Do you still say 兄弟姐妹 if you only have brothers?
Do I still say the full phrase if I don't have any sisters but do have siblings?
我有三个兄弟姐妹.
我有三个兄弟.
Or is the term generic to mean genderless siblings without implying which?
Do I still say the full phrase if I don't have any sisters but do have siblings?
我有三个兄弟姐妹.
我有三个兄弟.
Or is the term generic to mean genderless siblings without implying which?
I have 4 keyboard that use qmk, and 1 of them is my own which only exists only local. In additional I really don't want to download the entire folder of ALL keyboards as i get compile errors or something due to the amount of files (I think).
Which of the options below is correct?
Was talking with 2 linux users, one is a gamer and one is a general user. For background I use my pc to play games that I know won't work with linux (marathon, valorant). I also use it capture game footage (OBS), edit video (davinci resolve), create moving graphics and broadcast.
A:"I think he (me, OP) should get Bazzite, he has a nvidia graphic card, it's a no brainer"
B:"Yeah but any distro has nvidia graphic drivers"
B: "But linux gaming is hard, linux doesn't have a concept of a 'primary monitor', so your games will just open anywhere" edit: multiple people flagged that he might be talking about ACTIVE monitors, not primary
A: "Probably no concept of 'full screen either, maybe bazzite might though because it's gaming focused"
B: "What hardware do you use?" .... "Yeah all that elgato stuff will not work for sure, I know for a fact that capture card is a no-go, and it looks like that webcam is not UVC"
B: "Also there's a bug with davinci resolve right now, if you try to move windows around it will lag and then crash"
B: "Bazzite also has an OBS issue with browser source, and if you use a lot of it then you are out of luck".
I accept that my hardware won't work out of the box (mixer, capture card, webcam) or at all with linux, but what are they talking about regarding primary monitor, full screen etc? How can a primary monitor not be a concept?
Also they started talking about stuff like steamdeck=0, gamescope and I just nodded off. IS gaming actually that hard on linux or are they just trying to scare me off?
I played with the annual contribution field, and I found out that for every 5k additional that I invest annually I'm closer to retirement by 1 year (goal is 1.75MM).
Initially this was a good thing because it helped me frame my thinking about spending and I did cut a lot of fat in the beginning. Then I added a column that helped me manually adjust the contribution for 1 year if I make a big purchase.
Most of the time it didn't move the needle so instead of years I made it days until retirement. This is when it felt toxic to me. Every time I wanted to buy something I would plug it into the spreadsheet and see how many days it was costing me until retirement. The gaming PC I wanted was 2-3 months. Vacations would cost me weeks. Hanging out with friends might cost me days.
A friend told me about him trying to get a pool and I plugged the cost into a spreadsheet and saw and told him that it was cost me years of my retirement for that and that was a bad idea. He told me that this was a really bad way to think about life where every item, transaction is weighted and all I can think about is some metric.
While I disagreed with him that a pool was a good purchase, he did make a good point regarding how much I was thinking about everything being a cost to me retiring.
I've since switched it back to years and hopefully I can kick the habit
I'm trying to understand how blizzard's Cooldown manager comes into play. I've seen addons like ArcUI require you to enable stuff through the blizzard CDM before it can start working. Why is that? Does enabling stuff through blizzard CDM enable other addons to be able to interact with the buffs/ cooldowns or something? Or is that just a choice ArcUI made to streamline the process and it's not actually required?
I've been messing around with writing an addon with my warlock, and only found 2 ways to track if you have a certain buff
Burning rush (and demonbolt) using overlay glow: When you click the buff it gains an overlay glow and when you click it again you lose the buff and the overlay disappears. I've been using SPELL_ACTIVATION_OVERLAY_GLOW_SHOW and SPELL_ACTIVATION_OVERLAY_HIDE when the button is clicked and checking which spell is glowing to see which spell has it
Unending resolve using hard coded durations: When you click it, you take 40% less damage for 8 seconds duration, 3 mins cd. I set the trigger to show for 8 seconds (hard coded) after the unending resolve button is clicked.
Is there any other way to track buffs other than if you cast the spell manually or through blizzard spell activation overlays?
I'm trying to create an addon but I don't want to constantly join a key to test out functionality. Is a follower dungeon a good place to test addons that are meant to work in M+?