The 9th Amendment: Life as a Natural Right?
The basic premise asked of lawyers here is the 9th amendment protects natural rights and what right is more natural than life.
Therefore it's a rather simple test.
Does a state or federal law deny or disparage the right to life? If yes, it cannot be used to prevent a prosecution.
Basically a case should be taken all the way to the supreme court on a denied murder case let's say for a minor murdering an adult. And the answer from the court should be. Life is protected under the 9th amendment and cannot be construed to be denied or disparaged.
If my premise is correct, eventually this would be the the correct interpretation and even a minor is subject to prosecution under a faithful reading of the Constitution regardless of a state law or lower federal law.
Would James Madison the writer of the 9th amendment believe that a government that assumes the supremacy over violence but is not prosecuting or interpreting life as an inherent right of the constitution is commiting either a denial or a disparage of a natural right?
What do you think?