Shinobi II vs Ninja TX — screen/image quality?
Has anyone compared the Shinobi II and Ninja TX GO side by side, specifically in terms of screen quality?
I currently have the Shinobi II, but I’m not really happy with the display. My previous Ninja V felt noticeably better in terms of image sharpness and overall clarity, even though the specs on paper are pretty similar (Ninja TX GO).
With the Shinobi II, the image almost feels like it has poor pixel resolution/scaling, especially when judging fine details and focus. I also notice quite a bit of ghosting/motion blur, and the overall image just doesn’t feel as crisp or responsive as I remember the Ninja V being.
I’m considering selling the Shinobi II and getting the Ninja TX GO, but since the display specs seem fairly similar on paper, I’m wondering if the TX GO actually has a better panel, pixel rendering/scaling, response time, or noticeably less ghosting.
For anyone who has used both: does the Ninja TX GO screen actually look sharper and cleaner than the Shinobi II in real-world use? And if you’ve also used the older Ninja V, how does the TX GO compare?
I’m mostly concerned about sharpness, pixel rendering/scaling, ghosting, motion clarity, and latency, rather than brightness or recording features.