28 days of birth due to congenital disorders. These children die before they can understand anything, before they develop awareness, and long before they are capable of worship.

Premise 1: Allah created humans only for the purpose of worship (Qur’an 51:56).

Premise 2: Worship requires awareness, understanding, and reaching an age where a person can consciously choose to worship.

Premise 3: Many humans die as newborn babies before they reach an age where worship is even possible.

Premise 4: According to the Qur’an, Allah is the one who gives life and causes death (7:158), so their deaths ultimately occur by Allah’s will.

Conclusion: These children were created and then died without ever having the ability to fulfill the only purpose Allah claimed for their creation. So one of the following must be true:

1. Humans were not actually created only for worship, which contradicts Qur’an 51:56.

2. Allah’s stated purpose fails in many cases, because millions die before they can worship.

Either way, the statement that humans were created only for worship becomes logically flawed. Allah claims that he creates humans only for the purpose of worship, yet at the same time he takes the lives of many of them before they reach the age where worship is possible. This means those children never had the opportunity to fulfill the very purpose for which they were created. So, why create a human being for worship and then take that person’s life before worship even becomes possible? If Allah creates humans only for worship but many die before they can ever worship, then what was the purpose of creating those children?

There are some overly smart Muslims who try to solve this contradiction but end up making the situation even worse:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TvICUR\_e\_SOJDn1pBYZd3s8mgrya-N8y/view?usp=drivesdk